臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

現今企業所處之環境變化快速，大幅所短了組織核心資源的壽命，企業已無長期的競爭優勢。所以一企業必須不斷地進行市場破壞，透過知識創新，提高創新能力(innovation capability)才能夠維繫其競爭優勢。然而創新必須依賴大量的知識基礎，而企業的知識來源來自於企業內部與外部，也因此企業吸收外部知識的吸收能力(absorptive capacity)與知識獲取(knowledge acquisition)顯然與企業的創新能力息息相關。
因此，本研究主要在探討知識獲取、吸收能力、與創新能力在製造業與金融業中所造成的影響。以天下雜誌所公佈1000大製造業與100大金融為母體，製造業有效問卷227，金融業135份，共計回收有效問卷362份，透過線性結構化方程式模型將知識獲取、吸收能力、與創新能力之間的關聯性影響進行實證分析。本研究透過競爭模式發展，完全中介模式、部份中介模式與直接模式，結果發現完全中介模式為最佳模式，並且發現吸收能力為知識獲取與創新能力的中介變項，知識獲取的效果，必須透過吸收能力的中介才會對於創新能力有顯著的影響。而吸收能力係對創新能力具顯著的正向影響。
本研究發現完全中介模式為兩產業的最佳模式，因此以完全中介模式為基底模式，利用多群體分析，發現吸收能力與創新能力的關係，會受到不同產業的調節。

This study investigates the roles of knowledge absorptive capacity, knowledge acquisition and innovation capability in finance and manufacture industries. Based on the sample from 1000 manufacture and 100 financial industries in Taiwan and 362 valid questionnaires, we use structure equation model to confirm the relationships among absorptive capacity, knowledge acquisition and innovation capability. The results indicate that the absorptive capacity is the mediation between knowledge acquisition and innovation capability. It also proves that knowledge acquisition has positive effect on absorptive capacity. Furthermore, the full mediated model is the best model in two kinds of industries in this paper,. Finally, we use multi-group approach and found industry is a moderator between absorptive capacity and innovation capability.

目錄
摘要......................................................I
Abstract................................................III
表目錄...................................................IV
表目錄...................................................IX
圖目錄...................................................XI
第一章 緒論..............................................1
1.1研究背景與動機.........................................1
1.2 研究目的..............................................2
1.3 研究流程..............................................3
第二章 文獻探討...........................................5
2.1吸收能力之定義.........................................5
2.1.1吸收能力...........................................5
2.1.2吸收能力的衡量....................................12
2.1.3結論..............................................17
2.2 知識獲取.............................................18
2.2.1知識獲取之定義....................................18
2.2.2知識獲取的衡量....................................19
2.2.3 結論.............................................22
2.3創新能力..............................................22
2.3.1創新能力之定義......................................22
2.3.2創新能力的衡量......................................25
2.3.3結論 ................................................32
2.4研究假設..............................................32
2.4.1吸收能力與創新能力..................................32
2.4.2知識獲取與創新能力..................................34
2.4.3知識獲取與吸收能力..................................35
2.4.4 吸收能力之中介效果.................................36
2.4.5 產業別之調節效果...................................36
2.5概念性架構............................................37
第三章 研究方法..........................................41
3.1研究架構..............................................41
3.2操作型定義與變數衡量..................................41
3.2.1吸收能力............................................42
3.2.2知識獲取............................................42
3.2.3創新能力............................................42
3.2.4個人變項............................................43
3.3研究對象..............................................43
3.4問卷預試與信效度分析..................................47
3.4.1系統性偏誤..........................................47
3.4.2信效度分析..........................................48
3.5資料分析方法..........................................50
第四章 資料分析..........................................53
4.1敘述性統計分析........................................53
4.2測量模型分析..........................................55
4.2.1信度分析............................................55
4.2.2驗證性因素分析模型..................................56
4.2.3二階驗證性因素分析..................................58
4.2.4建構信度（construct reliability）...................59
4.2.5收斂效度(Converge Reliability)......................59
4.2.6各構面之區辨效度分析(Discriminant validity).........60
4.3相關分析..............................................61
4.4結構化模型方程式......................................63
4.4.1競爭模型與模型配適度分析............................63
4.4.2研究假設檢定........................................65
第五章 結論與建議........................................75
5.1研究結論..............................................75
5.2研究貢獻..............................................76
5.3管理實務意涵..........................................78
5.4未來研究方向與研究限制................................81
參考文獻.................................................84
一、中文文獻.............................................84
二、英文文獻.............................................85
附錄一：本研究正式問卷...................................95

表目錄
表 2.1吸收能力的概念與相關議題研究彙整....................6
表 2.2 2002年後吸收能力相關研究..........................10
表 2.3吸收能力之彙整.....................................13
表 2.4創新能力衡量與分類.................................30
表 3.1製造業問卷發放對象.................................44
表 3.2金融業問卷發放對象.................................46
表 3.3各構面之信度分析...................................49
表 4.1受測資料表.........................................53
表 4.2各構面之平均數、標準差、偏勢與峰度.................54
表 4.3正式問卷構面Cronbach’s α值........................55
表 4.4各配適指標.........................................57
表 4.5二階驗證性因素分析各配適指標.......................59
表 4.6建構信度與收歛效度表...............................60
表 4.7區辨效度表.........................................61
表 4.8相關矩陣...........................................62
表 4.9競爭模式表.........................................64
表 4.10直接效果與間接效果................................65
表 4.11路徑檢定表........................................66
表 4.12製造業之相關矩陣..................................69
表 4.13金融業之相關矩陣..................................70
表 4.14製造業完全中介模式配適指標........................71
表 4.15金融業完全中介模式配適指標........................71
表 4.16不同產業別之路徑檢定表............................71
表 4.17結構恆等性檢定....................................73
表 4.18因素負荷量恆等檢定................................73
表 4.19潛在路徑參數檢定..................................74
表 5.1 研究假設與驗證結果彙整表..........................76

圖目錄
圖 1.1研究流程圖..........................................4
圖 2.1研究地圖...........................................40
圖 3.1 研究架構圖........................................41
圖 4.1研究架構路徑圖.....................................64
圖 4.2最適化模式之路徑圖.................................67

一、中文文獻
周子敬(2006)。結構方程模式(SEM)─精通LISEREL，全華科技圖書股份有限公司，台北。
許士軍(1975)。管理學，東華出版社。
許蒞彥(2003)。「善用組織智慧資本，建立企業知識創新文化」，中小企業展望與對策研討會，經濟部中小企業處，社團法人中華民國管理科學學會
蔡啟通（民90）。組織因素、組織成員整體創造性與組織創新之關係。管理學報。18(4)，527-566。
賴士保、王秉鈞、黃佑安（民86）。創新能力與新產品研發過程關係之研究。中華民國科技管理研討會論文集，90-99。






二、英文文獻
Abernathy, W. J. & Clark, K. B. (1985). Innovation: Mapping the Winds of Creative Destruction. Research Policy, 14(1), 3-22.
Adler, P. S. & Shenhar, A. (1990). Adapting Your Technological Base: The Organizational Challenge. Sloan Management Review, 32(1), 25-37.
Afuah, A. (1998). Innovation Management: Strategies, Implementation and Profits. N.Y: Oxford University Press.
Anderson, J. C. & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice:A review and recommended Two step approach. Psychological Bulletin,103(May): 411-423.
Becker, W., Peters, J. (2000). Technological opportunities, absorptive capacities and innovation. The Eighth International Joseph A. Schumpeter Society Conference Centre for Research in Innovation and Competition (CRIC), University Manchester.
Betz, F. (1993). Managing technology competing through new ventures.Innovation,and Corporate Research. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables. New York: Wiley.
Boynton, A. C., Zmud, R. W. & Jacobs, G. C. (1994). The influence of IT management practice on IT use in large organizations. MIS Quarterly, 18(3), 299-318.
Chin-Loy, C. (2003). Assessing the influence of organizational culture on knowledge management success. Unpublished D.B.A., Nova Southeastern University, United States -- Florida.
Christensen, J. F. (1995). Asset profiles for technological innovation. Research Policy, 24(5), 727-745.
Cockburn, I. M. & Henderson, R. M. (1998). Absorptive capacity, coauthoring behavior, and the organization of research in drug discovery. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 46(2), 157-182.
Cohen, W. M. & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective On Learning And Inno. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests. Psychometrika,16(3), 297-334.
Darroch, J. & McNaughton, R. (2003). Beyond market orientation: Knowledge management and the innovativeness of New Zealand firms. European Journal of Marketing, 37(3/4), 572-593.
David, U. & Jay, B. B. (1984). Perspectives in organizations: Resource dependence, efficiency, and population. Academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review (pre-1986), 9(000003), 471-481.
Diamantopoulos, A. ＆ Siguaw, J. A. (2000). Introducing LISREL:A Guide for the uninitiated. Thousnad Oaks:Sage.
Ding, L., Velicer W. & Harlow, L. (1995). Effect of estimation methods, number of indicators per factor and improper solutions on structural equation modeling fit indices. Structural Equation Modeling, 2, 119-143
Delong, D. (1997). Bulding the knowledge-based organzation : how culuture drives knowledge behaviors.Working paper. Boston: Ernst & Young''s Center for Business Innovation
Drucker, P. F. (1993). Post-Capitalist Society. New York: HarperBusiness.
Fiol, C. M. & Marjorie, A. L. (1985). Organizational learning. Academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review (pre-1986), 10(000004), 803-813.
Frans, A. J. V. d. B., Henk, W. V. & Michiel de, B. (1999). Coevolution of firm absorptive capacity and knowledge environment: Organizational forms and combinative capabilities. Organization Science, 10(5), 551-568.
Gerard, G., Shaker, A. Z., Kathleen, K. W. & Raihan, K. (2001). The effects of alliance portfolio characteristics and absorptive capacity on performance: A study of biotechnology firms. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 12(2), 205-226.
Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A. & Segars, A. H. (2001). Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 185-214.
Gray, C. (2006). Absorptive capacity, knowledge management and innovation in entrepreneurial small firms. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 12(6), 345-360.
Guan, J. & Ma, N. (2003). Innovative capability and export performance of Chinese firms. Technovation, 23(9), 737-747.
Haiyang, L. & Kwaku, A.-G. (2002). The adoption of agency business activity, product innovation, and performance in Chinese technology ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 23(6), 469-490.
Helena, Y.-R., Erkko, A. & Harry, J. S. (2001). Social capital, knowledge acquisitions, and knowledge exploitation in young technology-based firms. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6/7), 587-613.
Helleloid, D. S., B. (1994). Organizational Learning and a Firm’s Core Competence. Competence-Base Competition. NY: John Willey & Sons.
Henderson, R. M. & Clark, K. B. (1990). Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration Of Existing. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 9-30.
Hill, C. W. L. & Jones, G. R. (1998). Strategic management theory: an integrated approach. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Huber, G. P. (1991). Organizational learning: the contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science, 2(1), 88-115.
Hulow, H. F. (1959), "Learning Set and Error Factor Theory," in S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A Study of Science, New York: McGrawHill, 492-537.
Hurley, R. F. & Hult, G. T. M. (1998). Innovation, Market Orientation, and Organizational Learning: An Integration and Empirical Examination. Journal of Marketing, 62(3), 42-54.
Janine, N. & Sumantra, G. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266.
Jantunen, A. (2005). Knowledge-processing capabilities and innovative performance: an empirical study. European Journal of Innovation Management, 8(3), 336-349.
Jesus, P.-O. Javier, G.-B., & Jesus, G. (2006). Total quality management as a forerunner of business innovation capability. Technovation, 26(10), 1170-1185.
Jocelyn, G. & Kamal, S. (1998). International technology transfer and the technology gap. Journal of Development Economics, 55(2), 369-398.
Julien, P. A. Andriambeloson, E., & Ramangalahy, C. (2004). Networks, weak signals and technological innovations among SMEs in the land-based transportation equipment sector. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 16(4), 251-269.
Kastelli, I. Caloghirou, Y., & Ioannides, S. (2001). Cooperative R&D as a means for knowledge creation: Paper presented in MESIAS workshop,Budapest.
Kedia, B. L. & Bhagat, R. S. (1988). Cultural Constraints On Transfer Of Technology Across Natio. Academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review, 13(4), 559-571.
Keller, W. (1996). Absorptive capacity: On the creation and acquisition of technology in development. Journal of Development Economics, 49(1), 199-227.
Kim, L. (1998). Crisis construction and organizational learning: Capability building in catching-up at Hyundai Motor. Organization Science, 9(4), 506-521.
Kim, S.(2000). Assessment of item parcels in representing latent variables. Unpublish doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens.
Kline, R. B. (1998). Princeples and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
Lane, P. J. & Lubatkin, M. (1998). Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal, 19(5), 461-477.
Leonard, D. (1995). Wellspring of Knowledge : Building and sustaining the source of innovation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Lewin, A. Y., Long, C. P. & Carroll, T. N. (1999). The coevolution of new organizational forms. Organization Science, 10(5), 535-550.
Liao, S. H., Fei, W. C. & Chen, C. C. (2006). Knowledge sharing, knowledge absorptive capacity, and innovation capability: an empirical study in Taiwan knowledge intensive industries, Journal of Information Science, 33(3), 1-20
Liu, X. & White, R. S. (1997). The relative contributions of foreign technology and domestic inputs to innovation in Chinese manufacturing industries. Technovation, 17(3), 119-125.
Luo, Y. (1997). Partner selection and venturing success: The case of joint ventures with firms in the People''s Republic of China. Organization Science, 8(6), 648-662.
Mangematin, V. & Nesta, L. (1999). What kind of knowledge can a firm absorb? International Journal of Technology Management, 18(3,4), 149-172.
Mariano, N. & Pilar, Q. (2005). Absorptive capacity, technological opportunity, knowledge spillovers, and innovative effort. Technovation, 25(10), 1141-1157.
Michael, L. & Andrew, K. (2004). Prospects for developing absorptive capacity through internal information provision. Strategic Management Journal, 25(4), 331-345.
Minbaeva, D., Pedersen, T., Bjorkman, I., Fey, C. & Park, H. (2003). MNC knowledge transfer, subsidiary absorptive capacity, and HRM. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(6), 586-599.
Moorman, C. & Miner, A. S. (1998). Organizational improvisation and organizational memory. Academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 698-723.
Mowery, D. C. & Oxley, J. E. (1995). Inward technology transfer and competitiveness: The role of national innovation systems. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), 67-93.
Mowery, D. C. , Oxley, J. E. & Sliverman, B. S. (1996). Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 77-91.
Nicholls-Nixon. (1993). Absorptive capacity and technological sourcing: implications for the responsiveness of established firms. Purdue University.
Nonaka, I. a. T., H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company : How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation New York: Oxlord University Press.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory, 2nd edition, NY：McGraw-Hill.
Omar, A. E. S., Arvind, M., Sanjay, G. & Kerry, M. Y. (1999). IT-intensive value innovation in the electronic economy: Insights from Marshall industries. MIS Quarterly, 23(3), 305-335.
Patterson, M. L. (1998). From experience: Linking product innovation to business growth. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15(5), 390-402.
Pemberton, J. D. & Stonehouse, G. H. (2000). Organisational learning and knowledge assets - an essential partnership. The Learning Organization, 7(4), 184-194.
Petroni, A. & Panciroli, B. (2002). Innovation as a determinant of suppliers'' roles and performances: An empirical study in the food machinery industry. European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 8(3), 135-149.
Rastogi, P. N. (2002). Knowledge management and intellectual capital as a paradigm of value creation. Human Systems Management, 21(4), 229-240.
Schilling, M. A. (1998). Technological lockout: An integrative model of the economic and strategic factors driving technology success and failure. Academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 267-284.
Schnmpeter. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development: Harvard University Press: Boston,MA.
Schwab & D.P. (2005). Research Methods for Organizational Studies, (2nd ed.). Mahwah: NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Shenkar, O. & Li, J. (1999). Knowledge search in international cooperative ventures. Organization Science, 10(2), 134-143.
Sepctor, P. E. (2006). Method variance in organizational research, truth or urban legend? Organizational Research methods, 9: 221- 232
Stock, G. N., Greis, N.P. & Fischer, W.A. (2001). Absorptive capacity and new product development. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 12, 77–91.
Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 27-43.
Tang, H. K. (1999). An inventory of organizational innovativeness. Technovation, 19(1), 41-51.
Thomas, S. R. & Hubert, G. (1998). Technology development mode: a transaction cost conceptualization. Strategic Management Journal (1986-1998), 19(6), 515-531.
Thuc Anh, P. T., Christopher Baughn, C., Minh Hang, N. T. & Neupert, K. E. (2006). Knowledge acquisition from foreign parents in international joint ventures: An empirical study in Vietnam. International Business Review, 15(5), 463-487.
Tidd, J., Bessant, J. & Pavitt, K. (2001). Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change. N.Y: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Tripsas, M. (1997). Surviving radical technological change through dynamic capability: Evidence from the typesetter industry. Industrial and Corporate Change, 6(2), 341-377.
Verona, G. (1999). A resource-based view of product development. Academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 132-142.
Veugelers, R. (1997). Internal R&D expenditures and external technology sourcing. Research Policy, 26(3), 303-315
Yang, J., Rui, M. & Wang, J. (2006). Enhancing the firm''s innovation capability through knowledge management: A study of high technology firms in China. International Journal of Technology Management, 36(4), 305-317.
Yannis, C., Ioanna, K. & Aggelos, T. (2004). Internal capabilities and external knowledge sources: complements or substitutes for innovative performance? Technovation, 24(1), 29-39.
Zack, M. H. (1999). Developing a knowledge strategy. California Management Review, 41(3), 125-145.
Zahra, S. A. & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185-2003.