跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.222.82.133) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/09/15 21:55
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:張桂津
研究生(外文):Kuei-Ching Chang
論文名稱:台灣失能榮民眷醫療與長期照護服務使用研究
論文名稱(外文):The Utilization of Medical Care and Long-term Care Services Among Disabled Veterans and Their Family Members in Taiwan
指導教授:吳淑瓊吳淑瓊引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺灣大學
系所名稱:衛生政策與管理研究所
學門:醫藥衛生學門
學類:公共衛生學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2007
畢業學年度:95
語文別:中文
論文頁數:90
中文關鍵詞:榮民眷醫療服務利用長期照護服務利用
外文關鍵詞:Veterans and their family membersMedical service utilizationLong-term care services utilization
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:15
  • 點閱點閱:377
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:5
本研究的目的為瞭解榮民眷之健康狀況與醫療與長期照護服務使用情形,並探討個人前傾因素(predisposing characteristic)、使能因素(enable factor)、需要因素(need factor)對榮民眷醫療服務與長期照護服務使用之影響。
本研究資料來自2002年行政院衛生署委託台灣大學公共衛生學院執行之「全國長期照護需要評估」計畫,以其中65歲以上失能榮民眷者為研究樣本,共1,344人,其中212人於機構內受訪,1,132人於居家中受訪;樣本特質,69.7%為男性,平均年齡77.7歲,標準差6.5,教育程度45.2%為中學以上畢業,婚姻有偶者佔60.1%,有子女者佔84.5%。
研究結果發現,1,344位65歲以上失能榮民眷總樣本中,有認知障礙者佔39.2%,慢性病平均數2.46,自述患有高血壓者佔53.9%最高,自述患有心臟病者佔33.3%,自述患有關節炎或風溼者佔34.7%,有插管者佔9.8%,只有認知障礙或IADLs(Instrumental Activities of Daily Living)障礙者佔33.5%,ADLs(Activities of Daily Living) 1-2項障礙者佔20.1%,ADLs 3-4項障礙者佔12.1%,ADLs 5-6項障礙者佔34.4%。在醫療服務使用方面,過去一個月使用西醫門診者佔76.1%,過去一年住院使用率43.4%,過去一年急診使用率33.6%,過去半年牙醫門診使用率17.3%。在長期照護服務使用方面,過去一年在家聘用全職看護者佔22.7%,過去一年曾住機構者佔19.0%,過去一年復健服務使用率為15.9%。
在醫療服務使用影響因素方面,邏輯斯複迴歸分析發現,只有慢性病數有顯著影響過去一個月西醫門診使用率,相對於0-1種慢性病,2-3種慢性病(OR= 1.99,95% CI=1.48-2.67),4種以上慢性病(OR=4.19,95% CI=2.70-6.52)的門診使用機會較高。影響過去一年住院使用率的顯著因素為慢性病數、失能情形、是否插管。相對於0-1種慢性病,2-3種慢性病(OR=1.42,95% CI=1.07 -1.89),4種以上慢性病(OR=3.19,95% CI=2.25-4.53)的住院機會較高,相對於只有認知障礙或IADLs障礙,0-1項ADL障礙(OR=1.71,95% CI=1.23-2.38),3-4項ADL障礙(OR=1.62,95% CI =1.09-2.41),5-6項ADL障礙(OR=2.14,95% CI =1.53-3.00)住院機會較高;有插管(OR=2.34,95% CI=1.51-3.61)比沒有插管者住院使用機會較高。照顧安排、慢性病數、失能情形、是否插管有顯著影響過去一年急診使用率。相對於住機構者,由家人照顧者急診使用機會較高(OR= 2.32,95% CI = 1.46-3.69);相對於0-1種慢性病,2-3種慢性病(OR=1.47,95% CI=1.07-2.02),4種以上慢性病(OR=2.96,95% CI=2.05-4.26)的急診使用機會較高;相對於只有認知障礙或IADLs障礙,3-4項ADL障礙(OR=1.68,95% CI =1.11-2.56),5-6項ADL障礙(OR=2.06,95% CI =1.45-2.95)急診使用機會較高;有插管者急診使用機會比沒有插管者高(OR= 2.00,95% CI= 1.30-3.08)。年齡、慢性病數、失能情形、是否插管有顯著影響過去半年牙醫門診使用率,相對於65-74歲,75-84歲者(OR=0.68,95% CI= 0.49 -0.93)、85歲以上者(OR= 0.47,95% CI= 0.28-0.78)使用牙醫門診的機會比較低;相對於0-1種慢性病,2-3種慢性病(OR=1.55,95% CI=1.06-2.27),4種以上慢性病(OR= 1.73,95% CI= 1.10 –2.73)使用牙醫門診的機會比較高;相對於只有認知障礙或IADLs障礙,5-6項ADL障礙(OR=0.60,95% CI = 0.39-0.92)使用牙醫門診的機會比較低;有插管者(OR=0.45,95% CI =0.21-0.94)比沒有插管者,使用牙醫門診的機會比較低。
在長期照護服務使用影響因素方面,邏輯斯複迴歸分析發現,教育程度、子女數、婚姻、認知障礙、失能情形、插管顯著影響過去一年長期照護機構使用率,相對於不識字,中學以上(OR=9.70, 95% CI=5.68-16.57)使用機會較高;相對於無子女,1-2個子女(OR=0.14, 95% CI=0.08-0.25),3個以上子女(OR=0.06, 95% CI=0.03-0.10)使用機會較低;有偶者(OR=0.44, 95% CI=0.29-0.67)比無偶者使用機會較低;有認知障礙者(OR=3.20, 95% CI=2.16-4.67)比無認知障礙者使用機會較高;相對於只有認知障礙或IADLs障礙,3-4項ADL障礙(OR=2.05, 95% CI=1.04-4.02),5-6項ADL障礙(OR=4.62, 95% CI=2.68-7.95)使用機會較高;有插管者(OR=3.05, 95% CI=1.78-5.22)比沒有插管者,使用機會較高。年齡、教育程度、慢性病數顯著影響過去一年復健服務使用率,相對於65-74歲,75-84歲者(OR=0.64, 95% CI=0.45-0.91)、85歲以上者(OR=0.34, 95% CI =0.18-0.65)使用機會較低;相對於不識字,中學以上(OR=1.64, 95% CI=1.05- 2.57)使用機會較高;相對於0-1種慢性病,4種以上慢性病(OR=1.65, 95% CI=1.01-2.71)使用機會較高。性別、教育程度、子女數、婚姻、居住地、認知功能、失能情形、插管顯著影響過去一年在家聘用全職看護使用率,男性(OR=0.46, 95% CI= 0.31 -0.68)比女性使用機會較低;相對於不識字,中學以上(OR=2.58, 95% CI =1.67 -3.99)使用機會較高;相對於無子女,1-2個子女(OR=0.43, 95% CI= 0.22 -0.84)使用機會較低;有偶者(OR=0.35, 95% CI=0.24-0.51)比無偶者使用機會較低;相對於住鄉鎮者,住縣轄市者(OR=1.56, 95% CI=1.03-2.37),住直轄市者(OR= 2.03, 95% CI=1.22-3.39)使用機會較高;有認知障礙者(OR=0.64,95% CI=0.45-0.90)比無認知障礙者使用機會較低;相對於只有認知障礙或IADLs障礙,1-2項ADL障礙(OR=2.80,95% CI=1.67-4.71),3-4項ADL障礙(OR=4.32,95% CI= 2.44 -7.65),5-6項ADL障礙(OR=8.23,95% CI=5.10-13.28)使用機會較高;有插管者(OR=2.25,95% CI=1.27-3.97)比沒有插管者,使用機會較高。
總而言之,榮民眷在醫療服務的使用,顯著影響因素為需要因素,如認知功能、慢性病數、失能情形等;而在長期照護服務使用的顯著影響因素,除了需要因素外,前傾因素如性別、教育程度,使能因素如子女數、婚姻、居住地、也有重要影響,本研究結果可提供輔導會及其他部會規劃未來老年榮民眷醫療服務與長期照護健康政策時參考。
The aims of this study were to examine health status, utilization of medical and long-term care services, and to explore the important factors in individual factors of predisposing factors, enabling factor, and need factors to affect the utilization of medical and long-term care services in veterans and their family members.
This dataset retrieved from the study program of “Long-term Care Need Assessment “ by National Public Health College in 2002 in Taiwan. Of the 1,344 disabled veterans and their family members who were older than 65 years old, 1,132 of them from the community and 212 from institutions. 69.7% of the sample was male, and mean age was 77.7 years old.,SD was 6.5.45.2% of them were junior high school or higher level of education. 60.1% of them were married and lived with spouses, and 84.5% of them had one or more kids.
The study results indicated that 39.2% of the sample was with cognitive impairment. The mean number of chronic conditions by self-reporting was 2.46. 53.9% of them had hypertension; 33.3% of them had heart disease; and 34.7% of them had arthritis. 9.8% of the sample was at least one tube. 33.5% of them were either cognitive impairement or IADLs(Instrumental Activities of Dialy Living) impairment. 20.1% of them were disabled with 1-2 items ADLs(Activities of Daily Living) impairment; 12.1% of them were disabled with 3-4 items ADLs impairment; 34.4% of them were disabled with 5-6 items ADLs impairment. The results related to the utilization of medical and long-term care service were shown that 76.1% had received out-patient medical services in last one month. 43.4% had received in-patient medical services in last one year. 33.6% had received emergency medical service in last one year. 17.3% had received dentist out-patient medical serviced in last half year. 22.7% had received home aid assistant care in last one year. 19.0% had received long-term institutional care in last one year. 15.9% had received rehabilitation care in last one year.
Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to explore the important factors affecting the utilization of medical care services. The number of type of chronic conditions was the significantly important factor to affect the utilization of out-patient medical services in last one month. Compared to the group with 0-1 type of chronic conditions, the group with 2-3 types (OR=1.99, 95% CI= 1.48 -2.67) and the group with more than 4 types (OR=4.19,95% CI=2.70 -6.52) of chronic conditions had more opportunity (odds ratio) to use out-patient medical services in last one month. Number of chronic conditions, level of dependency, and at least one tube were important factors to affect the utilization of in-patient medical services in last one year. Compared to the group with 0-1 type chronic conditions, and the group with 2-3 types (OR=1.42,95% CI=1.07-1.89), the group with more than 4 types (OR =3.19, 95% CI=2.25-4.53) of chronic conditions had more opportunity (odds ratio) to utilize in-patient medical services. Compared to the groups with cognitive and IADLs impairment only, 1-2 items ADLs impairment (OR=1.71, 95% CI=1.23-2.38), and 3-4 items ADLs impairment (OR=1.62, 95% CI=1.09-2.41), the group with 5-6 items ADLs impairment (OR=2.14, 95% CI=1.53-3.00) had more opportunity (odds ratio) to hospitalize last year. At least one tube (OR= 2.34, 95% CI=1.51-3.61) had more opportunity (odds ratio) than no tube to be hospitalized last year. Care arrangements, number of chronic conditions, level of dependency, and tube insertion were statistically significant factors to affect the utilization of emergent medical services in last year. Compared to the group with institutional care, the group with care by family members (OR= 2.32, 95% CI=1.46-3.69) had more opportunity (odds ratio) to use emergent medical care. Compared to the group with 0-1 type chronic conditions, and the group with 2-3 types of diseases (OR=1.47,95% CI=1.07-2.02), the group with more than 4 types (OR=2.96, 95% CI=2.05-4.26) of chronic conditions had more opportunity (odds ratio) to use emergent medical care. Compared to the group with cognitive and IADLs impairment only and 3-4 items ADLs impairment (OR= 1.68, 95% CI=1.11 -2.56), the group with 5-6 items ADLs impairment (OR=2.06, 95% CI= 1.45 - 2.95) had more opportunity (odds ratio) to use emergent medical care. The subjects with tube insertion (OR=2.00, 95% CI=1.30 -3.08) had more opportunity (odds ratio) than the subjects without tube to use emergent medical care. Age, number of chronic conditions, and level of dependency are statistically significant factors to affect the utilization of dentist out-patient medical services in last half year. Compared to the groups with 65-70 years old, the groups with 75-84 years old (OR=0.68, 95% CI=0.49-0.93) and older than 85 years old (OR= 0.47,95% CI=0.28-0.78) had less opportunity (odds ratio) to use dentist services. Compared to the group with 0-1 type chronic condition, the groups with 2-3 types (OR=1.55,95% CI= 1.06-2.27) and more than 4 types (OR=1.73, 95% CI= 1.01-2.73) of chronic conditions had more opportunity (odds ratio) to use dentist services. Compared to the group with cognitive and IADLs impairment only, the group with 5-6 items ADLs impairment (OR= 0.60, 95% CI=0.39-0.92) had less opportunity (odds ratio) to use dentist services. The subjects with tubes (OR= 0.45, 95% CI=0.21-0.94) had less opportunity (odds ratio) to use dentist services than those without tube.
The results related to the important factors affecting the utilization of long-term care services by using multiple logistic regression found that level of education, number of kids, marital status, cognitive impairment, level of dependency, tube insertion were statically significant factors to affect the utilization of long-term institutional services in last year. Compared to the group with illiteracy, the group with junior high school or higher level (OR=9.7, 95% CI=5.68-16.57) had more opportunity (odds ratio) to use long-term institutional services. Compared to the group without kid, the groups with 1-2 kids (OR=0.14, 95% CI=0.08-0.25) and more than 3 kids (OR= 0.06, 95% CI=0.03-0.10) had less opportunity (odds ratio) to use long-term institutional services. Compared to the group lived without spouse, the group lived with spouse (OR=0.44, 95% CI=0.29-0.67) had less opportunity (odds ratio) to use long-term institutional services. Compared to the group without cognitive impairment, the group with cognitive impairment (OR=3.20, 95% CI=2.16-4.67) had more opportunity (odds ratio) to use the services. Compared to the group with either cognitive or IADLs impairment only, the subjects with 3-4 items ADLs impairment (OR=2.05, 95% CI=1.04-4.02), and 5-6 items ADLs impairment (OR=4.62, 95% CI=2.68-7.95) had more opportunity (odds ratio) to use it. The subjects with tube insertion (OR=3.05, 95% CI=1.78-5.22) had more opportunity (odds ratio) than the subjects without tube to use it. Age, level of education, and number of chronic diseases were statistically significant factors to affect the utilization of rehabilitation services in last year. Compared to the group with 65-70 years old, the groups with 75-84 years old (OR=0.64, 95% CI=0.45-0.91), and older than 85 years old (OR= 0.34, 95% CI=0.18 -0.65) had less opportunity (odds ratio) to use it. Compared to the group with illiteracy, the group with junior high school or higher (OR=1.64, 95% CI=1.05 -2.57) had more opportunity (odds ratio) to use it. Compared to the group with 0-1 type chronic condition, the group with more than 4 types of chronic conditions (OR=1.65, 95% CI=1.01-2.71) had more opportunity (odds ratio) to use it. Gender, level of education, number of kids, marital status, residential area, cognitive impairment, level of dependency, and tube insertion were important factors to affect the utilization of home aid assistant services in last year. Male (OR= 0.46,95% CI=0.31-0.68) had less opportunity (odds ratio) than female to use it. Compared to the group with illiteracy, the group with junior high school or higher (OR=2.58, 95% CI=1.67-3.99) had more opportunity (odds ratio) to use it. Compared to the group without kid, the group with 1-2 kids (OR=0.43, 95% CI=0.22-0.84) had less opportunity (odds ratio) to use it. Compared to the group lived without spouse, the group lived with spouse (OR=0.35, 95% CI= 0.24 -0.51) had less opportunity (odds ratio) to use it. Compared to the group resident in urban, the group resident in county (OR=1.56,95% CI=1.03-2.37) and the group resident in megalopolitan (OR=2.03,95% CI=1.22-3.39) had more opportunity (odds ratio) to use it. Compared to the group without cognitive impairment, the group with cognitive impairment (OR=0.64, 95% CI=0.45-0.90) had less opportunity (odds ratio) to use it. Compared to the group with either cognitive or IADLs impairment only, the groups with 1-2 items ADLs impairment (OR=2.80, 95% CI=1.67-4.71), 3-4 items ADLs impairment (OR=4.32, 95% CI=2.44-7.65), and 5-6 items ADLs impairment (OR=8.23, 95% CI=5.10 -13.28) had more opportunity (odds ratio) to use it. The subjects with tube insertion (OR=2.25, 95% CI=1.27-3.97) had more opportunity (odds ratio) to use it than the subjects without tube.
In summary, the medical care services utilization was influenced by need factor such as cognitive impairment, number of chronic conditions, and level of dependency. In addition to the needs factor, predisposing characteristic (i.e., gender, and the level of education) and enabling factors (i.e., number of kids, marital status, and residential area) were important factors to affect the utilization of long-term care services. These findings provided important information for the Taiwan Veterans Affairs and related organizations to plan the medical and long-term care policy for veterans and their family members or elderly people in Taiwan.
中文摘要……………………………………………………………II
英文摘要 ……………………………………V
第一章 緒論……………………………………………………1
第二章 文獻探…………………………………………………4
第一節 榮民照顧體系…………………………………………4
第二節 榮民特質……………………………………………… 10
第三節 榮民眷健康狀況…………………………………………11
第四節 榮民眷醫療服務與長期照護服務使用情形…………13
第五節 醫療服務使用相關因素探討………………………15
第六節 長期照護服務使用相關因素探討……………… 22
第三章 研究方法………………………………………26
第一節 研究架構與研究假………………………………………26
第二節 資料來源………………………………………30
第三節 變項測量與操作型定義…………………………………31
第四節 資料處理與分析……………………………………34
第四章 研究結果…………………………………35
第一節 樣本特質………………………………………35
第二節 健康狀況………………………………………………35
第三節 醫療服務使用相關因素 ………………………………36
第四節 長期照護服務使用相關因素……………………………45
第五章 討論與建議………………………………………………74
第一節 重要結果與討論……………………………………74
第二節 研究限制………………………………………………76
第三節 政策啟示與未來研究之建議……………………………76
參考文獻………………………………………………….83

附錄
附錄1 行政院國軍退除役官兵輔導委員會醫療機構床位數 89
附錄2 行政院國軍退除役官兵輔導委員會安養機構床位數 90








表目錄

表4-1 樣本特質………………………………………………………………… 51
表4-2 樣本認知障礙…………………………………………………………… 52
表4-3 樣本慢性病種類………………………………………………………… 52
表4-4 樣本慢性病數…………………………………………………………… 52
表4-5 樣本是否有插管………………………………………………………… 53
表4-6 樣本有插管者之管路種類與數量……………………………………… 53
表4-7 樣本失能情形…………………………………………………………… 54
表4-8 醫療服務使用率與使用次數比較表…………………………………… 55
表4-9 住院總日數超過180天者特質…………………………………………… 56
表4-10 過去一個月西醫門診使用率分析表…………………………………… 57
表4-11 過去一個月西醫門診使用次數………………………………………… 58
表4-12 過去一年住院醫療服務使用率分析表………………………………… 59
表4-13 過去一年住院使用次數分析表………………………………………… 60
表4-14 過去一年住院總日數分析表…………………………………………… 61
表4-15 過去一年急診醫療服務使用率分析表………………………………… 62
表4-16 過去一年急診使用次數分析表………………………………………… 63
表4-17 過去半年牙醫門診醫療服務使用率分析表…………………………… 64
表4-18 過去半年牙醫門診醫療服務使用次數分析表………………………… 65
表4-19 過去一個月是否使用西醫門診邏輯斯複迴歸檢定結果……………… 66
表4-20 過去一年是否使用住院醫療服務邏輯斯複迴歸檢定結果…………… 67
表4-21 過去一個月是否使用急診邏輯斯複迴歸檢定結果…………………… 67
表4-22 過去一個月是否使用牙醫門診邏輯斯複迴歸檢定結果……………… 68
表4-23 長期照護服務使用率分析表…………………………………………… 69
表4-24 長期照護服務男女樣本使用率差異分析表…………………………… 70
表4-25 過去一年長期照護機構服務使用率分析表…………………………… 71
表4-26 過去一年復健服務使用率分析表……………………………………… 72
表4-27 過去一年居家看護服務使用率分析表………………………………… 73
表4-28 過去一個月是否使用機構式服務邏輯斯複迴歸檢定結果…………… 74
表4-29 過去一個月是否使用復健服務邏輯斯複迴歸檢定結果……………… 75
表4-30 過去一個月是否使用居家看護服務邏輯斯複迴歸檢定結果………… 76
表5-1 醫療服務使用與長期照護服務使用多變項分析結果………………… 82


圖目錄

圖1 醫療服務使用研究架構圖……………………………………………… 28
圖2 長期照護服務使用研究架構圖………………………………………… 29
參考文獻
一、中文部份
行政院退徐役官兵輔導委員會網站(2007)
94年「榮民狀況分析」,http://www.vac.gov.tw/content/index.asp?pno=509。
榮民資料統計分析,http://www.vac.gov.tw 。
第二處業務,http://www.vac.gov.tw/dept2/law/law930211001.htm。
中華民國台閩地區榮民重要統計指標95年第1季(2006),行政院國軍退除役官兵輔導委員會編印。
內政部統計處(2007)行政院內政部統計月報表,http://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/
全國法規資料庫(2007),http://law.moj.gov.tw.
朱慧凡、吳肖琪(2004)台灣六十五歲以上榮民住院之相關因素分析,中華衛誌,23(4):297-304。
吳淑瓊、林惠生(1998)台灣功能障礙老人家庭照顧者的全國概況剖,臺灣衛誌,18(1):44-53。
吳淑瓊、徐慧娟、莊媖智、張明正(1966)功能評估在估計台灣社區老人長期照護需要之應用,中華衛誌,15(6):533-45。
吳淑瓊、莊坤洋(2001)在地老化:臺灣二十一世紀長期照護的政策方向,臺灣衛誌,20(3):192-201。
李建嶢(2002)影響身心功能障礙者使用機構式服務之因素,台北:台灣大學衛生政策與管理研究所碩士論文。
杜明勳(1996)南部某榮民安養之家住家榮民健狀況調查。中華衛誌。15:97-106。
杜明勳(1999)衛生教育對於榮民之家高血壓老人自我照顧行為與血壓控制之影響,中華衛誌,18:54~65。
徐慧娟、吳淑瓊(1998)提供社區式家庭支持方案能否減少機構式長期照護服務之使用?中華衛誌,17(4): 326-336。
高碧弘(2003)榮民之家老年榮民營養與健康狀況調查—以岡山榮家為例,屏東:屏東科技大學食品科學系碩士論文。
張媚、吳淑瓊、莊坤洋(2004)社區認知障礙者之照護需要,臺灣衛誌,23(3):181-187。
張鴻仁、黃信忠、蔣翠蘋(2002)全民健保醫療利用集中狀況及高、低使用者特性之探討,臺灣衛誌,21(3):207-213。
郭洺豪(2002)榮家內住榮民健康生活品質之探討,台北:國防醫學院公共衛生學研究所論士論文。
陳之政、楊靜利(2005)人口變遷與老年長期照護費用-以無依榮民照護費用為估算基礎,台灣人口學會學術研討會「二十一世紀的台灣人口發展:趨勢與挑戰」。
陳怡吟(2004)機構內持續性醫療對榮民醫療利用、健康狀況與滿意度之探討—以退輔會南部安養機構為例,高雄:高雄醫學大學公共衛生學研究所碩士在職專班碩士論文。
陳俊源、呂淑芬(2004)榮民參加健保狀況分析,主計月刋,585:60-68。
傅菁菁等(2003)某榮民安養機構照顧情況之調查,台灣家衛誌,12(1),19-31。
曾淑芬(2005)機構式長期照護服務使用之相關因素探討:社區環境與個人背景因素的分析,台北:台灣大學衛生政策與管理研究所博士論。
曾淑芬、莊坤洋、陳正芬、葉乃禎、吳淑瓊(2004)給付標準的設定會引導民眾對社區式服務的利用嗎?—以居家服務為例,中華衛誌,23(3):221-234。
楊森(2004)榮民輔導業務與統計之結合運用,主計月刋,585:48-59。
趙珮琁(2003)老榮民自覺健康狀況、憂鬱狀態及生活品質相關性之探討,台中:中國醫藥學院護理學研究所碩士論文。
劉秀麗(2005)榮民機構住民缺牙與口腔相關生活品質之探討,高雄:高雄醫學大學口腔醫學院口腔衛生科學研究所碩士論文。
鄧文漢(2004)就養榮民現況,主計月刋,585:69-78。
蕭竍竛(2004)榮家榮民健康生活品質與兩年存活狀況追蹤比較研究,台北:台北護理學院長期照護研究所碩士論文。
韓敬富(2003)我國榮民福利之剖析,社區發展季刊,101:487-502。
簡齊(2000)老人長期照護服務使用之長期追蹤研究,台北:台灣大學衛生政策與管理研究所碩士論文。










二、英文部份
American Veterans Affair website:http://www.va.gov。
Andersen, R. M.(1995).Revisiting the behavior model and access to medical care : Does it matter ? Journal of Health and Social Behavior , 36 (March), 1-10.
Flett R., Hirini P., Long N.,& Millar M. (2004). Predictors of Health Care Utilisation in Community Dwelling New Zealand Maori. South Pacific Journal of Psychology, 15(1), p1-10.
Guzman J. S., Sohn L., and Harada N. D.(2004). Living alone and outpatient care use by older veterans. Journal of American Geriatrics Society ;52,617-622.
Kales H. C., et. al. (1999).Health care utilization by older patients with coexisting dementia and depression. The American journal of Psychiatry ; 156(4) ,550-556.
Katz, S., Ford, A., Moscovitz, R., BD, J., & Joffe, M. (1963).Studies of illness in the aged : the index of ADL, a standardized measure of biological and psychological function. Journal of American Medicine Asoociation , 185,914-919.
Kunik M. E., Show A. L., Molinari V. A., Menke T. J., Souchek J., Sullivan G., Ashton C., M. (2003).Health care utilization in dementia patients with psychiatric comorbidity. Gerontologist,43(1),86-91.
Miller E. A. & Rosenheck R. A.(2006). Mental illness nationally in the department of veterans affairs. Med. Care ,44,343-351.
Payne S. M. C., et. al. (2005).Utilization of medical services by veterans health study(VHS) respondents. J Ambulatory Care Manage ; 28(2),125-140.
Pfeiffer, E. (1975). Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire for the assessment of organic brain deficit in elderly patients. Journal of American Geriatrics Society; 23, 433-441.
Singh J. A., Nelson D. B., Fink H. A., & Nichol K.L.(2005). Health-related quality of life predicts future health care utilization and mortality in veterans with self-reported physician-diagnosed arthritis : the veterans arthritis quality of life study. Semin arthritis Rheum;34(5),755-765.
Steinbach U. (1992).Social networks, institutionalization , and mortality among elderly people in the United States. Journal of Gerontology: social sciences ,47(4),S183-S190.
Villa V. M. & Harada N. D.(2003).The health and functional status of US veterans aged 65+ : implications for VA health programs serving and elderly, diverse veterans population. American Journal of Medical Quality ,18(3),108-116.
Weeks W. B., et. al. (2004).Differences in health-related quality of life in rural and urban veterans. Am. J. Public Health;94,1762-1767.
Williams B. C., Fries B. E., Mehr D. R.(1993).Length of stay in VA nursing homes. Comparative characteristics of brief-, medium-, and long-stay residents. Journal of Aging Health;5(2),208-228.
Williams W., Weiss T. W., Edens A., Johnson M., Thornby J. I. (1998).Hospital utilization and personality characteristics of veterans with psychiatric problems. Psychiatry Services;49,370-375.
Wilson N. J & Kizer K. W.(2004). The VA health care system : an unrecognized national safety net. Health Aff(Millwood);16(4),200-204.
Wolinsky F. D., and Johnson R. J. (1992).Widowhood, health status, and the use of health services by older adults: a cross-sectional and prospective approach. Journal of Gerontology: social sciences,47(1),S8-S16.
Wolinsky F. D., and Johnson R. J.(1991).The use of health services by older adults. Journal of Gerontology: social sciences,46(6),S345-S357.
Wu Li-Fen .(2002).Predictive factors of self-care capacity in veterans’ care institution residents. Journal of Nursing Research,10(3),195-204.
Wu S. C., Ke D., Su T. L. (1998). The prevalence of cognitive impairment among nursing home residents in Taipei, Taiwan. Neuroepidemiology;17,147-153.
Yu W., Ravelo S., Wagner T. H., and Barnett P. G.(2004).The relationships among age, chronic conditions, and healthcare costs. Am J Manag Care;10,909-916.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top