跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.9.173) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/12/02 00:46
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:劉得駿
研究生(外文):Der-Jiunn Liou
論文名稱:艾克頓史觀中的多元性與轉折:以《自由史》卡片遺稿為研究中心
論文名稱(外文):Diversity and Transition in Lord Acton's Historical Thought: in case of the "History of Liberty" notes
指導教授:林慈淑林慈淑引用關係
指導教授(外文):Tzu-Shu Lin
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:東吳大學
系所名稱:歷史學系
學門:人文學門
學類:歷史學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2007
畢業學年度:95
語文別:中文
論文頁數:107
中文關鍵詞:多元性轉折《自由史》卡片輝格史觀
外文關鍵詞:diversitytransitionthe “History of Liberty” cardsWhig history
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:230
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:18
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
從二十世紀西方學者研究艾克頓史觀的既有成果中,大致可歸結出兩項重要的結論。首先,根據前人的看法,艾克頓獨特的出身讓他的思想融合了日耳曼、法國以及英美等國的思想元素而呈現高度的多元性。其次,過去的研究也指出,艾克頓對宗教和政治的態度,在十九世紀後期的政治動盪與社會局勢的影響下,曾歷經重大的轉折。在此前提下,由於艾克頓的未完之作《自由史》不但是他將各種思想調和於一套史觀之中的代表作,其卡片遺稿也正好寫於他思想的轉折期,因之無疑是研究艾克頓思想最珍貴的文本。基於此,鑑於過去的學者探討《自由史》時並未充分地利用卡片遺稿,本文即擬以一批新出版的《自由史》卡片為考察中心,重新審視艾克頓史觀中的多元性與轉折,並且就史料所及回應學界對於艾克頓是否為輝格史家的論爭。
Since the twentieth century, western scholars of historiography had long taken interest in Lord Acton’s reflections on history and proposed two sets of presumptions. First of all, according to previous works, born into a cosmopolitan background, Acton’s education and the course of his later life combined to make him a fusion of German learning, French thought, and British and American experience. Moreover, former studies had also indicated that the political upheaval and changing social conditions in the later-nineteenth century had to a large extent altered Acton’s religious and political outlooks. Acton’s unfinished project The History of Liberty, seen not only as a synthesis of his versatile thoughts, but its remaining manuscript notes and cards, which had not been fully utilized, were written during the turning point of his intellectual development and thus making it the most invaluable source for the understanding of his unique mind. Therefore, through the analysis of some newly published notes, it is the purpose of this thesis to reexamine the abovementioned presumptions concluded by students of Acton, and accordingly shed new light on the much disputed argument—whether Acton qualifies as a Whig historian.
目次

前言…………………………………………………………………………1
第一章 研究回顧與研究取向……………………………………………3
第一節 研究回顧…………………………………………………………3
第二節 前人研究趨勢與本文研究課題…………………………………18
第二章 艾克頓的養成背景和思想淵源…………………………………21
第一節 前期(1834-1858)………………………………………………21
(一)啟蒙教育(1834-1849)
(二)慕尼黑(1849-1854)
第二節 後期(1858-1902)………………………………………………32
(一)從政與天主教自由化運動(1858-1868)
(二)第一次梵蒂岡會議與劍橋欽定教授(1870-1902)
第三章 艾克頓的《自由史》在其思想中的意義……………………45
第一節 艾克頓的《自由史》寫作計畫…………………………………45
(一)《自由史》的寫作緣起和過程
(二)《自由史》的意義
第二節《自由史》卡片遺稿的流傳、特性和內容………………………51
(一)《自由史》卡片的流傳、編纂和出版
(二)《自由史》卡片的種類、價值和分類
第四章 艾克頓《自由史》遺稿中的史學思想…………………………65
第一節《自由史》中的思想架構…………………………………………65
(一)「自由」與「道德」
(二)思想和制度
第二節 宗教思想的世俗化………………………………………………75
(一)宗教觀的世俗化
(二)神意觀的世俗化
第三節 政治思想的現代化………………………………………………83
(一)自由哲學的轉折
(二)革命觀的變遷
第四節 艾克頓展現的普世輝格史觀……………………………………89
結語………………………………………………………………………99
徵引書目…………………………………………………………………101
徵引書目

本書目的編排採用美國心理學會APA格式(APA form),特此說明。

第一部分、一手文獻

(一)《自由史》遺稿

1.Fears, J. R. (Eds.). (1988). Selections from the Acton Legacy. In J. R. Fears (Eds.), Selected Writings of Lord Acton: Volume III: Essays in Religion, Politics, and Morality. (pp.489-662). Indianapolis: Liberty Fund & Liberty Classics.
2.Watson, G. (Ed.). (1994). The History of Liberty Notes. In G. Watson, Lord Acton’s History of Liberty: A Study of His Library. (pp. 56-103). London: Scholar Press.

(二)文集

1.Fears, J. R. (Eds.). (1985). Selected Writings of Lord Acton: Volume I: Essays in the History of Liberty. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund & Liberty Classics.
2.Fears, J. R. (Eds.). (1986). Selected Writings of Lord Acton: Volume II: Essays in the Study and Writing of History. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund & Liberty Classics.
3.Fears, J. R. (Eds.). (1988). Selected Writings of Lord Acton: Volume III: Essays in Religion, Politics, and Morality. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund & Liberty Classics.

(三)書信

1.Altholz, J. L., McElrath, D. & Holland, J. C. (Eds.). (1971). Acton-Simpson Correspondence I. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
2.Altholz, J. L., McElrath, D. & Holland, J. C. (Eds.). (1973). Acton-Simpson Correspondence II. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
3.Altholz, J. L., McElrath, D. & Holland, J. C. (Eds.). (1975). Acton-Simpson Correspondence III. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
4.Figgis, J. N. & Laurence, R. V. (Eds.). (1917). Selections from the Correspondence of the first Lord Acton. London: Longmans, Green & Co.
5.Gasquet, F. A. (Eds.). (1906). Lord Acton and His Circle. London: Buras and Oates.
6.Paul, H. (Eds.). (1904). Letters of Lord Acton to Mary Gladstone. London: George Allen.

第二部分、二手文獻

(一)專書
1. Althaus, F. (Eds.). Hamilton, G. W. (Trans.). (1911). The Roman Journals of Ferdinand Gregorovius 1852-1874. London: G. Bell & Son, Ltd.
2.Altholz, J. L. (1962). The Liberal Catholic Movement in England: The "Rambler" and its Contributors, 1848-1864. London: Burns & Oates.
3.Ben-Israel, H. (1968). English Historians on the French Revolution. London: Cambridge University Press.
4.Blakiston, N. (Eds.). (1962). The Roman Question. Extracts from the Dispatches of Odo Russell from Rome 1858-1870. London: Chapman and Hall.
5.Brinton, C. (1933). English Political Thought in the Nineteenth Century. London: E. Benn.
6.Butterfield, H. (1931). The Whig Interpretation of History. London: Bell.
7.Butterfield, H. (1955). Man on His Past: The Study of the History of Historical Scholarship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.Carr, E. H. (1962). What is History. London: Macmillan.
9.Chadwick, O. (1998). Acton and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.Fasnacht, G. E. (1952). Acton’s Political Philosophy: An Analysis. London: Hollis and Carter.
11.Figgis, J. N. (1907). Studies of Political Thought from Gerson to Grotius: 1414-1625: Seven Studies. Cambridge: University Press.
12.Gooch, G. P. (1962). History and Historians in the Nineteenth Century. Boston: Beacon Press.
13.Hayek, F. A. (1960). The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
14.Hill, R. (2000). Lord Acton. New York: Yale University Press.
15.Himmelfarb, G. (1952). Lord Acton: A Study in Conscience and Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16.Himmelfarb, G. (1968). Victorian Minds. New York: Knopf.
17.Kochan, L. (1954). Acton on History. London: Deutsch.
18.Laski, H. J. (1919). Authority in the Modern State. New Haven: Yale University Press.
19.Mathew, D. (1946). Acton, The Formative Years. London: Eyre & Spottiswoode.
20.Mathew, D. (1968). Lord Acton and His Times. London: Eyre & Spottiswoode.
21.MacDougall, H. (1962). The Acton-Newman Relations, The Dilemma of Christian Liberalism. New York: Fordham University Press.
22.Masterman, L. (Eds.). (1930). Mary Gladstone (Mrs. Drew): Her Diaries and Letters. New York: E. P. Dutton & Co.
23.Nurser, J. (1987). The Reign of Conscience: individual, church, and state in Lord Acton’s History of Liberty. New York: Garland.
24.Oman, C. (1939). On the Writing of History. London: Methuen.
25.Pezzimenti, R. (2000). The Political Thought of Lord Acton: The English Catholics of the Nineteenth Century. Roma, Italy: Millennium Romae.
26.Sarkissian, A. O. (1961). Studies in Diplomatic History and Historiography in honour of G. P. Gooch. London: Longmans.
27.Stuchtey, B. & Wende, P. (Eds.) (2000). British and German Historiography, 1750-1950, Traditions, Perceptions, and Transfers. London: German Historical Institute.)
28.Toynbee, A. J. (1934). Study of History I. London: Oxford University Press.
29.Walsh, W. H. (1967). An Introduction to Philosophy of History. London: Hutchinson.
30.Ward, W. (1897). The Life and Times of Cardinal Wiseman. London: Longmans, Green & Co.
31.Watson, G. (1994). Lord Acton’s History of Liberty: A Study of His Library. London: Scholar Press.

(二)學位論文

1. Anadale, C. (2005). The Political Philosophy of Lord Acton. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Emory University.
2. Raico, R. (1970). The Place of Religion in the Liberal Philosophy of Constant, Tocqueville, and Lord Acton. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Chicago.

(三)期刊論文

1. Brinton, C. (1919). Lord Acton’s Philosophy of History. Harvard Theological Review, 12, 84-112.
2. Butterfield, H. (1961). Reflections on Religion and Modern Individualism. Journal of the History of Ideas, 22, 33-46.
3. Deane, S. (1972). Lord Acton and Edmund Burke. Journal of the History of Ideas, 33, 325-35.
4. Elton, G. R. (1984). Herbert Butterfield and the Study of History. The Historical Journal, 27, 732-733.
5. Engel-Janösi, F. (1941). Reflections of Lord Acton on Historical Principles. Catholic Historical Review, 27, 166-85.
6. Engel-Janösi, F. (1953). The Historical Thought of Ernst von Lasaulx. Theological Studies, 14, 377-401.
7. Finer, H. (1948). Acton as Historian and Political Scientist. Journal of Politics, 10, 603-635.
8. Fish A. (1947). Acton, Creighton and Lea: A Study in History and Ethics. Pacific Historical Review, 16, 59-69.
9. Himmelfarb, G. (1949). The American Revolution in the Political Theory of Lord Acton. Journal of Modern History, 21, 293-312.
10. Lea, H. C. (1904). Ethical Values in History. The American Historical Review, 9, 233-246.
11. MacDougall D. J. (1944-1945). Lord Acton and the Modern State. CCHA Report, 12, 117-128.
12. Murphy, T. (1984). Lord Acton and the Question of Moral Judgments in History: The Development of His Position. Catholic Historical Review, 70, 225-250.
13. Tonsor, S. J. (1964). The Historical Morphology of Ernst von Lasaulx. Journal of the History of Ideas, 25, 374-392.
14. Weaver, R. M. (1960-1). Lord Acton: The Historian as Thinker. Modern Age: A Conservative Review, 5, 13-22.
15. Zagorin, P. (1998). Lord Acton’s Ordeal: The Historian and the Moral Judgment. The Virginia Quarterly Review, 17, 1-17.
16. 黃進興,〈「分析歷史哲學」的形成與發展〉《歷史主義與歷史理論》(台北:允晨文化,1992)。

(四)會議論文

1. Altholz, J. L. (1997). Lord Acton on the Historian. Occasional Paper, 7, Grand Rapids, Mich: Acton Institute.
2. Holland, J. C. (1997). The Legacy of an Education. Occasional Paper, 11, Grand Rapids, Mich: Acton Institute.
3. Kirk, R. (1994). Lord Acton on Revolution. Occasional Paper, 3, Grand Rapids, Mich: Acton Institute.
4. Tonsor, S. (1993). Quest for Liberty: America in Acton’s Thought. Occasional Paper, 1, Grand Rapids, Mich: Acton Institute.

(五)書評

5. Altholz J. L. (1999). [Review of the book Acton and History]. Church History, 68, 724-725.
6. Bentley, M. (1999). [Review of the book Acton and History]. The English Historical Review, 114, 1392-1393.
7. Brinton, C. (1953). [Review of the book Lord Acton: A Study in Conscience and Politics]. The American Historical Review, 58, 870-871.
8. Brinton, C. (1955). [Review of the book Acton on History]. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 299, 176-177.
9. Butterfield, H. (1955). [Review of the book Acton on History]. The English Historical Review, 71, 127-128.
10. Cairns, J. C. (1956). [Review of the book Acton on History]. The American Historical Review, 61, 354-356.
11. Carlson, L. H. (1989). [Review of the book The Reign of Conscience: individual, church, and state in Lord Acton’s History of Liberty]. Church History, 58, 402-403.
12. Forbes, D. (1953). [Review of the book Acton’s Political Philosophy: An Analysis]. The English Historical Review, 68, 108-113.
13. Forbes, D. (1953). [Review of the book Lord Acton: A Study in Conscience and Politics]. The Historical Review, 68, 292-293.
14. Geyl, P. (1956). [Review of the book Man on His Past: The Study of the History of Historical Scholarship]. Cambridge Historical Journal, 12, 89-92.
15. Gooch, B. D. (1956). [Review of the book Man on His Past: The Study of the History of Historical Scholarship]. The Western Political Quarterly, 9, 521-522.
16. Holland, J. C. (1999). [Review of the book Acton and History]. The Catholic Historical Review, 85, 644-645.
17. Kirk, R. (1953). Lord Acton’s Opinions. [Review of the book Lord Acton: A Study in Conscience and Politics]. The Yale Review, 42, 600-604.
18. Matthew, H. C. G. (1990). [Review of the book The Reign of Conscience: individual, church, and state in Lord Acton’s History of Liberty]. The English Historical Review, 105, 753-754.
19. Nutting, W. D. (1953). The Most Learned Englishmen. [Review of the book Acton’s Political Philosophy: An Analysis]. The Review of Politics, 15, 257-262.
20. Watson, G. (1994). Lord Acton's History of Liberty. A Study of His Library, with an Edited Text of His History of Liberty Notes, 53-55.
21. Weintraub, K. J. (1956). [Review of the book Lord Acton: A Study in Conscience and Politics]. The Journal of Modern History, 28, 389-290.
22. Wilkins, B. T. (1956). [Review of the book Man on His Past: The Study of the History of Historical Scholarship]. The Journal of Modern History, 28, 390-391.
23. Wolin, S. S. (1955). [Review of the book Lord Acton: A Study in Conscience and Politics]. The Western Political Quarterly, 8, 508-510.
24. Wight, M. (1953). [Review of the book Acton’s Political Philosophy: An Analysis]. International Affairs, 29, 474.
25. Young, B. W. (1996). [Review of the book Lord Acton's History of Liberty. A Study of His Library, with an Edited Text of His History of Liberty Notes]. The English Historical Review, 111, 1331-1332.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關論文
 
1. • 方世杰、方世榮,2000,知識管理—觀念性架構的建立,商管科技季刊,第一卷第三期,355-374。
2. • 方世杰、汪昭芬,2006,連鎖加盟體系知識創造影響因素之實證研究-雙重鑲嵌觀點,管理評論,第二十五卷第二期,1-28。
3. • 方世杰、蔡馥陞、邱志芳,2004,新產品開發團隊知識分享之研究:交易成本理論與社會交換理論之整合性觀點,科技管理學刊,第九卷第四期,67-100。
4. • 方世杰、蔡淑梨、羅育如,2005,從知識市場效率觀點探討組織知識之創造,中山管理評論,第十三卷第二期,695-719。
5. • 方世榮、方世杰,2004,關係資本、市場導向及組織學習對新產品開發績效之影響,交大管理學報,第二十四卷第二期,61-86。
6. • 汪美香、楊棠堯、吳朝森,2006,資訊系統開發團隊成員之自我效能、團隊互動與團隊信任對團隊效能之影響:知識分享之中介效果,臺大管理論叢,第十六卷第二期,73-99。
7. • 林鉦棽、彭台光,2006,多層次管理研究:分析層次的概念、理論和方法,管理學報,第二十三卷第六期,649-675。
8. • 張火燦、劉淑寧,2002,從社會網絡理論探討員工知識分享,人力資源管理學報,第二卷第三期,101-113。
9. • 黃家齊、林億明,2006,團隊導向人力資源管理活動及社會資本對團隊知識分享與創新之影響,臺大管理論叢,第十六卷第二期,101-130。
10. • 黃家齊、許雅婷,2006,團隊成員人格特質對知識分享及創新績效之影響-個人與團隊層次的分析,管理學報,第二十三卷第二期,149-170。
11. • 黃家齊、蔡達人,2003,團隊多元化與知識分享、知識創造及創新績效,臺大管理論叢,第十三卷第二期,233-280。
12. • 彭台光、高月慈、林鉦棽,2006,管理研究中的共同方法變異:問題本質、影響、測試和補救,管理學報,第二十三卷第一期,77-98。