跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.192.49.72) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/09/11 05:00
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:曾暐婷
研究生(外文):Wei-Ting Tseng
論文名稱:以多層次分析探討空氣污染對學童氣喘與肺功能之相關性研究
論文名稱(外文):The association of air pollution with asthma and lung function of children in multilevel analysis
指導教授:李建宏李建宏引用關係
指導教授(外文):Chien-Hung Lee
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:高雄醫學大學
系所名稱:公共衛生學研究所
學門:醫藥衛生學門
學類:公共衛生學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2008
畢業學年度:96
語文別:中文
論文頁數:94
中文關鍵詞:氣喘空氣污染ISAAC問卷肺功能多層次分析
外文關鍵詞:AsthmaAir pollutionISAACLung functionMultilevel analysis
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:299
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
氣喘及肺功能可能會受社區、個體等多層次因素所影響,而過去單一層次的研究對整個族群的了解有限。本研究使以多層次模式分析學童個體層次因素及學校社區層次因素對肺功能的影響,了解肺功能在學童間和學校間的變異。
本研究分析民國84年高屏區所進行的學童呼吸系統健康檢查資料,僅納入距空氣品質監測站3公里以內的國中,共56所88,902位學童接受International Study of Asthma and Allergy in Childhood(ISAAC)錄影帶問卷篩檢氣喘,並調查學童個體等危險因子。除氣喘之外,16,287位有進行肺功能檢測。
結果發現,學童FVC、FEV1、FEV1/FVC、PEF、PEF%等肺功能和氣喘盛行狀況在一定的程度上受其所在的學校不同而不同。在分別納入不同個體層次的變數後,不管是社區層次或個體層次的變異都有部分被解釋,且在兩個層次裡仍有變異存在。此外,發現學童肺功能的變異仍約有2.56~9.95%來自於社區層次,氣喘盛行的變異仍有2.81%,即不同學校間的學童這些肺功能和氣喘仍有群聚的效應存在。
考慮社區層次空氣污染後,臭氧確實能降低兩個層次的FEV1/FVC變異,總懸浮微粒和落塵量對於PEF%也有同樣的結果。而氣喘的部份,則是二氧化氮、臭氧、碳氫化合物、落塵量能部份解釋社區層次的變異情形。
BMI超過23.1 kg/m2 對FVC和FEV1的影響會隨學校不同而不同,即學校的脈絡現象會修飾個體層次BMI超過23.1 kg/m2 這變項和FVC和FEV1之間的關係。
運用隨機效應的多層次分析模式較傳統固定效應的分析模式合理及正確,在考量個體層次因素的影響後,社區層次的脈絡因素亦對學童的FVC與FEV1有顯著的影響性。
Asthma and lung function may be affected by both school (community) and schoolchildren (individual) level factors. In the single level analysis we can not completely understand whole group health disparity. We used multilevel analysis to understand the association between different level factors with asthma and lung function. And we estimated both between schoolchildren and between school variance in asthma and lung function
By using the video edition of International Study of Asthma and Allergy in Children (ISAAC), we studied the prevalence of asthma from 88,902 schoolchildren in 56 junior high schools. And each school is within 3 kilometers from air-monitoring station. Besides, we also measured the lung function of the schoolchildren.
The study found that distribution of FVC, FEV1, FEV1/FVC, PEF, PEF%, and prevalence of asthma differed from each school. After adjusted schoolchildren level factors, variance between schoolchildren and between school were partly explained but still existed. About 2.56~9.95% and 2.81% of the schoolchildren residual differences in lung function and asthma were related to school level. The potential clustering effect of asthma and lung function was found within schools.
After taking into account the outdoor air pollutant, ozone reduced two levels variance of FEV1/FVC. Total suspended particulate and airborne dust particles had the same effect on PEF%. And a portion of school level asthma variance was explained by NO2, O3, Carbon hydrogen compound, and airborne dust particles.
The effect of BMI above 23.1 kg/m2 on FVC and FEV1 was based on different school. The school context modifies the schoolchildren association between BMI above 23.1 kg/m2 with FVC and FEV1 these two lung function.
The random effect of multilevel analysis is more rational and correct than fixed effect of single level analysis. Schoolchildren asthma and lung function differences were partly conditioned by the schoolchildren composition of the schools and school contextual factors.
摘要 I
Abstract III
目錄 IV
第一章 緒論 2
第一章 緒論 2
第一節 研究背景 4
第二節 研究目的 5
第二章 文獻探討 6
第一節 氣喘 6
第二節 肺功能 10
第三節 空氣污染 12
第四節 危險因子 14
第五節 多層次分析 18
第三章 材料與方法 19
第一節 研究設計 19
第二節 資料來源 19
第三節 研究對象及資料前處理 21
第四節 研究變項 22
第五節 統計方法 25
第六節 名詞界定 28
第四章 結果 29
第一節 研究對象基本資料之描述 29
第二節 個體層次因素與氣喘、肺功能 32
第三節 社區層次因素與氣喘、肺功能 34
第四節 肺功能多層次模式分析 36
第五節 氣喘多層次模式分析 42
第五章 討論 43
第一節 氣喘 43
第二節 肺功能 46
第三節 多層次分析 47
第四節 結論 51
附圖 52
附表 55
參考文獻 87
1.Bateman, E.D., et al., Global strategy for asthma management and prevention: GINA executive summary. Eur Respir J, 2008. 31(1): p. 143-78.
2.Yeh, K.W., W. Fang, and J.L. Huang, Increasing the hospitalization of asthma in children not in adults - from a national survey in Taiwan 1996-2002. Pediatr Allergy Immunol, 2008. 19(1): p. 13-9.
3.Ho, W.C., et al., Air pollution, weather, and associated risk factors related to asthma prevalence and attack rate. Environ Res, 2007. 104(3): p. 402-9.
4.Tsai, S.S., et al., Air pollution and hospital admissions for asthma in a tropical city: Kaohsiung, Taiwan. Inhal Toxicol, 2006. 18(8): p. 549-54.
5.行政院衛生署, 氣喘診療指引. 2000, 台北市: 衛生署.
6.GINA. Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention. 2006 [cited; Available from: www.ginaasthma.org.
7.Price, D., et al., International Primary Care Respiratory Group (IPCRG) Guidelines: management of allergic rhinitis. Prim Care Respir J, 2006. 15(1): p. 58-70.
8.Corrao, W.M., S.S. Braman, and R.S. Irwin, Chronic cough as the sole presenting manifestation of bronchial asthma. N Engl J Med, 1979. 300(12): p. 633-7.
9.Killian, K.J., et al., Symptom perception during acute bronchoconstriction. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2000. 162(2 Pt 1): p. 490-6.
10.Cockcroft, D.W., Bronchoprovocation methods: direct challenges. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol, 2003. 24(1): p. 19-26.
11.Cockcroft, D.W. and B.E. Davis, Mechanisms of airway hyperresponsiveness. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 2006. 118(3): p. 551-9; quiz 560-1.
12.Zhang, J., P.D. Pare, and A.J. Sandford, Recent advances in asthma genetics. Respir Res, 2008. 9: p. 4.
13.Franco, R., et al., Cost-effectiveness analysis of a state funded programme for control of severe asthma. BMC Public Health, 2007. 7(147): p. 82.
14.Vogelberg, C., et al., Leisure time activity and new onset of wheezing during adolescence. Eur Respir J, 2007. 30(4): p. 672-6.
15.黃璟隆, 邁入21世紀-台灣氣喘病的新課題. 長庚醫訊, 2000. 21(4): p. 20-22.
16.洪濬 and 謝文斌, 氣喘問題為何日益嚴重?. 當代醫學, 1998. 25(8): p. 638-640.
17.Wong, G.W. and C.M. Chow, Childhood asthma epidemiology: insights from comparative studies of rural and urban populations. Pediatr Pulmonol, 2008. 43(2): p. 107-16.
18.謝貴雄, 小兒氣喘病之預防和處理. 中華民國小兒科醫學會雜誌, 1995. 36: p. 9-20.
19.林瑞雄, 學童呼吸系統健康檢查計畫. 1996: 行政院環境保護署.
20.Lee, Y.L., et al., Time trend of asthma prevalence among school children in Taiwan: ISAAC phase I and III surveys. Pediatr Allergy Immunol, 2007. 18(3): p. 188-95.
21.中央健保局, 中央健康保險局氣喘病醫療給付改善方案試辦計畫. 2001.
22.行政院衛生署, 生命統計. 2004.
23.Pellegrino, R., et al., Interpretative strategies for lung function tests. Eur Respir J, 2005. 26(5): p. 948-68.
24.行政院環境保護署空氣品質保護及噪音管制處, 中華民國八十五年台灣地區空氣污染防制總檢討.
25.Ober, C., Perspectives on the past decade of asthma genetics. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 2005. 116(2): p. 274-8.
26.Holgate, S.T., Genetic and environmental interaction in allergy and asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 1999. 104(6): p. 1139-46.
27.Bjerg-Backlund, A., et al., Asthma during the primary school ages--prevalence, remission and the impact of allergic sensitization. Allergy, 2006. 61(5): p. 549-55.
28.Kattan, M., et al., Health effects of indoor nitrogen dioxide and passive smoking on urban asthmatic children. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 2007. 120(3): p. 618-24.
29.Morgan, W.J., et al., Results of a home-based environmental intervention among urban children with asthma. N Engl J Med, 2004. 351(11): p. 1068-80.
30.Babin, S.M., et al., Pediatric patient asthma-related emergency department visits and admissions in Washington, DC, from 2001-2004, and associations with air quality, socio-economic status and age group. Environ Health, 2007. 6: p. 9.
31.D''Amato, G., et al., Environmental risk factors and allergic bronchial asthma. Clin Exp Allergy, 2005. 35(9): p. 1113-24.
32.Farchi, S., et al., Dietary factors associated with wheezing and allergic rhinitis in children. Eur Respir J, 2003. 22(5): p. 772-80.
33.Kilpelainen, M., et al., Body mass index and physical activity in relation to asthma and atopic diseases in young adults. Respir Med, 2006. 100(9): p. 1518-25.
34.Arshad, S.H., et al., Early life risk factors for current wheeze, asthma, and bronchial hyperresponsiveness at 10 years of age. Chest, 2005. 127(2): p. 502-8.
35.Morgenstern, V., et al., Respiratory health and individual estimated exposure to traffic-related air pollutants in a cohort of young children. Occup Environ Med, 2007. 64(1): p. 8-16.
36.McCreanor, J., et al., Respiratory effects of exposure to diesel traffic in persons with asthma. N Engl J Med, 2007. 357(23): p. 2348-58.
37.Brauer, M., et al., Air pollution and development of asthma, allergy and infections in a birth cohort. Eur Respir J, 2007. 29(5): p. 879-88.
38.Villeneuve, P.J., et al., Outdoor air pollution and emergency department visits for asthma among children and adults: a case-crossover study in northern Alberta, Canada. Environ Health, 2007. 6: p. 40.
39.Gauderman, W.J., et al., The effect of air pollution on lung development from 10 to 18 years of age. N Engl J Med, 2004. 351(11): p. 1057-67.
40.Downs, S.H., et al., Reduced exposure to PM10 and attenuated age-related decline in lung function. N Engl J Med, 2007. 357(23): p. 2338-47.
41.Rasbash, J., et al., A User''s Guide to MLwiN (Version 2.0). 2005: Centre for Multilevel Modelling, University of Bristol.
42.Merlo, J., et al., A brief conceptual tutorial on multilevel analysis in social epidemiology: interpreting neighbourhood differences and the effect of neighbourhood characteristics on individual health. J Epidemiol Community Health, 2005. 59(12): p. 1022-8.
43.Merlo, J., et al., A brief conceptual tutorial of multilevel analysis in social epidemiology: linking the statistical concept of clustering to the idea of contextual phenomenon. J Epidemiol Community Health, 2005. 59(6): p. 443-9.
44.Merlo, J., et al., A brief conceptual tutorial on multilevel analysis in social epidemiology: investigating contextual phenomena in different groups of people. J Epidemiol Community Health, 2005. 59(9): p. 729-36.
45.Chiang, L.C., et al., Prevalence and severity of symptoms of asthma, allergic rhinitis, and eczema in 10- to 15-year-old schoolchildren in central Taiwan. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol, 2007. 25(1): p. 1-5.
46.Cloutier, M.M., et al., Childhood asthma in an urban community: prevalence, care system, and treatment. Chest, 2002. 122(5): p. 1571-9.
47.Crain, E.F., et al., An estimate of the prevalence of asthma and wheezing among inner-city children. Pediatrics, 1994. 94(3): p. 356-62.
48.Findley, S., et al., Elevated asthma and indoor environmental exposures among Puerto Rican children of East Harlem. J Asthma, 2003. 40(5): p. 557-69.
49.Mvula, M., et al., Prevalence of asthma and asthma-like symptoms in inner-city schoolchildren. J Asthma, 2005. 42(1): p. 9-16.
50.Persky, V.W., et al., Relationships of race and socioeconomic status with prevalence, severity, and symptoms of asthma in Chicago school children. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol, 1998. 81(3): p. 266-71.
51.Tanaka, K., et al., Prevalence of asthma and wheeze in relation to passive smoking in Japanese children. Ann Epidemiol, 2007. 17(12): p. 1004-10.
52.Lewis, S.A., et al., Secondhand smoke, dietary fruit intake, road traffic exposures, and the prevalence of asthma: a cross-sectional study in young children. Am J Epidemiol, 2005. 161(5): p. 406-11.
53.Gilliland, F.D., Y.F. Li, and J.M. Peters, Effects of maternal smoking during pregnancy and environmental tobacco smoke on asthma and wheezing in children. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2001. 163(2): p. 429-36.
54.Shimoda, T., et al., Investigation of the mechanism of alcohol-induced bronchial asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 1996. 97(1 Pt 1): p. 74-84.
55.Thyagarajan, B., et al., Longitudinal association of body mass index with lung function: the CARDIA study. Respir Res, 2008. 9: p. 31.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top