臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究採用準實驗研究設計，探討目標導向與創造力訓練成效的關係。本研究目的主要有四：其一，探討創造力訓練對個體創造力提升的影響；其二，探討時間對創造力訓練遷移趨勢的影響；其三，探討目標導向對創造力訓練效果的影響；其四，探討目標導向對創造力訓練遷移趨勢的影響。參與實驗之學生共計61人，刪除不適樣本後，最後分析樣本為56人。在訓練過程中共實施兩次創造力測驗（訓練前、訓練後），及一次目標導向量表（訓練後）。在訓練後則進行創造力測驗的持續追蹤（訓練後三個月、訓練後六個月），共計得到四個創造力測驗時間點，並於第二個時間點加測了目標導向量表，整個實驗及追蹤研究共歷時15個月。在資料分析上，以t考驗及階層線性模式來進行整個創造力成長的改變情形分析。本研究結果發現創造力訓練可顯著提升學生創造力；時間可以顯著預測圖形創造力的負線性二次曲線；表現趨向對訓練遷移維持呈現負向二次曲線調節效果。最後，本研究針對上述結果，進行理論意涵與實務意涵上的討論，並說明本研究之限制及後續研究建議。

In this study, we used quasi experiment design in order to explore the relationship between personal goal orientation and the effect of creativity training. This study had four purposes. First, it was to explore the impact of the creativity training on individual creativity. Second, it was to explore the impact of the time on the trend of creativity training. Third, it was to explore the impact of the goal orientation on the effect of creativity training. Fourth, it was to explore the impact of the goal orientation on the trend of creativity. There were 61 students participating in this experiment. After deleting unsuited samples, there were 56 final samples to be analyzed. Creativity test was conducted twice during the creativity training (pre-training and post-training) and a goal orientation scale was conducted once (post-training). After the creativity training, we also tracked the behavior of the participates by administering the creativity test once after three months and also once after six months. Over a 15–month period , the creativity test data was retrieved from four time points, with an additional administration of the goal orientation scale. Data analysis was conducted using the t-test and hierarchical linear modeling (HLM).The result indicated that creativity training could promote students’ creativity , time could predict a negative quadratic trajectory of the figural creativity, and performance-approach could moderate the transfer maintenance curves in the form of a negative quadratic trajectory as. Based on the aforementioned result, theoretical and practical implications were discussed and the limitations of this study were identified with suggestions for further research.

序 言 i
摘 要 ii
ABSTRACT iii
目 次 iv
表 次 v
圖 次 vi
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景 1
第二節 研究問題敘述 4
第三節 研究目的 7
第四節 研究重要性 8
第二章 理論與假設推演 10
第一節 創造力訓練遷移 10
第二節 目標導向理論 19
第三節 研究假設推演 28
第三章 研究方法 35
第一節 實驗設計 35
第二節 研究工具 37
第三節 資料分析 41
第四章 研究結果 42
第一節 敘述性統計 42
第二節 創造力訓練效果檢定 44
第三節 創造力訓練遷移效果成長模式考驗 45
第五章 討論與建議 53
第一節 討論 53
第二節 理論意涵 56
第三節 實務意涵 58
第四節 研究限制與未來研究建議 60
參考文獻 66

參考文獻
王克先（1995）。學習心理學。台北：桂冠。
王精文、洪瑞雲（1999）。創造性問題解決訓練對研究績效的影響。臺大管理論叢，9（2），137-159。
王精文、洪瑞雲（2003）。創造性問題解決訓練對管理者問題解決過程的影響。交大管理學報，23（1），183-208。
王精文、洪瑞雲、范凱棠、陸佳瑩（2006）。創造力訓練及群體決策支援系統對問題解決能力的影響。交大管理學報，26（2），1-20。
朱敬先（1988）。學習心理學。台北：千華。
行政院教育改革委員會（1996）。中華民國教育改革總諮議報告書。台北：行政院教育改革委員會。
行政院國家科學委員會（1998）。科技化國家推動方案。台北：行政院國家科學委員會。
行政院經濟建設委員會（2000）。知識經濟發展方案。台北：行政院經濟建設委員會。
行政院經濟建設委員會（2002）。挑戰2008－國家發展重點計劃。台北：行政院經濟建設委員會。
行政院經濟建設委員會（2006）。2015年經濟發展願景－第一階段三年衝刺計畫（2007-2009年）。台北：行政院經濟建設委員會。
李乙明（2006a）。陶倫斯創造思考測驗語文版（TTCT）指導手冊。台北：心理。
李乙明（2006b）。陶倫斯創造思考測驗圖形版（TTCT）指導手冊。台北：心理。
李仁豪、余民寧（2003）。2×2成就目標理論架構之驗證。教育與心理研究，26，433-470。
李縐}（譯）（2007）。John Howkins著。創意經濟─好點子變成好生意。台北：典藏藝術家庭。
余嬪（2006）。臺灣、大陸與香港現中小學教師之玩興、教學創新、工作滿足與工作表現之關係。教育與心理研究，29（2），227-266。
余嬪、吳靜吉、林偉文、楊潔欣（2003）。成人玩興量表與組織玩興氣氛量表之發展。測驗學刊，50（1），73-110。
林宴瑛、程炳林（2007）。個人目標導向、課室目標結構與自我調整學習策略之潛在改變量分析。教育心理學報，39（2），173-194。
邱皓政（2006a）。量化研究法（一）：研究設計與資料處理。台北：雙葉。
邱皓政（2006b）。量化研究法（二）：統計原理與分析技術。台北：雙葉。
邱發忠、陳學志、卓淑玲（2003）。幽默創造訓練之課程設計暨實徵效果評估。教育心理學報，34（2），179-198。
吳思華、陳靜瑤（2005）。競爭力背後的創造力-以教育部顧問室「創造力教育中程發展計畫」為例談創造力教育。教育研究，113，5-10。
吳靜吉、高泉豐、王敬仁、丁興祥、葉玉珠（1994）。拓弄思圖形創造思考測驗（甲式）-指導及研究手冊。台北：教育部。
吳靜吉、高泉豐、王敬仁、丁興祥、葉玉珠、程炳林（1994）。拓弄思語文創造思考測驗（乙式）-指導及研究手冊。台北：教育部。
吳靜吉、陳甫彥、郭俊賢、林偉文、劉士豪、陳玉樺（1998）。新編創造思考測驗研究。台北：教育部。
洪新原、陳鴻基、葉景琳（2006）。創意支援系統提昇使用者創造力之研究：自我效能理論之解釋與實證。資訊管理學報，13（4），1-26。
教育部（2002）。創造力教育白皮書。2008年6月16日，取自：http://www.creativity.edu.tw/index.php
陳玉樹（2008）（已接受）。創造力訓練課程成效分析：準Solomon四組實驗設計。課程與教學季刊。
陳長益（2006）。陶倫斯創造力測驗成人適用精簡版（ATTA）指導手冊。台北：心理。
陳學志（2004）。從「哈哈」到「啊哈」─統整知、情、意、行的幽默課程對創造力培養的影響。教育心理學報，35（4），393-411。
陳學志、徐芝君（2006）。幽默創意課程對教師幽默感及創造力的影響。師大學報：教育類，51，71-93。
陳龍安（1984）。國內外有關創造力訓練效果之研究。載於台北市教師教學研習中心（主編），創造性教育資料彙編（頁20-70）。台北：台北市教師教學研習中心。
陳龍安（1986）。陶倫思圖形創造思考測驗（乙式）-指導手冊。台北：心理。
陳龍安（2006）。創造思考教學的理論與實際（第六版）。台北：心理。
黃家齊、黃荷婷（2006）。團隊成員目標導向對於自我與集體效能及創新之影響：一個多層次研究。管理學報，23（3），327-346。
程炳林（2002）。多重目標導向、動機問題與調整策略之交互作用。師大學報：教育類，47（1），39-58。
程炳林（2003）。四向度目標導向模式之研究。師大學報：教育類，48（1），39-58。
張景媛、陳學志、黃譯瑩（2004）。幽默訓練融入綜合活動對國一學生創造思考與人際因應之影響。教育心理學報，36（1），13-33。
溫福星（2006）。階層線性模式：原理、方法與應用。台北：雙葉。
楊語芸（譯）（1994）。Darley、Glucksberg與Kinchla合著。心理學。台北：桂冠。
葉玉珠、葉玉環、李梅齡、彭月茵（2006）。以創作性戲劇教學啟發幼兒創造力之行動研究。師大學報：創造力特刊，1-27。
蔡啟通、丁興祥、高泉豐（1989）。認知需求、腦力激盪與個人創造性。中華心理學刊，31（2），107-117。
劉士豪（1998）。年齡、性別、成就目標、目標導向與創意生活經驗、創造力之關係。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北。
劉英茂、黃明訓、李怜慧、項念華（1983）。托浪斯創造性思考測驗（語文甲式）。台北：中國行為科學社。
Amabile, T. M. (1983a). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Amabile, T. M. (1983b). Social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 357-377.
Amabile, T. M. (1993). Motivation synergy: Toward new conceptualization of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in workplace. Human Resource Management Review, 3, 185-201.
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in the context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Oxford: Westview Press.
Ames, C. (1992). Classroom: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261-271.
Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: students’ learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 260-267.
Atkinson, J. W. (1978). The Mainsprings of Achievement Oriented Activity. In J. W. Atkinson & J. O. Raynor (Eds.), Personality, Motivation, and achievement (pp.12-19). Washington: Hemisphere Publishing Co.
Baldwin, T. T., & Ford, K. J. (1988). Transfer of training: A review and directions for future research. Personnel Psychology, 41, 63–105.
Barron, B. K., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2001). Achievement goals and optimal motivation: Testing multiple goal models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(5), 706-722.
Bass, B. M., & Vaughan, J. A. (1966). Training in industry: The management of learning. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Beghetto, R. A. (2006). Creative Self-Efficacy: Correlates in Middle and Secondary Students. Creativity Research Journal, 18(4), 447-457.
Bell, B. S., & Kozlowski, W. J. (2002). Goal Orientation and Ability: Interactive Effect on Self-efficacy, Performance, and Knowledge. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 62-78.
Brown, J. A. (1958). Some tests of the decay theory of immediate memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 10, 12-21.
Burke, L. A., & Hutchins, H. M. (2007).Training Transfer: A Integrative Literature Review. Human Resource Management Review, 6(3), 263-296.
Camp, G. C. (1994). A Longitudinal Study of Correlates of Creativity. Creativity Reasearch Journal, 7(2), 125-144.
Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research on teaching. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Choi, J. N. (2004). Individual an Context Predictors of Creative Performance: The Mediating Role of Psychological Processes. Creativity Research Journal, 16(2 & 3), 187-199.
Claxton, A. F., Pannells, T. C. & Rhoads, P. A. (2005). Development Trends in the Creativity of School-Age Children. Creativity Research Journal, 17(4), 327-335.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Eribaum.
Collins, M. A., & Amabile, T. M. (1999). Motivation and Creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of Creativity (pp. 297-312). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Colquitt, J. A., LePine, J. A.; Noe, R. A. (2000). Toward an Integrative Theory of Training Motivation: A Meta-Analytic Path Analysis of 20 Years of Research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(5), 678-707.
Conway, M. A., Cohen, G., & Stanhope, N. (1991). On the very long term retention of knowledge acquired through formal education: Twelve years of cognitive psychology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 395-409.
Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Cramond, B., Matthews-Morgan, J., Bandalos, D., & Zuo, L. (2005). AReport on the 40-Year Follow-Up of the Torrance Test of Creative Thinking: Alive and Well in the New Millennium. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49(4), 283-291.
Cropley, A. J. (1997). Fostering creativity in the classroom: General principles. In M. A. Runco (Ed.). Creativity research handbook, 1, 83-114. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, 83-114.
Cropley, A. J. (2001). Creativity in education and learning., London: Kogan Page.
Csikszenmihalyi, M. (1990). The domain of creativity. In M. A. Runco & R. S. Alber (Eds.), Theories of creativity (pp. 190-214). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Cury, F., Elliot, A. J., Da Fonseca, D., & Moller, A. C. (2006). The Social-Cognitive Model of Achievement Motivation and 2 × 2 Achievement Goal Framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(4), 666-679.
Dresel, M. (2001). A Longitudinal Study of Dweck’s Motivation-Process-Model in the Classroom. Psychologische Beitrage, 43(1), 129-152.
Dweck, C. (1986). Motivational process affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040-1048.
Dweck, C. S., & Legget, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Report, 95, 256-273.
Elliot, A. J. (1997). Integrating the “classic”and “contemporary”approaches to achievement motivation: A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. In M. L. Maehr ＆ P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol.10, pp.143-179). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34(3), 169-189.
Elliot, A. J. (2005). A Conceptual History of the Achievement Goal Construct. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.). Handbook of Competence and Motivation. New York: The Gilford Press.
Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218-232.
Elliot, A. J., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 461-475.
Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2×2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 501-519.
Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2001). Achievement Goals and the Hierarchical Model of Achievement Motivation. Educational Psychology Review, 13(2), 139-156.
Feldhusen, J. F. & Treffinger, D. J. (1980). Creative thinking and problem solving in gifted education. Dubuque, IO: Kendall/Hunt.
Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2003). How TO Design AND Evaluate Research IN Education (15th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P. & Borg, W. R. (2003). Education research: An introduction (7th ed.). New York: Longman.
Gardner, H. (1988). Creativity: An Interdisciplinary perspective. Creativity Research Journal, 1, 8-26.
Gardner, H. (1993a). Creating minds. New York: Basic.
Gardner, H. (1993b). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. New York: Basic.
Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., & Elliot, A. J. (2002). Predicting success in college: A longitudinal study of achievement goals and ability measures as predictor interest and performance from freshman year through graduation. Journal of Education Psychology, 94(3), 562-575.
Hattie, J. (1980). Should creativity tests be administered under testlike condition? An empirical study of three alternative conditions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 87-98.
Heck, R. H., & Thomas, S. L. (2000). An introduction to multilevel models techniques. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hocevar, D., & Bachelor, P. (1989). A taxonomy and critique of measurements used in the study of creativity. In J. A. Glover, R., R. R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of Creativity (pp. 53-75). New York: Plenum.
Hox, J. (2002). Multilevel analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Klein, H. J., Noe, R. A., & Wang, C. (2006). Motivation to learn and course outcomes: the impact of delivery mode, learning goal orientation, and perceived barriers and enablers. Personnel Psychology, 59, 665-702.
Koestner, R. & McClelland, D. C. (1990). Perspective on competence motivation. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 527-548). New York: Guilford Press.
Kogan, N., & Pankove, E. (1974). LONG-TERM PREDICTIVE VALIDITY OF DIVERGENT-THINKING TESTS: SOME NEGTIVE EVIDENCE. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66(6), 802-810.
Kreft, I., & de Leeuw, J. (1998). Introducing multilevel modeling. London: Sage.
Lee, S. Y., Florida, R, & Acs, Z. J. (2004). Creativity and Entrepreneurship: A Regional Analysis of New Firm Formation. Regional Studies, 38(8), 879-891.
Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Achievement goal theory and affect: An asymmetrical bidirectional model. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 69-78.
Ma, H. (2006). A synthetic analysis of the effectiveness of single components and packages in creativity training programs. Creativity Research Journal, 18(4), 435-446.
McClelland, D. C. (1961). The Achieving Society. Princetion, NJ: Van Nostrand.
McGeogh, J. A. (1942). The Psychology of Human Learning. New York: Longmans.
Meaher, M. L., & Midgley, C. (1991). Enhancing student motivation: A school-wide approach. Educational Psychologist, 26, 399-427.
Middleton, M. J., & Midgley, C. (1997). Avoiding the demonstration of lack of ability：An under-explored aspect of goal theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(4), 710-718.
Midgley, C. (1993). Motivation and middle level schools. In P. Pintrich & M. L. Maehr (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Motivation in the adolescent years (Vol. 8, pp.217-294). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Midgley, C., Kaplan, A., & Middleton, M. (2001). Performance-approach goals: Good for what, for whom, under what circumstances, and at what costs? Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 77-86.
Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality. New York: Oxford University Press.
Nicholls, J. G. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task, and performance. Psychological Review, 91, 328-346.
Nickerson, R. S. (1999). Enhancing Creativity. In R. J. Sternberg. (Ed.), Handbook of Creativity (pp. 392-430). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Noe, R. A. (1986). Trainees'' Attributes and Attitudes: Neglected Influences on Training Effectiveness. Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 736-749.
Noe, R. A. (2005). Employee Training and Development (3rd ed.). New York: Irwin /McGraw.
Osburn, H. K., & Mumford, M. D. (2006). Creativity and planning: Training interventions to develop creative problem-solving skills. Creativity Research Journal, 18(2), 173-190.
Peterson, L. R., & Peterson, M. J. (1959). Short term retention of individual verbal items. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 193-198.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000a). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 544-555.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000b). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M., Boekaerts & P. R., Pintrich (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp.13-39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000c). An Achievement Goal Theory Perspective on Issues in Motivation Terminology, Theory, and Research. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 92-104.
Plucker, J. A., & Renzulli, J. S. (1999). Psychometric Approaches to the Study of Human Creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of Creativity (pp. 35-61). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Raudsepp, E. (1981). How Creative Are You? New York: G. P. Putman Sons.
Ritter, F. E., & Schooler, L. J. (2002). The learning curve. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 8602-8605). Amsterdam: Pergamon.
Roeser, R.W., Midgley, C. & Urdan, T. (1996). Perception of the school psychological environment and early adolescents’ psychological and behavioral function in school. Journal of Education Psychology, 83(3), 408-422.
Rubin, D. C., & Wenzel, A. E. (1996). One Hundred Years of Forgetting: A Quantitative Description of Retention. Psychological Review, 103(4), 734-760.
Runco, M. A. (1999). Time. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Creativity (Vol. 2, pp.659-663). California, SD: Academic Press.
Russ, S. W., Rubins, A. L., & Christiano, B. A. (1999). Pretend Play: Longitudinal Prediction of Creativity and Affect in Fantasy in Children. Creativity Research Journal, 12(2), 129-139.
Skaalvik, E. M. (1997). Self-enhancing and self-defeating ego orientation : Relation with task and avoidance orientation, achievement, self-perception, and anxiety. Journal of Education Psychology, 89(1), 71-81.
Scott, G., Leritz, L. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2004a). Type of creativity training: Approaches and their effectiveness. Journal of Creative Behavior, 38, 149-179.
Scott, G., Leritz, L. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2004b). The Effectiveness of Creativity Training: A Quantitative Review. Creativity Research Journal, 16(4), 361-388.
Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. (1999). Multilevel analysis. An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Sternberg, R. J. (2000). Pathway to Psychology. Singapore: Tomson Learning.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York: Simon & Schuster Inc.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. (1996). Investing in creativity. American Psychologist, 51(7), 677-688.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. (1999). Creativity and Intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of Creativity (pp.3-15). New York: Cambridge.
Swartz, R. J., & Parks, S. (1994). Infusing Critical and Creative Thinking into Content Instruction. Pacific Grove, CA: CRITICAL THINKING PRESS & SOFTWARE.
Taylor, D. W., (1943). Learning Telegraphic Code. Psychological Bulletin, 40, 461-487.
Torrance, E. P. (1962). Guiding creative talent. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Torrance, E. P. (1966). Torrance tests of creative thinking: Norms technical manual (Research ed.). Princeton, NJ: Presonnel Press.
Torrance, E. P. (1972). Can we teach children to think creatively? Journal of Creative Behavior, 6, 114-143.
Torrance, E. P. (1974). Norms-technical manual: Torrance test of creative thinking. Lexingon, MA: Ginn & Co.
Torrance, E. P. (1990). The Torrance test of creative thinking: Norms-technical manual. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service, Inc.
Torrance, E. P., Ball, E. O., & Safter, H. T. (1992). Torrance test of creative thinking: Streamlined scoring guide figural a and b. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service, Inc.
Torrance, E. P. (1995). Insights About Creativity: Questioned, Rejected, Ridiculed, Ignored. Educational Psychology Review, 7(3). 313-322
Torrance, E. P. (2003). The Millennium: A Time for Looking Forward and Looking Back. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 15(1), 6-12.
Torrance, E. P. (2004). Great Expectations: Creative Achievement of the Sociometric Stars in a 30-Years Study. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 16(1), 5-13.
Urdan, T. C. (1997). Achievement goal theory: Past results, future directions. In M. Maehr & P. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol.10, pp.99-141). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Wai, J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2005). Creativity and Occupational Accomplishments Among Intellectually Precocious Youths: An Age 13 to 33 Longitudinal Study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(3), 484-492.
Weisberg, R. W. (1993). Creativity: Beyond the myth of genius. New York: Freeman.
Weiten, W. (2002). Psychology Themes and Variations: briefer version (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: WardsWorth/Thomson Learning.
Williams, F. E. (1971). Assessing creativity pupti-teacher behavior related to a cognitive-affective teaching model. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 4, 14-22.
Wolters, C. A., Yu, S. L., & Pintrich, P. R. (1996). The relation between goal orientation and students’ motivational beliefs and self-regulated learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 8, 211-238.
Zusho, A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2000, April). Fear of not learning? The role of mastery avoidance goals in Asian American and European American college students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American. Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.