跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(3.236.124.56) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/07/28 08:08
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:柯雅真
研究生(外文):Ya-Chen Ko
論文名稱:論複調、嘉年華小說、與對話論:一種巴克汀的閱讀
論文名稱(外文):A Bakhtinian Novel Discourse on Polyphony, Carnivalesque, and Dialogism
指導教授:鄭冠榮鄭冠榮引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立中興大學
系所名稱:外國語文學系所
學門:人文學門
學類:語言學類
論文種類:學術論文
畢業學年度:96
語文別:英文
論文頁數:87
中文關鍵詞:複調嘉年華小說對話論
外文關鍵詞:PolyphonyCarnivalesqueDialogism
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:353
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
本論文的主要目的在於將巴克汀文學理論當中的小說理論、複調概念、與嘉年華精神放入對話論之中,來揭櫫其共同具備的開放性和多元意義,而這正是巴克汀對話哲學的本質與精髓。本論文共分三章。第一章闡述巴克汀對文類的觀點,特別強調小說在文學史上的意義與角色。第二章是討論杜思妥也夫斯基小說中的複調概念。第三章則說明嘉年華小說中的諧擬、諷刺、以及對話的特質。巴克汀的小說論述如何與其對話哲學相呼應將是本論文探究的要點。討論的內容,除了巴克汀的文學理論,也涵蓋其它相關論述,如亞里斯多德的詩學、當代理論家托多洛夫(Tzvetan Todorov)之對話原理、霍奎斯特(Michael Holquist)之對話理論都在探查的範圍之內,以期產生更細緻的看法。筆者認為巴克汀對小說的閱讀在當代批評理論中更能夠協助讀者重新閱讀文本,並經由新奇的閱讀經驗來成就不同於過往研究的新論述。
The purpose of this thesis is to investigate Mikhail Bakhtin’s critical positions on genre and the novel, and to explore the critical approach he adopts to evaluate literary works. The thesis is composed of three chapters. Chapter One elaborates on Bakthin’s views about literary genre with special emphasis on the novel. Chapter Two discusses Bakhtin’s perspectives on the polyphonic effect of Dostoevskian novel. Chapter Three surveys the transportation of the spirit of carnival into the language in literature. This thesis gives weight to Bakhtin’s critical positions on genre and the novel, and has worked from a slightly different angle. Ideas of genre and the novel are the crucial issue of Bakthin’s literary theory, but little attention has been given to their philosophical significance. As readers, we must look more carefully so that Bakhtin’s dialogic philosophy of literature can be proved. Three heads seem to be helpful in attempting to sketch out the panorama of Bakhtin’s literary theory: (1) Genre and the Novel; (2) Polyphony; (3) Carnivalesque. All these things make it clear that the literary world is viewed by Bakhtin in terms of dialogue, dialogic interaction, and dialogism. It must be noted that the order is not listed according to their relative importance. Rather, it is arranged specifically to indicate their interconnection. We may, therefore, reasonably conclude that Bakhtin’s critical approach to literature is very informative in reporting that there are competing instincts within a literary text; that a text can simultaneously be subversive and conservative; and that readers must acknowledge the complexity of a literary text and the complexity of its historical and cultural impact.
Chinese Abstract I
English Abstract II
Contents III
Introduction 1
Chapter One: Genre and the Novel 15
Chapter Two: Polyphony 36
Chapter Three: Carnivalesque 56
Conclusion 69
Works Cited 82
Abrams, M. H. A Glossary of Literary Terms. 7th ed. Boston: Heinle & Heinle, 1999.
Adlam, Carol, Rachel Falconer, Vitalii Makhlin and Alastair Renfrew, eds. Face to Face: Bakhtin in Russia and the West. Sheffield: Sheffield Acad. P, 1997.
Atkins, G. Douglas and Laura Morrow, eds. Contemporary Literary Theory. Amherst: The U of Massachusetts P, 1989.
Atkins, G. Douglas. “Introduction: Literary Theory, Critical Practice and the Classroom.” Contemporary Literary Theory. 1-23.
Bakhtin, M. M. Art and Answerability: Early Philosophical Essays. Trans. Vadim Liapunov. Ed. Michael Holquist and Vadim Liapunov. Austin: U of Texas P, 1990.
---. The Dialogical Imagination: Four Essays. Trans. Carl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Ed. Michael Holquist. Austin: U of Texas P, 1981.
---. “Discourse in the Novel.” In The Dialogical Imagination: Four Essays. 259-422.
---. “Epic and Novel.” The Dialogical Imagination: Four Essays. 3-40.
---. Estetika slovesnogotvorchestva. Ed. S. G. Bocharov. Moscow: Iskusstvo, 1979.
---. The Formal Method in Literary Scholarship: A Critical Introduction to Sociological Poetics. P. N. Medvddev. Trans. Albert J. Wehrle. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1985. Published under the names M. M. Bakhtin/P. N. Medvedev.
---. “Forms of Time and the Chronotope in the Novel: Notes Toward a Historical Poetics.” The Dialogical Imagination: Four Essays. 84-258.
---. “From Notes made in 1970-71.” Speech Genres and Other Essays. 132-58.
---. “From the Prehistory of Novelistic Disccourse.” The Dialogical Imagination: Four Essays. 41-83.
---. Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics [the 1963 edition of the Dostoevsky book]. Trans. and Ed. Caryl Emerson. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1984.
---. “The Problem of Speech Genres.” Speech Genres and Other Essays. 60-102.
---. Rabelais and His World. Trans. Hélène Iswolsky. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT P, 1968.
---. Speech Genres and Other Essays. Trans. Vern W. McGee. Ed. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin: U of Texas P., 1986.
---. “ Toward a Reworking of the Dostoevsky Book.” Appendix 2. Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. 283-302.
Baldick, Chris. The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Literary Terms. Oxford, New York: Oxford UP, 1990.
Bernard-Donals, Michael F. Mikhail Bakhtin: Between Phenomenology and Marxism. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1994.
Bialostoscky, Don H. “Dialogic Criticism.” Contemporary Literary Theory. 214-28.
---. “Booth’s Rhetorics, Bakhtin’s Dialogics and the Future of Novel Criticism.” Why the Novel Matters: A Postmodern Perplex. Ed. Mark Spilka and Caroline McCracken-Flesher. Indiana UP, 1990. 22-29.
Booth, Wayne. The Rhetoric of Fiction. 2nd ed. Chicago: The U of Chicago P, 1983.
---. Introduction. Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. xiii-xxvii.
Brooker, Peter. “Refunctioning Theory: ‘at most pedagogics’.” Dialogue and Difference. Ed. Peter Brooker and Peter Humm. London and New York: Routledge, 1989. 73-89.
Burns, Gerald L. “Stevens without Epistemology.” Wallace Stevens: The Rhetorics of Modernism. Ed. Albert Gelpi. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1985. 24-40.
Clark, Katerina, and Michael Holquist. Mikhail Bakhtin. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1984.
Cooper, Lane. Introduction. Aristotle: On the Art of Poetry. Ithaca and London: Cornell UP, 1947.
Dallmayr, Fred R. Introduction. The Other: Studies in the Social Ontology of Husserl, Heidegger, Satre, and Buber. Michael Theunissen. Tr. Christopher Macann. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT P, 1984.
Danow, David K. The Thought of Mikhail Bakhtin: From Word to Culture. London: Macmillan, 1991.
Davis, Robert Con, ed. Contemporary Literary Criticism. New York & London: Longman, 1986.
Dentith, Simon, ed. Bakhtinian Thought: An Introductory Reader. London: Routledge, 1995.
Dostoevsky, Fyodor. Notes from Underground. Tr. Andrew R. MacAndrew. New York: Penguin Group, 1980.
Emerson, Caryl. “The Outer Word and Inner Speech: Bakhtin, Vygotsky, and the Internalization of Language.” Bakhtin: Essays and Dialogues on His Work. Ed. Cary Saul Morson. The U of Chicago P, 1986. 21-40.
Foucault, Michael. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Science. New York: Vintage Books, 1970.
Gardiner, Michael. The Dialogics of Critique: M. M. Bakhtin and the Theory of Ideology. London: Routledge, 1992.
Guerard, Albert J. The Triumph of the Novel: Dickens, Dostoevsky, Faulkner. New York: Oxford UP, 1976.
Guerin, Wilfred L., Earle G. Labor, Lee Morgan, and John R. Willingham. A Handbook of Critical Approaches to Literature. New York: Harper & Row, 1979.
Harris, Wendell V. “Bakhtinian Double Voicing in Dickens and Eliot.” ELH 57.2 (Summer 1990): 445-459.
Hirschkop, Ken. “Bakhtin, Discourse and Democracy.” New Left Review 160 (1986): 92-113.
Hirschkop, Ken and David Shepherd, eds. Bakhtin and Cultural Theory. Manchester: Manchester UP, 1989.
Holland, Philip. “Robert Burton’s Anatomy of Melancholy and Menippean Satire, Humanist and English.” Ph. D. dissertation. U of London, 1979.
Holquist, Michael. Dialogism: Bakhtin and His World. London: Methuen, 1990.
Holquist, Michael and Katerina Clark. Mikhail Bakhtin. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 1984.
Kristeva, Julia. “Word, Dialogue, and Novel.” Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. Trans. Leon S. Roudiez. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1980. 64-91.
Lodge, David. After Bakhtin: Essays on Fiction and Criticism. London: Routledge, 1990.
Mandelker, Amy, ed. Bakhtin in Contexts: Across the Disciplines. Evanston: Northwestern UP, 1995.
Morson, Gary Saul. “Who Speaks for Bakhtin?” Bakhtin: Essays and Dialogues on His Work. Ed. Gary Saul Emerson. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1986. 1-19.
Morson, Gary Saul, and Caryl Emerson. “Introduction: Rethinking Bakhtin.” Rethinking Bakhtin: Extensions and Challenges. Ed. Gary Saul Morson and Caryl Emerson. Northwestern UP, 1989.
---, eds. Rethinking Bakhtin: Extensions and Challenges. Evanston: Northwestern UP, 1989.
---. Mikhail Bakhtin: Creation of a Prosaics. Stanford: Standord UP, 1990.
Olson, Elder, ed. Introduction. Aristotle’s Poetics and English Literature. Chicago and London: The U of Chicago P, 1965.
Rauch, Leo. Plato’s the Republic and Phaedrus, Symposium, Apology, Crito, Phaedo and Other Works. New York: Monarch Press, 1965.
Sartre, Jean Paul. Being and Nothingness: An Essay in Phenomenological Ontology. Trans. Hazel E. Barnes. London: Methuen, 1977.
Saussure, Ferdinand de. Course in General Linguistics. Trans. Roy Harris. London: Duckworth, 1983.
Schwarz, Daniel R. “The Case for a Humanistic Poetics.” Why the Novel Matters: A Postmodern Perplex. Ed. Mark Spilka and Caoline McCracken-Flesher. Indians UP, 1990. 39-61.
Selden, Raman, and Peter Widdowson. A Reader’s Guide to Contemporary Literary Theory. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1993.
Stallybrass, Peter and Allon White. The Politics and Poetics of Transgression. London: Methuen, 1986.
Stam, Robert. “Mikhail Bakhtin and Left Cultural Critique.” Postmodernism and Its Discintents: Theories, Practices. Ed. E. Ann Kaplan. New York: Verso, 1989.
Stamelman, Richard. “The Dialogue of Absence.” Studies in Twentieth Century Literature 12.1 (1987): 93-113.
Todorov, Tzvetan. Mikhail Bakhtin: The Dialogical Principle. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1984.
Toolan, Michael, ed. Langauge, Text, and Context: Essays in Stylistics. London & New York: Routledge, 1992.
Voloshinov, V. N. Freudianism. Trans. I. R. Titunik. Ed. I. R. Titunik and N. H. Bruss. Indianapolis: Indiana UP, 1987.
---. Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. Trans. L. Matejka and I. R. Titunik. Cambridge MA: Harvard UP, 1986.
Webster, Roger. Studying Literary Theory: An Introduction. London and New York: Edward Arnold, 1992.
White, Allon. “Bakhtin, Sociolinguistics, Deconstruction.” The Theory of Reading. New York: Oxford UP, 1984. 123-46.
---. “The Struggle Over Bakhtin: Fraternal Reply to Robert Young.” Cultural Critique 8 (Winter 1987-88): 217-241.
Williams, Patrick. “Cultural Coherence and Contradiction in Yeats.” Literary Theory and Poetry: Extending the Canon. Ed. David Murray. London: B T Batsford, 1989. 23-41.
Willingham, John R. “The New Criticism.” Contemporary Literary Theory. Ed. G.. Douglas Atkins & Laura Morrow. 24-41.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top