跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.83) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/12/09 14:12
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:薛雅寧
研究生(外文):Ya-Ning Hsueh
論文名稱:歐盟高等教育品質保證制度之研究
論文名稱(外文):A study on Quality Assurance in Higher Education of the European Union
指導教授:楊瑩楊瑩引用關係
指導教授(外文):Ying Chan
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:淡江大學
系所名稱:教育政策與領導研究所碩士班
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2007
畢業學年度:95
語文別:中文
論文頁數:229
中文關鍵詞:歐盟高等教育品質保證
外文關鍵詞:European UnionHigher EducationQuality Assurance
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:4
  • 點閱點閱:434
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:6
本研究主要係採用文件分析法探討歐盟高等教育品質保證制度。主要的研究目的包括:(一)瞭解歐盟的起源與體制運作發展;(二)探討歐盟高等教育品質保證機制建構之緣起、目標,與內容;(三)探討歐盟高等教育品質保證相關的政策、實施現況與問題;及(四)對歐盟高等教育品質保證制度進行分析,並對國內教育相關政策提供建言。
本研究之主要發現或結論有:
一、歐盟之產生乃源於西歐諸國於二次戰後階段性的整合發展轉變而成,成立之後透過會員國之陸續加入,組織逐漸擴大,其相關法規也因應修正。
二、歐盟高等教育發展政策,隨不同時期的發展需求而有階段上之差異,對高等教育的品質保證工作,可說是自1999年「波隆那宣言」簽署後才正式開展,最終以達到2010年建構完成「歐洲高等教育區域」(EHEA)為目標。
三、歐盟致力於建置「歐洲高等教育區域」,主要的動機是要在全球市場中增加其國際競爭力及吸引力,並透過「歐洲面向」的凝聚,及「知識歐洲」的模塑,吸引歐洲以外國家或民眾對歐洲的向心力。
四、以「波隆那宣言」為基礎,歐盟於2000年透過設置ENQA,致力於促進歐洲國家合作交流及促進會員國的專業發展。
五、歐盟的高等教育品質保證制度旨在建立一套高等教育品質能見度、透明性和包容性均能達理想之評鑑制度。
六、歐洲各國高等教育品質保證計畫的多元特性,有助強化各國間的互動,促進跨文化的理解,並凝聚歐洲各國對高等教育品質保證的意識。
七、目前歐洲各國在推動高等教育品質保證工作時所面臨的問題與挑戰,是以國家層面和機構層面為主。
This study mainly, via the method of document analysis and literature review, aims to explore the systems of quality assurance of higher education in the European Union. In so doing, the formation and development of the EU, the policies of the quality assurance, and responsive actions of the EU member states are analyzed in this study.
The main findings of this study include:
1. The European Union, formed originally by six countries in the Western Europe, has been gradually expanded by the joining of other countries in Europe, and its related rules or regulations have been revised according to the changing needs of its existing 27 member states.
2. The focus of higher education policies of the EU has been varied with different stages of its development. Policies concerning the quality assurance of higher education in the EU were initiated formally from the signing of the “Bologna Declaration” by 29 European Education Ministers in June 1999, which called for the creation of a “European Higher Education Area” (EHEA) by 2010.
3. The driving forces of establishing the EHEA is mainly from the increased concern of internationalization and globalization, as well as that of the international competitiveness of Europe at global level. By strengthening the “European dimension” of activities of its member states, the ambitious goal of the EU is to become the most competitive and dynamic knowledge-based economy in the world, i.e., by creating a “Europe of knowledge”, to promote the attractiveness of the EHEA.
4. Based on the agreement of the “Bologna Process”, which listed a range of actions to be undertaken by signatory states, the European Commission supported the establishment of ENQA.. ENQA, becoming operational in 2000, is membership organizations whose mission is to promote cooperation, exchange best practices and stimulate the professional development of its members and their personnel. It also plays a role as the advocate of the quality assurance community in its relations with national governments, institutions and their organizations and the European Commission.
5. The policies of quality assurance of higher education in the EU are, by integrating
different quality assurance mechanisms of different states into a single European
framework of qualifications, mainly aiming to develop a more transparent, visible,
and inclusive system.
6. One of the distinctive characteristic of European quality assurance system is its diversified national nature. Based on the common European framework, each member state, with a high degree of self-regulation, committed to working together for establishing its own transparent structure of higher education with a high degree of mobility, compatibility, and comparability.
7. Due to the variation in higher education systems, problems and challenges faced by European countries in promoting quality assurance of higher education are mainly at national and institutional levels.
目 次
第一章 緒論...............................................1
第一節 研究背景與動機...................................1
第二節 研究目的.........................................5
第三節 研究方法、步驟與架構.............................6
第四節 名詞釋義與研究範圍...............................8
第五節 章節安排.........................................9
第二章 文獻探討..........................................11
第一節 歐盟高等教育品質保證制度概念之內涵..............11
第二節 歐盟的沿革、現況及體制運作發展..................26
第三節 歐盟高等教育品質保證制度之既有相關文獻分析......41
第三章 歐盟高等教育品質保證制度之背景、歷史沿革、與會員國回 應之策略..........................................53
第一節 歐盟高等教育品質保證制度建構之背景..............53
第二節 歐盟高等教育品質保證制度之歷史沿革..............55
第三節 歐盟會員國回應之策略............................73
第四章 歐盟高等教育品質保證制度推動方案..................77
第一節 歐盟高等教育品質保證制度之相關法規..............77
第二節 歐盟高等教育品質保證制度之負責單位與機構........80
第三節 歐盟高等教育品質保證相關方案....................86
第四節 歐盟實施高等教育品質保證制度面臨的挑戰.........106
第五章 歐洲各國執行「波隆那過程」之情形.................111
第一節 「波隆那過程」簽署國2003年執行情況之國家報告分析111
第二節 2005年「波隆那過程」簽署國國家報告分析.........140
第三節 2003年與2005年「波隆那過程」簽署國國家報告分析與
比較...........................................185
第六章 結論與建議.......................................199
第一節 結論...........................................199
第二節 建議...........................................204
參考文獻................................................208

表 次
表2-1 歐洲高等教育區域品質保證的標準與指引..............22
表2-3 歐盟建構的歷史沿革................................30
表2-4 會員國加入歐盟時間表..............................34
表2-5 歐盟執委會委員及所屬職權..........................35
表2-6 歐盟執委會二十六個總署所屬職權....................36
表2-7 歐盟各會員國在2004年選出之歐洲議會議員人數分......39
表2-8 歐盟歐洲法院成員名單..............................40
表3-1 歐盟高等教育政策的歷史發展........................58
表3-2 歐盟高等教育品質保證制度發展之歷史沿革............73
表3-3 歐盟各會員國成立國家性評鑑機構時間................74
表4-1 執委會教育與文化總署之組織架構....................81
表4-2 ENQA會員機構所屬國別及評鑑模式....................82
表4-3 跨國評鑑計畫(TEEP)Ⅰ學程評鑑學校及學門資料表......87
表5-1 波蘭評鑑結果.....................................148
表5-2 2003與2005年波隆那過程簽署國國家報告分析.........186

圖 次
圖1-1 研究架構............................................7
圖2-1 品質保證循環.......................................13
圖2-3 標竿化的步驟.......................................17
圖2-4 歐洲聯盟:三個支柱及負責項目.......................31

附 錄 次
附錄一 國內有關<品質保證制度>之期刊、論文...............218
附錄二 國內有關<品質保證制度>之博碩士論文...............219
附錄三 國外有關<品質保證制度>之期刊論文.................220
附錄四 國外有關<品質保證制度>之專書.....................221
附錄五 品質文化計畫(QCP)第一階段實施對象............... 222
附錄六 品質文化計畫(QCP)第二階段實施對象................223
附錄七 品質文化計畫(QCP)第三階段實施對象................224
附錄八 中英文名詞對照表(按項目排列).....................225
附錄九 英文簡稱與全銜的對照表(按大小排列).............. 229
參考文獻
中文部分
丁元亨(2002)。歐洲整合與歐盟語言政策。出版社:行政院客家委員會。
王如哲(2004,12月)。高等教育品質管理機制之國際經驗。發表於國立暨南國際大學主辦之「第6屆海峽兩岸高等教育研討會-高等教育品質管理機制」研討會論文集(頁15-25),南投。
王如哲(2005)。高等教育品質管理機制之國際經驗。台灣教育,632,22-25。
王保進(2003)。高等教育品質的理念與實際。台灣教育,619,38-49。
王保進(2005,4月)。波隆那(Bologna )宣言後歐洲國家高等教育品質機制之發展。發表於淡江大學高等教育研究與評鑑中心主辦之「大學評鑑、進退場機制與提升國際競爭力」研討會論文集(頁Ⅱ1-35),台北。
翁福元、李曉蓉(2004,12月)。歐洲高等教育品質確保之現況與發展及其對我國之啟示。發表於國立暨南國際大學主辦之「第6屆海峽兩岸高等教育研討會-高等教育品質管理機制」研討會論文集(頁27-36),南投:埔里。
張亞中(1998)。歐洲統合:政府間主義與超國家主義的互動。台北:揚智。
張鈿富(2002)。加入WTO對台灣教育之衝擊。教育研究月刊,95,89-94。
張福昌(2002)。邁向『歐洲聯盟』之路。台北:三民書局。
許 仟(1999)。歐洲文化與歐洲聯盟文化政策。台北:樂學。
郭秀華(1997)。歐洲聯盟高等教育政策發展之研究。淡江大學歐洲研究所碩士論文。全國博碩士論文資訊網,85TKU00481003。
陳 勁(1999)。歐洲聯盟之整合與體制運作。台北:五南。
陳 勁(2002)。歐盟外交政策與對外關係。台北:五南。
黃彥蓉(2003)。歐洲聯盟語言教育計畫之研究。國立暨南國際大學比較教育研究所碩士論文。全國博碩士論文資訊網,91NCNU0578015。
楊國賜(2003)。提昇大學教育品質增進國際競爭力。教育資料與研究,54,75-92。
楊 瑩(2005)。高等教育的品質保證。台灣教育,632,13-20。
楊 瑩、楊國賜、張倍禎(2006,3月)。歐盟高等教育品質保證機制之檢視。發表於淡江大學高等教育研究與評鑑中心暨台灣高等教育學會共同主辦「大學分類、評比與品質保證」研討會論文集(頁Ⅲ1-53),台北淡水:淡江大學覺生國際會議廳。
楊 瑩(2006a)。英國高等教育研究評鑑改革新趨勢。評鑑雙月刊,3,47-50。
楊 瑩(2006b,6月)。歐盟高等教育評鑑機制之形成與建置。發表於財團法人高等教育評鑑中心基金會主辦「2006年邁向卓越高等教育評鑑國際學術研討會」研討會論文集。台北市:政大公企中心。
鄭勝耀(2004)。荷蘭高等教育改革及其對台灣的啟示。發表於中華民國比較教育學會主辦之「高等教育品質管理與國際競爭力」研討會論文集(頁115-129),台北。
賴昀締(2005)。歐洲聯盟高等教育制度整合之研究。淡江大學歐洲研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
蘇錦麗(1997)。高等教育評鑑理論與實際。台北:五南圖書出版公司。
駐比利時代表處文化組(2005)。柏林高等教育大會-全心實踐波隆那過程。2005年9月30號。擷取自駐比利時代表處文化組網站:
http://www.edu.tw/EDU_WEB/EDU_MGT/BICER/EDUIANG001/belgium/eu-news8-berlin-ch.htm
駐比利時代表處文化組(2005)。柏根高等教育大會。2005年9月30號。擷取自駐比利時代表處文化組網站:http://www.edu.tw/EDU_WEB/EDU_MGT/BICER/EDUIANG001/belgium/eu-news14-postdr-ch.htm#bergen
駐比利時代表處文化組(2005)。比利時的高等教育改革獲得讚賞。2005年9月30號。擷取自駐比利時代表處文化組網站:
http://www.edu.tw/EDU_WEB/EDU_MGT/BICER/EDUIANG001/ belgium/be-news-31052005-ch.htm
駐比利時台北代表處文化組( 2005 )。歐盟文教簡輯,第十三期。

西文部分
Barnett, R.(1992). Improving higher education- Total quality care. Milton Keynes: The Society Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
BFUG (2004). Work programme 2003-2005 for the Bologna Follow-up Group. Brussels: BFUG.
Brennan, J.; de Vies, P. & Williams, R.(Eds) (1997). Standards and quality in higher education. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers Ltd.
Council Decision 819/95/EC of the EP and of the Council of 14.3.95 establishing the Community action programme “Socrates”, 1995.
Council Decision 253/2000/EC of the EP and of the Council of 24.1.00 establishing the Community action programme in the field of education “Socrates”, 2000.
Campbell, C., & van der Wender, M. (2000). Quality and recognition in higher education: The cross-border challenge. Paris: OECD.
Van Damme, D. (2000). Internationalization and quality assurance: Toward Worldwide accreditation, European Journal Education Law and Policy, 4, 1-20.
Van Damme. D.; Hijden. P. V. Der; Campbell. C.(2004). International quality assurance and recognition of qualifications in higher education: Europe. In OECD(Ed). Quality and recognition in higher education: The cross-border challenge. Pairs: OECD, 76-104.
Dittrich, K. (2004). From Bologna to the Bologna Declaration: A Bologna experience at the grassroots. Netherlands: NVAO.
Elas Hackl. (2001). The Intrusion and Expansion of community policies in higher education, Higher Education Management, 13(3), 101.
ENQA (2001a). Follow-up on the Bologna declaration: A European quality assurance. Helsinki: ENQA.
ENQA (2001b). Quality assurance implications of new forms of higher education. Helsinki: ENQA.
ENQA (2003a).Evaluation of European Higher Education: A Status Report, Prepared for the quality assurance for European higher education. Helsinki, Finland:ENQA.
ENQA (2003b). Transnational evaluation of four veterinary programmes. Helsinki: ENQA.
ENQA(2003c). Transnational European evaluation project five history programmes. Helsinki: ENQA.
ENQA (2004). Transnational European evaluation project: Methodological reflections. Helsinki: ENQA.
ENQA (2005a). Standards and guidelines for quality assurance in the European higher education area. Helsinki, Finland: ENQA.
ENQA (2005b). Past Project, Details- Transnational European Evaluation Project II. Retrieved July 11, 2006, from http://www.enqa.eu/projectitem.lasso?id=34837&cont=pastprojDetail
ENQA (2006a). Candidate Members. Retrieved July 11, 2006, from http://www.enqa.eu/candidates.lasso
ENQA (2006b). About ENQA. Retrieved July 11, 2006, from http://www.enqa.net/agencies.lasso
ENQA (2006c). Follow-up on the Bologna declaration: a European quality assurance system. Retrieved July 11, 2006, from http://www.enqa.net/agencies.lasso
ENQA (2006d). Programme report-Transnational European evaluation project (TEEP II). Retrieved July 11, 2006, from http://www.enqa.eu/files/EMLE%20Programme%20report.pdf
European Parliament (2003). Realizing the European Higher Education Area: Berlin Conference of European Higher Education Ministers, European Education, 36(3), 28-35.
Evaluation of European Higher Education: A Status Report, Prepared for the European Commission by the Centre Quality Assurance and Evaluation of Higher Education, Denmark in cooperation with Committee’ National d’Evaluation, September 1998.
EU (1992). The Maastricht Treaty - Finalact and Declarations. Retrieved March 11, 2006, from http://www.eurotreaties.com/maastrichtfinalact.pdf
EU (1997). Treaty of Amsterdam Amending The Treaty on European Union: The Treaties Establishing The European Communities and Related Acts. Retrieved March 11, 2006, from http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex/en/treaties/dat/11997D/htm/11997D.html
EU (2004). Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe. Retrieved March 11, 2006, from http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2004:310:SOM:EN:HTML
EU (2005a). SCADPlus: The Single EuropeanAct. Retrieved November 20, 2005, from http://europa.eu.int/scadplus/treaties/singlect_en.htm
EU (2005b). SCADPlus: Treaty of Masstrichton European Union. Retrieved November 20, 2005, from http://europa.eu.int/scadplus/treaties/masstricht_en.htm
EU (2005c). Treaty of Maastricht on European Union. Retrieved November 20, 2005, from http://www.europa.eu.int/scadplus/treaties/maastricht_en.htm
EU (2005d). The European Union at a glance: The History of the European Union. Retrieved November 20, 2005, from http://europa.eu.int/abc/history/index_en.htm
EU (2005e). Enlargement. Retrieved November 20, 2005, from http://www.europa.eu.int/abc/12lessons/index3_en.htm.
EU (2005f). European Union Member States. Retrieved November 20, 2005, from file://C:DOCUME~1/OwnerLOCALS~1Temp61KJ651S.htm
EU (2005g).European Union Commissioners. Retrieved November 20, 2005, from http://europa.eu.int/comm/commission_barroso/index_en.htm
EU (2005h). Europe in 12 lessons: How does the Union work? Retrieved November 20, 2005, from http://www.europa.eu.int/abc/12lessons/index4_en.htm.
EU (2005i). The Court of Justice of the European Communities. Retrieved November 20, 2005, from http://curia.eu.int/en/instit/presentationfr/index_cje.htm
EU (2006a). What is Socrates/Erasmus? Retrieved February 11, 2006 http://europa.eu.int/comm/education/programmes/socrates/erasmus/what_en.html
EU (2006b). ECTS USER’S GUIDE: European Credit Transfer and Transfer and Accumulation System and the Diploma Supplement. Retrieved November 20, 2005, from http://europa.eu.int/comm/education/programmes/socrates/ects/doc/guide_en.pdf
EU (2006c). Guide to programmes and actions. Retrieved February 11, 2006, from
http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/education_culture/publ/pdf/guide-eac/2003_en.pdf
EUA (2001). EUA’s quality culture project 2002-2003: A Socrates-funded project. Brussels: European University Association.
EUA (2006a). Quality Culture Project. Retrieved July 11, 2006, from http://www.eua.be/eua/en/projects_quality.jspx
EUA (2006b). Developing an Internal Quality Culture in European Universities: Report on the Quality Culture Project (2002-2003). Retrieved July 11, 2006, from http://www.eua.be/eua/jsp/en/upload/QC1_full.1111487662479.pdf
EUA (2006c). Developing an Internal Quality Culture in European Universities: Report on the Quality Culture Project Round II (2004). Retrieved July 11, 2006, from http://www.eua.be/eua/jsp/en/upload/QCII%20Report%2030.03.05.1115967574238.pdf
EUA (2006d). Quality culture project round Ⅲ (2005). Retrieved July 11, 2006, from http://www.eua.be/eua/en/quality_culture_roundIII.jspx
EuroStat (2005). Retrieved November 2, 2005, from:http://epp.eurostat.cec.eu.int/portal/page?_pageid=1090,30070682,1090_33076576&_dad=portal&_schema=PORTAL
Field, J.(1998). European dimensions: Education, training and the European Union. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers Ltd.
Green, D.(1994). What is Quality in Higher Education? Buckingham: Open University Press. 101-111.
Haug, G. & Taugh, C. (2001).Trends in learning structures in higher education(Ⅱ): Follow report prepared for the Salamanca and Prague conferences of March/May. Helsinki: Finish National Board of Education.
Huitema, D.; Jeliazkova, M. & Westerheijden, Don F.(2002). Phases, levels and circles in policy development: the cases of higher education and environmental quality assurance. Higher Education Policy, 15, 197-215.
Jeliazkova, M. & Westerheijden, Don F. (2002). Systemic adaptation to a changing environment: Towards a next generation of quality assurance models. Higher Education, 44, 433-448.
Kells, H. R. (1995): Self-study processes: A guide to self-evaluation in higher
education, 4th edition. Phoenix, Arizona: Oryx Press.
Moschona, A. (1998). Education and Training in the European Union. Aldershot: A shgate, 145.
National Report (2003a). Austria State of Implementation of the Bologna Objectives. Retrieved October 20, 2005, from
http://www.bologna-bergen2005.no/Docs/Netherlands/NETHERLANDS.PDF
National Report (2003b). Realizing the goals of the Bologna Declaration in Germany. Retrieved October 20, 2005, from http://www.bologna-bergen2005.no/EN/national_impl/Countries/GERMANY.HTM
National Report (2003c). Introduction – Basic information on the Czech higher education system. Retrieved October 20, 2005, from http://www.bologna-bergen2005.no/Docs/Czech/CZECH_REPUBLIC.PDF
National Report (2003d). Introduction – Basic information on the Slovak Higher Education System. Retrieved October 20, 2005, from
http://www.bologna-bergen2005.no/Docs/Slovakia/SLOVAK_REPUBLIC.PDF
National Report (2003e). Implementation of Bologna Declaration in Estoniain in 1999-2003. Retrieved October 20, 2005, from http://www.bologna-bergen2005.no/Docs/Estonia/ESTONIA.PDF
National Report (2003f). Implementation of the Bologna Objectives: Country Report Luxembourg. Retrieved October 20, 2005, from http://www.bologna-bergen2005.no/Docs/Luxembourg/LUXEMBOURG.PDF
National Report (2003g). Country report of the Netherlands: achievements so far relating to the goals mentioned in the Bologna declaration and in the Prague communiqué. Retrieved October 20, 2005, from http://www.bologna-bergen2005.no/Docs/Netherlands/NETHERLANDS.PDF
National Report (2003h).UK National Report on the Implementation of the Bologna Process. Retrieved October 20, 2005, from http://www.bologna-bergen2005.no/Docs/UK/UK.PDF
National Report (2003i). Report on the Finnish implementation of the Bologna Declaration and the Prague Communiqué. Retrieved October 20, 2005, from http://www.bologna-bergen2005.no/Docs/Finland/FINLAND.PDF
National Report(2003j). Report on the Swedish follow-up of the Bologna Declaration and the Prague Communiqué. Retrieved October 20, 2005, from http://www.bologna-bergen2005.no/Docs/Sweden/SWEDEN.PDF
National Report (2003k). Implementation of The Bologna Process :Country Report Greece. Retrieved October 20, 2005, from http://www.bologna-bergen2005.no/Docs/Greece/GREECE.PDF
National Report (2005a). Bologna process: AUSTRIA. Retrieved October 20, 2005, from http://www.bologna-bergen2005.no/EN/national_impl/00_Nat-rep-05/National_Reports-Austria_050103.pdf
National Report (2005b). Bologna process: Czech. Retrieved October 20, 2005, from http://www.bologna-bergen2005.no/EN/national_impl/00_Nat-rep-05/National_Reports-Czech_Republic_050114.pdf
National Report (2005c). Bologna process: Poland. Retrieved October 20, 2005, from http://www.bologna-bergen2005.no/EN/national_impl/00_Nat-rep-05/National_Reports-Poland_050114.pdf
National Report (2005d). Bologna process: Slovak. Retrieved October 20, 2005, from http://www.bologna-bergen2005.no/Docs/Slovakia/SLOVAK_REPUBLIC.PD
National Report(2005e). Bologna process: Slovenia. Retrieved October 20, 2005, from http://www.bologna-bergen2005.no/EN/national_impl/00_Nat-rep-05/National_Reports-Slovenia_050114.pdf
National Report(2005f). Bologna process: Hungary. Retrieved October 20, 2005, from http://www.bologna-bergen2005.no/EN/national_impl/00_Nat-rep-05/National_Reports-Hungary_050111.pdf
National Report (2005g). Bologna process: Latvia. Retrieved October 20, 2005, from http://www.bologna-bergen2005.no/EN/national_impl/00_Nat-rep-05/National_Reports-Latvia_050106.pdf
National Report (2005h). Bologna process: Lithuania. Retrieved October 20, 2005, from http://www.bologna-bergen2005.no/EN/national_impl/00_Nat-rep-05/National_Reports-Lithuania_050114.pdf
National Report(2005i). Bologna process: Belgium. Retrieved October 20, 2005, from http://www.bologna-bergen2005.no/EN/national_impl/00_Nat-rep-05/National_reports-Belgium_Flemish_050121.pdf
National Report(2005j). Bologna process: France. Retrieved October 20, 2005, from http://www.bologna-bergen2005.no/EN/national_impl/00_Nat-rep-05/National_Reports-France_050125.pdf
National Report (2005k). Bologna process: Ireland. Retrieved October 20, 2005, from http://www.bologna-bergen2005.no/EN/national_impl/00_Nat-rep-05/National_Reports-Ireland_050120.pdf
National Report (2005l). Bologna process: Denmark. Retrieved October 20, 2005, from http://www.bologna-bergen2005.no/EN/national_impl/00_Nat-rep-05/National_Reports-Denmark_050222.pdf
National Report (2005m). Bologna process: Italy. Retrieved October 20, 2005, from http://www.bologna-bergen2005.no/EN/national_impl/00_Nat-rep-05/National_Reports-Italy_050127.pdf
National Report (2005n). Bologna process: Portugal. Retrieved October 20, 2005, from http://www.bologna-bergen2005.no/EN/national_impl/00_Nat-rep-05/National_Reports-Portugal_050114.pdf
National Report (2005o). Bologna process: Spain. Retrieved October 20, 2005, from http://www.bologna-bergen2005.no/EN/national_impl/00_Nat-rep-05/National_Reports-Spain_050114.pdf
National Report (2005p). Bologna process: Cyprus. Retrieved October 20, 2005, from http://www.bologna-bergen2005.no/EN/national_impl/00_Nat-rep-05/National_Reports-Cyprus_050112.pdf
National Report (2005q). Bologna process: Malta. Retrieved October 20, 2005, from http://www.bologna-bergen2005.no/EN/national_impl/00_Nat-rep-05/National_Reports-Malta_050113.pdf
Realizing the European Higher Education Area. Communiqué of the conference of Ministers response for higher education in Berlin[Berlin Communiqué]. Berlin, September, ninteen,2003.
Schwarz, S. & Westerheijden, D.F. (Eds.) (2004). Accreditation and evaluation in the European Higher Education Area. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Sebkova, H. (2002). Accreditation and quality assurance in Europe. Higher Education in Europe, 27(3), 239-247.
Segers, M.; Dochy, F. (1996). Quality assurance in higher education: Theoretical considerations and empirical evidence. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 22 (2), 115-137.
Tavenas, F. (2003). Quality assurance: A reference system for indicators and evaluation procedures. Brussels: European University Association.
The European Higher Education Area - Achieving the Goals. (2005). Communiqué of the Conference of European Ministers Responsible for Higher Education, Bergen, 19-20 May 2005. Retrieved October 20, 2005, from http://www.bologna-bergen2005.no/Docs/00-Main_doc/050520_Bergen_Communique.pdf
Woodhouse, D.(1999). Quality and quality assurance. In OECD (Ed). Quality and internationalization in higher education. Paris: OECD.
Towards the European Higher Education Area. Communiqué of the meeting of European Ministers in charge of Higher Education [Prague Communiqué]. Prague, May, Nineteen, 2001.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 蔡茂寅,〈論中央與地方權限劃分問題〉,月旦法學,第93卷,頁36-39。
2. 許登芳,〈新財政收支劃分法對地方財政自主性的影響:實證分析觀點〉,高雄:美和技術學院學報,19期,頁160-173。
3. 林新沛(2005),標準化迴歸係數的正確解釋,中山管理評論, 13(2), 533-548。
4. 魯炳炎,2003,〈中央與地方財政關係-我國地方政府觀點之分析〉,經社法制論叢,31期,頁160-163。
5. 趙永茂,1997,〈地方政府組織設計與組織重組問題之探討-兼論台灣地方政府組織重組問題〉,政治科學論叢,第8期,頁183-211。
6. 趙永茂,1996,〈行政區劃對地方自治的影響〉,國家政策雙周刊,149期,頁5-7。
7. 許宗力,1995,〈中央與地方人事權的分際〉,月旦法學雜誌,第一期,頁16-22。
8. 紀俊臣,2003(A),〈行政區劃法制建構與地方自治〉,月旦法學雜誌,第93期,頁40-56。
9. 何金銘,陳淑玲,童冠燁(2006),從人力資本與勞動市場區隔觀點探討非自願離職者再就業的決定因素:洛基對數線性分析,管理學報,23(1),61-75。
10. 謝嘉梁,1996,〈當前鄉鎮市自治面臨的困難與解決之道〉,國家政策雙周刊,149期,頁8-9。
11. 紀俊臣,2002,〈中央與地方夥伴關係之建構與推展〉,考銓季刊,32期,頁22-34。
12. 賴宗裕、蘇儀雯,2000,〈財政收支劃分法、地方財政課題與修法內容之探討〉,人與地,203、204期,頁74-95。
13. 蔡良文,2001,〈我國地方政府人事權之演變與發展〉,中國地方自治,第54期,第3卷,頁4-31。
14. 紀俊臣、李長晏,2001,〈精省與新地方政府機制效能之評估〉,中國地方自治,54卷第8期,頁14-17。
15. 紀俊臣,1995,〈自治法制化後地方人事行政權之運作〉,考銓季刊,第2期,頁48-55。