跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.212.96.86) 您好!臺灣時間:2023/12/10 05:12
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:陳達德
研究生(外文):Da-Der Chen
論文名稱:握筆與長時間書寫表現間關係之探究
論文名稱(外文):Investigation of the Relationships between Pen Grips and Long Writing Performance
指導教授:曾美惠曾美惠引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺灣大學
系所名稱:職能治療研究所
學門:醫藥衛生學門
學類:復健醫學學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2007
畢業學年度:95
語文別:英文
論文頁數:65
中文關鍵詞:握筆姿勢書寫表現長時間書寫書寫耐力幼稚園孩童
外文關鍵詞:pen gripwriting performancelong writingwriting endurancekindergartener
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:6
  • 點閱點閱:667
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:2
背景與目的:書寫技巧是兒童在學習過程中的重要技能。相關文獻回顧整體上顯示著握筆的差異並不影響書寫的表現,然而這些研究中用來分類握筆的方法,以及本身的研究設計等,都有需多值得保留與有待商議之處。此外,根據臨床的實際觀察,則可發現許多有書寫困難與相關問題的兒童,在握筆姿勢上仍有許多普遍共同之處,例如使用近端關節握筆以及握筆筆尖方向朝內等等,這些不同於有正常書寫表現兒童的握筆姿勢,暗示著握筆對於書寫表現仍應當存在一定的關係。因此,本次研究的主要目的在於以新的觀點分類握筆並探討握筆對於長時間書寫表現的影響。
方法︰一百二十位來自於三所位於大台北都會地區幼稚園的大班孩童,在根據日常書寫可讀性的表現下(最好與最差的10%),由班級老師建議來參加此次研究。所有參與研究孩童都沒有知覺動作發展障礙相關之診斷或歷史。每個孩童分別進行120個字且至少576筆劃的書寫測驗,每人平均需要花費約10分鐘。由於測驗中途發生變換握筆方式之事件,三位孩童的資料被剔除,最後以177 (62名女生、55名男生)為孩童的資料進入後續資料分析。
結果︰多重迴歸模式分析結果顯示所有握筆相關特徵(例如握筆方式、筆尖方向以及筆尖與握筆點間距)都可能對書寫速度有顯著影響效果,並藉由複雜相互關係與其他變項共同產生影響效果。至於書寫可讀性部份,只有一個握筆相關的交互反應(筆尖與握筆點間距x男生)呈現顯著影響但僅有極低的部份決定值(partial r square <0.0336),這顯示握筆與書寫可讀性間極其有限的相關性。其中書寫效率多重迴歸模式分析的決定值為20.59%, 書寫可讀性多重迴歸模式分析的決定值則為34.89%。
結論︰本研究的結果顯示部分握筆相關因子對於書寫速度有顯著的影響,但與書寫可讀性卻呈現極低相關。此外結果亦顯示書寫速度與書寫可讀性呈現低度相關,這可能因兩者間存在著某種交換機制。握筆相關因子解釋了部份的書寫速度的變異量。其他潛在影響因子,諸如知覺動作功能以及高階心智執行功能,可能可協助解釋其他握筆所無法解釋的變異量,並幫助做出更正確的預測,因此建議於未來的研究將之列為研究變項。
Backgroundand and Purpose: Writing skill is one of the most important skills for children during their learning process. The results of previous studies concluded that there was no significant effect of pen grips on writing performance in general. However, the classification of pen grips and fundamental designs of those studies were controversial. Besides, according to clinical observations, there seems to be many traits of pen grip in common among children who have writing difficulties and related problems, such as using proximal grips and inward direction of penpoint, which strongly implies that there should be certain relationships between pen grip and writing performance. Thus, the main purpose of this study was to systematically investigate the effects of pen grip, using a classification method from a new perspective, on long writing performance.
Method: one hundred and twenty kindergarteners came from three kindergartens located in Taipei metropolis were recruited for this study basing on their legibility (best and worst 10%). All of them had no history and related diagnosis of sensorimotor disabilities. Writing test was performed individually without stop which took an average of 10 minutes. Due to changes of grips during the test, data of three were excluded and 117 (62 females and 55 males) children’s data were finally collected and then analyzed
Results: Multiple regression model analysis revealed significant effects of all grip related factors such as pen grip style, direction of penpoint and distance between penpoint and pen holding point on writing speed via complex interrelationship with each other and other non grip related variables. As for writing legibility, only one grip related interaction (distance between penpoint and pen-holding point x boy) was shown significantly but with extremely low r-square value (<0.0336), revealing limited effect on writing legibility. R-square value was 20.59% for writing efficiency analysis and 34.89% for writing legibility analysis.
Conclusion: The finding of this study might demonstrate significant effects of pen grips on writing speed, but limited correlation to writing legibility. A low correlation between writing speed and legibility was noted, but it might be due to a trade-off mechanism between them. Pen grip might partially explain the performance of writing speed, but other potential covariates, such as sensorimotor and executive functions, might help explain the rest and make better prediction, which were suggested to be taken into account in future studies.
Abstract -------------------- I
中文摘要 -------------------- III
Table of Contents -------------------- V
List of Tables -------------------- VIII
List of Figures -------------------- IX
Introduction -------------------- 1
Literature Reviews -------------------- 3
Relationship between handwriting and pen grip -------------------- 3
Development of pen grip -------------------- 3
Primitive and transitional pen grips -------------------- 4
Mature pen grips -------------------- 4
Structural analysis of pen grip -------------------- 7
Biomechanical aspect -------------------- 8
Classification based on biomechanical considerations -------------------- 9
Proximal vs. distal grips -------------------- 9
Proximity to pen tip -------------------- 11
Dimensions of writing performance -------------------- 12
Concerns -------------------- 12
Dynamic change of pen grip -------------------- 13
Writing endurance -------------------- 14
The Purpose of This Study -------------------- 15
The Hypotheses of This Study -------------------- 16
Significance of This Study -------------------- 16
Methods -------------------- 17
Research designs -------------------- 17
Participants -------------------- 19
Instruments -------------------- 21
Text of the writing task -------------------- 21
The testing sheet -------------------- 22
The writing tool -------------------- 23
Video taping -------------------- 23
Test environment -------------------- 23
Procedures -------------------- 24
Scoring criteria -------------------- 24
Data Analysis -------------------- 27
Results -------------------- 28
Descriptive and correlative information -------------------- 28
Multiple regression analyses -------------------- 29
Discussion -------------------- 30
Effects of pen grips on writing speed -------------------- 30
Effects of pen grips on legibility -------------------- 31
Effects of other important factors on writing speed -------------------- 32
Effects of other important factors on legibility -------------------- 33
Effects of pen grips on deterioration -------------------- 34
Relationship between writing speed and legibility -------------------- 35
Gender and preference of pen grips -------------------- 36
Other potential factors excluded from this study -------------------- 37
Clinical Implications -------------------- 38
Limitations and Suggestions for Future Research -------------------- 38
Conclusion -------------------- 40
References -------------------- 41
Tables -------------------- 49
Figures -------------------- 57
Altemeier, L., Jones, J., Abbott, R., & Berninger, V. (2006). Executive factors in becoming writing-readers and reading-writers: Note-taking and report writing in third and fifth graders. Developmental Neuropsychology, 29, 161-173.
Amundson, S. J. (1992). Handwriting: Evaluation and intervention in school settings. In J. Case-Smith & C. Pehoski (Eds.), Development of hand skills in the child, 63-67. Rockville, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association.
Amundson, S. J., & Weil, M. (2001). Prewriting and handwriting skills. In J. Case-Smith (Eds.), Occupational therapy for children, 4th ed., 545-567. St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
Benbow, M. (1987). Sensory and motor measurements of dynamic tripod skill. Unpublished Masters thesis. Boston, MA: Boston University.
Benbow, M. (1995). Principles and practices of teaching handwriting. In Henderson, A., Pehoski, C. (Eds.) Hand Function in the Child: Foundations for Remediation, 255-281. St. Louis: Mosby.
Bergman, K. E., & McLaughlin, T. F. (1988). Remediation handwriting difficulties with learning disabled students: A review. Boston College Journal of Special Education,
12(2), 101-120.
Bergmann, K. P. (1990). Incidence of atypical pencil grasps among nondysfunctional adults. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 44, 736-740.
Berninger, V. W., D. T. Mizokawa, et al. (1991). "Science practitioner." Journal of School Psychology, 29: 57-79.
Blote, A. W., Zielstra, E. M., & Zoerewey, M. W. (1987). Writing posture and writing movement of children in kindergarten. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 13, 323-341.
Bonney, M. (1992). "Understanding and assessing handwriting difficulty: perspectives form the literature." Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 39(3): 7-15.
Burton, A. W. and M. J. Dancisak (2000). "Grip form and graphomotor control in preschool children." American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 54(1): 9-17.
Cailliet, R. (1975). Hand pain and impairment (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.
Callewaert, H. (1963). For easy and legible handwriting. In Herrick, V. (Ed.) New horizons for research in handwriting, 39-52. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
Chang, L. Y. & Matcuoka Y. (2006). A kinematic thumb model for the ACT hand. Conference on Robotics and Automation, May, 1000-1005.
Chang, S. H. & Yu, N. Y. (2005). Evaluation and classification of types of Chinese handwriting deficits in elementary schoolchildren. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 101, 631-647.
Cooney, W. P. & Chao, E. Y. (1997). Biomechanical analysis of static forces in the thumb during hand function. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 59, 27-36.
Cornhill, H. and J. Case-Smith (1996). "Factors that relate to good and poor handwriting." American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 50: 732-739.
David, K. S. (1985). "Motor sequencing strategies in school-aged children." Physical Therapy, 65(6): 883-889.
Dennis, J. L. and Y. Swinth (2001). "Pencil grasp and children''s handlegibility during different-length writing tasks." American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55(2): 175-83.
Denton, P. L., Cope, S., & Moser, C. (2006). The effects of sensorimotor-based intervention versus therapeutic practice on improving handwriting performance in 6- to 11-year-old children. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 60(1), 16-27.
Elliott, J. M., & Connolly, K. J. (1984). A classification of manipulative hand movements. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 26, 283-296.
Erhardt, R. P. (Ed.) (1984). Erhardt Developmental Prehension Assessment. Laurel, MD.: RASMCO Publishing CO.
Greer, T., & Lockman, J. J. (1998). “Using writing instruments: Invariances in young children and adults”. Child Development, 69(4): 888-902
Hamstra-Bletz, L. and Blote A. W. (1993). "A longitudinal study on dysgraphic handwriting in primary school". Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26(10): 689-99.
Harrison, S. H. (1981). “The functional relationship of the thumb to the fingers”. The Hand, Vol. 1, R. Tubiana, Ed., W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp. 481-487.
Jacobson, C., & Sperling, L. (1976). “Classification of the handgrip”. Journal of Occupational Medicine, 18, 395-398.
Koziatek, S. M. and N. J. Powell (2003). "Pencil grips, legibility, and speed of fourth-graders'' writing in cursive." American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57(3): 284-8.
Levine, M. D., Brooks, R., & Shonkoff, J. P. (1980). A pediatric approach to learning disabilities. New York: Wiley.
Levine, M. D., Oberklaid, F., & Meltzer, L. (1981). Developmental output failure: A study of low productivity in school-aged children. Pediatrics, 67, 18-25.
Long, C., Conrad, M. S., Hall, E. A., & Furler, M. S. (1970.). Intrinsic-extrinsic muscle control of the hand in power and precision handling. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 52A, 853-867.
Maarse, F. J., Schomaker, L. R. B., Thomassen, A. J.W. M. (1986). The influence of changes in the effector coordinate system on handwriting movements. Graphonomics: Contemporary research in handwriting. North Holland: Elsevier Sience.
McHale, K. and S. A. Cermak (1992). "Fine motor activities in elementary school: preliminary findings and provisional implications for children with fine motor problems." American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 46(10): 898-903.
Mendoza, M. A., Holt, W. J., & Jackson, D. A. (1978). Circles and tape: An easy, teacher implemented way to teach fundamental writing skills. Teaching Exceptional Children, 10, 48-50.
Parush, S., N. Levanon-Erez, et al. (1998). "Ergonomic factors influencing handwriting performance." Work, 11: 295-305.
Parush, S., V. Pindak, et al. (1998). "Does fatigue influence children''s handwriting performance?" Work, 11(3): 307-13.
Phelps, J., L. Stempel, L. & Speck, G. (1985). "The children''s handwriting scale: A new diagnostic tool". Journal of Education Research, 79: 46-50.
Reisman, J. E. (1991). "Poor handwriting: who is referred". American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45(9): 849-852.
Rosenbloom, L., & Horton, M. E. (1971). The maturation of fine prehension in young children. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 13, 3-8.
Saida, Y., & Myashita, M. (1979). Development of fine motor skills in children: Manipulation of a pencil in young children aged 2-6 years old. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 5, 104-113.
Sassoon, R., Nimmo-Smith, I., & Wing, A. M. (1986). An analysis of children’s penholds. In: Kao, H. S. R., Van Galen, G. P., Hoosain, R. (Eds.) Graphonomics: Contemporary research in handwriting. North Holland: Elsevier Sience.
Schneck, C. M. (1991). Comparison of pencil-grip patterns in first graders with good and poor writing skills. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45(8), 701-706.
Schneck, C. M., & Henderson, A. (1990). Descriptive analysis of developmental progression of grip position for pencil and crayon control in nondysfunctional children. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 44, 893-900.
Selikowitz, M. (2004). ADHD: the facts. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.
Sovik, N., Arntzen, O., & Teulings, H. L. (1982). Interactions among overt process parameters in handwriting motion and related graphic production. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 8, 103-122.
Tseng, M. H. (1998). "Development of pencil grip position in preschool children." The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research 18(4): 207-225.
Tseng, M. H. & Chow, S. M. K. (2003). Perceptual-motor function of school-age children with slow writing speed. In C. Royeen (Ed.), Pediatric issues in occupational therapy. Bethesa, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association.
Tseng, M. H. & Huseh, I-P. (1997). Performance of School-Aged Children on a Chinese Handwriting Speed Test. Occupational Therapy International. 4, 294-303.
Tseng, M. H. and S. A. Cermak (1993). "The influence of ergonomic factors and perceptual-motor abilities on handwriting performance." American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47: 919-926.
Tseng, M. H. and S. A. Cermak (1991). "The evaluation of handwriting in children." Sensory Integration quarterly, 19(4): 2-6.
Wallen, M., Bonney, M., & Lennox, L. (1996). The Handwriting Speed Test. Adelaide: Helios
Ziviani, J. (1987). Pencil grasp and manipulation, In Alsotin (Ed.). Handwriting: Theory, research and practice (pp.24-39). New York: Nichols Publishing Co.
Ziviani, J. (1995). The development of graphomotor skills. In Henderson, A., Pehoski, C. (Eds.) Hand Function in the Child: Foundations for Remediation, 184-193. St. Louis: Mosby.
Ziviani, J. and A. Watson-Will (1998). "Writing speed and legibility of 7-14-year-old school students using modern cursive script." Australian Occupational Therapy Journal. 45(2): 59-64.
Ziviani, J., & Elkins, J. (1984). An evaluation of handwriting performance. Educational Review, 6, 251-261.
Ziviani, J., & Elkins, J. (1986). Effect of pencil grip on handwriting speed and legibility, Educational Review, 38, 247-257.
Ziviani, J., A. Hayes, et al. (1990). "Handwriting: a perceptual-motor disturbance in children with myelomeningocele." Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 10(1): 12-26.
李營玓 (2004) 寫字困難學生寫字特徵之分析。師大學報:教育類,49(2),43-64。
張慶龍 (1996) 重視孩子的寫字。中國語文,78(4),91-94。
陳俊隆 (1996) 書寫困難學童視知覺相關因素探討。未出版碩士論文,彰化師大特殊教育系,彰化。
麥錦城 (2000) 廣州市學生體質健康狀況調查研究成果。2000(2),1-12。
李琬生, 李靜娟 (2000) 兒童身高生長追蹤研究。人類學學報,19(2),97-107。
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top