跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.200.94.150) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/10/16 15:00
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:李祐誠
研究生(外文):Yu-Cheng Lee
論文名稱:汽車銷售人員離職傾向之實證研究
論文名稱(外文):The Study on Turnover Intentions of Salespeople in Chinese Automobile Retail Business
指導教授:李伯謙李伯謙引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:元智大學
系所名稱:企業管理學系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2007
畢業學年度:95
語文別:英文
論文頁數:53
中文關鍵詞:離職傾向角色衝突角色模糊自我效能資深員工支持
外文關鍵詞:Turnover intentionsRole conflictRole ambiguitySelf-efficacySupport of senior colleagues
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:245
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
Salespeople who occupy a boundary role position tend to face various kinds of problems, including role conflict, role ambiguity, and a sense of self-deficiency, which in turn may result in salesperson’s turnover intentions. It is doubted that previous findings on salesperson turnover obtained from Western countries could be generalized to the Asian sales contexts. Further, there are few studies of this area conducted in Chinese sales setting.
The principal objective of this research investigates the effects of select factors on salesperson turnover intentions. Thus, this study designs a questionnaire and collects 313 valid samples to test the research model. This research uses AMOS 5.0 to estimate the structure model. As the result, the finding indicates that support of senior colleagues and self-efficacy has negative effects on role conflict and role ambiguity. Further, role conflict and role ambiguity are positively related to turnover intentions. Finally, this study provides research findings and discusses the empirical results according to the research model. Finally, managerial implication and suggestions for future research are advanced.
Salespeople who occupy a boundary role position tend to face various kinds of problems, including role conflict, role ambiguity, and a sense of self-deficiency, which in turn may result in salesperson’s turnover intentions. It is doubted that previous findings on salesperson turnover obtained from Western countries could be generalized to the Asian sales contexts. Further, there are few studies of this area conducted in Chinese sales setting.
The principal objective of this research investigates the effects of select factors on salesperson turnover intentions. Thus, this study designs a questionnaire and collects 313 valid samples to test the research model. This research uses AMOS 5.0 to estimate the structure model. As the result, the finding indicates that support of senior colleagues and self-efficacy has negative effects on role conflict and role ambiguity. Further, role conflict and role ambiguity are positively related to turnover intentions. Finally, this study provides research findings and discusses the empirical results according to the research model. Finally, managerial implication and suggestions for future research are advanced.
ABSTRACT I
Table of Contents II
List of Tables IV
List of Figures V
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
1.1 Research Background and Motivations 1
1.2 Research Purpose 2
1.3 Research Procedure 3
Chapter 2 Literature Review 4
2.1 Turnover Intentions 4
2.2 Self-efficacy 5
2.2.1 The Definition of Self-efficacy 6
2.2.2 The Resources and Outcomes of Self-Efficacy 6
2.2.3 The Dimensions of Self-Efficacy 8
2.3 Role Perception 9
2.3.1 Role Conflict 9
2.3.1.1 The Definition of Role Conflict 9
2.3.1.2 The Influence of Role Conflict 10
2.3.2 Role Ambiguity 11
2.3.2.1 The Definition of Role Ambiguity 11
2.3.2.2 The Influence of Role Ambiguity 12
Chapter 3 Research Framework and Hypotheses 15
3.1 Research Model 15
3.1.1 Support of Senior Colleagues 16
3.1.2 Self-efficacy 16
3.1.3 Role Conflict 16
3.1.4 Role Ambiguity 17
3.1.5 Turnover Intentions 17
3.2 Research Hypothesis Development 17
3.2.1 Self-efficacy and Role Perceptions 17
3.2.2 Support of Senior Colleagues and Role Perceptions 19
3.2.3 Role Perceptions and Turnover Intentions 20
Chapter 4 Research Methodology 22
4.1 Instrument Design and Measures 22
4.1.1 Instrument Design 22
4.1.2 Measures 22
4.2 Data Collection and Sample 24
4.3 Analysis Method 25
4.3.1 Descriptive Statistics 25
4.3.2 Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) 25
4.3.3 Reliability Test (α) 26
4.3.4 Correlation Analysis 26
4.3.5 Structural Equation Model (SEM) 26
Chapter 5 Data Analysis and Result Discussion 28
5.1 Descriptive Statistics 28
5.2 Items Selection and Reliability 29
5.3 Correlation Analysis and Average Variance Extracted (AVE) 32
5.4 Structural Equation Model (SEM) 34
5.4.1 Measurement Model 34
5.4.2 The Structural Model 35
5.4.3 Hypothesis Testing 37
Chapter 6 Conclusions and Suggestions 39
6.1 Discussion 39
6.1.1 The Effect of Self-Efficacy on Role Perceptions 39
6.1.2 The Effect of Support of Senior Colleagues on Role Perceptions 40
6.1.3 The Effect of Role Perceptions on Turnover Intentions 40
6.2 Managerial Implications 41
6.3 Limitations 42
6.4 Direction for Future Research 42
References 44
Appendix 1-- Questionnaire 51
1.Alfonso, Sousa-Poza ; Henneberger, Fred. (2004). Analyzing Job Mobility with Job Turnover Intentions: An International Comparative Study. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 38 Issue 1, p113-136
2.Alexander, J. A., Bloom, J. R., & Nuchols, B. A. (1994). Nursing turnover and hospital efficiency: An organization-level analysis. Industrial Relations, 33, 505–520.
3.Ashford, S.J., & Taylor, M.S. (1990). Adaptation to Work transitions:An integrative approach . In G.R. Ferris & K.M. Rowland (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resource management (Vol.8, 1-39).Greenwich, CT:JAL Press.
4.Axtell, C. M.. Maillis, S., & Yearta. S. K. (1997). Predicting immediate and longer-term transfer of training. Personnel Review. 26. 201-213.
5.Banduea, A. (1977), “Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.” Psychological Review, 14, pp.191-215.
6.Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122-147.
7.Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, N. Y.: Prentice-Hall.
8.Bandura, A. (1989a), “Regulation of Cognitive Processes through Perceived Self-Efficacy,” Developmental Psychology, September 1989. pp 729-35.
9.Bandura, Albert (1997), Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control, New York: Freeman.
10.Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94.
11.Barling, J. and Beattie, R. (1983). ''Self-efficacy beliefs and sale performance''. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 5,41-5l.

12.Beehr, T. and J. Drexler (1986). Social Support, Autonomy, and Hierarchical Level as Moderators of the Sole Characteristics Outcomes Behavior. Journal of Occupation Behavior, 7, 207-214.
13.Belasco, M. (1966), ''The Salesman''s Role Revisited," Journal of Marketing, 30 (April), 6-11.
14.Behrman, Douglas N. and Willliam Perreault Jr. (1984), "A Role Stress Model of the Performance and Satisfaction of Industrial Salesperson," Journal of Marketing, 48 (Fall), 9-21
15.Browne, Michael W. and Robert Cudeck (1993), "Alternative Ways of Assessing Mode! Fit," in Testing Structural Equation Model, Kenneth A. BoUen and J. Scott Long, eds., Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 136-162.
16.Brown, Steven P., and Robert A. Peterson (1993), “Antecedents and Consequences of Salesperson Job Satisfaction: Meta- Analysis and Assessment of Causal Effects,” Journal of Marketing Research, 30 (February), 63–77.
17.Caemines, E., & McIver, J. (1981). Analyzing models with unobserved variables:Analysis of convarience structures. In G. Bohrnstedt and E. Borgatta (Eds.), Social Measurement:Current Issues:61-73.CA:Sage, Beverly Hills.
18.Challagalla, Goutam N., and Tasadduq A. Shervani (1996),“Dimensions and Types of Supervisory Control: Effects on Salesperson Performance and Satisfaction,” Journal of Marketing, 60 (1), 89–105.
19.Churchill, G.A., Jr., N. M., Ford, O. C., Walker, M. W. Johnston, and J.F. Tanner (2000), Sales Force Management, Burr Ridge, IL:Irwin.
20.Compeau, D. R & Higgins, C. A (1995a), “Application of social cognitive theory to training for computer skill,” Information System Research, 6(2), pp.118-143.
21.Cronbach, D. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and internal structure of test. Psychometrika, 16(3),297-334.

22.Fisher, Cynthia and Richard Gitelson (1983), "A Meta-Analysis of the Correlates of Role Conflict and Role Ambiguity," Journal of Applied Psychology, 68 (May), 320-33.
23.Fisher, C. D, (1985). Social Support and Adjustment to Work:A Longitudinal Study. Journal of Management, 11,39-53.
24.Frayne. C. A. and Latham. G. P. (1987). ''Application of social learning theory toemployee sclf-managenKnt of attendance''. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72. 387-392.
25.Gist, M. E, (1987), Self-efficacy: Implications for organizational behavior and human resource management. Academy of Management Review. 12, 472-485.
26.Grant, Ken, David W. Cravens, George S. Low, and William C. Moncrief (2001), “The Role of Satisfaction with Territory Design on the Motivation, Attitudes, and Work Outcomes of Salespeople,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 29 (2), 165–178.
27.Griffeth, R. W., & Hom, P. W. (2001). Retaining valued employees. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.Guerrero, S,, & Sire, S. (2001), Motivation to train from the workers''perspective: Example of French companies. International Journal of Human Resource Management. 12(6), 988-l(X)4.
29.Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis, New York:Macmillan.
30.Hartile, M. D. & Ferrell, O. C. (1996). The management of customer-contact service employees: An empirical investigation. Journal of Marketing, 60(Oct.): 52-70.
31.House, James S. (1981), Work Stress and Social Support, Reading, MA: John Wiley & Sons, 70-78.
32.House, James S. and J.A. Wells (1978),"Occupational Stress, Social Support, and Health, in Reducing Occupational Stress: Proceedings of a Conference," McLeon, Black and Colligan, eds., Washington, DC: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 8-29.
33.Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis:Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55.
34.Jackson, Susan and Randall Schuler (1985), "A Meta-Analysis and Conceptual Critique of Research on Role Ambiguity and Role Conflict in Work Setting," Organizational Behavior and Human Decisions Processes, 36 (August), 16-78.
35.Jackofsky, Ellen F. (1984), “Turnover and Job Performance:An Integrated Process Model,” Academy of Management Review, 9(1), 74-83.
36.Jaccard, J., and C. K. Wan. LISREL Approaches to Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage Publications,1996.
37.Jex, S. M. 1998. Stress and Job Performance: Theory, Research, and Implications for
Managerial Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38.Jones, G.R. (1983). Psychological orientation and the process of organizational socialization: An interactionist perspective. Academy of Management Review, 8, 464-474.
39.Jones, G. R. (1986). Socialization tactics, self-efficacy, and newcomers’ adjustments to organizations. Academy of Management Journal 1986. Vol. 29, No. 2, 262-279.
40.Johnston, Mark W. and Charles W. Futrell (1989), “Functional Salesperson Turnover:An Empirical Investigation into the Positive Effects of Turnover,” Journal of Business Research, 18, 141-57.
41.Johnston, Mark W., A. Parasuraman, Charles M. Futrell. And William C Black (1990). "A Longitudinal Assessment of the Impact of Selected Organizational Influences on Salespeople''s Organizational Commitment During Early Employment." Journal of Marketing Research. 27 (August), 333-44.
42.Kahn, Robert L., Donald M. Wolfe, Robert P. Quinn, J. Diedrick Snoek, and Robert A. Rosenthal (1964), Organizational Stress, New York: Wiley.
43.King, Lynda A. and Daniel W. King (1990). Role conflict and role ambiguity:A critical Assessment of Construct Validity. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 48-64.
44.Low, George S., David W. Cravens, Ken Grant, and William C. Moncrief (2001), “Antecedents and Consequences of Salesperson Burnout,” European Journal of Marketing, 35 (5–6), 587–611.
45.Louis, M. R. (1980). ''Surprise and sense making: What newcomers experience in entering unfamiliar organizational settings''. Administrative Science Quarterly. 25, 226 251.
46.Latham, G. P. and Frayne, C. A. (1989). ''Self-management training for increasing job attendance: A follow-up and a replication''. Journal of Applied Psychology. 74,411 -416.
47.Lee, C. and Gillen, D. J. (1989). "Relationship of type A behavior pattern, self-efficacy perceptions on sales performance.” Journal of Organizational Behavior, 10. 75-81.
48.Lent. R. W. and Hackett. G. (1987). "Career seif-efficacy: Empirical status and future directions''. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 30, 347-382.
49.Mathieu, John E. and Dennis M. Zajac. (1990). "A Review and Meta-Analysis of the Antecedents, Correlates, and Consequences of Organizational Commitment," Psychological Bulletin, 108(2): 171-194.
50.Michaels, Ronald E., Ralph L. Day, and Erich A. Joachimsthaler (1987), “Role Stress Among Industrial Buyers: An Integrative Model,” Journal of Marketing, 51 (April), 28–45.
51.Martocchio, J.J.,& Webster, J. (1992), Effects of feedback and cognitive playfulness on performance in microcomputer software training. Personnel Psychology, 45, 553-578.
52.Netemeyer, R.G., Johnston, M.W. and Burton, S. (1990) ‘An Analysis of Role Conflict and Role Ambiguity in a Structural Equations Framework’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 75: 148–57.


53.Netemeyer, Richard G., Thomas Brashear-Alejandro, and James S. Boles (2004), “A Cross-National Model of Job-Related Outcomes of Work Role and Family Role Variables: A Retail Sales Context,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32, 1 (Winter), 49–60.
54.Nunnally, J. C. (1978), Psychometric Theory (2nd Edition), New York: McGraw-Hill.
55.Ostroff, C., & Kozlowski, S W. J. (1992), Organization socialization as a learning process: The role of information acquisition. Personnel Psychology, 45, 849-874.
56.Van Maanen, J., & Schein, E. H. (1979). Towards a theory of organizational socialization. In B. M. Staw (Ed.), Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 1: 209-264. Greenwich, Gonn.: JAI Press.
57.Van Sell, M., Brief, A. P., & Schuler, R. S. (1981). Role conflict and ambiguity: Integration of the literature and directions for future research. Human Relations, 34: 43-71.
58.Quinones. M, A, (1995), Pretraining context effects: Training assignment as feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology. 80(2). 226-238.
59.Rahim, Afzalur. M. (1996). STRESS, STRAIN, AND THEIR MODERATORS: AN EMPIRICAL COMPARISON OF ENTREPRENEURS AND MANAGERS. Journal of Small Business Management, 46-58.
60.Rahim, Afzalur. M. and Psenicka, Clement (1996). The Structure Equation Model of Stress, Locus of Control, Social Support, Psychiatric Symptoms, and Propensity to Leave a Job. The Journal of Social Psychology, 136(1), 69-84.
61.Rizzo, J. R., House, R. J., & Lirtzman, S. I. (1970). Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15, 150-163.
62.Schein EH. (1968). Organizational socialization and the profession of management. Industrial Management Review, 9,1-16.

63.Singh, Jagdip (1998), “Striking a Balance in Boundary-Spanning Positions: An Investigation of Some Unconventional Influences of Role Stressors and Job Characteristics on Job Outcomes of Salespeople,” Journal of Marketing, 62 (July), 69–86.
64.Singh, J., Goolsby, J. R. & Rhoads, G. K. (1994). Behavioral and Psychological Consequences of boundary Spanning Burnout for customer service representatives. Journal of Marketing Research, 31(4): 558-569.
65.Singh, Jagdip and Gary K. Rhoads (1991), “Boundary Role Ambiguity in Marketing-Oriented Positions:A Multidimensional, Multifaceted Operationalization,” Journal of Marketing Research, 28 (August), 328-338.
66.Singh, Jagdip, Gary K. Rhoads, and Phillips W.Goodell (1994). The Multiple Dimensions of Role Ambiguity and Their Impact Upon Psychological and Behavioral Outcomes of Industrial Salespeople. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, Volume XIV, Number 3.
67.Taylor. M. S., Locke. E. A., Lee, C. and Gist, M. E. (1984). ''Type A behavior and faculty research productivity: What are the mechanisms?'' Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34.402-418.
68.Wood R. and Bandura. A.,(July 1989), ”Social Cognitive Theory of Organizational Management,” Academy of Management Review, pp. 361-84
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top