(3.235.108.188) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/02/28 00:44
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果

詳目顯示:::

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:黃漢光
研究生(外文):Monirainsey Ung
論文名稱:The Effects of Absorptive Capacity of Exploration and Exploitation on Market Reactions to R&D Announcements
論文名稱(外文):The Effects of Absorptive Capacity of Exploration and Exploitation on Market Reactions to R&D Announcements
指導教授:張紹基張紹基引用關係
指導教授(外文):Shao-Chi Chang
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立成功大學
系所名稱:國際管理碩士在職專班
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2008
畢業學年度:96
語文別:英文
論文頁數:40
外文關鍵詞:Firm performanceExploitationMarket reactionExplorationR&D announcementAbsorptive capacity
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:187
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:26
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
The study discovers the effects of the absorptive capacity of exploration and exploitation on the market reactions to R&D increase announcements. We expect that firms with greater absorptive capacity of exploration (ACE) and/or absorptive capacity of exploitation (ACEi) generate more market returns when firms announce R&D expenditure. Moreover, we also expect that the firms get more positive reaction from the market in the case of absorptive capacity of exploration than in the case of absorptive capacity of exploitation when the increase of R&D expenditure is announced.
The study examines 226 firms which announce the R&D expenditure and the results show that the market negatively reacts to firms with greater ACEi in the window period (-10, 10), but positively reacts to firms with greater ACE when those firms announce the increase of R&D. Furthermore, the result supports the argument that firms with greater ACE generate more returns than firms with ACEi.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I
ABSTRACT II
TABLE OF CONTENTS III
LIST OF TABLES V
LIST OF FIGURES VI
CHAPTER ONE 1
INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Research Background and Motivation. 1
1.2 Research Objective and Contribution. 4
1.3 Structure of Research. 5
CHAPTER TWO 6
LITERATURE REVIEW 6
2.1 Benefit of Absorptive Capacity. 6
2.2 Cost of Absorptive Capacity. 8
2.3 Explorative vs. Exploitative. 9
CHAPTER THREE 14
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY 14
3.1 Data Source & Sample. 14
3.2 Empirical Methodology. 15
3.2.1 Independent Variable. 16
3.2.2 Control Variable. 18
3.2.3 Cross-sectional Regression Analysis. 20
CHAPTER FOUR 22
RESEARCH RESULTS 22
4.1 Sample Description. 22
4.2 Announcement Effects of R&D Expenditure Increased. 27
4.3 Cross-sectional Regression Analysis. 28
CHAPTER FIVE 32
CONCLUSION 32
5.1 Research Conclusion. 32
5.2 Research Contribution. 34
5.3 Research Limitation and Suggestion for Future Research. 34
REFERENCES 36
Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 425-457.
Alchian, A., & Demetz, A. (1972). Production, information costs and economic performance. American Economic Review, 62, 777-795.
Arora, A., & Gambardella, A. (1994). Evaluating technological information and using it. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 24, 91-114.
Atiase, K. (1985). Predisclosure information, firm capitalization, & security price behavior around earnings announcements Journal of Accounting Research 23, 21-36.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.
Brown, S., & Warner, J. (1985). Using daily stock returns: the case of event studies. Journal of Financial Economics, 14(1), 3-31.
Chan, L., Lakonishok, J., & Sougiannis, T. (2001). The stock market valuation of research and development expenditures. The Journal of Finance, LVI(6), 2431-2456.
Chan, S., Martin, J., & Kensinger, J. (1990). Corporate research and development expenditures and share value. Journal of Financial Economics, 26(2), 255-276.
Chang, S.-C., Chen, S.-S., & Lai, J.-H. (2008). The effect of alliance experience and intellectual capital on the value creation of international strategic alliances. The International Journal of Management Science, 36, 298-316.
Chang, S.-C., & Wang, C.-F. (2007). The effect of product diversification strategies on the relationship between international diversification and firm performance. Journal of World Business, 42, 61-79.
Cockburn, I., & Griliches, Z. (1988). Industry effects and appropriability measure in the stock market's valuation of R&D and patents. The American Economic Review, 78(2), 419-423.
Cockburn, I. M., & Henderson, R. M. (1998). Absorptive capacity, co-authoring behavior, and the organization of research in drug discovery. Journal of Industrial Economics, 46(2), 157±183.
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Administrative Science Quarterly. New perspective on earning and innovation, 35, 128–179.
Deeds, D. L. (2001). The role of R&D intensity, technical development and absorptive capacity in creating entrepreneurial wealth in high technology start-ups. Journal of Engineering and Technology Managent, 18(1), 29-47.
Deeds, D. L., & Hill, C. W. (1996). Strategic alliances and the rate of new product development: an empirical study of entrepreneurial biotechnology firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 11, 41–55.
Feng, G. (2005). Innovation, future earnings, and market efficiency. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 20(4), 385-418.
George, G., Zahra, S. A., Wheatley, K. K., & Khan, R. (2001). The effects of alliance portfolio characteristics and absorptive capacity on performance A study of biotechnology firms. Journal of High Technology Managemnet Research, 12, 205-226.
Gilsing, V., & Nooteboom, B. (2006). Exploration and exploitation in innovation systems: The case of pharmaceutical biotechnology. Research Policy, 35, 1-23.
Glass, A. J., & Saggi, K. (1998). International technology transfer and the technology gap. Journal oi Development Economics, 55, 369-398.
Gregory, N. S., Noel, P. G., & William, A. F. (2001). Absorptive capacity and new product development. Journal of High Technology Managemnet Research, 12, 77-91.
Griliches, Z. (1979). Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth. Bell Journal of Economics, 10, 92–116.
Hadlock, C. J., Ryngaert, M., & Thomas, S. (2001). Corporate structure and equity offerins: Are there benefits to deversitication? The Journal of Business 74(4), 613-635.
Hagedoorn, J. (1993). Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: Interorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences Strategic Management Journal, 14, 371-385.
Hagedoorn, J., & Duysters, G. (2002). Learning in dynamic inter-firm networks—the efficacy of quasi-redundant contacts. Organization Studies, 23(4), 525–548.
Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. (2005). Market value and patent citations. RAND Journal of Economics, 36(1), 16-38.
Hambrick, D. G., & MacMillan, I. (1985). Efficiency of product R&D in business units: the role of strategic context. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 527-547.
Hamel, G. (1991). Competition for competence and inter-partner learning within international strategic alliance. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 83-103.
Haro-Dom�瀋guez, M. d. C., Arias-Aranda, D., Llor�聲s-Montes, F. J., & Moreno, A. R. (2007). The impact of absorptive capacity on technological acquisitions engineering consulting companies. Technovation, 27(8), 417-425.
Hertzel, M., & Smith, R. L. (1993). Market discount & shareholder gains for placing equity privately. Journal of Finance, 48(2), 459-485.
Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360.
Jones, G. K., Lanctot, J. R., Aldor, T., & Hildy, J. (2001). Determinants and performance impacts of external technology acquisition. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(3), 255–283.
Kang, J. K., & Stulz, R. M. (1996). How different is japanese corporate finance? An investigation of the information content of new security issues. Review of Financial Studies, 9, 109-139.
Katila, R., & Ahuja, G. (2002). Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behaviorand new product introduction. Academy of management Journal, 45(6), 1183-1194.
Kedia, B. L., & Bhagat, R. S. (1988). Cultural constraints on transfer of technology across nations: Implications for research in international and comparative management. Academy of Management Review, 13, 559-571.
Kelm, K. M., & Narayanan, V. K. (1995). Shareholder value creation during R&D innovation and commercialization stages. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 770-786.
Kelm, K. M., Narayanan, V. K., & Pinches, G. E. (1995). Shareholder value creation during R&D innovation and commercialization stages. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 770-786.
Kilic, C., & Dursun, T. K. (2006). The effect of corporate identity changes on firm value an empirical investigation. Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge, 10(1), 234-240.
Kim, L. (1998). Crisis construction and organizational learning : capability building in catching-up at Hyundai Motor. Organization Science, 9, 506–521.
Lanctot, A., & Swan, S. K. (2000). Technology adquisition strategy in an internationally competitive environment. Journal of International Management, 6(3), 187–215.
Lane, P. J., & Lubatkin, M. (1998). Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 461-447.
Levitt, B., & March, J. G. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 319-340.
Link, A. L., & Long, J. E. (1981). The simple economics of basic science research. Journal of political economy, 67, 297-306.
Littler, C. (2006). A signalling theory of strategy. In: Academy of Management Conference, Best Paper Proceedings, Atlanta.
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87.
McEvily, S. K., & Chakravarthy, B. (1999). Resource context and the returns of investments in R&D. Proceedings of the Academy of Management Meetings 1999, In: Havlovic, S.J. (Ed.).
McMillan, G. S., Mauri, A., & Robert D. Halmilton, I. (2003). The impact of publishing and patenting activities on new product development and firm performance: The cases of the US pharmaceutical industry. International Journal of Innovation Management 7(2), 213-221.
Mowery, D. C., Oxley, J. E., & Silverman, B. S. (1996). Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 77-91.
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23, 242-266.
Namara, P. M., & Baden-Fuller, C. (2007). Shareholder returns and exploration-exploitation dilemma: R&D announcements by biotechnology firms. Research Policy, 36(4), 548-565.
Narayanan, V., Pinches, G., Kelm, K., & Lander, D. (2000). The influence of voluntarily disclosed qualitative information. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 707-722.
Nooteboom, B. (2000). Learning and innovation in organizations and economies. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Nooteboom, B., Haverbeke, W. V., Duysters, G., Gilsing, V., & Oord, A. v. d. (2007). Optimal cognitive distance and absorptive capacity Research Policy 36 1016-1034.
Powell, W. W. (1998). Learning from collaboration: knowledge and networks in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries. California Management Review, 40, 228-240.
Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 116-145.
Rowley, T., Behrens, D., & Krachkhardt, D. (2002). Redundant governance structures: an analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 369-386.
Sampson, R. C. (2007). R&D alliances and firm performance: The impact of technological diversity and alliance organization on innovation. Academy of management Journal, 50(2), 364-386.
Schilling, M. (1998). Technological lockout: An integrative model of the economic and strategic factors driving technology success and failure. Academy of Management Review 23, 267-284.
Todorova, G., & Durisin, B. (2007). Absorptive capacity: Valuing a reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 32(3 ), 774–786.
Walter, N. R., & Tucker, S. (1987). Implementing routine and radical innovation: . Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Zahra, S. A. (1996). Technology strategy and new venture performance: a study of corporate-sponsored and independent biotechnology ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 11(4), 289-322.
Zahra, S. A., & Bogner, W. C. (2000). Technology strategy and software new ventures’ performance: exploring the moderating effect of the competitive environment. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(23), 135–173.
Zi-Lin, H., & Poh-Kam, W. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15(4), 481-494.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊
 
系統版面圖檔 系統版面圖檔