臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究欲將策略聯盟下的合資經營透過賽局模型的建立來說明當企業採取策略聯盟的經營策略之時，雖因透過策略聯盟而產生了綜效，但由於獲利會被對方所分享，所以想偷懶，而採取投機行為進而產生道德風險，而此道德風險的產生將使企業獲利較差，為了降低道德風險的產生，本文嘗試以股權分配與交叉持股兩種方式來改善聯盟間的道德風險問題，提高雙方的努力程度，進而使得採取合資經營後雙方的利潤得以提升。

本研究的第一個研究目的為，建立模型以表達廠商透過合資經營而獲利，並表達出由於合資經營的free rider問題，所產生的道德風險之下，使廠商利潤與努力水準並未達到最適，並可了解，透過最適股權分配可部份改善廠商的道德風險。

本研究的第二個研究目的為，透過原模型的設定下，找出解決廠商道德風險的方式，本研究以廠商間交叉持股來解決其道德風險問題，由於彼此公司交叉持股，故雙方努力水準因而提升並且獲利亦更隨增加。

This study is about build a game model to explain when firms using joint venture which is a part of strategy alliance. Despite of using joint venture to gain synergy, but that the profit which created by each firm would share by each other, because of this profit sharing effect that every firm in the alliance would want to be a free rider and this free rider problem would lower the profit when there exist no such free rider problem. So this study tries to solve free rider problem by using profit distribute and cross ownership in order to rise each firms effort and profit.

The first purpose of this study is build a game model which represent firms using joint venture to gain synergy and profit, also shows that the free rider problem would appear in the model and we can find that the effort and profit are both lower than the efficiency criterion. By profit share we can find the optimal profit for the new joint venture company, but still can’t solve free rider problem perfectly.

The second purpose of this study is follow by the original model build anteriorly. In order to solve free rider problem we put cross ownership into the model and we can tell that free rider problem could be solved by the means of cross ownership and both firm effort and profit rise close to the efficiency criterion.

第壹章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究架構與流程 3
第貳章 文獻探討 4
第一節 賽局理論 4
第二節 古諾競爭(Cournot Competition) 5
第三節 子賽局完美均衡(Subgame perfect equilibrium) 6
第四節 策略聯盟之定義 7
第五節 策略聯盟之區分 9
第六節 策略聯盟之風險 11
第七節 搭便車(Free Rider)問題 13
第參章 理論模型 14
第一節 模型設定： 14
第二節 未交叉持股下均衡模型推導 16
第三節 未交叉持股下模型圖型分析 25
第四節 交叉持股下均衡模型推導 27
第五節 交叉持股下模型圖型分析 33
第肆章 結論與建議 35
參考文獻 37

1.何嘉惠、陳寬裕、林純純（民94），『以競局理論分析競合環境之資源分享』，經營管理論叢 Vol.1, No.1, 2005 第1-15 頁。
2.賴宜鴻（民90），『企業策略聯盟長期績效之研究』，國立成功大學國際企業研究所碩士論文。
3.李文欣（民92），『國際策略聯盟長期績效之研究』，國立成功大學國際企業研究所碩士論文。
4.曾文聰（民92），『創投公司與創業者間雙重道德危險之研究』，國立中山大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
5.童桂馨（民93），『創業投資契約中道德風險與逆選擇問題之研究』，國立中山大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
6.黃建銘（民95），『責任分散工作文化下，多代理人道德危機問題之研究』，私立東海大學會計學系碩士班碩士論文。
7.胡權峰（民89），『合作賽局理論在海運市場聯營競爭行為模式之應用』，私立淡江大學運輸管理學系碩士論文。
8.游曉芸(民92) ，『大陸台商策略聯盟類型決定因素之研究—以電機電子業實證』，私立中原大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
9.黃常慧(民93) ，『我國服裝業策略聯盟失敗之研究』，私立大同大學事業經營研究所碩士論文。
10.David A. Aaker & Eeich Joachimsthaler 合著，高登第譯（民91），「品牌領導」，天下文化出版社。
11.吳青松(民79)，本國產業策略聯盟結構與績效之評估，發表於產業科技研究發展管理研討會，台北：中國生產力中心。
12.蔡正揚(民81)，「企業策略聯盟探討-照明設備個案研究」，收於中國生產力中心編，科技管理研討會論文集(頁 11-18)，台北：中國生產力中心。
13.蔡正揚、許政郎(民81)，「互惠協定與策略聯盟之探討為例」，產業科技研究發展管理研討會。
14.吳思華(民85)，策略九說，麥田出版社。
15.呂鴻德(民85)，企業策略聯盟：提升競爭力的經營利器。商業週刊。
16.呂鴻德(民85)，企業策略聯盟Q&A，商週文化。
17.葉匡時、蔡敦浩(民82)，策略聯盟的發展策略-交易成本的觀點，管理評論，12，105-106。
18.竹田志郎(民81)，國際策略聯盟，同文館。
19.吳萬益等人，2001，以資源網路觀點探討策略聯盟間管理作為與績效關係之研究，淡江人文社會學刊pp.55-84。
20.林容如 (民85)，國際合作方式選擇決定因素研究-以外商進入台灣市場的汽機車、資訊電子業合作案為例，國立台灣大學商研所未出版博士論文。
21.柯博瑜 (民86)，聯盟資源與企業特性對國際策略聯盟類型選擇之影響，國立暨南國際大學國際企業研究所碩士論文。
<資料庫部分>
1.Business Full Text (Wilson Web) 商業經濟全文資料庫
2.BSP - Business Source Premier (EBSCOhost) 商管財經類精華版
<網站部分>
1.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page
2.http://www.1000ventures.com/
3.http://www.bnet.com/
4.http://www.sonyericsson.com
<英文部分>
1.Anderson J. and J. Narus（1990）,”A model of the distributor’s perspective ofdistributor-manufacture working partnership,” Journal of Marketing, Vol.54, pp.42-58.
2.Anming Zhang and Yimin Zhang（2005）,” Rivalry between Strategic Alliances”.
3.Badaracco, J. L.,(1991), “The Knowledge Link ：How Firms Compete Through Strategic Alliances,” Boston, MA：Harvard Business School Press.
4.Barber, B. M. and J. D. Lyon（1997）,” Detecting long-run abnormal stock returns: The empirical power and specification of test-statistics,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.43, pp.341-372.
5.Borys,Bryan & Jemison, David B.(1989), "Hybrid Arrangements as Strategic Alliances：Theoretical Issues in Organizational Combinations, " Academy of Management Review, Vol.14, No.2, pp.234-249.
6.Bronder, C. and Pritzl(1992), ” Developing Strategic Alliances: A Conceptual Framework for Successful Cooperation,” European Management Journal, vol.10, no.4, pp.412-421.
7.Chan, S. H., J. W. Kensinger, A. J. Keown and J. D. Martin（1997）,” Do strategic alliances create value?,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.46, pp.199-221.
8.Contractor, F. J. and P. Lorange（1988）,”Competition v.s. cooperation: A benefit/cost framework for choosing between fully-owned investments and cooperative relationships,” Management International Review, Vol. 28, pp.5-18.
9.Devlin, G. and M. Bleackley(1988), “Strategies Alliances—Guidelines for Success”, Long Range Planning, Vol.21, No.5, pp.18-23.
10.Fama, E. F. and M. C. Jensen（1983）,”Agency problems and residual claims,” Journalof Law and Economics, Vol.26, pp.327-349.
11.Glaister, K. W. and P. J. Buckley（1994）,”UK international joint ventures: an analysis of patterns of activity and distribution,” British Journal of Management, Vol.5, pp.33-51.
12.Hamel, G., Y. L. Doz and C. K. Prahalad（1989）,” Collaborate with your competitors,” Harvard Business Review, Vol.67, pp.133-139.
13.Harbison, J. R. and P. Pekar（1997）, “Cross-broder alliance in the age of collaboration,” Booz Allen ＆ Hamilton.
14.Harrigan, K.R.(1988), “Strategic Alliance and Partner Asymmetries,” Management International Review, Vol.28, pp.53-72.
15.Hart, O. and J. Morre（1990）,”Property rights and the nature of the firm,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol.98, pp.1119-1158.
16.Hoffmann, W. H. and W. Schaper-Rinkel（2001）,”Acquire or ally？ A strategy framework for deciding between acquisitions and cooperation,” Management International Review, Vol.41, pp.131-159.
17.Jan Borgonjon and David J. Hofmann（2008）,” The Re-Emergence of the Joint Venture?” chinabusinessreview.com.
18.Jesen, M. C. and W. H. Mickling (1976), “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Cost and Ownership Structure,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.3, 305-360.
19.Killing, J.P.(1988), “Understanding Alliances: The Role of Task and Organizational Complexity,” Cooperative Strategies in International Business.
20.Lewis, J. D. (1990), Partnerships for profit, New York: Free Press.
21.Lewis, J. D, (1990) “Making strategic alliances to work,” Research Technology Management, Vol. 33, pp. 12-15.
22.Magasaysay(1989), J., “Strategic: Why Compete? Collaborate!” World Executive’s Digest, Oc., pp.29-34.
23.Merrifield B. (1989),"Strategic alliances in the global Marketplace," Research Technology Management. Jan./Feb.,p.15.
24.Nohria, N., & Garcia-Pont, C. (1991). Global strategic linkages and industry structure. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 105-124.
25.Nueno, P. and Oosterveld, C.（1988）,Managing Technology Alliance, Long Range Planning,21(3),11-17 of Management Journal, Vol.35, No1, pp.122-160.
26.Porter M.E. & Fuller M.B. (1986), “Coalitions and Global Strategy,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 68, pp. 79-91.
27.Porter, M. E. & Fuller, R. (1986), “Competitive in Global Industries ,” Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press, pp.315-344.
28.Shannon W. Anderson and Jesse H. Jones (2006) “Managing Strategic Alliance Risk: Survey Evidence of Control Practices in Collaborative”.
29.Spekman, R. E., Isabella, L. A., MacAvoy, T. C., & Forbes, T., Ⅲ ,(1998), “Creating strategic alliances which endure,” Long Range Planning, 29(3), 346-357.
30.Turner, L. (1987). Industrial Collaboration with Japan, by Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.
31.Williamson, O. and W. G. Ouchi（1981）,”The markets and hierarchies and the visible hand perspectives,” Perspectives on Organization Design and Behavior, pp.347-370.
32.Williamson, O.E.(1991),. ‘Comparative economic organization: the analysis of discrete structural alternatives,’ Administrative Science Quarterly, 36: 269-296.