跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.9.170) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/12/11 04:16
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:蔡明融
研究生(外文):Ming-Jung Tsai
論文名稱:創新產品與服務特性、消費者個人特徵對知覺價值和態度影響之研究─以數位電視與電子現金為例
論文名稱(外文):The Effect of Innovation Product and Service Characteristics on Perceived Value and Attitude Effect ─a study of Digital TV and iCash
指導教授:謝文雀謝文雀引用關係
指導教授(外文):Wen-Chueh Hsieh-
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:東吳大學
系所名稱:國際貿易學系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:貿易學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2007
畢業學年度:95
語文別:中文
論文頁數:119
中文關鍵詞:創新產品與服務特性個人特徵創新擴散模型科技接受模型科技接受模式態度知覺價值科技準備度先驗知識
外文關鍵詞:innovative product and service characteristics
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:53
  • 點閱點閱:1844
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:653
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:11
創新特性與消費者個人特徵會影響消費者對創新產品的知覺利益與知覺犧牲,透過利益與犧牲間的權衡建立消費者對創新科技的主觀態度。行銷人員可以藉由操弄這些創新特性與不同的消費者個人特徵作為市場區隔的參考依據。對行銷者來說了解消費者心目中知覺價值的傳達路徑,使消費者對創新科技有正向的態度,十分重要。本研究嘗試以有形產品與無形服務的角度探討知覺價值的傳達過程。

本研究針對15-65歲具有消費能力之族群發放500份問卷,有效問卷為401份。以複迴歸分析,探討創新產品與服務特性中的相容性、複雜性、相對利益對知覺價值的影響;其次以變異數分析,探討個人特徵中的科技準備度、先驗知識是否對知覺價值有不同影響;最後以簡單迴歸分析知覺價值對態度之影響,並以路經分析檢驗知覺價值之中介效果。

本研究發現,創新產品與服務特性在有形產品與無形服務中,有不同的因素影響知覺價值。其次具備高科技準備度的消費者,有較高的知覺價值;而在創新產品中,具備高先驗知識的消費者,有較高的知覺價值。第三,知覺價值在創新產品與服務特性與態度間有中介效果,且知覺價值顯著影響主觀態度。
Innovative product and service characteristics and consumer’s personal characteristics will affect consumer’s perceived value and consumer’s subject attitude for innovative technology. Marketer can manipulate different innovative product and service characteristics、consumer’s personal characteristics as for the referent basis of market segmatation. For marketer, it is important to understand the path of consumer’s perceived value to make consumers have positive attitude. This research used the points of tangible product and untangible service to explore the determinants of perceived values.

500 questionnaires were sent to correspondents aged between 15-65 and 401 copies were collected .This research found the effect of compatibility、complexity and relative advantages in innovative product and service characteristics for perceived values. Statistics analysis methods include regression, ANOVA and so on. Research hypothesis examination and management implication were proposed according to the finding. The finding are as follows:

This research found in the tangible products and intangible services of innovative products and services characteristics have different factors to influence perceived values. Then, consumers who have higher technology readiness have higher perceived values, higher prior knowledge have higher perceived values. Finally, there are mediation effects among innovative product and service characteristics and attitudes in perceived value, the perceived value influence subjective attitude significantly.
第一章 諸論 1
第一節 研究動機 1
第二節 研究問題 3
第三節 研究目的 4
第二章 文獻探討 5
第一節 資訊科技採用行為 5
第二節 創新擴散理論 12
第三節 知覺價值理論 21
第四節 先驗知識 26
第五節 科技準備度 30
第三章 研究方法 34
第一節 研究架構 35
第二節 研究假設 36
第三節 研究變項的操作性定義與衡量 40
第四節 問卷設計 44
第五節 信度分析 54
第六節 研究對象與資料蒐集 55
第七節 資料分析方法 63
第四章 實證結果與分析 65
第一節 產品(服務)特性與知覺價值之關係 65
第二節 個人特徵對知覺價值之關係 71
第三節 知覺價值與態度之關係 76
第四節 知覺價值之中介效果 77
第五章 結論與建議 87
第一節 研究結論與管理意涵 87
第二節 研究貢獻與建議 93
第三節 研究限制 97

參考文獻 98
附錄 108
1.江武崇 (2000),資訊系統創新的擴散與競爭優勢關聯性之研究,國立雲林科技大學,碩士論文。

2.汪志堅、黃營杉 (2000),消費者產品知識對網際網路上商品資訊搜尋量之影響,企業管理學報,第51期,頁109-138。

3.段正明、李鎮樟 (1996),電子付款的分析與探討,通訊與電腦,頁18。

4.張重昭、周宇貞 (1998),知覺品質與參考價格對消費者知覺價值與購買意願之影響,企業管理學報,第45期,頁1-36。

5.張重昭、黃麗霞、沈致瑋 (2001),消費者的經驗與知識對外部資訊搜尋量的影響,臺大管理論叢,第十一卷第二期,頁197-237。

6.張淑青 (2004),服務知覺價值多構面量表之實證研究,企業管理學報,第63期,頁95-120。

7.張春興(2002),張氏心理學辭典(二版)。台北:東華書局

8.張雅蓉(2001),顧客知覺價值與忠誠度之研究,國立台灣科技大學企業管理學系碩士論文。

9.黃柏彰 (2003),廠商行銷方案對顧客滿意度、知覺價值、忠誠度影響之研究-以行動通訊產業為例,國立成功大學交通管理研究所碩士論文。

10.黃智強 (2000),影響採用網路購物因素之研究─以網路書店為例,國立中央大學研究所碩士論文。

11.郭書銘(2002),消費者之國族認同、國族意識對大陸產品態度影響之研究,私立東吳大學研究所碩士論文。

12.葉人瑋 (2004),消費者科技準備度與網路銀行使用意願關聯性之研究,國立雲林科技大學企業管理學系研究所碩士論文。

13.陳廣(2006),7-11連鎖便利攻略,大利出版社,頁11-15。

14.蔡孟諺 (2006) ,影響網路電話採用意向之因素研究─整合技術接受模式與計畫行為理論觀點,私立東吳大學國際貿易研究所碩士論文。

15.鄭智仁 (2000),影響我國企業採用成本制度之因素探討以作業基礎成本制為例,國立台灣大學研究所碩士論文。

16.潘明全(1990),個人投資股票行為傾向之研究-Fishbein 模式之運用,國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。

17.賴蕙君(1991),嘉義市國中教師終生學習行為意圖及其影響 因素之研究-計
劃行為理論的驗証,國立中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所碩士論文。
1. Agarwal, R. and J. Prasad (1997), “The Role of Innovation Characteristics and Perceived Voluntariness in the Acceptace of Information Technologies.” Decision Sciences, 128(2), pp.557-582.

2. Alba, Joseph W. (1983), “The Effects of Product Knowledge on the Comprehension, Retention, and Evaluation of Product Information.” in Richard P. Bagozzi and Alice H. Tybout, ets. Advances in Consumer Research. Volume X, Chicago: Association for Consumer Research, pp. 577-580.

3. Agarwal, Sanjeev and R. Kenneth Teas (2000), “The Effects of Extrinsic Product Cues on Consumers' Perceptions of Quality, Sacrifice, and Value.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2), pp. 278-290.

4. Ajzen and Icek (1991 ), “The Theory of Planned Behavior.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, pp.179-211.

5. Adams, D. A., R. R. Nelson and P.A. Todd (1992) , “Perceives Usefulness, Ease of Use ,and Usage of Information Technology : A Replication.” MIS Quarterly, 16(2), pp.227-247.

6. Aaker, D. A. (1991), Managing Brand Equity: Capitalizing on the Value of a BrandName, NY: The Free Press, Macmillan.

7. Bitner, Mary Jo, Stephen W. Brown and Matthew L. Meuter(2000), “Technology Infusion in Service Encounters.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(1), pp.138-149.

8. Bowen A.M., M. Williams, H.V. McCoy and C. B. McCoy (2001), “Crack Smokers Intention to use condoms with loved partners: intervention development using the theory of reasoned action, condom beliefs , and processes of change.” AIDS CARE, 13(5), pp.579-594.

9. Bettman, James R. and C. Whan Park (1980), “Effects of Prior Knowledge and Experience and Phase of the Choice Process on Consumer Decision Processes.” Journal of Consumer Research, 17(1), pp.234-248.

10. Bolton, N.Ruth. and H.Drew James(1991),“A Longitudinal Analysis of the Impact of Service Changes on Costomer Attitude.” Journal of Marketing, 55(1), pp.1-9.

11. Bilkey, W. J. and E. Nes. (1982), “Country-of-Origin Effects on Products Evaluations.” Journal of International Business Studies, 13 (1), pp.89-99.

12. Bolton, N.Ruth and H. James Drew(1991), “A Multistage Model of Consumers' Assessment of Service Quality and Value.” Journal of Consumer Research, 17(1), pp. 375-384.

13..Bolton, N .Ruth., P. K. Kannan and Matthew D. Bramlett(2000),“Implications of Loyalty Program Membership and Service Experiences for Customer Retention and Value.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 128(1), pp.95-108.

14. Brucks, Merrie(1985),“The Effects of Product Class Knowledge on Information Search Behavior.” Journal of Consumer Reseerch, 112(2), pp.1-16.

15. Buselle, Rick, Joey Reagen, Bruce, Pickleton and Kim Jackson (1999),“Factors
Affecting Internet Use in a Santur-Access Population.”Telematics and Information, 16(2), pp.45-58.

16. Blythe, J. (1999), “Innovativenes and Newness in High-Tech Consumer Durablaes.” Journal of Product & Brand Management, 18, pp.415-429.

17. .Boyd, Thomas C. and Charlotte H. Mason, (1999), “The Link Between Attractiveness of ‘Extrabrand’ Attributes and the Adoption of Innovations.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(2), pp.306-319.

18. Capon, Noel and Glazer Rashi(1987),“Marketing and Technology: A Strategic Coalignment.” Journal of Marketing, 151(3), pp.1-14.

19. Crawford, C. Merle(1983),“Key Techniques for the Development of Web-Based PDM System”Product Innovation Management, 11, pp.5-11.

20. Davis, D. Fred and Viswanath Verkatosh(2000), “A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal Field Studies.” Management Science, 46(2), pp.186.

21. Davis, D. Fred, Richard P. Bagozzi and Paul R. Warshaw(1989), “User Acceptance Of Computer Technology: A Comparison Of Two Theoretical Models.” Management Science, 35(1), pp.982.

22. Davis, Fried(1989),“Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology.” Management Information Systems Quarterly, 13.

23. Dodds, William B., Kent B. Monroe, and Dhruv Grewal (1991), “The Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers’ Product Evaluations.” Journal of Marketing Research, 28, pp.307-319.

24. Fichman, G .Robert and Chris F Kemerer(1999),“The illusory diffusion of innovation: An examination of assimilation gaps.” Information Systems Research, 10(3), pp.255-275.

25. Fishbein, Martin and Isek Ajzen(1975) ,“Belief Attitude Intention and Behavior :An
Introduction to Theory and Research.” MA: Addison-Wesley.

26. Gardner, Meryl Paula(1983),“Advertising Effects on Attributes Recalled and Criteria Used for Brand Evaluations.” Journal of Consumer Reaserch, 10(1), pp.310-318.

27.Grewal, Dhruv, Kent B. Monroe, and R. Krishnan (1998), “The Effects of Price comparison Advertising on Buyers’ Perceptions of Acquisition Value, Transaction Value, and Behavioral Intentions.” Journal of Marketing, 62(1), pp.46-59.

28. Garvin, David A.(1987), “Competing on the eight dimensions of quality.” Harvard Business Review, November-December, pp.101-109.

29. Gatignon, Hubert and Thomas S. Robertson(1989),“Technology Diffusion: An Empirical Test Of Competitive Effects.” Journal of Marketing, 53(1), pp.35-49.

30. Gugnano, Greg, R. Glenn, Hawkes, Curt. Acredolo and Nancy White(1986),“Innovation Perception and Adoption of Solar Heating Technology.” Journal of Consummer Affairs, 20(1), pp.48-64.

31. Hu, P.J., P.Y.K. Chau, O.R. Liu Sheng and K.Y. Tam (1999) , “Examing the Technology Acceptance Model Using Physician Acceptance of Telemedicine Technology.” Journal of Management Information System , 16(2), pp.91-112.

32. Holak, S. L. (1988), “Determinants of Innovative Durables Adoption An Empirical Study with Implications for Early Product Screening.” Journal of Product
Innovation Management, 7(3), pp.50-69.

33. Hirshman, E. C. (1980), “Innovativeness, Novelty Seeking, and Consumer Creativity.” Journal of Consumer Research, 7(3), pp.283-295.

34. Holak, S. L. and Lehmann, D. R. (1990), “Purchase Intentions and the Dimensions of Innovation : an Exploratory Model.” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 7(1), pp.59-73.

35. Johnson, Eric and J. Edward Russo (1984), “Product Familiarity and Learning New
Information.” Journal of Consumer Research, 11(2), pp.542-550.

36. Karahanna, Elena and Straub W. Detmar.(1999), “The psychological origins of perceived usefulness and ease-of-use.” Information & Management, 35, pp.237-250.

37. Kashima, Y. , Gallois, C. & McCamish , M. ,(1993) , “Theory of reasoned action and
cooperative behavior: It takes two to use a condom.” Journal of Social Psychology, 32 , pp.227-239.

38. Kotler, P. (2003), Marketing Management, 11th ., New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.

39. Lawrence, A. Brown(2006), “Brown, L.A. 1981: Innovation diffusion: a new perspective. London: Methuen.” Progress in Human Geography, 30(4), pp.487-494.

40. Laroche, M., Kim C. and Zhou, L. (1996), “Brand Familiarity and Confidence as Determinants of Purchase Intention: An Empirical Test in a Multiple Brand Context.” Journal of Business Research, 37 (2), pp.115-120.

41. Lee, Ho Geun, Clark Theodore and Tam Kar Yan(1999),“Research report. Can EDI benefit adopters.” Information Systems Research, 10(2), pp.186-195.

42. Legris, Paul, John Inghamb and Pierre Collerette(2003),“Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model.” Information & Management, 40(1), pp.191-204.

43. Liao, Shaoyi, Yuan Pu Shao, Huaiqing Wang and Ada Chen(1999),“The adoption of virtual banking: An empirical study.” International Journal of Information Management, 19, pp.63-74.

44. Lichtenstein, Donald R., Richard G. Netemeyer and Scot Burton(1990), “Distinguishing Coupon Proneness from Value Consciousness: An Acquisition-Transaction Utility Theory Perspective.” Journal of Marketing, 54, pp.54-67.

45. Lin J. C.C. and Lu H.( 2000) , “Towards an understanding of the behavioral intention to use a web site.” International Journal of Information Management , 20(1),
pp. 197-208.

46. Levitt, T. (1986), The Marketing Imagination, New York: Free Press.

47. McGrath, Cathleen and Deone Zell(2001),“The future of innovation diffusion research and its implications for management.” Journal of Management Inquiry, 10(4), pp.386-391.

48. Monroe, B. Kent , Dhruv Grewal and R Krishnan(1998),“The effects of price-comparison advertising on buyers' perceptions of acquisition Value, and Behavioral Intensitions.” Journal of Marketing, 62, pp.46-59.

49. Moore, C. Gary and Izak Benbasat(1991), “Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation.” Information Systems Research, 2(3), pp.192-222.

50. Mathieson K.,Peacock E. and W. Chin (2001) , “Extending the Technology Acceptance Model: The Influence of Perceived User Resources.” DATA BASE for Advances in Information System, 32(3), pp.86-112.

51. Nagashima, A.(1977)“A Comparative‘Made in’Product Image Survey Among Japanese Businessmen.”Journal of Marketing, 40, pp.95-100.

52. Oliver, L. Richard and John E. Swan(1989), “Consumer Perceptions Of Interpersonal Equity And Satisfaction in Transactions:A Field Survey Approach.” Journal of Marketing, 53, pp. 21-35.

53. Parasuraman, A. and Dhruv Grewal(2000), “The Impact of Technology on the Quality-Value-Loyalty Chain:A Research Agenda.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(1), pp.168-174.

54. Parasuraman, A.(2000),“Technology readiness index (TRI): A multiple-item scale to measure readiness to Embrace New Technologies.” Journal of Service Research, 2(4), pp.307-320.

55. Parasuraman, A., A. Valarie Zeithaml and Leonard L. Berry(1991), “Refinement and Reassessment of the SERVQUAL Scale.” Journal of Retailing, 67(4), pp.420-450.

56.Parasuraman, A., A Valarie Zeithaml and Leonard L. Berry(1994), “Reassessment of expectations as a comparison standard in measuring service quality:Implication for Further Research.” Journal of Marketing, 58, pp.111-124.

57. Park, C. Whan and V. Parker Lessig(1981), “Familiarlity and Its Impact on Consumer Decision Biases and Heuristics.” Journal of Consumer Reaserch, 8, pp.223-230.

58. Petrick, James F(2002),“Development of a multi-dimensional scale for measuring the perceived value of a Service.” Journal of Leisure Research, 34(2), pp.119-134.

59. Rao, Akshay R. and Kent B. Monroe(1989), “The Effect Of Price, Brand Name, And Store Name On Buyers' Perspections of Product Quality:An Integrative Review.” Journal of Marketing Research, 26(3), pp.351-357.

60. Rao, R. Akshay and Kent B.Monroe(1988), “The Moderating Effect of Prior Knowledge on Cue Utilization in Product Evaluations.” Journal of Consumer Reaserch, 15, pp.253-264.

61. Rogers, Everete M. and D. Lawrence Kinceid(1981),“Communication Networks
Toward a New Paradigm for Research.” New York:Free Press.

62. Robertson, T. S. (1967), “The process of innovation and diffusion of innovation.” Journal of Marketing, 36, pp.15-16.

63. Roth, M. S. and Romeo, J. B. (1992), “Matching product category and country image perceptions: A framework for managing country-of-origin effects.” Journal of international business studies, 23(3), pp.477-497.

64. Steenkamp, E. M. (1990), “Conceptual Model of the Quality Perception Process.” Review of Economic Studies, 12(4), pp.100-105.

65. Samiee, S. (1994), “Customer Evaluation of Products in a Global Market.” Journal of International Business Studies, 25(3), pp.579-604.

66.Sujan, Mital(1985), “Consumer Knowledge:Effects on Evaluation Strategies Mediating Consumer Judgments.” Journal of Consumer Reaserch, 12, pp.31-46.

67. Subin, I., B. L.Bayus, and L. L Kanuk (2003), “An empirical study of innate counsumer innovativeness, personal characteristics, and new-product adoption behavior.” Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 31(1), pp.61-73.

68. Aler, Richard(1985),“Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice.” Marketing Science, 4(3), pp.199-214.

69. Tornatzky, L.G. and Klein, K.J. (1982) , “Innovation Characteristics and Innovation Adoption-Implementation: A Meta-Analysis of Findings.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 29(1), pp.28-45.

70. Teng J.T.C., Grover V. and Guttler W.(2000), “Information Technology Innovation:
General Diffusion Patterns and it’s Relationships to Innovation Characteristics.”
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 49(1), pp.13-27.

71. Taylor, Shirley and Peter A. Todd , (1995) , “Decomposition and Cross Effects in the
Theory of Planned Behavior: A Study of Consumer Adoption Intentions.” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 12, pp.137-155.

72. Urbany, Joe E., William O. Bearden, Ajit Kaicker, and Melinda Smith-deBorrero ( 1997), “Transaction Utility Effects When Quality is Uncertain.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(1), pp.45-55.

73. Veryzer, R. W. Jr. (1998), “Key Factors Affecting Customer Evaluation of Discontinuous.” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15. pp.136-150.

74. Wright, Peter L.(1974),“The Cognitive Process Mediating the Acceptance of
Advertising.” Journal of Marketing Research, 4, pp.53-62.

75. Wycliffe L. and Jostein R., (1999), “Predicting Intended Condom Use among Tanzanian Students using the Theory of Planned Behavior.” Journal of Health Psychology, 4(4), pp.497-506.

76. Wee, T. T. T., (2003), “Factors Affecting New Product Adoption in the Consumer Electronics Industry.” Singapore Management Review, 25(2), pp.51-71.

77. Zeithaml, A Valarie(2000),“Service Quality, Profitability, and the Economic Worth of Customers: What We Know and What We Need to Learn.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28, pp.67-85.

78. Zeithaml, A Valarie, Leonard L. Berry and A. Parasuraman(1996), “The behavioral consequences of service quality.” Journal of Marketing, 60, pp.31-46.

79. Zeithaml, A.Valarie(1988),“Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value:A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence.” Journal of Marketing, 52, pp.2-22.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top