(3.236.231.14) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/04/15 08:20
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果

詳目顯示:::

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:蕭輔瑞
研究生(外文):Ray F.J. Hsiao
論文名稱:促進數位化民主的另一個關鍵:培養公民資格-以台北市、台中市,以及大里市三個層級的地方政府為例
論文名稱(外文):Another key factor of promoting the digital democracy: developing the citizenship-Taking Taipei City, Taichung City and Dali City as examples
指導教授:項 靖
指導教授(外文):Jing Shiang
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:東海大學
系所名稱:公共行政學系
學門:社會及行為科學學門
學類:公共行政學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2007
畢業學年度:95
語文別:中文
論文頁數:237
中文關鍵詞:數位民主審議式民主線上民主公民資格
外文關鍵詞:citizenshipdigital democracyon-line democracydeliberative democracy
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:4
  • 點閱點閱:766
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:117
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:6
追求持續民主深化與鞏固民主的浪潮,伴隨著不斷進步之資訊科技的助長,使得數位民主逐漸成為一個政府必須回應的人民需求,以及民主發展轉向的新課題。透過資訊科技其獨具之特性使得民主形式的改善再次顯露曙光,一時之間透過資訊科技的新興服務供給,國內外之政府部門無不極力發展數位化服務,以及提供數位交流平台,如電子信箱、線上論壇,以及線上申辦等電子化政府之新型態政府服務功能,以及服務供給的方式改變。

更進一步,各類民主理論也期盼資訊科技得以成為實現其理論預期的契機,讓還政於民、個人權利的彰顯,或是公共理性形成的數位民主形式成為可能。但是,資訊科技對人類社會所造成的影響不僅僅只有正面的幫助,其亦造成許多眾所皆知,諸如數位落差等新問題的產生,同時,相關民主理論所賦予數位民主的重責大任,也需要許多其他要素的配合方得以使其有發展與落實的空間,而其中更以需要具有一定程度的公民資格的參與。

因此,本文將以培養公民資格作為促進數位民主發展此一議題為主軸,透過相關文獻的整理歸納,並輔以實際案例經驗的對照,嘗試為我國發展數位民主的具體措施與方向提出建議。
第一章 緒 論
第一節 研究背景與目的
第二節 國內外重要參考文獻評述
第三節 數位民主的研究概念
第四節 研究設計與研究問題
第五節 研究方法與困難
第二章 數位民主
第一節 數位民主的內涵
第二節 數位民主的形態發展與對民主活動的影響
第三節 數位民主所引發的問題與爭議
第四節 數位民主的條件與政府所扮演的角色
第五節 小結
第三章 公民資格
第一節 公民資格的本質與相關論點
第二節 作為基礎的公民資格
第三節 政府如何培養公民資格
第四節 小結
第四章 研究設計
第一節 研究架構
第二節 研究對象與研究範圍
第三節 實證性研究問題與研究方法
第五章 研究發現
第一節 地方政府機關強化公民資格以促進數位民主的現況
第二節 綜合分析
第三節 小結
第六章 研究結論與建議
第一節 研究問題的回答
第二節 研究結果與討論
第三節 研究建議與貢獻
第四節 後續研究建議
參考文獻
附件
王意茹,1998,〈當代自由主義社會公民德行之研究〉,《重高學報》,創刊號,頁149-167。

王佳煌,2002,〈電子化政府與電子化民主:以台北市政府為例〉,《國政研究報告》,http://npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/IA/091/IA-R-091-058.htm,accessed 2005/07/14。

王秉鈞,2002,〈由資訊運用觀點看我國中央政府行政組織再造工作〉,《國政研究報告》,http://npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/IA/091/IA-R-091-056.htm,accessed 2005/07/14。

王文岳,2005,〈互動治理:數位時代之民主〉,http://www.japanresearch.org.tw/politics-38.asp,accessed 2006/03/17。

王百祿等主持,2005,〈全面提升政府網站服務品質方案-對政府網站評鑑的研究〉,行政院研考會委台灣資訊智慧財產權協會研究專案,http://www.rdec.gov.tw/public/Attachment/6126121371.doc,accessed 2006/05/01。

毛治國,2004,〈International Cooperation on Reducing Digital Divide〉,全球數位落差與數位機會國際研討會。

石元康,1992,〈交跌共識與民主社會中的政治哲學工作:羅爾斯理論的最近發展〉,載於石元康等著,《當代政治思潮》,台北:民主基金會,頁129-176。

江明修,1992,〈危機與重建—公共行政教育之省思〉,第四屆全國管理教育研討會,台北:國立政治大學與中華民國館裏科學學會主辦。

江明修,1997,〈再造公民性政府〉,地方自治與國家發展研討會,台北:台灣教授協會主辦。

宋興洲,2003,〈論網路民主的理論與發展現況—網路民主是科幻小說〉,《全球政治評論》,第3期,頁1-28。

宋餘俠,1996,〈由政府便民服務電子窗口談便民資訊服務之趨勢與展望〉,《Online-Today:電子資料庫簡訊》,第9期,頁2-5。

沈宗瑞,2002,〈兩種公民資格觀的歷史發展與對話〉,《教育與社會研究》,第3期,頁1-34。

林逢慶,2003,〈消弭數位落差:政府的責任與對策〉,《國家政策季刊》第2卷,第1期,頁29-52。

林文程、陳東升、黃昭元、黃東益、汪平雲、徐永明、蔡佳泓、柏立思、周奕成、許文英,2004,〈臺灣民主基金會國際交流報告〉,IRI DIRECT DEMOCRACY STUDY TRIP TO EUROPE。

何包鋼,2002,〈哈伯馬斯的溝通理性觀述評〉,《中山人文社會科學期刊》,第10卷,第2期,頁25-44。

余致力,1999,〈黑堡宣言:論公共行政在民主治理過程中的正當角色〉,民主行政與政府再造學術研討會,台北:世新大學行政管理學系主辦。

李雪津,1995,〈主要國家便民服務自動化推動重點及展望〉,《研考雙月刊》,第19卷,第4期,頁11-16。

李仲彬、黃朝盟,2001,〈電子化政府的網站設計:台灣省二十一市政府WWW網站內容評估〉,《中國行政》,第69期,頁47-73。

吳英明,1999,〈政府再造與民主行政〉,民主行政與政府再造學術研討會,台北:世新大學行政管理學系主辦。

洪淑芬,2001,〈數位簽名技術/公開金鑰認證機構涉及和衍生法律問題之探討〉,資策會科技法律中心,http://www.cqinc.com.tw/grandsoft/gim/010/deil01.htm,accessed 2006/04/26。

苑舉正,2002,《英美哲學》,東海大學哲學研究所:英美哲學課堂講義。

許文傑,2000,〈「公民參與」的理論論術語「公民性政府」的形成〉,《公共行政學報》,第4期,頁65-97。

許紀霖主編,2003,《共合、社群與公民》,南京:江蘇人民出版社。

黄朝盟、王俊元、許耿銘,2004,〈數位民主之實踐與挑戰—網路電子投票之析探〉,《研考雙月刊》,第28卷,第4期,頁67-77。

黃東益,2000,〈審慎思辯民調-研究方法的探討與可行性評估〉,《民意研究
季刊》,一月號,頁123-143。

黃東益、黃佳珊,2003,〈地方政府「數位民主」機制—以台灣省21縣市政府網站為例〉,《法政學報》,第16期,頁179-202。

黃東益,2003,〈審慎思辯、議題資訊與政策偏好形成—核四議題意見調查結果初探〉,《理論與政策》,第16卷,第4期,頁65-88。

黃東益、陳敦源、陳俊明、蕭乃沂,2004,〈數位時代商議式民主的實驗原型:線上公民顧問團〉,《研考雙月刊》,第28卷,第4期,頁81-91。

黃東益、陳敦源、余致力,2005,〈我國中央政府公共管理者的政治態度〉,《中國行政評論》,第14卷,第2期,頁1-32。

黃東益主持,2005,〈電子審議民主的實踐-「線上公民會議」之初探性實驗〉,財團法人台灣民主基金會委託研究報告,http://www.tfd.org.tw/docs/iri_c2.pdf,accessed 2005/12/07

黃惠娟,2005,〈新陪伴主義〉,http://www.bliayad.org/articles/pages/0288.htm,2006/04/17。

張秀雄,1999,〈建構適合台灣社會的公民資格觀〉,《公民訓育學報》,第8輯,頁99-122。

張世杰、蕭元哲、林寶安,2000,〈資訊科技與電子化政府治理能力〉,第一借政治與資訊研討會,宜蘭:佛光人文社會學院主辦。

張嘉彬,2000,〈系統評估研究之文獻探討:從電子圖書館角度考量〉,http://www.lib.ntu.edu.tw/pub/univj/uj3-2/%E7%B3%BB%E7%B5%B1%E8%A9%95%E4%BC%B0%E7%A0%94%E7%A9%B6%E4%B9%8B%E6%96%87%E7%8D%BB%E6%8E%A2%E8%A8%8E.doc,accessed 2006/03/05。

葉俊榮,2004,〈電子化民主對民主政治發展之意涵〉,《研考雙月刊》,第28卷,第4期,頁12-24。

童世駿譯,Habermas, J. 著,2003,《事實與格式》,台北:台灣商務印書出版。

紀國鐘,2001,〈電子化政府推動現況與未來發展〉,《研考雙月刊》,第25卷,第1期,頁15-20。

陳金貴,1992,〈公民參與的研究〉,《行政學報》,第24期,頁95-128。

陳銘祥,2004,〈政府在電子化民主發展過程的角色〉,《研考雙月刊》,第28卷,第5期,頁89-97。

陳思先,2004,〈第一屆「青年國是會議」會後評析〉,《國政研究報告》,http://www.npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/EC/093/EC-B-093-042.htm,accessed 2005/05/02。

陳東升、林國明,2003,〈審議民主、科技與公民教育〉,第十屆張昭鼎紀念研討會,台北:國立台灣大學、張召鼎紀念基金會、科學月刊社與國立陽明大學共同主辦。

項 靖,1999,〈理想與現實:民主行政之實踐與地方政府網路公共論壇〉,《東海社會科學學報》,第18期,頁149-178。

項 靖,2000,〈線上政府:我國地方政府WWW網站之內涵與演變〉,《行政暨政策學報》,第2期,頁41-95。

項 靖,2003,〈邁向資訊均富:我國數位落差現況之探討〉,《東吳政治學報》,第16期,頁127-178。

項 靖,2004,〈推動數位化民主之基礎條件〉,《研考雙月刊》,第28卷,第4期,頁52-66。

項 靖,2005,《數位化治理與資訊政策》,秀威資訊出版。

莫漢輝、陳瑞貞,2002,〈社會資本之公民身分狀況研究〉,《青少年問題研究系列》,香港青年協會出版。

楊深坑,1997,《溝通理性、生命情懷與教育過程—哈伯馬失的溝通理性教育》,師大書苑出版。

楊朝祥,1999,〈邁向數位時代的智慧型政府〉,《研考雙月刊》,第23卷,第1期,頁3-9。

詹中原,1999,〈新公共管理與民主行政〉,民主行政與政府再造學術研討會,台北:世新大學行政管理學系主辦。

詹中原,2001,〈數位民主與電子化治理〉,http://www.npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/CL/090/CL-R-090-052.htm,accessed 2005/05/02。

詹中原、王俊元、許耿銘,2005,〈數位民主與電子投票:台灣實踐過程之初探〉,《中國行政評論》,第14卷,第2期,頁53-75。

熊瑞梅、黃毅志,1992,〈社會資本與小資本階級〉,《中國社會學刊》,第16期,頁107-138。

管中祥,2001,〈資訊控制?還是電子民主?-我國電子化政府政策規劃與實際分析〉,中華傳播學會2001年年會,香港。 http://www.benla.mymailer.com.tw/study/study-16.htm,accessed 2006/02/17.

劉久清,2003,〈網路民主前景初探—以公共領域為核心之探討〉,第三屆政治與資訊研討會,宜蘭:佛光人文社會學院主辦。

劉久清,2004,〈網路民主與網路公民〉,《哲學與文化》,第31卷,第6期,頁63-80。

劉莘譯、Kymlicka, Will著,2003,《當代政治哲學導論》,台北:聯經出版社。

賴維堯,1995,〈新公共行政運動與黑堡宣言〉,《空大學訊》,第166期,頁56-59。

盧倩儀,2004,〈審議式超國家主義〉,《問題與研究》,第43卷,第6期,頁53-71。

盧鄂生、吳啟文,2001,〈電子認證與網路安全管理〉,《研考雙月刊》,第25卷,第1期,頁21-29。

蔡達智,2002,〈行政資訊公開之問題初探〉,《經社法制論叢》,第30期,頁141-166。

蔡志恆,2002,〈全球治理思潮與治理結構之發展〉,http://www.npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/CL/091/CL-R-091-052.htm,accessed 2005/05/02。

蕭乃沂,2001,〈電子化政府便民應用服務的評估架構〉,《研考雙月刊》,第25卷,第1期,頁75-81。

蕭乃沂,2004a,〈公民關係管理與政策問題建構:以民意電子信箱為起點〉,《國家政策季刊》,第3卷,第1期,頁155-174。

蕭乃沂,2004b,〈數位民主行政的資訊業務、資訊組織、與資訊人力:對公共行政教育的意涵〉,
www.ntpu.edu.tw/pa/news/ 93news/attachment/931215/931215-8.pdf,accessed 2005/05/02。

謝宗學,2003,〈網際民主與審議民主之實踐:資訊化社會的桃花源村?〉,《資訊社會研究》,第4期,頁87-139。

簡太郎,1995,〈戶政革新與便民服務自動化〉,《研考雙月刊》,第19卷,第4期,頁17-22。

譚家哲,1997,〈西方倫理之根源:古希臘與希臘〉,《哲學雜誌》,第21期,頁28-67。

孫國祥,1999,〈台灣電子民主社會:展望與挑戰〉,http://www.ios.sinica.edu.tw/itst/seminar/seminar3/sun_kuo_shyang.htm,accessed 2006/04/01。

劉楚俊譯,Sen, Amartya著,2001,《經濟發展與自由》,台北:時報出版。

劉莘譯,Kymlicka, Will著,2003,《當代政治哲學導論》,台北:聯經出版。

羅 晉,2004,〈網際審議式民主之實現與現實:以我國地方政府網際公共論壇為例〉,《行政暨政策學報》,第39期,頁105-142。

潘天翠,2001,〈關注:網上政府正向我們走來!〉,http://www.people.com.cn/BIG5/14677/22114/41180/41185/3015293.html,accessed 2006/01/16。

瞿海源,2002,〈網路公共論壇與民意--有關停建核四事件討論的分析〉
http://140.109.196.10/pages/seminar/infotec4/1-1.doc,accessed 2005/05/04。

霍韜晦,2005,〈對話的反思〉,http://www.dbi.org.hk/dbi/fadeng_280.htm,accessed 2006/03/15。

戴豪君、廖書賢,2004,〈電子化民主法制規劃芻議〉,《研考雙月刊》,第28卷,第4期,頁78-88。

行政院青年輔導委員會、行政院青少年事務促進委員會,2005,《青少年政策白皮書-綱領》。http://youthforum.nyc.gov.tw/young/policy/document/young2.ppt, acceesed 2005/08/22。

行政院研考會專案調查報告,電子化政府93-94年度報告書
http://www.rdec.gov.tw/public/egov/9408/enter.html,accessed 2005/11/20。

Ackerman, Bruce
1991, We the People: Foundations, Cambridge: Harvard University Press. http://www.bsos.umd.edu/gvpt/lpbr/subpages/reviews/ackerman.htm, accessed 2005/05/07

Anttiroiko, Ari-Veikko
1998, “The Promises of Net Communication to Citizen's Participation” http://www.uta.fi/~kuaran/citizen.html, accessed 2006/01/17

Astrom, Joachim
2004. ”Digital Democracy: Ideas, Intentions, and Initiatives in Swedish Local Governments”, in Rachel K. Gibson, Andrea Rommele, and Stephen J. Ward. eds. Electronic Democracy: Mobolisation, Organisation, and Participation via New ICTs. London: Routedge Press. http://scholar.google.com/url?sa=U&q=http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm%3Fid%3D983760, accessed 2005/12/07

Barber, B.
1984, Strong Democracy:Participatory Politics for a New Age. California:University of California Press.
1997, “ The New Telecommunications Technology,” Constellations 4(2):
pp.208-228.
1999,“The Discourse of Civility” In Stephen L. Elkin and Edward Soltan eds. Citizen Competence and Democratic Institutions. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University press. pp.39-47.

Baier, Annette
1994, Moral Prejudices. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Beiner, Ponald
1999, Theorizing Nationalism, Albany: State University of New York Press.

Bohman, James., and William Rehg.
1997. Introduction, in Deliberative Democracy. pp. ix-xxx. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Bimber, Bruce
2001, “Information and Political Engagement in America: The Search for
Effects of Information Technology at the Individual Level,” Political Research
Quarterly 54(1): pp.53-67,

Chadwick, A.
2003, “Bringing E-Democracy Back In: Why It Matters for Future Research on E-Government.” Social Science Computer Review 21(4) pp. 443-455.

Christiano, Thomas.
1997. “The Significance of Public Deliberation”. In James Bohman and William Rehg. Eds. Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press pp. 243-277

Chen, P.
2002. Australian Elected Representatives: Use of New Media Technologies, Center for Public Policy, University of Melbourne Press

Cohen, Joshua
1997, “Procedure and Substance in Deliberative Democracy” Pp. 405-437. In James Bohman and William Rehg. Eds. Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Coleman, Stephen and John Gotze.
2001 Bowling Together: Online Public Engagement in Policy Deliberation. London: Hansard Society, http://bowlingtogether.net/bowlingtogether:pdf , accessed 2006/04/01

Dahl, Robert
1971, Oligarchy: Participation and Opposition . New Haven: Yale U. Press.
1989, “A Theory of Democratic Processes.” In Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University press. pp. 106-118.

Dai, Xiudian
2000. The Digital Revolution and Governance. Ashgate Press.

Dahlberg, Peter
2001, “Democracy via cyberspace:Mapping the rhetoric’s and practices of the three Prominent camps”, New media & society, 3 (2) pp. 157-177.

Davis, Richard.
1999, The Web of Politics:The Internet’s Impact on the American Political System, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

David, Potter. David Goldblatt.Margaret, Kiloh and Paul, Lewis Ed.
1997, Democratization, Polity Press.

Dryzek, John S.
1990, Discursive Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
1996, Discursive Democracy: Politics, Policy, and Political Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2000, Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2001, “Legitimacy and Economy in Deliberative Democracy”, Political Theory 29(5): pp. 651-669.

DeLeon, P.
1995. “Democratic Values and the Policy Sciences.” American Journal of Political Science, 39(4): 886~905.

Dworkin, Ronald
1986, Law’s Empire, London: Harvard University Press.
1989, “Liberal Community”, California Law Review, 77(3): 479-504.

Elkin, Stephen L.
1999, “Citizen Competence and the Design of Democratic Institutions”, In Stephen L. Elkin and Edward Soltan eds. Citizen Competence and Democratic Institutions. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University press. pp. 385-504.

Elster, Jon.
1998 "Deliberative Democracy"
.http://www.geocities.com/hmelberg/elster/elboed.htmdeliberative, accessed 2005/05/07

Everard, Jerry
2000. Virtual States: The Internet and the Boundaries of the Nation-State. London: Routledge Press

Fearon, James D.
1998. Deliberation as Discussion. In John Elster ed. Deliberative Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 44-68

Fishkin, James S.
1999.”Toward Deliberative Democracy: Experimenting with an Ideal”. In S. L. Elkin and K E. Soltan eds. Citizen Competence and Democratic Institution.. Penn State Press. pp.279-290

Gibson, Rachel
2001, “Elections Online: Assessing Internet Voting in Light of the Arizona
Democratic Primary,” Political Science Quarterly 116(4): pp.561-583.

Galston, William
1991, Liberal Purpose:Goods, Virtures, and Duties in the Liberal Sate.
Cambridge, Cambridge University Press

Gastail, John and Levine Peter Ed.
2005, The Deliberative Democracy Handbook:Strategies for Effective Civic Engagement in the 21st Century. Jossey-bass an imprint of Wiley Press.

Gastail, John.
2000.”Is Face to Face Citizen Deliberation a Luxury or Necessity for Democracy”, Paper prepared for University of Washington:Workshop on Communication and Civic Engagement. http://depts.washington.edu/ccce/events/gastil.htm, accessed 2006/03/09

Habermas, J.
1979, Communication and he Evolution of Society, translated by Thomas McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press..
1984, The Theory of Communicative Action, Beacon Press.
1992,”Citizenship and National Identity:Some Reflections on the Future of
Europe” Prazis International, 12/1:pp1-19.
1996, “Three Normative Models of Democracy.”.In S. Benhabid ed. Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 21-30.
2001, The Inclusion of Other:Studies in Political Theory. Cambridge, MA:MIT press.

Hague, Barry N. and Brian D. Loader
1999, “Digital Democracy: an introduction,” Digital Democracy. New York:
Routledge Press, pp.3-22,

Heater, Derek
2000, What is Citizenship. Oxford: Blackwell Press

Heidegger, Martin
1977 (1952) “The Question Concerning Technology”, in The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays, translated by William Lovitt, pp. 3-35. NY: Harper & Row Press.

Held, David
1989,”Citizenship and Autonomy”, in Political Theory and the Modern State, Stanford: Calif. pp. 189-213.
1999,”The Transformation in Political Community: Rethinking Democracy in the Context of Globalization”, in Ian Shapiro and Casiano Hacker-Cordon eds. Democracy’s Edges. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 84-111.

Herzog, Don
1986, “Some Questions for Republicans’, Political Theory, 14/3: pp473-493. http://www.bsos.umd.edu/gvpt/lpbr/subpages/reviews/sellers.html, accessed 2006/03/07

Howard, P.
2001, “Can technology enhance democracy? The doubters' answer,”
Journal of Politics 63(3) pp.949-955.

Hall, Peter A.
2002, “Great Britain: The Role of Government and the Distribution of Social Capital”, in Robert D. Putnam ed. Democracies in Flux: The Evolution of Social Capital in Contemporary Society, Oxford University Press.

Joss, Simon
2000, “Participation in Parliamentary Technology Assessment: From Theory to Practice”. In N. Vig and H. Paschen eds. Parliaments and Technology:The Development of Technology Assessment in Europe. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, pp. 325-362.

Jordan, Tim
1999. Cyberpower: The Culture and Politics of Cyberspace and the Internet. London: Routledge Press.

Kant, Immanuel. K. Abbott, Thomas Translated
1996,(original 1788), Critique of Practical Reason, Prometheus Books Press.

Kamarck, Elaine Ciulla, and Joseph S. Nye, Jr.
1999. Democracy.com? Governance in a Networked World. NH: Hollis Publishing Co. Press.

Kindleberger, C. P.
1996. Centralization Versus Pluralism. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.

King, A. Y. C.
1994, “A nonparadigmatic search for democracy in a post-Confucian culture:the case of Taiwan’s” in Diamond, L. Ed.. Political Culture and Democracy in Developing Courtiers, London, Lynne Rienner, pp. 131-153

Kuo, Cheng-tian and James W.Y. Wang.
2003. “The Fungus Policy Network of Taiwan’s Internet Industry”,「政治經濟學:哲學、制度與政策的對話」學術研討會論文,國立政治大學。http://iir.nccu.edu.tw/chinapolitics/rethinking/06.doc, accessed, 2006/03/14.

Kymlicka, Will
1995, Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. N.Y.: Oxford University Press.
2001, Politics in the Vernacular: Nationalism, Multiculturalism and Citizenship. N. Y.: Oxford University Press.
2003, “Immigration, Citizenship, Multiculturalism: Exploring the Links”, The Political Quarterly 74(s1): pp.195-208.

Klüver, Lars.
2000. “Danish Board of Technology”. In N. Vig and H. Paschen eds. Parliaments and Technology :The Development of Technology Assessment in Europe. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. pp. 173-197

Larmore, Charles E.
1987, Patterns of Moral Complexity. New York: Columbia University Press.

Levine, Herbert M.
1992, Political Issues Debated: An Introduction To Politics 4th ed., Prentice Hall Inc. Press.

Lijphart, Arend
1999, Patterns of Democracy - Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

Low, Eugenia
1997,” Frameworks of Participation: Conceptions of Citizenship in Twentieth Century Britain”, www.psa.ac.uk/cps/1997%5Clow.pdf, accessed 2005/06/07

Marshall, T.H.
1950, Citizenship and Social Class, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
1965, Class, Citizenship and Social Development, New York : Anchor Press.
1981, The Right to Welfare and Other Essays, London: Heineman Press.

Mathews, David, & Noelle McAfee
2000. Making Choices Together: The Power of Public Deliberation. Kettering, OH: Ruffolo Press

Macedo, Stephen
1990, Liberal Virtues: Citizenship, Virtue, and Community in Liberal Constitutionalism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
1995, “Liberal Civic Education and Religious Fundamentalism: The Case of God v. John Rawls? Ethics, 105(3): 468-496.

Mansbridge, Jane M.
1999, ”On the Idea That Participation Makes Better Citizens”. In Stephen L. Elkin and Edward Soltan eds. Citizen Competence and Democratic Institutions. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press, pp. 291-325

Mayer, Igor., and Jac Geurts.
1998. “Consensus Conferences as Participatory Policy Analysis. A Methodological Contribution to the Social Management of Technology”’. In Peter Wheale, René von Schomberg and Peter Glasner eds. The Social Management of Genetic Engineering. Brookfield, Vermont: Ashgate
Publishing Ltd Press. pp. 279-301

McCullagh, Karen
2003, “E-democracy: potential for Political Revolution?” International Journal of Law and Information Technology 11(2):149-161; doi:10.1093/ijlit/11.2.149
© 2003 by Oxford University Press, http://scholar.google.com/url?sa=U&q=http://www.oup.co.uk/inttec/hdb/Volume_11/Issue_02/pdf/110149.pdf, accessed 2005/11/14

Miller, David
1996, “Deliberative Democracy and Social Choice,” in David Held ed,
Prospects for Democracy. Oxford: Polity Press, pp.74-92

Mulgan, Geoff
1991, “Citizens and Responsibilities”, in Andrew 1991, pp37-49

Norris, Pippa
2000, Democratic Divide? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association in Washington, DC. http://ksghome.harvard.edu/~.pnorris.shorenstein.ksg/acrobat/apsa2000demdiv.pdf, accessed 2006/03/01.
2001, Digital Divide:Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Workwide. UK:Cambrifge University Press.

Negroponte, 1996,Digital living http://www.easysea.com/baike/nglpd-szhsc/index.htm, accessed 2006/03/01

Neuman, W. Russell
1991. The Future of Mass Audience. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.

Nye, Joseph S.
1999. ”Technology.Gov: Information Technology and Decmocratic Governance”, in Elaine Ciulla Kamarck, and Joseph S. Nye, Jr. Democracy.com? Governance in a Networked World. NH: Hollis Publishing Co. Press.

Oldfield, Adrian
1990, Citizenship and Community: Civic Republicanism and the Modern World. London: Routledge Press.

Parsons, Wayne
1995, ”Meso Analysis”, Public polic :an introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis, Brookfield, Vt. :Edward Elgar Pub. Press, pp.85-244.

Pateman, Carole
1970. Participation and Democratic Theory. New York: Cambridge
University Press. pp. 1-44 http://books.google.com/books?hl=zh-TW&lr=&id=7ZNiOo89Er4C&oi=fnd&pg=PP7&sig=x2PMCvsxWtsRr19ZhJTtF3JSSUU&dq=%22Pateman%22+%22Participation+and+Democratic+Theory%22+&prev=http://scholar.google.com/scholar%3Fq%3Dauthor:%2522Pateman%2522%2Bintitle:%2522Participation%2Band%2BDemocratic%2BTheory%2522%2B%26hl%3Dzh-TW%26lr%3D, accessed, 2005/11/05

Peter, B. Guy
1993, American Public Policy 3rd ed. New Jersey: Chatham House Pub. Press. http://newark.rutgers.edu/~ncpp/roundtable/Publishers.htm, accessed 2005/10/21

Perez, Oren
2002, Global Governance and Electronic Democracy: e-Politics as a Multidimensional Experience, http://insites.heinz.cmu.edu:8080/insites/events/past_events/conferences/democracy/abstract/perez.html/paper/perez.pdf, accessed 2005/08/02

M. Pomper, Gerald
2006, Ordinary Heroes and American Democracy, Yale University Press. http://www.rci.rutgers.edu/~gpomper/HeroesTableofContents.htm, accessed 2006/04/07.

Putnam, Robert
1993, Making Democracy Work:Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, Princeton University Press, Princetion. http://www.pupress.princeton.edu/einstein/book/7gPutnam.pdf, accessed 2005/11/07

Rawls, John
1971, A Theory of Justice, London:Oxford University Press.
1993, Political Liberalism, New York: Columbia University Press.
1999a, ”The Idea of Public Reason Revisited” Collected papers, edited by Samuel Freeman. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
1999b, The Law of People, Harvard University Press.

Raymond, M. Lee
2005. ”The UK Freedom of Information Act and Social Research” International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 8(1):pp.1~18

Rheingold, Howard.
1991 “Electronic Democracy.” Whole Earth Review, Summer, pp.4-13.
1993 “Slice of Life in My Virtual Coummunity,” in L. M. Harisim, ed. Global Networks. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, pp.57-80.

Renn, O. T., Webler and P. Wiedemann,
1996. “The Pursuit of Fair and Competent Citizen Participation”. In O. Renn, Weblerk and P. Wiedemann, eds. Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation.. Boston: Kluwer Academic Press. pp.339-367 http://books.google.com/books?id=i6osqwfcy3wC&pg=PR5&lpg=PR5&q=%22Renn%22+%22Fairness+and+Competence+in+Citizen+Participation:+...%22&vq=%22Renn%22+%22Fairness+and+Competence+in+Citizen+Participation:+...%22&dq=%22Renn%22+%22Fairness+and+Competence+in+Citizen+Participation:+...%22+&sig=laPJ6_Tciaq4dfjc05oPrS_byEA, accessed 2006/01/27

Rothenberger, Roger D.
2001, Beyond Plutocracy: True Democracy for America, http://www.beyondplutocracy.com/, accessed 2005/08/02

Rowe, Gene., and Lynn J. Frewer.
2000. “Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation”. Science, Technology & Human Value, 18(3) pp.341-360 http://sth.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/1/3, accessed 2006/02/07

Sandel, Michael
1983, Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. London: Cambridge University Press.
1996, Democracy’s Discontent:America in Search of a Public Philosophy, Cambridge:Harvard University Press.

Saunders, Peter
1993, “Citizenship in the liberal society”, In Turner, Bryan S. ed. Citizenship and Social Theory. London: Sage publication Press.

Schumpter, Joseph A.
1976,Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York : Harper & Row Press

Skinner, Quentin
1992, “On Justice, the Common Good and the Priority of Liberty”, in Mouffe, Chantal, Dimensions of Radical Democracy: Pluralism, Citizenship and Community, London: Routledge Press. pp. 211-224

So, Alvin Y.
1990, Social Change and Development, Newbury Park, California: Sage Pub. Press.

Steenhuis, Quinten.
2004 "The Deliberative Opinion Poll: Promises and Challenges". Carnegie Mellon University. Unpublished thesis. Available http://www.hss.cmu.edu/philosophy/programs/undergrad/logic_comp/Graduates/2004/steenhuis.pdf, accessed 2005/07/08.

Walzer, Michael
1995, Toward a Global Civil Society. Oxford: Berhahn Books Press. http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=22815334 ,accessed 2005/09/21.

Webler, Thomas. 1996. “Right-Discourse in Citizen Participation: An Evaluative Yardstick”. In O. Renn, Weblerk and P. Wiedemann, eds. Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation. Boston: Kluwer Academic. Press. . pp.35-77 http://scholar.google.com/url?sa=U&q=http://www.mosaikon.com/documents/Laurie%2520Canada%2520collective%2520action.pdf, accessed 2006/01/17.

Witschge, Tamara
2002, Online Deliberation: Possibilities of the Internet for Deliberative Democracy http://insites.heinz.cmu.edu:8080/insites/events/past_events/conferences/democracy/abstract/witschge.html/paper/witschge.pdf, accessed 2005/07/09.

Wilhelm, Anthony G.
2000. Democracy in the Digital Age: Challenges to Political Life in Cyberspace. London: Routledge Press.

Yang, Guobin
2003, “The Co-evolution of the Internet and Civil Society in China”. http://www2.hawaii.edu/~guobin/Yang_AS_03.pdf, accessed 2005/11/21.

Young, Iris Marion
1990, Justice and Politics of Difference, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. http://scholar.google.com/url?sa=U&q=http://inside.coe.edu/~jhoover/freedom/Young-Justiceexcerpts.pdf, accessed 2006/01/17.
2000, Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press http://users.ox.ac.uk/~oaces/conference/papers/Michael_Fleming.pdf,
accessed 2005/11/21.

Zittel, Thomas
2004.“Digital Parliaments and Electronic Democracy,” in Rachel K. Gibson, Andrea Rommele, and Stephen J. Ward. eds. Electronic Democracy: Mobolisation, Organisation, and Participation via New ICTs. London: Routedge Press, pp. 70-95.
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 戴豪君、廖書賢,2004,〈電子化民主法制規劃芻議〉,《研考雙月刊》,第28卷,第4期,頁78-88。
2. 譚家哲,1997,〈西方倫理之根源:古希臘與希臘〉,《哲學雜誌》,第21期,頁28-67。
3. 簡太郎,1995,〈戶政革新與便民服務自動化〉,《研考雙月刊》,第19卷,第4期,頁17-22。
4. 謝宗學,2003,〈網際民主與審議民主之實踐:資訊化社會的桃花源村?〉,《資訊社會研究》,第4期,頁87-139。
5. 蕭乃沂,2004a,〈公民關係管理與政策問題建構:以民意電子信箱為起點〉,《國家政策季刊》,第3卷,第1期,頁155-174。
6. 蕭乃沂,2001,〈電子化政府便民應用服務的評估架構〉,《研考雙月刊》,第25卷,第1期,頁75-81。
7. 蔡達智,2002,〈行政資訊公開之問題初探〉,《經社法制論叢》,第30期,頁141-166。
8. 盧鄂生、吳啟文,2001,〈電子認證與網路安全管理〉,《研考雙月刊》,第25卷,第1期,頁21-29。
9. 盧倩儀,2004,〈審議式超國家主義〉,《問題與研究》,第43卷,第6期,頁53-71。
10. 賴維堯,1995,〈新公共行政運動與黑堡宣言〉,《空大學訊》,第166期,頁56-59。
11. 劉久清,2004,〈網路民主與網路公民〉,《哲學與文化》,第31卷,第6期,頁63-80。
12. 熊瑞梅、黃毅志,1992,〈社會資本與小資本階級〉,《中國社會學刊》,第16期,頁107-138。
13. 楊朝祥,1999,〈邁向數位時代的智慧型政府〉,《研考雙月刊》,第23卷,第1期,頁3-9。
14. 陳銘祥,2004,〈政府在電子化民主發展過程的角色〉,《研考雙月刊》,第28卷,第5期,頁89-97。
15. 陳金貴,1992,〈公民參與的研究〉,《行政學報》,第24期,頁95-128。
 
系統版面圖檔 系統版面圖檔