臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

資產反抵押是可作為高齡者長期照護補充性財源的一項融資工具，這項工具適用的對象為有房子沒現金(house-rich but cash-poor)的高齡者。本研究主要目的在於了解社區中老年人對於資產反抵押之使用意願及相關因素。
本研究將相關因素分成五個部份：(一)人口學相關影響因素，(二)個人經濟相關影響因素，(三)供給面相關影響因素，(四)需求面相關影響因素，(五)其他影響因素。本研究以立意取樣方式選取於社區願意接受問卷訪問的中高齡者367 名，扣除無效樣本後，選取307 名超過45 歲，擁有自有房產的個案為有效樣本。
本研究發現於307 名的樣本當中有22%對於資產反抵押有使用的意願；相關影響因素方面，是否有兒子、對於資產反抵押的了解程度與其使用資產反抵押有正相關。本研究建議資產反抵押可作為高齡者於長期照護及健康照護的另一項補充性財源；且建議政府參與規劃、
加強大眾教育並提供借款前諮商以促進資產反抵押的使用及保障高齡者之借款安全。

The reverse mortgage has been proposed as a viable solution to be
used as a supplemental financial instrument for long-term care and health care financing for those who are “house-rich but cash-poor”. The objectives of the current study were to find out the percentages of the middle- to old-aged (aged above 45 years) homeowners in the Taiwan community who would consider applying for the reverse mortgage after they were 65 years old and to identify social demographic, self economic, supply side, demand side and other factors that were significantly related to the willingness to consider applying for the reverse mortgage.
Our sample included those in the Taiwan community middle- to
old-aged who owned self-occupied houses. After excluding unqualified
cases total sample size was 307 cases. About 22% of these home-owners
definitely or probably would consider to applying for such a plan if it were available in Taiwan. Moreover, using logistic regression analyses, we found that the number of sons and a deeper understanding of reverse mortgage were positively related to the willingness to consider applying for the reverse mortgage. Results suggest that the reverse mortgage may be useful as a supplemental financing instrument for long-term care and health care financing. Therefore, the government should be involved in planning reverse mortgages, educating the population, and providing consulting services to the elderly to protect the borrowing aspect of their financial safety.

中文摘要-1
Abstract -2
第一章、 緒 論-1
第一節、 研究背景-1
第二節、 研究動機與目的-5
第二章、 文獻探討-8
第一節、 長期照護財源-8
第二節、 老年經濟安全-11
第三節、 資產反抵押-17
第三章、 研究方法-41
第一節、 研究架構-41
第二節、 研究假設-43
第三節、 研究對象及方法-47
第四節、 研究工具-49
第五節、 研究程序-50
第六節、 資料分析-51
第四章、 研究結果與討論-58
第一節、 描述性資料-58
第二節、 社區中老年人對資產反抵押意願之相關因素分析-71
第三節、研究假設驗證-83
第五章、 建議與結論-88
第一節 結論-88
第二節、研究限制-90
第三節、政策建議-95
參考文獻-99
附錄-106

1. 內政部. (2006). 主要國家老人現金津貼占GDP比率(Publication. Retrieved http://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/, from 內政部統計處: http://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/
2. 內政部. (2007). 內政統計通報-95年敬老福利生活津貼核付概況. from http://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/index.asp
3. 內政部. (2007). 現住人口按五歲年齡組分. from http://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/index.asp
4. 行政院主計處. (2007). 中央政府債務餘額. from http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=15468&CtNode=46
5. 行政院主計處. (2006). 九十四年家庭收支調查-平均每戶家庭收支按經濟戶長年齡組別分. from http://fies2.tpg.gov.tw/doc/result/94/212/159-164.xls
6. 行政院主計處. (2006). 家庭收支調查-平均每戶相關細表. from http://fies2.tpg.gov.tw/212.asp?year=94
7. 行政院經濟建設委員會都市及住宅發展處編印. (2006). 都市及區域發展統計彙編.
8. 邱皓政. (2006). 量化研究與統計分析：spss中文視窗版資料分析範例解析. In (pp. 13-30). 台北市: 五南圖書出版股份有限公司.
9. 單驥. (2002). 老人經濟安全保障. 國家政策論壇, 2(3),22-26.
10. 楊世瑩. (2005). 因素分析. In SPSS統計分析實務 (pp.13-12-13-27). 台北市: 旗標出版股份有限公司.
11. 楊瑪利. (2007, 2007.02.25). 台灣人退休觀調查-存款比老伴重要房子比子女重要. 遠見雜誌, 248.
12. 臺北市國稅局. (2007). 綜合所得稅試算 (Publication. Retrieved http://www.ntat.gov.tw/county/ntat_ch/index.jsp:
13. 劉威辰. (2006). 臺灣地區癌症病患使用醫療費用及其財務保障之探討. 亞洲大學, 台中縣.
14. 衛生統計資訊網. (2006). 九十四年個人醫療費用(金額)－按年齡別、性別及疾病別分. from http://www.doh.gov.tw/statistic/國民醫療保健支出/94.htm
15. 鄭文輝. (2006). 台灣多層次長期照護財務保障架構之探討. Paper presented at the 第四屆世界華人地區長期照護會議,中國澳門.
16. 鄭清霞 , & 趙清遠. (2003). 個人年金保險與老年經濟安全規劃. 台灣銀行季刊, 54(3), 70-88.
17. 賴景昌. (2001). 消費函數. In 總體經濟學 (pp. 415-424).台北市: 雙葉書廊有限公司.
國外文獻部份：
日文部份：
1. 小嶋勝衛, & 劉銑鍾. (2002). 日本におけるリバース・モーゲ ージ制度普及のための一試論. 会計検査研究, 25, 141-173.
2. 小沢理市郎. (2000). リバースモーゲージの活用ニーズと普及促進の方向性: 財団法人高齢者住宅財団.
3. 生命保険文化センター, 財. (2006). サラリーマンの老後のライフスタイルと生活設計に関する調査. 生活設計と金融・保険に関する調査, 6, 29-31.
4. 厚生労働省. (2006). 介護保険制度改革の概要-介護保険法改正と介護報酬改定.
5. 厚生労働省. (2007). 平成１７年度 介護保険事業状況報告（年報）. from http://www.mhlw.go.jp/topics/kaigo/osirase/jigyo/05/dl/02.pdf
6. 柳成京, & 申紀燮. (2006). 韓国におけるリバ-スモ-ゲ-ジ制度の活性化方案. Paper presented at the 平成18年度日本保険学会大会.
7. 豐島區. (2006). 介護保險サービス利用の手引き. Retrieved.from.
8. 須山馨. (2007). 各国のリバース・モーゲージ制度とわが国の 課題. 早稻田大學.
簡體中文部份：
1. 汪傳敬. (2004). 反向抵押貸款及其在我國的應用. 浙江大學,浙江.
2. 范子文. (2006). 住房逆抵押貸款的構成要素和特征分析. 中國房地產金融, 2, 27-30.
英文部份：
1. A.I. Hermalin (2003). The well-being of the Elderly in asia -A four-courntry comparative study.
2. A.S.I.C. (2005). Equity release products: australian securities & Investments Commission.
3. AARP. (2006). Home Made Money A Consumer's Guide to Reverse Mortgages.
4. AARP. (2006). Reverse Mortgage Calculator. from http://www.rmaarp.com/
5. Australian Securities and Investments Commission. (2007). Equity release-accessing the equity in your home from www.asic.ogv.au
6. Brodsky, J., Habib, J., Hirschfeld, M., Siegel, B., & Rockoff, Y.(2003). Choosing overall LTC strategies: a conceptual framework for policy development,. In J. Brodsky, J. Habib & M. Hirschfeld (Eds.), KEY POLICY ISSUES IN LONG-TERM CARE (pp. 245-269). Geneva.
7. Chou, K.-L., Chow, N. W. S., & Chi, I. (2006). Willingness to consider applying for reverse mortgage in Hong Kong chinese middle aged homeowners. Habitat International, 30, 4716-727.
8. Crown, W. (2001). Economic status of the elderly. In Handbook of aging and the social sciences. (pp. 352-368): Academic press.
9. Dolan, A., McLean, P., & Roland, D. (2005). Home Equity , Retirement Incomes and Family Relationships. Paper presented at the 9th Australian Institute of Family Studies Conference.
10. Fratantoni, M. C. (1999). Reverse Mort gage Choices: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of the Borrowing Decisions of Elderly Homeowners. Journal of Housing Research, 10(2), 189-203. 11. Godfrey, H., & Malmgren, E. (2006). Going forward with reverse mortgages. Journal of Accountancy, 202(1), 35-40.
12. Gooden, L. (2005). Media Release-Equity Release Centre. from www.equityreleasecentre.com.au
13. Gordon, D., & Townsend, P. (2000). The Measurement of Poverty. Retrieved.
14. Hansen, K. A. (2002). Reverse mortgages: Tax-Free Money you don't Pay back while living in your homes. Journal of Financial service professional, 56(5), 84-92.
15. Huan, C., & Mahoney, J. (2002). Equity Release Mortgages-United states and Europe. Housing Finance International 16(4), 29-35.
16. HUD. (2000). Evaluation Report of FHA's Home Equity Conversion Mortgage Insurance Demonstration Washington DC: Department of Housing and Urban Development.
17. HUD. (2006). FHA's Reverse Mortgage for Seniors - Home Equity Conversion Mortgage. from http://www.hud.gov/offices/hsg/sfh/hecm/hecmhome.cfm
18. Jackson, W. A. (1998. ). Pensons and Retirement. The Political economy of population ageing, 121-147.
19. Mayer, C. J., & Simons, K. V. (1994). Reverse mortgages and the liquidity of housing wealth Journal of the American Real Estate &Urban Economic Assoication, 22(2), 235-256.
20. Mitchell, O. S., & Piggott, J. (2004). Unlocking housing equity in Japan. J.Japanese Int. Economic, 18, 466-505.
21. Philips, W., & S. Gwin. (1993). Reverse mortgages. Transactions Society of Actuaries,, XLVIV, 289-323.
22. Shiller, R. J., & Weiss, A. N. (2000). Moral hazard in Home Equity conversion. Real Estate Economics, 28(1), 1-31.
23. Streeter, B. (2004). Is Medicaid conundrum an opportunity for banks? ABA Banking Journal 96(11), 10-12.
24. Wanless, D. (2006). Changing the way the system is funded. In Securing good care for older people (pp. 221-250).
25. Weber, J. A., & Chang, E. (2006). The reverse mortgage and its ethical concerns. Journal of Personal Finance, 5(1),37-52.