跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(3.231.230.177) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/07/27 09:45
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:郭亮君
研究生(外文):Liang-Chun Kuo
論文名稱:狄更斯工業小說《艱難時世》中的手足亂倫
論文名稱(外文):Sibling Incest in Dickens’s Industrial Novel Hard Times
指導教授:陳昭芳陳昭芳引用關係
指導教授(外文):Chao-Fang Chen
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立成功大學
系所名稱:外國語文學系專班
學門:人文學門
學類:外國語文學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2008
畢業學年度:96
語文別:英文
論文頁數:86
中文關鍵詞:工業資本主義手足亂倫社會問題小說亂倫禁忌聯姻理論
外文關鍵詞:social-problem novelsibling incestindustrial capitalismalliance theoryincest prohibition
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:518
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:54
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
本論文旨在探討狄更斯(Charles Dickens)所著工業小說《艱難時世》(Hard Times, 1854)中的手足亂倫關係。本文將檢視小說中所暗示之手足亂倫與工業資本主義間的交互關係,並進而指出十九世紀資本主義社會實為造成此亂倫關係的主要因素之一。
本文第一部分著重於研究小說中所呈現的工業生產概念。此部分先從社會學的觀點檢視十九世紀工業發展對手足關係的影響,接著詳細說明格萊恩先生(Mr. Gradgrind)的教育制度和工業社會中生產模式的共通處,以及此關聯性如何導致露易莎(Louisa)及湯姆(Tom)的亂倫關係。論文第二部分進一步探討手足亂倫與工業資本主義間的交互關係。這部分引用人類學之研究,以闡明露易莎的婚姻實為一互惠之交換行為,旨在為格萊恩先生及邦得比先生(Mr. Bounderby)建立一長久的聯姻關係。再者,本文也將探討伴隨婚姻關係而來之亂倫禁忌,藉以了解狄更斯對此社會結盟的態度。最後,本文結論說明狄更斯藉由手足亂倫及工業資本主義的連結,以亂倫關係隱射當代嚴重的社會問題。
This thesis explores the theme of sibling incest in Charles Dickens’s industrial novel Hard Times (1854). It aims to examine the correlation, suggested in the novel, between sibling incest and industrial capitalism and to illustrate the nineteenth-century capitalist circumstances as a potential cause for sibling incest.
The first half of the thesis focuses on the representation of industrial production in the novel. It begins with a sociological investigation into the impacts of nineteenth-century industrial capitalism on sibling relationships. Then, it details how Mr. Gradgrind’s educational system resembles the mode of production in an industrial society and how his training eventually leads to Louisa and Tom’s incestuous relationship. The second half of the thesis further elaborates the correlation between sibling incest and industrial capitalism. With references to anthropological studies, Louisa’s marriage is shown to be a reciprocal exchange, aimed at constructing a lasting alliance between Mr. Gradgrind and Mr. Bounderby. Moreover, the incest prohibition, supposed to come after marriage, is examined to disclose Dickens’s attitude towards such a social alliance. Finally, the thesis concludes that, in connecting sibling incest with industrial capitalism, Dickens uses sibling incest as a symbol to expose the serious social problems of his time.
Chapter 1: Introduction ------------------------------------- 1

Chapter 2: Sibling Incest and Industrial Capitalism ----- 11

Chapter 3: Siblings as Products for Exchange ------------ 46

Chapter 4: Conclusion -------------------------------------- 72

Works Cited -------------------------------------------------- 83
Adrian, Arthur A. “Dickens and Inverted Parenthood.” Dickensian 67 (1971): 3-11.
Allen, Walter. The English Novel: A Short Critical History. New York: Dutton, 1954.
Archimedes, Sondra M. Gendered Pathologies: The Female Body and Biomedical Discourses in the Nineteenth Century English Novel. New York and London: Routledge, 2005.
Arens, William. The Original Sin: Incest and Its Meaning. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986.
Bloom, Harold, ed. Charles Dickens’s Hard Times. New York: Chelsea House Publishers, 1987.
Boone, Joseph A. and Deborah E. Nord. “Brother and Sister: The Seductions of Siblinghood in Dickens, Eliot and Brontė.” Western Humanities Review 46.2 (1992): 164-88.
Brown, James M. Dickens: Novelist in the Market-Place. Hampshire: Macmillan, 1982.
Cooper, J. “Incest Prohibitions in Primitive Culture.” Primitive Man 5 (1932): 1-20.
David Ricardo. The Principles of of Political Economy and Taxation. London: J. M. Dent& Sons Ltd., 1957.
Deneau, Daniel P. “The Brother-Sister Relationship in Hard Times.” Dickensian 60 (1964): 173-77.
Dickens, Charles. Hard Times. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2001.
“Exogamy.” Webster’s New World College Dictionary. 3rd ed. New York: Macmillan, 1994.
Fabrizio, Richard. “Wonderful No-Meaning: Language and the Psychopathology of Family in Hard Times.” Dickens Studies Annual: Essays on Victorian Fiction 16 (1987): 61-94.
Foucault, Michael. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Trans. Alan Sheridan. New York: Vintage House, 1979.
---. The History of Sexuality. New York: Vintage House, 1990.
Freud, Sigmund. “General Theory of the Neuroses.” Introductory Lectures on Psychoanalysis. Trans. James Strachey. Ed. James Strachey and Angela Richards. London: Penguin Books, 1976: 281-517.
---. Die Traumdeutung [The Interpretation of Dreams]. Wiesbaden: Bergmann, 1900.
Goldberg, Michael. Carlyle and Dickens. Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1972.
Goldfarb, Russell. Sexual Repression and Victorian Literature. Lewisburg: Bucknell UP, 1970.
Guy, Josephine M. The Victorian Social-Problem Novel: The Market, the Individual and Communal Life. Houndmills: Macmillan, 1996.
Handler, Richard and Daniel Segal. Jane Austen and the Fiction of Culture: An Essay on the Narration of Social Realities. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 1990.
“Hard Times.” Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. 9 Feb. 2007 <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hard_Times>.
Hudson, Glenda A. Sibling Love and Incest in Jane Austen's Fiction. London: Macmillan, 1999.
Humpherys, Anne. “Louisa Gradgrind’s Secret: Marriage and Divorce in Hard Times.” Dickens Studies Annual, vol. 25 (1996): 177-96.
Johnson, Patricia E. “Hard Times and the Structure of Industrialism: The Novel as Factory.” Dickens 409-18.
Kane, Penny. Victorian Families in Fact and Fiction. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1995.
Kaplan, Fred and Sylvère Monod. Preface. Dickens ix-xi.
Ketabgian, Tamara. “Melancholy Mad Elephants: Affect and the Animal Machines in Hard Times.” Victorian Studies 45.4 (2003): 649-76.
Leavis, E. R. “Hard Times: An Analytic Note.” Dickens 364-84.
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. The Elementary Structures of Kinship. Boston: Beacon Press, 1969.
Linehan, Thomas M. “Rhetorical Technique and Moral Purpose in Dickens’ Hard Times.” University of Toronto Quarterly 47 (1988): 22-26.
Lougy, Robert E. “Dickens’s Hard Times: The Romance as Radical Literature.” Bloom 17-38.
More, Charles. The Industrial Age: Economy and Society in Britain, 1750-1995. London: Longman, 1997.
Nussbaum, Martha C. “The Literary Imagination in Public Life.” Dickens 429-39.
Orwell, George. “George Orwell’s critical commentary on Charles Dickens.” The Complete Works of Charles-Dickens. Retrieved on 6 Mar. 2006 <http://www.dickens-literature.com/George_Orwell's_critical_commentary_on_Charles_Dickens/3.html>.
Parker, Seymour. “Precultural Basis of Incest Taboo: Toward a Biosocial Theory.” American Anthropologist 78 (1976): 285-305.
Rank, Otto. The Incest Theme in Literature and Legend: Fundamentals of a Psychology of Literary Creation. Trans. Gregory C. Richter. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1992.
Richardson, Alan. “The Dangers of Sympathy: Sibling Incest in English Romantic Poetry.” Studies in English Literature 25 (1985): 737-54.
Sanders, Valerie. The Brother-Sister Culture in Nineteenth-Century Literature: From Austen to Woolf. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002.
Schacht, Paul. “Dickens and the Uses of Nature.” Victorian Studies 34 (1990): 77-102.
Slater, Michael. Dickens and Women. Stanford: Stanford University Express, 1983.
Thorslev, Peter Jr. “Incest as Romantic Symbol.” Comparative Literature Studies 2 (1965): 41-58.
Williams, Raymond. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. Rev. Ed. New York: Oxford UP, 1985.
---. “The Industrial Novels: Hard Times.” Bloom 11-15.
Webb, Igor. From Custom to Capital: The English Novel and the Industrial Revolution. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Express, 1981.
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top