跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(3.235.120.150) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/08/06 03:16
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:陳譽汯
研究生(外文):Yu-Hung Chen
論文名稱:公司董事之民事責任∼公司法上安全港條款之研究∼
論文名稱(外文):CORPORATE DIRECTOR’S CIVIL LIABILITIES : A STUDY OF SAFE HARBOR CLAUSES UNDER TAIWAN’S COMPANY ACT
指導教授:陳俊仁陳俊仁引用關係
指導教授(外文):Chun-Jen Chen
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立成功大學
系所名稱:法律學研究所
學門:法律學門
學類:一般法律學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2008
畢業學年度:96
語文別:英文
論文頁數:195
中文關鍵詞:公司內部監控股東優位原則進步公司法學派揭露義務公司經營者忠實義務公司治理絕對多數選任制度重大性標準契約理論責任免除完全正直義務正直義務忠誠義務
外文關鍵詞:Complete Candor ObligationMajority VotingLiability ImmunityDuty of LoyaltyContractarianShareholder Primacy NormCorporate GovernanceProgressive Corporate Law SchoolDuty of DisclosureCorporate ManagersFiduciary DutyDuty of CandorInternal Corporate ControlMateriality Test
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:717
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:176
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:3
為了滿足商業實務上之需求,美國之公司法學,尤如德拉瓦州者,創造了諸如商業判斷法則與責任豁免機制之創新機制,與此同時,公司之內部監控,亦透過獨立董事與代位訴訟理,經常地並有效地實行,此些成果殊值得我國學界與立法者加以分析、學習,並加以運用於處理我國現行公司治理之內部缺陷。而我國雖分別於公司法及證券交易法中,正式引入忠實義務以及獨立董事、審計委員會,但學者對於其餘用以強化公司內控之相關配套措施,例如:商業判斷法則、獨立董事之之支出補償,放寬代位訴訟要件等,未能一併引入而向有微詞,本文對此敬表贊同,但不論立法或修法之程序皆屬曠日廢時之舉,無法立即反應業界需求,本文著眼於此,故力求在現行法之規範中,試圖達成公司經營彈性與內部監控之平衡。另見我國學界既有之文獻,多探討、注重在忠實義務之內容與闡釋,鮮有觸及實已重新改寫部分忠實義務之內涵,與影響訴訟實務甚鉅之避風港條款,故而作者始擇之作為論文研究之主軸,而實際上,散見於法律各處之避風港條款,確實也反映了忠實義務之界線與樣貌而頗值研究。

首先,本文之論述自確認公司之本質與其存在之目的開展。在介紹、分析傳統股東優位理論、契約理論與進步公司法學後,本文首先確認公司經營者所應負擔之忠實義務對象,實為公司而非股東,因而公司經營者在公司之經營上,擁有較高之權限,而非侷限於股東優位原則與利潤最大化。據此,本文稍後概略地簡介忠實義務之體系,在分析、研究忠實義務三個子義務群之後,以之作為對我國之公司法中,與避風港條款相類性質之條文:公司法第231條與第209條,研究之基礎。於研究注意義務時,本文以為我國公司第231條,倘能適當地解釋該條之「不法行為」,則該條實可與德拉瓦州普通公司法第102(b)(7)條相比擬,更有甚者,透過該條更可同時引入商業判斷法則,使公司經營者免於騷擾性之訴訟。至忠誠義務,其本意乃用以約束涉入各種利害衝突之行為,常見態樣包括有:競業行為、掠奪公司機會與自己交易,對此,我國現行公司法第209條,僅能豁免公司董事之競業行為,不得推及其他違反忠誠義務之行為態樣。至於正直義務,乃由注意義務與忠誠義務衍生而來,不僅在資訊傳遞上有重要意義,更是公司監控之關鍵工具,本文將之區分為完全正直義務與揭露義務,前者乃是適於尋求股東會決議之諸多情事中,此時需依重大性標準檢驗之,可用以彌補現行委託書管理規則之規範漏洞;至於後者,實已被證券交易法所吸收,而令發行人之負責人與總經理負擔更重的責任,縱使如此,本文以為此僅是提高責任標準,卻非謂該等負責人與總經理不得適用避風港條款,即我國公司法第231條,故當負責人與總經理之行為,經法院認定非屬該條不法行為之範疇時,仍得免除對於公司所需負擔之損害賠償責任。
For the business necessity, corporate jurisprudence in the United States, especially the one of the Delaware State, has many innovative mechanisms, such as the business judgment rule and liability immunity. Besides, the modern theory of corporate governance relies heavily on internal su-pervision of the corporation which is also frequently and efficiently enforced through the inde-pendent directors and derivative litigations. These are highly worthy for Taiwan’s academias and the legislators to analyze and thereto tackle the difficult problems in present internal governance flaws. After the introduction of fiduciary duty and independent directors into Taiwan’s Company Act and Securities and Exchange Act recently, there still are many suggestions to advance internal corporate monitor functions including the introduction of the business judgment rule, indemnification for in-dependent directors, and lift of the restrictions of present derivative litigation. This thesis agrees with these arguments above, but at the same questions that under the business practice, it wouldn’t be timely to meet the desperate need. Thus, this thesis seeks through present Taiwan’s Company Act to find proper basis to strike the balance of corporate managing flexibility and internal supervision.

In light of Taiwan’s academic literature which mainly focuses on the materials and interpreta-tions of fiduciary duty, and there are rare articles ever discuss safe harbor clauses which in turn will materially re-write contents of fiduciary duties and litigation practices; this thesis orients toward safe harbor. These, in fact, dispersive safe harbor clauses also reflect limitations of fiduciary duties, and deserve a thoroughly elaboration. This thesis first analyzes corporate theories and determines that the corporation is the ultimate beneficiary whom corporate managers owe fiduciary duty to. Thus, the corporate managers are granted with greater discretion rather than under the shareholder primacy norm. Then, this thesis outlines contents of fiduciary duty branches. Through the process of researching and figuring the safe harbor clauses, this thesis identifies that in Taiwan’s Company Act there are two Sections have comparable similarity, Sections 231 and 209.

While discussing duty of care, this thesis argues that Section 231 could be interpreted as the safe harbor clause which has equivalent function of the Section 102(b)(7) of the Delaware General Corporation Law (DGCL). With appropriate definitions of the debate-provoking term, unlawful conducts, Section 231 of Taiwan’s Company Act could plays equivalent character which Section 102(b)(7) of the DGCL plays in the corporate jurisprudence of the Delaware. Moreover, to ac-knowledge such interpretation would simultaneously introduce business judgment rule which grants corporate managers with necessary management discretions and protects them from nuisance of de-rivative litigations.

As to duty of loyalty, it binds varied acts which involve conflicts-of-interest including competing with fiduciary’s corporation, usurping corporate opportunity, and self-dealing. And present Section 209 of Taiwan’s Company Act solely allows shareholders to authorize or to ratify corporate managers to compete with fiduciary’s corporation, but it shall not be extended to other disloyalty conducts. As to duty of candor, the hybrid of fiduciary duties of care and loyalty, this thesis regards its importance in information access and views it to be the essential tool in corporate governance. Duty of candor could be divided into complete candor obligation and duty of disclosure. The former is applied when corporate managers seek for shareholders actions, and examined by the materiality test. Complete candor obligation also helps to fix loopholes in present Taiwan’s proxy rules. The latter has been absorbed into the mandatory disclosure obligations of the securities regulation, and causes the issuers’ chairman and general manager face enhanced strict liability. However, this thesis argues that the chairman and general manager are still able to be immuned from monetary damages as long as their conducts don’t fall within the range of unlawful conducts of the Section 231 of Taiwan’s Company Act.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT I
PREFACE III
ABSTRACTS VII
SUMMARY OF CONTENTS XIII
TABLE OF CONTENTS XV
Ⅰ. INTRODUCTION 1
Ⅱ. NATURE OF THE FIRM 9
1 FUNDAMENTAL CORPORATE THEORIES 9
2 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN THE U.S. 24
3 INTERACTIONS BETWEEN FIDUCIARY DUTY AND CORPORATE THEORIES 35
Ⅲ. DUTY OF CARE 53
1. BASIC CONCEPT OF DUTY OF CARE 53
2. SAFE HARBOR CLAUSE FOR DUTY OF CARE 62
Ⅳ. DUTY OF LOYALTY 85
1. BASIC CONCEPT OF DUTY OF LOYALTY 85
2. SAFE HARBOR CLAUSE FOR DUTY OF LOYALTY 97
Ⅴ. DUTY OF CANDOR 105
1. BASIC CONCEPT OF DUTY OF CANDOR 105
2. THE SAFE HARBOR CLAUSE FOR DUTY OF CANDOR 147
Ⅵ. CONCLUSION 153
BIBLIOGRAPHY i
1. Chinese Materials:
(1) Periodicals:
1. Chang, Hsin-Ti, Kung Kai Fa Hsing Kung Ssu Kao Chieh Ching Li Jen Pao Chou Chueh Ting Yu Chien Tu Chih Yen Chiu [A Study on the Pay-Setting Process and Disciplinary Mechanisms of Executive Compensation in Public Companies], 58 Taipei University L. Rev. 1 (2006).
(張心悌,公開發行公司高階經理人報酬決定與監督之研究,臺北大學法學論叢第58期第1頁以下,2006年。)
2. Chen, Chun-Jen, Yu Chi Yeh Ping Kou Fa Ti Wu Tiao Yu Ti Liu Tiao Lun Wo Kuo Chung Shih Yi Wu Kuei Fan Te Chueh Shih [Taiwan’s Misadoption of Fiduciary Duties into Corporate Jurispru-dence: Evidentiates by the Article 5 and 6 of the Business Mergers and Acquisitions Law], 33 Hwa Kang L. Rev. 203 (2005).
(陳俊仁,由企業併購法第五條與第六條論我國忠實義務規範的缺失,華岡法粹第33期第203頁以下,2005年。)
3. _________, Lun Kung Ssu Chih Li Te Fa Chan Chu Shih—Chi Yeh Pi An Hou Chih Fan Ssu [The Study of Corporate Governance Development: The Introspection of Business Scandals], 310 Taipei Bar Journal 38 (2005).
(陳俊仁,論公司治理的發展趨勢-企業弊案後之反思,律師雜誌第310期第38頁以下,2005年。)
4. _________, Lun Ku Tung Yu Kung Ssu Chih Ti Wei-Chao Yueh “Chi Yeh So Yu Yu Chi Yeh Ching Ying Fen Li” Chih Mi Ssu [Nature of Corporate Shareholders: Beyond the Myth of the Separation of Ownership and Control], 35 Hwa Kang L. Rev. 191 (2006).
(陳俊仁,論股東於公司之地位-超越「企業所有與企業經營分離」之迷思,華岡法粹第35期第191頁以下,2006年。)
5. _________, Lun Ku Tung Yu Kung Ssu Chih Ti Wei-Ku Tung Yu Kung Kai Fa Hsing Chiao Se Yu Kung Neng Chih Chien Shih [Nature of Corporate Shareholders: An Examination of the Role and Function of Shareholders in Publicly-held Corporations], 12 Cheng Kung L. Rev. 185 (2006).
(陳俊仁,論股東於公司之地位-股東於公開發行公司角色與功能之檢視,成大法學第12期第185頁以下,2006年。)
6. _________, Lun Kung Ssu Pen Chih Yu Kung Ssu She Hui Tse Jen—Tung Shih Chung Shih Yi Wu Chih Kuei Fan Yu Tiao Ho [Study of the Nature of Corporation and Corporate Social Responsibil-ity: The Obligations and Balances of Fiduciary Duty], 94 Taiwan L.J. 79 (2007).
(陳俊仁,論公司本質與公司社會責任-董事忠實義務之規範與調和,台灣本土法學雜誌第94期第79頁以下,2007年。)
7. _________, Tung Shih Chih Chi Chi TsoWei I Wu-Lun Wo Kuo Kung Ssu Fa Ti I Pai Chiu Shih San Tiao Chih Kuei Fan Chueh Shih [A Director’s Active Duty of Care: A Critical Analysis of Ar-ticle 193 of Taiwan’s Corporation Law], 13 Cheng Kung L. Rev. 81 (2007).
(陳俊仁,董事之積極作為義務-論我國公司法第一百九十三條之規範缺失,成大法學第13期第81頁以下,2007年。)
8. _________, Chung Chen Yi Wu-Lun Kung Ssu Fu Tse Jen Chih Ching Yeh Chin Chih Kuei Fan [Duty of Loyalty: A Study of the Noncompete Duty of Corporate Directors and Officers], 15 Cross-Strait L. Rev. 34 (2007).
(陳俊仁,忠誠義務-論公司負責人之競業禁止規範,月旦民商法雜誌第15期第34頁以下,2007年。)
9. Chen, Li-Jiuan, Tsung Mei Kuo Yu Te Kuo Fa Ku Fen Yu Hsien Kung Ssu Tung Shih Hui Chih Kuei Ting Lun Wo Kuo Ku Fen Yu Hsien Kung Ssu Tung Shih Hui Chih Tsu Chih Chia Kou [The Structure of Board of Directors under the Legal Comparison among American, German, and Taiwan's Corporation Law], 2(1) National University of Kaohsiung L.J. 115 (2006).
(陳麗娟,從美國法與德國法股份有限公司董事會之規定論我國股份有限公司董事會之組織架構,高大法學論叢第二卷第一期,第115頁以下,2006年。)
10. Chen, Yen-Liang, Wo Kuo Ku Fen Yu Hsien Kung Ssu Tung Shih Hsuan Chu Chih Tu Chih Yen Hsi-Te Kuo Fa Chih Chi Shih Chien Ping Da-I Ching Ying Chuan Cheng To An [A Study on the Institution of Voting Mechanism of Management Board: In the Light of German Law and the Case of Da-I Technology Co. Ltd.], 14 Cheng Kung L. Rev. 1 (2007).
(陳彥良,我國股份有限公司董事選舉制度之研析-德國法之啟示兼評大毅經營權爭奪案,成大法學第14期第1頁以下,2007年。)
11. Chiao, Cing-Kae, Kung Tso Ping Teng Kuo Chi Lao Tung Chi Chun Chih Chien Kou [The Es-tablishment of International Labor Standard for Legal Regime Governing Equality in Employ-ment], 3(2) Chinese (Taiwan) Rev. of International and Transnational L. 367 (2007).
(焦興鎧,工作平等國際勞動基準之建構,中華國際法與超國界法評論,第3卷2期367頁以下,2007年。)
12. Chien, Tze-Shiou, Fa Lu Ching Chi Fen Hsi Hsi Chiang Tso(1)-Yi Ko Tzu Chu Tan Kai Fang Te Fa Hsueh Kuan Tien [Economic Analysis of LawⅠ: An Independent and Open Viewpoint in Jurisprudence], 93 The Taiwan L. Rev. 236 (2003).
(簡資修,法律經濟分析系列講座(1)-一個自主但開放的法學觀點,月旦法學雜誌第93期第236頁以下,2003年。)
13. _________, Po Ssu Na Yu Fa Lu Ching Chi Fen His-Yi Ko Pien Hu Hsing Te Shuo Ming [Posner and Economic Analysis of Law: An Apologetic Perspective], 8 Cross-Strait L. Rev. 179 (2005).
(簡資修,波斯納與法律經濟分析-一個辯護性的說明,月旦民商法雜誌第8期第179頁以下,2005年。)
14. Chiou, Lian-Gong, Ming Shih Su Sung Fa Hsiu Cheng Hou Chih Cheng Hsu Fa Hseuh-Cho Chung Yu Cheuh Jen Hsiu Fa Chih Li Lun Pei Ching Ping Chih Ming Chin Hou Ying Yu Chih Yen Chiu Chu Hsiang [The Procedure Jurisprudence after Amendment of Taiwan’s Civil Proce-dure Act: Focus on Determining Background Theory and Indicating Future Research Topics], 101 Taiwan L. Rev. 152 (2003).
(邱聯恭,民事訴訟法修正後之程序法學-著重於確認修法之理論背景並指明今後應有之研究取向,月旦法學第101期第152頁以下,2003年。)
15. Chuang, Yung-Cheng, Cheng Chuan Chiao Yi Fa Ti Erh Shih Tiao Cheng Chuan Cha Chi Sun Fang Fa Shih Hsing Ssu [Rethinking the Measure of Damages in Article 20 of Securities and Exchange Law], 34(2) National Taiwan University L.J. 123 (2005).
(莊永丞,證券交易法第二十條證券詐欺損害估算方法之省思,台大法學論叢第34卷第2期第123頁以下,2005年。)
16. _________, Tsung Kung Ssu Chih Li Kuan Tien Lun Wo Kuo Shang Shih Shang Kuei Kung Ssu Chih Tzu Shan Chuan Tseng Hsing Wei [A Study of the Listed and Over-the- counter Corpora-tions’ Charity Donations: From the Viewpoint of the Corporate Governance], 94 Taiwan L.J. 110 (2007).
(莊永丞,從公司治理觀點論我國上市上櫃公司之慈善捐贈行為,台灣本土法學第94期第110頁以下,2007年。)
17. Faung, Kai-Lin, Kuan His Chi Yeh Chuan Chang Kuan Chih Kung Chih Li Lan Yung Chih Fa Lu Wen Ti (I)—Tzu Wo Kuo Chuan Tung Chien Kung Mo Shih Lun Chuan Chang She Chi Chih Chia Kou Yu Chueh Han [Issues Regarding Regulations of Abused by Controlling Shareholders: The Structural Problems in View of the Traditional Corporate Governance Approach], 63 ChengChi L. Rev. 185 (2000).
(方嘉麟,關係企業專章管制控制力濫用之法律問題(一)-自我國傳統監控模式論專章設計之架構與缺憾,政大法學評論第63期第185頁以下,2000年。)
18. Fong, Jerry G.., Tsung Mei Kuo Kung Ssu Fa Lun Li Yung Wang Lu Hsing Shih Ku Tung Chuan Chih Fa Chan Yu Chu Shih [Electronic Voting and Its Development in Corporate Governance: A Comparative Introduction], 29 Socioeconomic Law and Institution Rev. 139 (2002).
(馮震宇,從美國公司法制論利用網路行使股東權之發展與趨勢,經社法制論叢第29期第139頁以下,2002年。)
19. _________, Tsung Mei Kuo Shih Wo Kan Taiwan Chuan Li An Chien Shih Chia Chu Fen Chiu Chi [A Comparative Study of Injunctions in Taiwan’s Patent Litigations and Judicial Practice], 109 Taiwan L. Rev. 9 (2004).
(馮震宇,從美國司法實務看臺灣專利案件之假處分救濟,月旦法學雜誌第109期第9頁以下,2004年。)
20. Hor, Spenser Y., Kung Ssu Chih Li Yu Kung Kai Fa Hsing Kung Ssu Tung Shih Chih Kao Chih Yi Wu-Yi Mei Kuo Fa Wei Chung Hsin [Corporate Governance and Disclosure Duties of Di-rectors in Public Companies: Centered upon American Law], 30 Hwa Kang L. Rev. 101 (2003).
(何曜琛,公司治理與公開發行公司董事之告知義務-以美國法為中心,華岡法粹第30期第101頁以下,2003年。)
21. Huang, Ming-Jye, Kung Ssu Chien Kung Yu Chien Cha Jen Chih Tu Kai Lun- Chao Yeuh “Tu Li Tung Shih” Chih Mi Ssu [Innovation of Taiwan's Corporate Auditor System: A Corporate Governance Perspective], 29(4) National Taiwan University L.J. 159 (2000).
(黃銘傑,公司監控與監察人制度改革論-超越「獨立董事」之迷思,臺大法學論叢第29卷第4期第159頁以下,2000年。)
22. _________, Kung Ssu Chih Li Yu Tung Chien Ming Shih Tse Jen Chih Hsien Chuang Yu Ko Ti-Yi Wai Pu Tung Shih Chih Tu Chi Chung Shih, Chu Yi Yi Wu Wei Chung Hsin [Status and Sub-jects of Corporate Governance and Civil Responsibility of Directors and Supervisors: Concen-trates on the system, Duty of Care, and Duty of Loyalty of Outside Directors], 305 Taipei Bar Journal 15 (2005).
(黃銘傑,公司治理與董監民事責任之現狀與課題-以外部董事制度及忠實、注意義務為中心,律師雜誌305期第15頁以下,2005年。)
23. Hsiung, Bing-Yuan, Taiwan “Fa Lu Ching Chi Hsueh” Te Hsien Tsai Yu Wei Lai [Present and Future of the Law and Economics in Taiwan], 113 Taiwan L. Rev. 204 (2004).
(熊秉元,臺灣「法律經濟學」的現在與未來,月旦法學雜誌第113期第204頁以下,2004年。)
24. Hsueh, Albert Ming-Ling, & Tsai, Eric C.A., Tsung Tzu Hsun Chieh Lou Kan Kung Ssu Chih Li [A Study on Corporate Governance on the Basis of Information Disclosure], 96 Taiwan L. Rev. 335 (2003).
(薛明玲、蔡朝安,從資訊揭露看公司治理,月旦法學雜誌第96期第335頁以下,2003年。)
25. Jen, Shu-Chin, & Lin, Jai-Huey, & Chen, Kuan-Chieh, & Huang, Hsiang-Yu, Kung Ping Yuan Tse Tsai Tung Shih Tzu Wo Chiao Yi Chung Te Shih Yung-Tsung Weinberger v. UOP Yi An Tan Chi [Fairness test on Corporate Directors’ Self-Dealing: An Analysis of the Case of Weinberger v. UOP and further Issue], 19 Cross-Strait L. Rev. 111 (2008).
(任書沁、林佳慧、陳冠潔、黃湘榆,公平原則在董事自我交易中的適用-從Weinberger v. UOP一案談起,月旦民商法雜誌第19期第111頁以下,2008年)
26. Lai, In–Jaw, Lun Chuan Chiu Meng Yueh Yu Kung Ssu She Hui Tse Jen [Global Compact and Corporate Social Responsibility], 58(2) The Law Monthly 4 (2007).
(賴英照,論全球盟約與公司社會責任,法令月刊第58卷第2期第4頁以下,2007年。)
27. Lee, Leon, Po Ju Yi Cang Mein Chih-Lun Mei Kuo Chung Kuo Chiang Tso Shih Chih Hsin Fa Chan [Thin Like a Paper: The New Trend in Chinese Wall in the United States], 9(10) Taiwan Bar J. 75 (2005).
(李曜崇,薄如一張棉紙-論美國法上中國牆措施之新發展,全國律師第9卷第10期第75頁以下,2005年。)
28. Lin, Andrew Jen-Guang, Kung Ssu Chih Li Chih Li Lun Yu Shih Chien: Ching Ying Che Chih Pei Yu Ku Tung Chih Pei Chih Chung Tu Yu Tiao Cheng [The Theory and Practice of Corporate Governance: The Conflict and Adjustment between Managerial Control and Shareholders' Con-trol], 33(3) National Taiwan University L.J. 201 (2004).
(林仁光,公司治理之理論與實踐—經營者支配與股東支配之衝突與調整,台大法學論叢第33卷第3期第201頁以下,2004年。)
29. _________, Tung Shih Hui Kung Neng Hsing Chih Fa Chih Ke Ti: Ching Ying Chuan Kung Neng Chih Chiang Hua Yu Chien Kung Chi Chih Chih She Chi [Issues Regarding Division of Board of Directors Functions: Enhancement of Managerial Function and Internal Supervisory Mechanisms], 35(1) National Taiwan University L.J. 157 (2006).
(林仁光,董事會功能性分工之法制課題—經營權功能之強化與監控機制之設計,台大法學論叢第35卷第1期第157頁以下,2006年。)
30. Lin, Chien-Liang, & Lee, Wei-Cheng, & Huang, Yu-Lan, & Liu-Yi-Ting, & Liu, Yi-Te, Mi Lao Shu Te Yin Ying-Yu Disney An Kan Tung Shih Chih Chu Yi Yi Wu [The Shadow of the Mickey Mouse: An Observation of Director’s Duty from Disney], 19 Cross-Strait L. Rev. 131 (2008).
(林建良、李韋誠、黃郁嵐、劉怡婷、劉懿德,米老鼠的陰影-由迪士尼案看董事之注意義務,月旦民商法雜誌第19期第131頁以下,2008年。)
31. Lin, Kuo-Chuan, Ku Fen Yu Hsien Kung Ssu Tung Shih Ming Shih Pei Chang Tse Jen Chih Chui Chiu [A Study on Corporate Directors’ Civil Liabilities], 1 Cross-Strait L. Rev. 50 (2003).
(林國全,股份有限公司董事民事賠償責任之追究,月旦民商法雜誌創刊號第50頁以下, 2003年。)
32. Lin, Te-Jui, Lun I Jen Kung Ssu [A Study on One-Man Company], 23 Fu Jen L. Rev. 177 (2002).
(林德瑞,論一人公司,輔仁法學第23期第177 頁以下,2002年。)
33. Liu, Kung-Wei, Chieh Chuan Kung Tzu Mien Sha Yuan Tse Chih Ching Chi Fen Hsi [Economic Analysis of "Piercing Corporate Veil"], 30(5) National Taiwan University L.J. 175 (2001).
(劉公偉,揭穿公司面紗原則之經濟分析,臺大法學論叢第30卷第5期第175頁以下,2001年。)
34. Liu, Lien-Yu, Ku Tung Tai Piao Su Sung [The Derivative Litigation], 64 Taiwan L.J. 156 (2004).
(劉連煜,股東代表訴訟,台灣本土法學雜誌第64期第156頁以下,2004年。)
35. _________, Chien Chuan Tu Li Tung Chien Shih Yu Kung Ssu Chih Li Chih Fa Chih Yen Chiu-Kung Ssu Tzu Chih, Wai Pu Chien Kung Yu Cheng Fu Kuei Chih Chih Chiao Tso [A Study on Completing the Legal System of Independent Directors, Supervisors, and Corporate Govern-ance: Interactions among Corporate Self-governing, Outside Monitoring, and Government Regulation], 94 The Taiwan L. Rev. 131 (2003).
(劉連煜,健全獨立董監事與公司治理之法制研究-公司自治、外部監控與政府規制之交 錯,月旦法學雜誌第94期第131頁以下,2003年。)
36. _________, Chieh Chuan Kung Tzu Mien Sha Yuan Tse Yu Fou Jen Kung Tzu Jen Ko Tsai Wo Kuo Shih Wu Chih Shih Yung [The Application of the Theories of Corporate Veil Piercing and Limitation of Limited Liability in Taiwan’s Judicatory Practice], 67 Taiwan L.J. 40 (2005).
(劉連煜,揭穿公司面紗原則及否認公司人格理論在我國實務之運用,台灣本土法學第67期第40頁以下,2005年。)
37 _________, Kung Kai Fa Hsing Kung Ssu Tung Shih Hui Yu Chien Cha Chih Chung Ta Pien Ko-Cheng Chiao Fa Hsin Hsiu Kuei Fan Yin Chin Tu Li Tung Shih Yu Shen Chi Wei Yuan Hui Chih Chieh Shao Yu Ping Lun [The Great Evolution for the Board of Directors and the Supervi-sors of the Publicly-held Corporation: The introduction and Comment of the Adoption of Inde-pendent Directors and Audit Committee], 116 OTC Monthly Review 12 (2006).
(劉連煜,公開發行公司董事會、監察人之重大變革-證交法新修規範引進獨立董事與審計委員會之介紹與評論,證券櫃檯116期第12頁以下,2006年。)
38. _________, Kung Ssu She Hui Tse Jen Yu Ku Tung Ti An Chuan [Corporate Social Responsibil-ity and Shareholder Proposal Right],93 Taiwan L.J. 181 (2007).
(劉連煜,公司社會責任理論與股東提案權,台灣本土法學雜誌第93期第181頁以下,2007年。)
39. Lu, Shih-Ning, Hsien Hsing D&O (Kung Ssu Tung Chien Shih Chung Yao Chih Yuan) Tse Jen Pao Hsien Chih Ping His-Chien Ping Kung Ssu Fa Hsiu Cheng Hou Chih Ying Hsiang [Analysis of Present D&O Insurance and Influence of the Amendment of Taiwan’s Company Act], 43 Taiwan L.J. 157 (2003).
(盧世寧,現行D&O(公司董監事重要職員)責任保險之評析-兼評公司法修正後之影響,臺灣本土法學第43期第157頁以下,2003年。)
40. Shao, Ching-Ping, Tung Shih Fa Chih Te Yi Chih Yu Chung Tu-Chien Lun “Wai pu Tung Shih Mien Tse” Tso Wai Fa Chih Yi Chih Te Tse Lueh [Transplantation and Divergence between Corporate Director Regimes: A Proposal of “No Liability for Outside Director” Rule], 57 Taipei University L. Rev. 169 (2005).
(邵慶平,董事法制的移植與衝突-兼論「外部董事免責」作為法制移植的策略,臺北大學法學論叢第57期第169頁,2005年。)
41. _________, Kuei Fan Hsing Tai Yu Kung Ssu Chih Li Mo Chih Te Chien Kou-Lei Chi Tou Piao Chih “Pien” Yu “Pu Pien”Te Hsing Ssu Yu Chi Shih (1) [Regulatory Models and the Con-struction of Corporate Governance Regimes: Implications from the Variation and the Constancy of Cumulative Voting (1)], 88 ChengChi L. Rev. 107 (2005).
(邵慶平,規範型態與公司治理模式的建構--累積投票制「變」與「不變」的省思與啟示 (上),政大法學評論第88期第107頁以下,2005年。)
42. _________, Kuei Fan Hsing Tai Yu Kung Ssu Chih Li Mo Chih Te Chien Kou-Lei Chi Tou Piao Chih “Pien” Yu “Pu Pien”Te Hsing Ssu Yu Chi Shih (2) [Regulatory Models and the Con-struction of Corporate Governance Regimes: Implications from the Variation and the Constancy of Cumulative Voting (2)], 89 ChengChi L. Rev. 109 (2006).
(邵慶平,規範型態與公司治理模式的建構--累積投票制「變」與「不變」的省思與啟示 (下),政大法學評論第89期第109頁以下,2006年。)
43. _________, Lun Ku Tung Hui Yu Tung Shih Hui Chih Chuan Hsien Fen Pei [The Allocation of Powers between Shareholders and Directors: Rethinking Recent Revisions of Taiwan Company Law], 17(3) Soochow L. Rev. 139 (2006).
(邵慶平,論股東會與董事會之權限分配--近年來公司法修正之反思,東吳法律學報第17卷第3期第139頁以下,2006年。)
44. Shen, Kuan-Ling, Wo Kuo Chia Chu Fen Chih Kuo Chu Yu Wei Lai-Yi Ting Chan Shih Chuang Tai Chia Chu Fen Ju Ho Heng Ping Pao Chang Liang Taso Tang Shih Jen Chih Li Yi Wei Chung Hsin [The Pass and Future of Preliminary Injunctions system: Focusing on How to Strike the Balance of Interests between Two Parties through Preliminary Injunction], 109 Taiwan L. Rev. 52 (2004).
(沈冠伶,我國假處分制度之過去與未來--以定暫時狀態之假處分如何衡平保障兩造當事人之利益為中心,月旦法學第109期第52頁以下,2004年。)
45. Tai, Chih-Chieh, Kung Ssu Fa Shang “Ching Ying Pan Tuan Fa Tse” Chih Yen Chiu [A Study of Business Judgment Rule in Corporate Jurisprudence], 106 Taiwan L. Rev. 157 (2004).
(戴志傑,公司法上「經營判斷法則」之研究,月旦法學雜誌第106期第157頁以下,2004年。)
46. Tseng, Wang-Ruu, Tung Shih Chung Shih Yi Wu Chih Nei Han Chi Shih Yung Yi-Ping His Hsin Hsiu Cheng Kung Ssu Fa Ti Erh Shih San Tiao Ti Yi Hsiang [The Meaning and Questions of Fi-duciary Duty Adoption: The Analysis of Lately Revised Section 23, Paragraph 1 of Taiwan’s Company Act], 38 Taiwan L.J. 51 (2002).
(曾宛如,董事忠實義務之內涵及適用疑義-評析新修正公司法第二十三條第一項,台灣本土法學雜誌第38期第51頁以下,2002年。)
47. _________, Wo Kuo Kung Ssu Chih Li Chih Hsing Ssu-Yi Tu Li Tung Chien Shi Fa Chih Kai Ko Wei Chung Hsin [A Review of Corporate Governance in Taiwan: Take the Amendments of Independent Directors and Supervisors for Instance,]103 Taiwan L. Rev. 61 (2003).
(曾宛如,我國有關公司治理之省思--以獨立董監事法制之改革為例,月旦法學第103期第61頁以下,2003年。)
48. Wang, Chih-Cheng, Pu He Ying Yeh Chang Kuei Chiao I Chih Pan Ting Yu Lei Hsing [The Standards and the Types of the Not Arm’s Length Transactions], 66 ChengChi L. Rev. 163 (2001).
(王志誠,不合營業常規交易之判定標準與類型,政大法學評論第66期第163頁以下,2001年。)
49. _________, Tung Shih Hui Kung Neng Hsing Fen Kung Chih Fa Chih Ko Ti [The Functional Diversity of the Board of Directors: A Study for Legal Issues], 92 ChengChi L. Rev. 301 (2006).
(王志誠,董事會功能性分工之法制課題,政大法學評論第92期第301頁以下,2006年。)
50. Wang, Hsin-Chun, Tung Shih Tse Jen Pao Hsien Chih Yi Chih Chi Neng Yu Kung Ssu Chih Li Chih Huan Hsi [The Interaction between the Deterrence Function of D&O Insurance and Corporate Governance], 156 Taiwan L. Rev. 141 (2008).
(汪信君,董事責任保險之抑制機能與公司治理之關係,月旦法學雜誌第156期第141頁以下,2008年。)
51. Wang, Wen-Yeu, Lun Tung Shih Yu Kung Ssu Chiao Yi Chih Kuei fan [Regulation on Self-dealing Transactions], 62 ChengChi L. Rev. 415 (1999).
(王文宇,論董事與公司間交易之規範,政大法學評論第62期第415頁以下,1999年。)
52. _________, Tsung Kung Ssu Chih Li Lun Tung Chien Shih Fa Chih Chih Kai Ko [Discuss the Reform of the Legal Mechanism of Directors and Supervisors from the Corporate Governance], 34 Taiwan L.J. 99 (2002).
(王文宇,從公司治理論董監事法制之改革,台灣本土法學雜誌第34期第99頁以下,2002年。)
53. _________, Fa Lu Yi Chih Te Chi Chi Yu Tiao Chan-Yi Kung Ssu Fa Te Hsin To、Chu Yi Yu Chung Shih Yi Wo Wai Chung Hsing [The Opportunities and Challenges of Legal Transplant: The Case of Directors’ Fiduciary Duties], 19 Cross-Strait L. Rev. 81 (2008).
(王文宇,法律移植的契機與挑戰-以公司法的受託、注意與忠實義務為中心,月旦民商法雜誌第19期第81頁以下,2008年。)
54. Wang, Yu-Hui, Cheng Chuan Tou Tzu Chi Chin Chien Tu Chi Chih Chih Yen Chiu [Supervision System of the Securities Investment Trust Fund], 23 National Chung Cheng University L.J. 115 (2007).
(王育慧,證券投資信託基金監督機制之研究,國立中正大學法學集刊第23期第115頁以下,2007年。)

(2) Books:
1. GREENSPAN, ALAN, THE AGE OF TURBULENCE: ADVENTURES IN A NEW WORLD (Lin Mao-Chang trans.)(2d ed. Locus Publishing Company 2007).
(艾倫•葛林斯潘,我們的新世界,林茂昌譯,二版,大塊文化,2007年。)
2. HUANG, JACK J.T., Fa Lu Chueh Sheng Fu-Chi Yen Ping Kou Yu Chi Shu Shou Chuan [LAW, THE KEY TO WIN: M&AS AND LICENSING] (Common Wealth Magazine Group 2004).
(黃日燦,法律決勝負-企業併購與技術授權,初版,天下雜誌出版,2004年。)
3. HUANG, MING-JYE, Kung Ssu Chih Li Yu Chi Yen Chin Jung Fa Chih Chih Tiao Chan Yu Hsing Ko [THE CHALLENGES AND REVOLUTIONS IN LEGAL SYSTEMS OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND CORPORATE FINANCE] (Angle Publishing Co., Ltd. 2006).
(黃銘傑,公司治理與企業金融法制之挑戰與興革,初版,元照出版有限公司,2004年。)
4. HWANG, LI, Ming Fa Chai Pien Tsung Lun [THE GENERAL RULE OF THE CIVIL ACT](2d ed. Angle Publishing Co., Ltd. 1999).
(黃立,民法債偏總論,二版,元照出版有限公司,1999年。)
5. LAI, IN-JAW, Ku Shih Yu Hsi Kuei Tse: Tsui Hsin Cheng Chuan Chiao Yi Fa Chieh Hsi [RULE FOR STOCK MARKET: ANALYSIS OF THE LATEST SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT] (2006).
(賴英照,股市遊戲規則-最新證券交易法解析,初版,作者自版,2006年。)
6. LIAOW, TA-YING, Cheng Chuan Chiao Yi Fa Tai Lun [INTRODUCTION OF SECURITIES REGULATIONS](San Min Book Co., Ltd 2005).
(廖大穎,證券交易法導論,初版,三民書局,2005年。)
7. _________, Kung Ssu Fa Yuan Lun [CORPORATION LAW](3d ed. San Min Book Co., Ltd 2006).
(廖大穎,公司法原論,修訂三版,三民書局,2006年。)
8. LIU, LIEN-YU, eds., Hsien Tai Kung Ssu Fa Chih Hsin Ko Ti [NEW TOPICS OF MODERN CORPORATION LAW] (Angle publishing Co., Ltd. 2005) .
(劉連煜主編,現代公司法制之新課題,初版,元照出版有限公司,2005年。)
9. _________, Hsien Tai Kung Ssu Fa [MODERN CORPORATE LAW](Sharing Culture Enterprise Co. Ltd. 2006).
(劉連煜,現代公司法,初版,新學林有限公司,2006年。)
10. _________, & LIN, KUO-CHUAN, & TSENG, WANG-RUU, & HUNG, SHIU-FENG, Ku Tung Hui Wei To Shu Chih Kuan Li [REGULATION ON SHAREHOLDERS’ MEETING PROXY](Angle Publishing Co., Ltd. 2007).
(劉連煜、林國全、曾宛如、洪秀芬,股東會委託書之管理,初版,元照出版有限公司,2007年。)
11. MICKLETHWAIT, JOHN, & WOOLDRIDGE, ADRIAN, Kung Ssu Te Li Shih [THE COMPANY: A SHORT HISTORY OF A REVOLUTIONARY IDEA](Hol-Li Shia trans.)(Rive Gauche Publishing House 2005).
(米可斯維特、伍爾得禮奇,公司的歷史米,夏荷立譯,初版,左岸文化事業公司,
2005年。)
12. WANG, WEN-YEU, Kung Ssu Fa Lun [CORPORATION LAW](2d ed. Angle Publishing Co., Ltd. 2005).
(王文宇,公司法論,二版,元照出版有限公司,2005年。)
13. _________, Chi Yeh Yu Kung Ssu Fa Chih (Erh)[LAWS ON CORPORATION (Ⅱ)](Angle Publishing Co., Ltd. 2006).
(王文宇,企業與公司法制(二),初版,元照出版有限公司,2006年。)

(3) Thesis and Dissertations:
1. Chen, Mei-Ping, Tung Shih Ching Yeh Hsing Wei Kuei Fen Chih Yen Chiu [Study on Liability of Directors for Engaging in a Competitive Business](July, 2007)(unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, National Taipei University) (on file with Law Library, National Cheng Kung University).
(陳梅萍,董事競業行為規範之研究,台北大學法律研究所博士論文,2007年。)
2. Chuang, Hui-Chen, Tung Shih Chih Tzu Hsun Chieh Lou I Wu [Directors’ Duty of Disclsure](July, 2005) (unpublished LL.M.thesis, National Chung Cheng University) (on file with Law Library, National Cheng Kung University).
(莊惠真,董事之資訊揭露義務,中正大學財經法律研究所碩士論文,2005年。)
3. Hsu, Wen-Yi, Lun Cheng Chuan Fen His Shih Chih Li Yi Chung Tu-Yi Mei Kuo Fa Wei Chung Hsin [Study on Analyst’s Conflicts of Interest: Focusing on American Law] (June, 2004)(unpublished LLM thesis, National Taiwan University)(on file with Law Library, National Cheng Kung University).
(徐文怡,論證券分析師之利益衝突-以美國法為中心,臺灣大學法律研究所碩士論文,2004年。)
4. Liao, Ti-Yi, Tung Shih Tzu Hsun Chieh Lou Pu Shih Ming Shih Tse Jen Chih Yen Chiu-Yi Tu Li Tung Shih Tse Jen Kuei Fen Fang Shih Tan Tao Wei Chung Hsing [The Research on Civil Liabili-ties of Director’s Misrepresentation: Focus on the Studies of Independent Directors’ Liabilities] (June, 2007)(unpublished LL.M.thesis, National Taiwan University) (on file with Law Library, National Cheng Kung University).
(廖棣儀,董事資訊揭露不實民事責任之研究─以獨立董事責任規範方式探討為中心,臺灣大學法律研究所碩士論文,2007年。)
5. Lu, Hsiao-Yen, Yen Lu, Mei Kuo Mu Tzu Kung Ssu He Ping Tzu Kung Ssu Shao Shu Ku Tung Pao Hu Chih Yen Chiu-Chien Lun Taiwan Shih Wu An Li Yu Hsiang Kuan Kuei Fan She Chi Chih Chueh Han [The Research of the Protection of the Subsidiary’s Minority Shareholders un-der the Merger of the Parent and Subsidiary Corporations in the US: And the Comment of the Taiwan’s Cases and the Relevant Defects of the Statutes] (July, 2004) (unpublished LL.M. thesis, National Cheng Chi University Law) (on file with Law Library, National Cheng Kung Univer-sity).
(盧曉彥,美國母子公司合併子公司少數股東保護之研究-兼論台灣實務案例與相關規範設計之缺憾,政治大學法律研究所碩士論文,2004年。)
6. Shen, Hui-Ya, Kuei Ju Chuan Fa Lu Hsing Chih Chih Yen Chiu [Legal Issue’s on Eintrittsrecht] (June, 1994)(unpublished LL.M. thesis, National Chung Hsing University Supplementary Col-lege/ now National Taipei University) (on file with Law Library, National Cheng Kung Univer-sity).
(沈慧雅,歸入權法律性質之研究,中興大學法律研究所碩士論文,1994年。)
7. Wu, Jen-Yuan, Tsung Kung Ssu Chih Li Chih Kuan Tien Tan Tao Ku Tung Ti An Chuan Chih Tu [Researching the Shareholder Proposal Mechanism by the View of Corporate Governance] (June, 2007) (unpublished LLM thesis, National Chung Cheng University) (on file with Law Library, National Cheng Kung University).
(吳俊源,從公司治理之觀點探討股東提案權制度,中正大學財經法律研究所碩士論文,2007年。)
8. Wu, Chi-Shun, Lun Kung Kai Fa Hsing Kung Ssu Tsai Wu Pu Shih Ming Shih Tse Jen-Yi Tung Shih Tse Jen Wei Chun Hsing [Research the Civil Liability of Misrepresentations in Financial Reports of the Publicly-held Corporation: Focus on Directors Liability] (June, 2007) (unpub-lished LLM thesis, National Cheng Chi University) (on file with Law Library, National Cheng Kung University).
(吳啟順,論公開發行公司財務報告不實之民事責任-以董事責任為中心,政治大學法律研究所碩士論文,2007年。)

2. English Materials:
(1) Periodicals:
1. Akerlof, George A., The Market for 'Lemons': Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism, 84 Q. J. Econ. 488 (1970).
2. Alchian, Armen A., & Demsetz, Harold, Production, Information Costs and Economic Organiza-tion, 62 Am. Econ. Rev. 777 (1972).
3. Alexander, Frederick H., & Honaker, James D., The Nuts and Bolts of Majority Voting, 1634 PLI/Corp. 585 (2007).
4. Armour, John, & Whincop, Michael J., An Economic Analysis of Shared Property in Partnership and Close Corporations Law, 26 Iowa J. Corp. L. 983 (2001).
5. Backer, Larry C., Multinational Corporations, Transnational Law: The United Nation’s Norms on the Responsibilities of Transnational Corporations as A Harbinger of Corporate Social Respon-sibility in International Law, 37 Colum. Human Rights L. Rev. 287 (2006).
6. Bainbridge, Stephen M., Book Review: Community and Statism: A Conservative Contractarian Critique of Progressive Corporate Law Scholarship, 82 Cornell L. Rev. 856 (1997).
7. _________, Director Primacy in Corporate Takeovers: Preliminary Reflections, 55 Stan. L. Rev. 791 (2002).
8. _________, The Business Judgment Rule as Abstention Doctrine, 57 Vand. L. Rev. 83 (2004).
9. Barclift, Z. Jill, Senior Corporate Officers and the Duty of Candor: Do the CEO and CFO Have a Duty to Inform, 41 Val. U. L. Rev. 269 (2006).
10. Barzuza, Michal, Price Considerations in the Market for Corporate Law, 26 Cardozo L. Rev. 127 (2004).
11. Bebchuk, Lucian A., The Myth of the Shareholder Franchise, 93 Virginia L. Rev. 675 (2007).
12. Berle, Adolf A., Jr., Corporate Powers as Powers in Trust, 44 Harv. L. Rev. 1049 (1931).
13. _________, For Whom Corporate Managers are Trustees: A Note, 45 Harv. L. Rev. 1365 (1932).
14. _________, “Control” in Corporate Law, 58 Colum. L. Rev. 1212 (1958).
15. Blair, Margaret M., & Stout, Lynn A., Team Production in Business Organizations: An Introduc-tion, 24 Iowa J. Corp. L. 743 (1999).
16. _________, & Stout, Lynn A., A Team Production Theory of Corporate Law, 85 Virginia L. Rev. 247 (1999).
17. _________, Director Accountability and the Mediating Role of the Corporate Board, 79 Wash. U. L. Q. 403 (2001).
18. Bradley, Michael & Schipani, Cindy A., The Relevance of the Duty of Care Standard in Corpo-rate Governance, 75 Iowa L. Rev. 1 (1989).
19. Branson, Douglas M., Countertrends in Corporation Law: Model Business Corporation Act Re-vision, British Company Law Reform, and Principles of Corporate Governance and Structure, 68 Minn. L. Rev. 53 (1983).
20. Bratton, William W. Jr., The New Economic Theory of the Firm: Critical Perspectives from History, 41 Stan. L. Rev. 1471 (1989).
21. Brown, J. Robert Jr., Speaking with Complete Candor: Shareholder Ratification and the Elimi-nation of the Duty of Loyalty, 54 Hastings L.J. 641 (2003).
22. Bradley, Michael, & Schipani, Cindy A., The Relevance of the Duty of Care Standard in Cor-porate Governance, 75 Iowa L. Rev. 1 (1989).
23. Burke, Kerry S., Regulating Corporate Governance through the Market: Comparing the Ap-proaches of the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom, 27 J. Corp. L. 341 (2002).
24. Carlton, Dennis W. & Fischel, Daniel R., The Regulation of Insider Trading, 35 Stan. L. Rev. 857 (1983).
25. Carney, William J., The Legacy of “The Market for Corporate Control” and Origins of the Theory of The Firm, 50 Case W. Res. 215 (1999).
26. Coase, Ronald H., The Nature of the Firm, 4 Economica 386 (1937).
27. Craft, Jason Michael, What's All the Commotion?: An Examination of the Securities and Ex-change Commission's Regulation FD, 14 DePaul Bus. L.J. 119 (2001).
28. Dalley, Paula J., To Whom It May Concern: Fiduciary Duties and Business Associations, 26 Del. J. Corp. L. 515 (2001).
29. Dhir, Aaron A., Realigning the Corporate Building Blocks: Shareholder Proposals as a Vehicle for Achieving Corporate Social and Human Rights Accountability, 43 Am. Bus. L.J. 365 (2006).
30. Dibadj, Reza, Reconceiving the Firm, 26 Cardozo L. Rev. 1459 (2005).
31. Dodd, E. Merrick, For Whom are Corporate Managers Trustees?, 45 Harv. L. Rev. 1145 (1932).
32. Epstein, Richard A., Contract and Trust in Corporate Law: The Case of Corporate Opportunity, 21 Del. J. Corp. L. 5 (1996).
33. Easterbrook, Frank H., & Fischel, Daniel R., The Corporate Contract, 89 Colum. L. Rev. 1416 (1989).
34. Eisenberg, Melvin A., The Divergence of Standard of Conduct and Standards of Review in Cor-porate Law, 62 Fordham L. Rev. 437 (1993).
35. _________, The Duty of Good Faith in Corporate Law, 31 Del. J. Corp. L. 1 (2006).
36. Epstein, Richard A., Contract and Trust in Corporate Law: The Case of Corporate Opportunity, 21 Del. J. Corp. L. 5 (1996).
37. Fairfax, Lisa M., Spare the Rod, Spoil the Director? Revitalizing Directors' Fiduciary Duty through Legal Liability, 42 Hous. L. Rev. 393 (2005).
38. Gilson, Ronald J., Controlling Shareholders and Corporate Governance: Complicating The Comparative Taxonomy, 119 Harv. L. Rev. 1641 (2006).
39. Hamermesh, Lawrence A., Calling off the Lynch Mob: The Corporate Director's Fiduciary Dis-closure Duty, 49 Vand. L. Rev. 1087 (1996).
40. _________, Why I Do Not Teach Van Gorkom, 34 Ga. L. Rev. 477 (2000).
41. Hazen, Thomas Lee, Disparate Regulatory Schemes for Parallel Activities: Securities Regula-tion, Derivatives Regulation, Gambling, and Insurance, 24 Ann. Rev. Banking & Fin. L. 375 (2005).
42. Herlitz, Georg Nils, The Meaning of the Term “Prima Facie”, 55 La. L. Rev. 391 (1994)
43. Jensen, Michael C. & Meckling, William H., Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure, 3 J. Fin. Econ. 305 (1976).
44. Katz, Jonathan J., Barbarians at the Ballot Box: The Use of Hedging to Acquire Low Cost Cor-porate Influence and Its Effect on Shareholder Apathy, 28 Cardozo L. Rev. 1483 (2006).
45. Kraakman, Reinier H., Corporate Liability Strategies and the Costs of Legal Controls, 93 Yale L.J. 857 (1984).
46. Langevoort, Donald C., Agency Law inside the Corporation: Problems of Candor and Knowl-edge, 71 U. Cin. L. Rev. 1187 (2003).
47. Leslie, Christopher R., The Significance of Silence: Collective Action Problems and Class Ac-tion Settlements, 59 Fla. L. Rev. 71 (2007).
48. Loring, Jason M., & Taylor, C. Keith, Shareholder Activism: Directorial Responses to Investors’ Attempts to Chang the Corporate Governance Landscape, 41 Wake Forest L. Rev. 321 (2006).
49. Millon, David, Theories of the Corporation, 2 Duke L.J. 201 (1990).
50. _________, New Directions in Corporate Law Communitarians, Contractrians, and the Crisis in Corporate Law, 50 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 1373 (1993).
51. Mitchell, Dalia Tsuk, Understanding Corporate Law through History: Shareholders as Proxies: The Contours of Shareholder Democracy, 63 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 1503 (2006).
52. Mitchell, Lawrence E., A Theoretical and Practical Framework for Enforcing Corporate Con-stituency Statutes, 70 Tex. L. Rev. 579 (1992).
53. O’Hare, Jennifer, Director Communications and the Uneasy relationship between the Fiduciary Duty of Disclosure and the Anti-Fraud Provisions of the Federal Securities Laws, 70 U. Cin. L. Rev. 475 (2002).
54. Palmiter, Alan R., Toward Disclosure Choice in Securities Offerings, 1999 Colum. Bus. L. Rev. 1 (1999).
55. Reed, John L., & Keiderman, Matt, Good Faith and the Ability of Directors to Assert §102(b)(7) of the Delaware Corporation Law as a Defense to Claims Alleging Abdication, Lack of Over-sight, and Similar Breached of Fiduciary Duty, 29 Del. J. Corp. L. 111 (2004).
56. Rifkind, Neil C., Should Uninformed Shareholders be a Threat Justifying Defensive Action by Target Directors in Delaware?: “Just Say No” after Moore v. Wallace, 78 B.U.L. Rev. 105 (1998).
57. Rodrigues, Usha, Understanding Corporate Law through History: The Seductive Comparison of Shareholder and Civic Democracy, 63 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 1389 (2006).
58. Salacuse, Jeswald. W., Corporate Governance Symposium: Corporate Governance, Culture and Convergence: Corporations American Style or With a European Touch?, 9 Law & Bus. Rev. Am. 33 (2003).
59. Sale, Hillary A., Delaware’s Good Faith, 89 Cornell L. Rev. 456 (2004).
60. Smith, D. Gordon, The Shareholder Primacy Norm, 23 Iowa J. Corp. L. 277 (1998).
61. Talley, Eric, Turning Servile opportunities to Gold: A Strategic Analysis of the Corporate Op-portunities Doctrine, 108 Yale L.J. 279 (1998).
62. Testy, Kellye Y., Capitalism and Freedom - For Whom?: Feminist Legal Theory and Progres-sive Corporate Law, 67(4) Law & Contemp. Prob. 87 (2004).
63. Weissbrodt, David, & Kruger, Muria, Current Development: Norms on the Responsibilities of Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises with Regard to Human Rights, 97 A.J.I.L. 901 (2003).
64. Westbrook, David A., Notes Toward a Theory of the Executive Class, 55 Buffalo L. Rev. 1047 (2007).
65. Williamson, Oliver E., The Modern Corporation: Origins, Evolution, Attributes, 19 J. Econ. Lit. 1537 (1981).
66. Winkler, Adam, Corporate Law or the Law of Business?: Stakeholders and Corporate Govern-ance as the End of History, 67 Law & Contemp. Prob. 109 (2004).

(2) Books:
1. EASTERBROOK, FRANK H., & FISCHEL, DANIEL R., THE ECONOMIC STRUCTURE OF CORPORATE LAW (Harvard University Press 1996).
2. FERRELL, O.C., FRAEDRICH, JOHN & FERRELL, LINDA, BUSINESS ETHICS: ETHICAL DECISION MAKING AND CASES (6th ed. Houghton Mifflin Company 2005).
3. FRANKLIN A. GEVURTZ, CORPORATION LAW (West Group 2000).
4. HAMILTON, ROBERT W., THE LAW OF CORPORATIONS IN A NUTSHELL (5th ed. Thomson/West 2000).
5. HARRISON, JEFFERY L., LAW AND ECONOMICS IN A NUTSHELL (2d ed. Thomson/West 2000).
6. HASS, JEFFREY J., CORPORATE FINANCE IN A NUTSHELL (Thomson/West 2004).
7. HYNES, J. DENNIS & LOEWENSTEIN, MARK J., AGENCY, PARTNERSHIP, AND THE LLC IN A NUTSHELL (3d ed. Thomson/West 2005).
8. OESTERLE, DALE A., MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS IN A NUTSHELL (2d ed. Thomson/West 2006).
9. RATNER, DAVID L. & HAZEN, TOMAS LEE, SECURITIES REGULATION IN A NUTSHELL (8th ed. Thomson/West 2005).

3. Internet source:
1. New York Stock Exchange
http://www.nyse.com
2. 2005 Model Business Corporations Act
http://www.abanet.org/buslaw/committees/CL270000pub/nosearch/mbca/home.shtml
3. The American Jurisprudence, Second Edition.
https://www.lexisnexis.com
4. The Library of Economics and Liberty
http://www.econlib.org
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. (張心悌,公開發行公司高階經理人報酬決定與監督之研究,臺北大學法學論叢第58期第1頁以下,2006年。)
2. (陳俊仁,由企業併購法第五條與第六條論我國忠實義務規範的缺失,華岡法粹第33期第203頁以下,2005年。)
3. (陳俊仁,論公司治理的發展趨勢-企業弊案後之反思,律師雜誌第310期第38頁以下,2005年。)
4. (陳俊仁,論股東於公司之地位-超越「企業所有與企業經營分離」之迷思,華岡法粹第35期第191頁以下,2006年。)
5. (陳俊仁,論股東於公司之地位-股東於公開發行公司角色與功能之檢視,成大法學第12期第185頁以下,2006年。)
6. (陳俊仁,董事之積極作為義務-論我國公司法第一百九十三條之規範缺失,成大法學第13期第81頁以下,2007年。)
7. (陳俊仁,忠誠義務-論公司負責人之競業禁止規範,月旦民商法雜誌第15期第34頁以下,2007年。)
8. (陳麗娟,從美國法與德國法股份有限公司董事會之規定論我國股份有限公司董事會之組織架構,高大法學論叢第二卷第一期,第115頁以下,2006年。)
9. (陳彥良,我國股份有限公司董事選舉制度之研析-德國法之啟示兼評大毅經營權爭奪案,成大法學第14期第1頁以下,2007年。)
10. (焦興鎧,工作平等國際勞動基準之建構,中華國際法與超國界法評論,第3卷2期367頁以下,2007年。)
11. (簡資修,法律經濟分析系列講座(1)-一個自主但開放的法學觀點,月旦法學雜誌第93期第236頁以下,2003年。)
12. (簡資修,波斯納與法律經濟分析-一個辯護性的說明,月旦民商法雜誌第8期第179頁以下,2005年。)
13. (邱聯恭,民事訴訟法修正後之程序法學-著重於確認修法之理論背景並指明今後應有之研究取向,月旦法學第101期第152頁以下,2003年。)
14. (方嘉麟,關係企業專章管制控制力濫用之法律問題(一)-自我國傳統監控模式論專章設計之架構與缺憾,政大法學評論第63期第185頁以下,2000年。)
15. (馮震宇,從美國公司法制論利用網路行使股東權之發展與趨勢,經社法制論叢第29期第139頁以下,2002年。)