(3.237.97.64) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/03/03 05:04
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果

詳目顯示:::

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:李俊諺
研究生(外文):Jiun-Yan Li
論文名稱:以前置時間為基礎評估供應鏈交期績效
論文名稱(外文):Evaluating Supply Chain Delivery Performance Based on Lead Time Approach
指導教授:蘇明鴻蘇明鴻引用關係
指導教授(外文):Ming-Hung Shu
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立高雄應用科技大學
系所名稱:工業工程與管理系碩士班
學門:工程學門
學類:工業工程學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2008
畢業學年度:96
語文別:日文
論文頁數:53
中文關鍵詞:前置時間交期績效圖製程能力指標摩托羅拉六標準差下信賴界限
外文關鍵詞:lead timedelivery performance chartprocess capability indexMotorola Six-Sigmalower confidence bound
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:672
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:9
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
在供應鏈網路中降低變異和同步化流程是達成及時交貨的關鍵。交期績效的評估在供應鏈中的全面管理和控制是重要的構成要素。在本研究中我們使用前置時間(Lead time)和交期績效圖(Delivery performance chart; DPC)評估供應鏈網路中每階段的交期績效。前置時間對組織而言是重要的交期績效準則。交期績效圖(Delivery performance chart; DPC)是由製程能力指標(Process capability index; PCI)和摩托羅拉六標準差(Motorola Six-Sigma) 組成的並且能同步地顯現供應鏈網路中交期績效的眾多重要特性。我們也藉由在交期績效圖中描繪PCI的下信賴界限(Lower confidence bound; LCB)。LCB是以樣本資料為基礎,在考慮抽樣誤差下來衡量最小交期能力的衡量工具。最後,我們將所提出的方法應用在筆記型電腦產業商業流程的個案研究並且評估該供應鏈流程中每階段的交期績效。
Variability reduction and business synchronization are acknowledged as keys to achieve timely deliveries in supply-chain networks. The evaluation of delivery performance is a crucial component in the overall management and time control of a supply chain. In this research we use the lead time and delivery performance chart (DPC) to measure the delivery performance of every stage in a serial supply chain. The lead time is an important metric of delivery performance for organizations. The DPC integrated by the process capability indices (PCIs) and the concept of Motorola Six-Sigma is proposed to provide several simultaneously visualized important features of delivery performance in a supply chain. We also consider the uncertainty of the estimated PCIs caused by sampling data and plot their lower confidence bounds (LCBs) in the DPC to measure the minimum delivery capability of each stage in the supply chain. Finally, a case study related to a supply chain of notebook industry is presented to demonstrate how the proposed approach can be applied to evaluate delivery performance for the further variability reduction of the lead time.
CONTENTS
CHINESE ABSTRACT..................................................i
ABSTARACT.........................................................ii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT...................................................iii
TABLES OF CONTENTS................................................iv
LIST OF TABLES....................................................v
LIST OF FIGURES...................................................vi
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION............................................1
CHAPTER II LITERATURE REVIEW......................................5
2.1 Delivery Window...............................................5
2.2 Process Capability Index(PCI).................................6
2.3 Concept of Motorola Six-Sigma.................................8
CHAPTER III METHODOLOGY...........................................10
3.1Supply Chain Model.............................................10
3.2Lower Confidence Bound (LCB)of PCIs for the Supply Chain Model.12
3.2.1 Lower Confidence Bound of Cpm...............................13
3.2.2 Lower Confidence Bound of Spk...............................16
3.3 Delivery Performance Chart(DPC)...............................20
3.3.1 Motorola Six-Sigma Level Zones..............................21
3.3.2 Cpm DPC.....................................................23
3.3.3 Spk DPC.....................................................26
CHAPTER IV AN APPLICATION CASE....................................28
CHAPTER Ⅴ CONCLUSION.............................................37
REFERENCE.........................................................38
Appendix..........................................................43
作者簡介...........................................................47
[1]Antony, J. and R. Banuelas, 2001, “A strategy for survival”, Manufacturing Engineer, vol. 80(3), pp. 119-121.
[2]Boyles, R. A., 1991, “The Taguchi capability index”, Journal of Quality Technology, vol. 23, pp.17-26.
[3]Boyles, R. A., 1994, “Process capability with asymmetric tolerances”, Communications in Statistics, vol. 23(3), pp.615-643.
[4]Chan L. K., Cheng S. W., and F. A. Spring, 1988, “A new measure of process capability: Cpm”, Journal of Quality Technology, vol. 20, pp.162-173.
[5]Chen, K. S., Huang, M. L. and R. K. Li, 2001, “Process capability analysis for an entire product” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 39(17), pp.4077-4087.
[6]Corbett, L. M., 1992, “Delivery windows—a new view on improving manufacturing flexibility and on-time delivery performance”, Production and Inventory Management Journal, vol. 33(3), pp.74-79.
[7]Garg, D., Narahari, Y., and N. Viswanadham, 2004, “Design of Six Sigma supply chains”, IEEE transactions on automation science and engineering, vol. 1(1), pp.38-57.
[8]Garg, D., Narahari, Y., and N. Viswanadham, 2006, “Achieving sharp deliveries in supply chains through variance pool allocation”, European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 171, pp.227-254.
[9]Guiffrida, A. L. and R. Nagi, 2006, “Cost characterizations of supply chain delivery performance”, International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 102, pp.22-36.
[10]Harry, M. and R. Schroeder, 2000, Six-Sigma: the breakthrough management strategy revolutionizing the world’s top corporations, Random House, USA.
[11]Huang, M. L., Chen, K. S. and Y. H. Hung, 2002, “Integrated process capability analysis with an application in backlight module”, Microelectronics & Reliability, vol. 42, pp.2009-2014.
[12]Hsiang, T. C. and G. Taguchi, 1985, A tutorial on quality control and assurance-the Taguchi methods , ASA Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.
[13]Jaruphongsa, W., Centinkaya, S. and C. H. Lee, 2004, “Warehouse space capacity and delivery time window considerations in dynamic lot-sizing for a simply supply chain”, International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 92(2), pp.169-180.
[14]Kane, V. E., 1986, “Process capability indices”, Journal of Quality Technology, vol. 18, pp.41-52.
[15]Kotz, S. and N. L. Johnson, 1993, Process Capability Indices, Chapman & Hall, London.
[16]Kotz, S. and C. R. Lovelace, 1998, Process Capability Indices in Theory and Practice, Arnold, London.
[17]Kotz, S. and N. L. Johnson, 2002, “Process capability indices – a review, 1992-2000”, Journal of Quality Technology, vol. 34(1), pp.1-19.
[18]Lee, C. H., Centinkaya, S. and A.P.M. Wagelmans, 2001, “A dynamic lot-sizing model with demand time windows”, Management Science, vol. 47(10), pp.1384-1395.
[19]Lee, J. C., Hung, H. N., Pearn, W. L., and T. L. Kueng, 2002, “On the Distribution of the Estimated Process Yield Index Spk”, Quality and Reliability Engineering International, vol. 18, pp.111-116.
[20]Pearn, W. L., Kotz, S. and N. L. Johnson, 1992, “Distributional and inferential properties of process capability indices”, Journal of Quality Technology, vol. 24, pp.216-231.
[21]Pearn, W. L. and K. S. Chen, 1997, “Multi-process performance analysis: a case study”, Quality Engineering, vol. 10(1), pp.1-8.
[22]Pearn, W. L., Lin, G. H. and K. S. Chen, 1998, “Distributional and inferential properties of the process accuracy and process precision”, Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods, vol. 27(4), pp.985-1000.
[23]Pearn, W. L., Ko, C. H., and K. H. Wang, 2002, “A multi-process performance analysis chart based on the incapability index Cpp : an application to the chip resistors”, Microelectronics Reliability, vol. 42(7), pp.1121-1125.
[24]Pearn, W. L. and M. H. Shu, 2003, “Lower confidence bounds with sample size information for Cpm applied to production yield assurance”, International Journal of Production Research, vol. 41(15), pp.3581-3599.
[25]Pearn, W. L., Shu, M. H., and B. M. Hsu, 2004, “Cpm MPPAC for manufacturing quality control applied to precision voltage reference process”, International Journal Manufacturing Technology, vol. 23, pp.712-719.
[26]Pearn, W. L. and S. Kotz, 2006, Encyclopedia and handbook of process capability indices. A Comprehensive Exposition of Quality Control Measures Series of Quality, Reliability and Engineering Statistics, Vol.12, World Scientific, Singapore.
[27]Ruczinski, I., 1996, “The relation between Cpm and the degree of inclusion. Doctoral dissertation”, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germary.
[28]Singhal S. C., 1990, “A new chart for analyzing multi-process performance”, Quality Engineering, vol. 2(4), pp.379-390.
[29]Singhal S. C., 1991, “Multi-process performance analysis chart (MPPAC) with capability zones”, Quality Engineering, vol. 4(1), pp.75-81.
[30]Shu, M. H., 2006, “Manufacturing capability assurance for product with multiple characteristics: a case study applied to low dropout voltage regulator”, International Journal of Industrial Engineering, vol. 13(1), .pp. 41-50.
[31]Stevenson, W. J. 2007, Operation management international student edition with global readings, McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York.
[32]Tadukamala, P., 1994, “The confusion over Six Sigma quality”, Quality Progress, vol. 27(11), pp.83-95.
[33]Wilson, E. B. and M. M. Hilferty, 1931, “The distribution of Chi-Square”, Proceedings of the Notional Academy of Sciences, Washington, vol. 17, pp. 684-688.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊
 
系統版面圖檔 系統版面圖檔