跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.192.95.161) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/10/04 14:33
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:黃政傑
研究生(外文):Jeng-Jie Huang
論文名稱:市售護腕滑鼠墊材質對手腕壓力影響之研究
論文名稱(外文):The Material of Wristlet Mousepad Influence Wrist Pressure
指導教授:盧瑞琴盧瑞琴引用關係
指導教授(外文):Rui-Qin Lu
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立高雄應用科技大學
系所名稱:工業工程與管理系碩士班
學門:工程學門
學類:工業工程學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2008
畢業學年度:96
語文別:中文
論文頁數:65
中文關鍵詞:手腕壓力滑鼠墊
外文關鍵詞:wristpressuremouse pad
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:7
  • 點閱點閱:1194
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:45
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
本研究主要目的是想要探討操作者使用滑鼠時,使用不同材質的護腕滑鼠墊,對手腕部位所產生的壓力值是否有顯著的差異性存在,以及手腕部位呈現的壓力值是否與手腕部位舒適度的主觀評比有不一致的現象。
研究中主要使用壓力量測系統T2000來與三種市面上最常見、最普遍使用的護腕滑鼠墊材質(矽膠、塑膠、聚氨酯)做討論,且會在實驗後做一份主觀評量的問卷,來對手腕部位的壓力與主觀感覺之間做對照,而之研究結論如下:
1. 壓力量測系統中得知,紅色點數(超過臨界值)方面聚氨酯平均8.07最好、矽膠的14其次、塑膠16.4最差;紅色點數壓力方面,聚氨酯的壓力861.53psi最好、矽膠的1661.47psi其次、塑膠的2012psi壓力最差;總和壓力方面,聚氨酯的壓力1497.47psi最好、矽膠的2465.73psi其次、塑膠的2770.73psi壓力最差。而主觀評量方面得知,舒適度得分以聚氨酯的平均1.6最好、塑膠的2.87其次、矽膠的3.53最差。
2. 三種護腕滑鼠墊在紅色點數、紅色點數壓力、總和壓力都有顯著性的差異。
3. 相關性比較方面來看,壓力與主觀舒適度之間並沒有顯著的相關性,顯示出來的結果說明了並非壓力值大,主觀評量的得分就比較好,故本研究的手腕部位呈現的壓力值與手腕部位的舒適度的主觀評比是不一致的。
整體來看的話,聚氨酯材質的護腕滑鼠墊在三項的評比最好、矽膠其次、塑膠
則是最差的,以上結果可供選擇護腕滑鼠墊材質時的參考。
The purpose of this research is to explore the operator to use the mouse, the use of different materials mouse pads, wrist position of the pressure generated by the value of whether there are significant differences exist, and whether there is phenomenon inconsistent with the wrist position comfortable subjective assessment in the pressure value that the wrist position appear.
Research on the use of pressure in the main measurement system T2000 to the market with the three most common and widespread use of the mouse pad material (silicone, plastics, polyurethane) to discuss, and will do the experiment after a subjective assessment of the questionnaire, to the wrist positions pressure and subjective feeling to do between the control and the conclusion of the research are as follows:
1. Pressure measurement system that the red points (over the threshold) polyurethane average 8.07 best, followed by the 14 silicone, plastic 16.4 worst;the red points pressure, polyurethane 861.53 psi best, followed by the 1661.47 psi silicone, plastic 2012 psi worst;the sum total pressure, polyurethane 1497.47 psi best, followed by the 2465.73 psi silicone, plastic 2770.73 psi worst;the subjective assessment that the comfort to score polyurethane best average of 1.6, followed by the plastic of 2.87, 3.53 silicone the worst.
2. Three kinds of mouse pad in the red points, the red points pressure, the sum total pressure are significant differences.
3. Dependence is comparative the respect is come to watch, there is no apparent dependence between pressure and subjective assessment, the result shown has not proved pressure value is big, it is better to comment the score of subjective assessment, so the subjective comparison and assessment of comfort degree of pressure value and wrist position appearing in wrist position of this research is inconsistent.
Come to see wholly, the mouse pad of the polyurethane material is the best in the assessment of three items, secondly the silicone, the plastics is the worst, the above result may supply the choice when the wrist mouse pad material quality the reference.
摘 要 i
ABSTRACT ii
致謝 iv
目錄 v
圖目錄 vii
表目錄 viii
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景與動機 1
1.2 研究目的 3
1.3 研究限制 3
1.4 研究架構 3
第二章 文獻探討 5
2.1 護腕滑鼠墊的介紹 5
2.2 手部生物力學探討 6
2.3 腕部的累積性傷害研究 9
2.4 主觀評量 12
第三章 研究方法 14
3.1 實驗受試者 14
3.2 實驗設備 15
3.2.1 硬體方面 15
3.2.2 軟體方面 17
3.3 問卷設計 18
3.4 實驗設計 18
3.4.1 自變項 18
3.4.2 依變項 18
3.4.3 控制變項 20
3.5 實驗程序 21
3.6 實驗資料蒐集 26
3.6.1 壓力訊號 26
3.6.2 主觀評量 28
第四章 實驗結果與分析 29
4.1統計與分析法探討 29
4.1.1 變異數分析 29
4.1.2 One-Way ANOVA 檢定 30
4.2實驗數據 30
4.2.1 受測者實驗數據 30
4.2.2 常態性與同質性檢定 33
4.2.3 描述統計量 36
4.2.4 ANOVA檢定 37
4.2.5 多重比較檢定-LSD 38
4.3 主觀評量 40
4.3.1 受測者主觀評量數據 40
4.3.2 描述性統計量 41
4.4 相關性比較 42
4.5 綜合比較 42
4.6 討論 44
第五章 結論與建議 46
5.1 結論 46
5.2 後續研究建議 47
參考文獻 48
附錄A:市售護腕滑鼠墊材質對手腕部位壓力的主觀評比問卷 52
作者簡介 54
參考文獻
1. Aaras, A., Fostervold, K.I., Ro, O., Thoresen, M., Larsen, S., 1997.Postural load during VDU work: a comparison between various workpostures. Ergonomics 40, 1255–1268.
2.Albin, T. (1997), “Effect of wrist rest use and keyboard tilt on wrist angle while keying”, Paper presented at the 13th Triennial Conference of the International Ergonomics Association.
3.Amstrong, T. J., Martin, B. J., Franzblau, A., Rempel, D.M. and Johnson, P. W. ,“Mouse input devices and workrelated upper limb disorder”,Proceedings of WWDU 1994,eds A. Grieco, G. Molteni, E. Occhipinti and B. PiccoliElsevier Science,Amsterdam,p.375-380,1995.
4.Bernard, B., Sauter, S., Petersen, M., Fine, L.and Hales, T. (1993), Health Hazard Evaluations and technical Assistance Branch, NIOSH, US Dept of Health and Human Services, Cincinnati, ohio, NIOSH Report No. HETA-90-013-2277, 119.
5.Cook C., Burgess-Limerick R. and Chang S., 2000, “The prevalence of neck and upper extremity musculoskeletal symptoms in computer mouse users”, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, No.26, pp.347–356.
6.David L. Leea, Hugh McLooneb, Jack T. Dennerleina , “Observed finger behaviour during computer mouse use” , Applied Ergonomics 39 (2008) 107–113.
7.Fogleman Maxwell and Brogmus George, Computer mouse use and cumulayive trauma disorders of the upper extremities,Ergonomics Vol.38,No.2,p.2465-2475,1995.
8.Fogleman Maxwell and Brogmus George, Computer mouse use andcumulayive trauma disorders of the upper extremities, Ergonomics Vol.38,No.2 p.2465-2475,1995.
9.Harvey, R. and Peper, E., Surface electromyography andmouse use position, Ergonomics Vol.40,No.8,p.781-789,1997.
10.Johnson, P. W., Tal, R., Smutz, W. P. and Rempel, D. M.,Fingertip forces measured during computer mouse operation:A comparision of pointed and dragging, Proceeedings of theInternational Ergonomics Association 1994 Meeting Vol.2,Occupational Health Safety,1993.
11.Johnson, P. W., Tal, R., Smutz, W. P. and Rempel, D. M.,Fingertip forces measured during computer mouse operation:A comparision of pointed and dragging, Proceeedings of theInternational Ergonomics Association 1994 Meeting Vol.2,Occupational Health Safety,1994
12.Kadefors, R., Areskoug, A., Dahlman, S., Kilbom, A., Sperling, L., Wikstrom, L. and Oster, J. (1993), “An approach to ergonomics evaluation of hand tools”, Applied Ergonomics, 24(3), 203-211.
13.Keir, P. J., Bach, J. M., & Rempel, D. M. (1998a). Effects of finger posture on carpal tunnel pressure during wrist motion. Journal of Hand Surgery, 23A, 1004–1009.
14.Keir, P. J., Bach, J. M., & Rempel, D. M. (1998b). Fingertip loading and carpal tunnel pressure: Differences between a pinching and pressing task. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 16, 112–115.
15.Keir, P. J., Wells, R. P., Ranney, D. A., & Lavery, W. (1997). The effects of tendon load and posture on carpal tunnel pressure. Journal of Hand Surgery, 22A, 628–634.
16.Lean Karlqvist, Mats Hagberg, and Kristina Selin,“Variation in upper limb posture and movement during word proceeding with and without mouse use”,Ergonomics, 37,pp.1261-1267,1994.
17.Lundborg, G. N., Gelberman, R. H., Minteer-Convery, M., Lee, Y. F., & Hargens, A. R. (1982). Median nerve compression in the carpal tunnel – Functional response to experimentally induced controlled pressure. Journal of Hand Surgery, 7A, 252–259.
18.Peper, E. and Tibbetts, V., 1994, “Illness at the computer keyboard : Part É : Workstation/ergonomics assessment and modification”, Proceeding of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Association for Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, pp.93–96.
19.Peter J. Keir, Jole M. Bach,1999, Flextor muscle incursion into the carpal tunnel: a mechanism for increased carpal tunnel pressure ,Clinical Biomechanics,vol.15,p. 301-305.
20.Peter J. Keir, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, Joel M. Bach, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Aurora, Colorado, and Mark Hudes and David M. Rempel, University of California, San Francisco, Richmond, California,Guidelines for Wrist Posture Based on Carpal Tunnel Pressure Thresholds (2007).
21.Peter J. Keir, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, Joel M. Bach, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Aurora, Colorado, and Mark Hudes and David M.Rempel, University of California, San Francisco, Richmond, California,Guidelines for Wrist Posture Based on Carpal Tunnel Pressure Thresholds(2007).
22.Putz–Anderson, V., 1992, “Cumulative Trauma Disorders, A manual for musculoskeletal disease of the upper limbs”, NIOSH:Taylor and Francis, OH.
23.R.Werner, R., Armstrong, T. J., Bir, C., & Aylard, M. K. (1997). Intracarpal canal pressures: The role of finger, hand, wrist and forearm position. Clinical Biomechanics, 12, 44–51.
24.Rempel, D. M., Bach, J. M., Gordon, L., & So, Y. (1998). Effects of forearm pronation/supination on carpal tunnel pressure. Journal of Hand Surgery, 23A, 38–42.
25.Rempel, D. M., Keir, P. J., Smutz, W. P., & Hargens, A. R. (1997). The effects of static fingertip loading on carpal tunnel pressure. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 15, 422–426.
26.Rempel, D., Horie, S., 1994. Effect of wrist posture during typing on carpal tunnel pressure. In: A. Grieco, G. Molteni, E. Occhipinti, B. Piccoli (Eds.) Work with Display Units WWDU ’94, vol. 3. University of Milan, Milan, pp. C27–28.
27.Rempel, D.M., Krause, N., Goldberg, R., Benner, D., Hudes, M.,Goldner, G.U., 2006. A randomised controlled trial evaluating theeffects of two workstation interventions on upper body pain andincident musculoskeletal disorders among computer operators. Occup.Environ. Med. 63, 300–306.
28.Sinclair, M.A., Subjective assessment. In:J.R.,Wilson and E.N. Corlett ﹙Eds.﹚,Evaluation of human work. Taylor & Francis , London,58-88,1990.
29.Smith, M. J., Cohen, B. C. F., Stammerjohn, L. W. and Happ, A., 1981, “An investigation of health complaints and job stress in video display operations”, Human Factors, Vol. 23, pp. 387–400.
30.Visser, B., de Korte, E., van der Kraan, I., Kuijer, P., 2000. The effectof arm and wrist supports on the load of the upper extremityduring VDU work. Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon) 15 (Suppl 1),S34–S38.
31.Werner, R., Armstrong, T.J., Aylard, M.K., 1997. Intracarpal canal presure: the role of finger, hand, wrist and forearm position. Clin. Biomech. 12, 44–51.







1.台灣地區人體計測資料庫,2002。
2.行政院主計處電子處理資料中心,電腦應用概況調查93年度到95年度調查結果,2007年。
3.吳豐光、張若菡,「應用肩部動作型態分析於電腦使用者間不保健產品之設計」,成功大學工業設計研究所碩士論文,2002 年。
4.林弘宗,「學童滑鼠護腕墊設計與操作舒適度之評估」,成功大學工業設計研究所碩士論文,2002 年。
5.林昱君,「態度量表中檢定組間差異之統計方法」,國立政治大學統計研究所碩士論文,2004年。
6.胡明一等編譯,人體解剖學,藝軒圖書出版社,2001年。
7.徐延之,「長期使用滑鼠,小心危機四伏」,PC OFFICE,第6 期,P.174-175,1997年。
8.高雄醫學大學教育訓練網 http://www.kmu.edu.tw/admin/safe/training/documents/04.pdf

9.張文豪,「李克特式量表、分群方法與分群群數關係之研究」,國立成功大學工業管理研究所碩士論文,2002年。
10.張志宏、陳柏州,「滑鼠設計與操作之評估研究」,大葉大學工業工程研究所碩士論文,2000 年。
11.陳圳卿,民87。「電腦桌的設計與研究—滑鼠操作型態之探討」,大同工學院工業設計研究所碩士論文。
12.陳松林,「單指與雙指最大屈力之生物力學分析」,台灣工業技術學院工程技術研究所碩士論文,1993 年。
13.單位換算服務網 http://www.a1.com.tw/calc/

14.黃証柳、李永輝,「滑鼠之人因工程與績效評估」,國立台灣科技大學管理技術研究碩士論文,1998 年。
15.蔡家盛等人,PC Shopper 電腦專有名詞寶典,PC HOME 電腦家庭文化事業股份有限公司,頁211-212, 2001 年。
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊