(3.232.129.123) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/03/06 02:04
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果

詳目顯示:::

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:陳煌文
研究生(外文):Huang Wen Chen
論文名稱:專利外溢對台灣積體電路公司產出之影響
論文名稱(外文):The Effect of Patent Spillover on the Output of the Integrated Circuit Firms in Taiwan
指導教授:蔡璧徽蔡璧徽引用關係
指導教授(外文):Bi-Huei Tsai
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立交通大學
系所名稱:管理學院碩士在職專班管理科學組
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:其他商業及管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2007
畢業學年度:96
語文別:中文
論文頁數:101
中文關鍵詞:專利外溢效果製程創新產品創新
外文關鍵詞:Research and Developmentpatentspillover effectprocess innovationproduct innovation
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:237
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
本文以Cobb-Douglas生產函數為計量模型,針對IC產業上市上櫃公司共82家公司2001年到2006年的縱橫資料﹙panel data﹚進行實證研究。依照「製程創新」與「產品創新」的不同,以及地區的不同,將樣本區分為台灣IC製程公司、台灣無晶圓廠IC設計公司、世界無晶圓廠IC設計公司等共三組樣本。研究目的為: (1) 研發的產出面(公司專利資本存量)的外溢效果對IC全體公司的生產力是否有正面貢獻。(2) 不同創新型態 ( 製程創新與產品創新 ) 在不同的外溢形式 (研發的投入面(公司研發費用資本存量)與產出面(公司專利資本存量) )中其表現是否不同。(3) 不同創新型態 (製程創新與產品創新) 的專利資本存量外溢效果其表現是否不同。(4) 國內外的IC群聚在不同的外溢形式 (研發的投入面(公司研發費用資本存量)與產出面(公司專利資本存量) )中其表現是否不同。(5) 對IC全體公司的生產力而言,專利獨占的時間延長價值是否有正面貢獻。
本文實證結果有以下主要發現:(1) IC全體公司研發的產出面(公司專利資本存量)的外溢效果對生產力有正面貢獻。(2) 以製程創新為主的IC製程公司其研發費用外溢效果較大;以產品創新為主的IC設計公司其專利外溢效果較大。(3) 以製程創新為主的IC製程公司其專利生產力較大。(4) 以直接研發費用之形式探討其外溢效果時,世界IC設計公司外溢效果大於台灣IC設計公司;以專利之形式探討其外溢效果時,台灣IC設計公司外溢效果大於世界IC設計公司。(5) 對IC全體公司的生產力而言,專利獨占的時間延長價值有正面貢獻。
This study aims to study the intra-industry Patent spillover effect in Integrated Circuit ﹙IC﹚industry according to Cobb-Douglas production function model on firm-level panel data during year 2001 to 2006. According to the characteristics of process innovation and product innovation, the sample is divided into three categories : (1) process firms in Taiwan, (2) fabless IC design firms in Taiwan, and (3) fabless IC design firms worldwide.
The empirical evidence shows the following findings:
1. The spillover effect of patent capital does have significantly contribution to firms’ sales.
2. Regarding the spillover effect by R&D expense, the effect of process innovation is greater than product innovation at significant confidence level; regarding the spillover effect by patent capital, the effect of product innovation is greater than process innovation at significant confidence level.
3. The patent capital productivity of product innovation-based IC design firms is less than process innovation-based IC manufacturing firms at significant confidence level.
4. Regarding the spillover effect by R&D expense, the effect of world-wide IC design firms is greater than Taiwan IC design firms at significant confidence level; Regarding the spillover effect by patent capital, the effect of Taiwan IC design firms is significantly greater than worldwide IC design firms.
5. Regarding all IC sample firms, the prolonging values monopolize by patent have significantly contribution to firms sales.
文摘要 ------------------------------------------- i
英文摘要 ------------------------------------------- ii
誌謝 ----------------------------------------------- iii
目錄 ----------------------------------------------- iv
表目錄 ----------------------------------------------- v
圖目錄 ----------------------------------------------- vii
第一章、序論 --------------------------------------- 1
第一節、前言 ------------------------------- 1
第二節、研究動機 --------------------------- 11
第三節、研究目的 --------------------------- 12
第四節、本文貢獻 -------------------------- 12
第五節、論文架構 -------------------------- 13
第二章、文獻探討 ----------------------------------- 15
第三章、研究假說 ----------------------------------- 20
第四章、研究方法 ----------------------------------- 31
第一節、實證模型與變數設定 ------------------- 31
第二節、估計方法 --------------------------- 41
第三節、資料來源 --------------------------- 43
第五章、實證結果 ----------------------------------- 48
第一節、基本統計與分析 ----------------------- 48
第二節、研發外溢效果 ----------------------- 59
第六章、結論 --------------------------------------- 80
第一節、研發外溢效果 ----------------------- 82
第二節、研究限制與建議 ----------------------- 85

中文參考文獻 --------------------------------------- 86
英文參考文獻 --------------------------------------- 88
附錄 ----------------------------------------------- 93
附記 ----------------------------------------------- 96
中文參考文獻

1. 莊奕琦、許碧峰﹙1999﹚,《研究發展對生產力的貢獻及產業間的外溢效果—台灣製造業實證》,〈經濟論文〉, 27:3, 407-432.
2. 蔡光第、楊彥浩﹙1996﹚,《多層次巢覆式R&D外溢效果與其對台灣製造業不同科技部門之貢獻》,〈經濟論文叢刊〉, 24:1, 29-59.
3. 楊志海、陳忠榮 (1999) ,《技術來源、創新與生產力》,國立中央大學產業經濟研究所,未出版博士論文。
4. 楊志海、陳忠榮﹙2002﹚, 《研究發展與生產力—台灣製造業的實證研究》,〈經濟論文叢刊〉, 30:1, 27-48.
5. 陳忠榮、陳威勳﹙1992﹚, 《研究發展外溢效果對廠商利潤績效之影響—以自動化產業為例》,〈經濟論文叢刊〉, 20:2, 155-175.
6. 楊丁元、陳慧玲﹙1996﹚,《業競天擇—高科技產業生態》, 時報出版社
7. 邱泰穎(1997),《研究發展外溢效果經濟涵意與理論模型之推導》,台灣經濟第244期,P.73-83。
8. 蕭和鳴﹙2001﹚, 《創新的外溢效果:台灣產業關聯表之實證研究》,世新大學經濟學系,未出版碩士論文
9. 霍德明、熊秉元、胡春田、巫和懋﹙2003﹚,《經濟學2000》,雙葉書廊.
10. 黃台心﹙2005﹚,《計量經濟學》, 雙葉書廊
11. 林柳君譯(2000),Rivette, K. G. and Kline, D.著,閣樓上的林布蘭,經典傳訊.
12. 劉常勇(1997),「建準電機─智慧財產權為核心的經營策略」,中華管理評論.
13. 馮震宇(2004),「運用專利策略掌握競爭優勢」,能力雜誌.
14. 馬仁宏(2003),「奈米技術專利佈局的緣起與發展」,科學技術資料中心簡訊.
15. 劉尚志(2001),「高科技時代的專利競賽」,活力:台灣如何創造半導體與個人電腦產業奇蹟,張俊彥、游伯龍編,台北市:時報文化.
16. 陳先齊、蔡璧徽﹙2006﹚,《研發外溢效果對台灣的積體電路公司產出之影響》,國立交通大學管理科學系碩士班,未出版碩士論文.
17. 鄭國強、郭迺鋒﹙2004﹚,《廠商的專利行為與市場價值關聯—以全球半導體產業為例》,世新大學管理學院財務金融學系碩士班,未出版碩士論文.
18. 陳雅娟、蔡璧徽 (2007) ,《台灣半導體產業之創新能力與績效》,國立交通大學管理科學系碩士班,未出版碩士論文.
19. 黃宛華(1999),《資訊服務業智慧資本之研究》,政治大學科技管理研究所碩士班,未出版碩士論文
20. 曾俊堯(2002),「國內銀行業智慧資本之探討與比較」,產業金融季刊,第114 期,35-52 頁
21. 曾俊堯與古永嘉(2003),「智慧資本與公司無形價值關係之研究-以台灣製造業為例」,管理與系統,1-30 頁。
22. 楊明炯 (2002), 《半導體廠商的競爭策略與核心競爭優勢研究》, 臺灣大學EMBA 國際企業研究所,未出版碩士論文。
23. 陳柏彰 (2002),《創新發明能力與企業生產力及企業價值之關連性研究-以台灣之資訊電子業為例》,國立台灣大學會計學系研究所,未出版之碩士論文。

英文參考文獻

1. Aghion, Philippe and Peter Howitt,(1992),“A Model of Growth through Creative Destruction”, Econometrica,60(2),pp.323-51.
2. Arora,A., Ceccagnoli, M. and W. M. Cohen(2003), “R&D and the patent premium,” NBER Working Paper,w9431.
3. Baptista, R. and Swann, P. (1998), “Do firms in clusters innovate more ?”, Research Policy, 27, 525-540.
4. Bassi, L. J. and Van Buren, M. E.(1999), “Valuing Investment in Intellectual Capital,” International Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 18, No. 5/6/7/8, pp.414-432.
5. Bond, S., Harhoff, D. and Van Reenen, J. ﹙2003﹚, “Corporate R&D and productivity in Germany and the United Kingdom”, Working paper, Center for Economic Performance, London School of Economics and Political Science.
6. Branstetter, L.G. ﹙2001﹚, “Are knowledge spillovers international or intranational in Microeconomics evidence from the U.S. and Japan”, Journal of International Economics, 53-79.
7. Chen, C.J., H.L. Wu, and B. W. Lin (2006), “Evaluating the Development of High-tech Industries: Taiwan's Science Park,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 73, 452-465.
8. Cohen, W.M. and Levinthal, D. ﹙1989﹚, “Innovation and learning : the two faces of R&D – implications for the analysis of R&D investment”, Economic Journal, 99, 569-596.
9. Connolly, R. and M. Hirschey (1988). "Market Value and Patents: A Bayesian Approach, ", Economics Letters 27: 83-87.
10. Cuneo, P. and Mairesse, J., ﹙1984﹚, “Productivity and R&D at the firm level in Franch manufacturing”, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 375-392.
11. David, P.A. and Rosenbloom, J.L., ﹙1990﹚, “Marshallian factor market externalities and the dynamics of industrial localization”, Journal of Urban Economics, 28, 349-370.
12. Drucker, P. F. (1993), Post-Capitalist Society, Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann
13. Edvinsson, L., and Malone, M. S. (1997), Intellectual capital: realizing your company’s value by finding its hidden roots, London: Piatkus.
14. Ellerman, J. and Montgomery, B. and Stradley, B. (2002), “Linking intangibles in executive pay,” Workspan, Vol. 45, No. 5, pp.8-10
15. Griliches, Z. ﹙1979﹚, “Issues in assessing the contribution of R&D to productivity growth”, Bell Journal of Economics, 10, 92-116.
16. Griliches, Z. (1981), “Market Value, R&D and Patents”, Economic Letters, 7, 183–187.
17. Griliches, Z. and J. Mairesse ﹙1984﹚, “Productivity and R&D at the firm level”, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
18. Griliches, Z., (1990) “Patent statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey,” Journal of accounting Research, 37, 319-352.
19. Griliches, Z. ﹙1992﹚, “The search for R&D spillovers”, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 94, 29-47.
20. Grossman, Gene M. and Elhanan Helpman (1991), “Innovation and Growth: Technological Competition in the Global Economy”, MIT PRESS,Boston, MA.
21. Hall, J. and Scobie, G.M. ﹙2006﹚, “The role of R&D in productivity growth : The case of agriculture in New Zealand : 1927 to 2001 ”, New Zealand Treasury working paper.
22. Hall, B.H., Jaffe, A., and R.M. Ham (1999), “The Determinants of Patenting in the US Semiconductor Industry,” Working Paper.
23. Hall,B.H., Jaffe,A., and M. Trajtenberg (2000),“Market Value and Patent Citation: A First Look”, NBER Working Paper,No.7741.
24. Hall, B.H. and R.H. Ziedonis (2001), “The Patent Paradox Revisited: An Empirical Study of Patenting in the US Semiconductor Industry”, 1979-1995, Rand Journal of Economics, 32, 101-128.
25. Harabi, N. ﹙1997﹚, “Channels of R&D spillovers: An empirical investigation of Swiss firms”, Technovation, 17:11, 627-635.
26. Harhoff, Dietmar, Francis Narin, F. M. Scherer, and Katrin Vopel, (1999),” Citation Frequency and the Value of Patented Inventions” The Review of Economics and Statistics, August , 81(3): 511-515.
27. Hill, R.C., Griffiths, W.E., and Judge, G.G. ﹙2002﹚, “Undergraduate econometrics”, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
28. Hurwitz, J.(2002), “The Linkage between Management Practices, Intangible Performances and Stock Returns,” Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol.3, No.1, pp.51-61.
29. Jaffe, A.B. ﹙1986﹚, “Technological Spillovers of R&D : evidence from firms, patents, profits, and market value”, The America Economic Review, 76:5, 984-1001.
30. Jaffe, A.B. ﹙1996﹚, “Economic analysis of research spillovers: Implications for the advance technology program”, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 97-108.
31. Jang, S.L. and Huang, G.G. ﹙2005﹚, “Public R&D and industrial innovations at the project levels: An exploration of Taiwan’s public research projects”, Contemporary Economic Policy, 23:4, 635-646.
32. Mairesse, J. and Hall, B.H. ﹙1996﹚, “Estimating the productivity of research and development in Franch and United States manufacturing firms”, International Productivity Comparisions, 285-315.
33. Mansfield, E. (1988) “Industrial R&D in Japan and the United States: A Comparative Study,” American Economic Review, 78: 223-228
34. Megna, P. and Klock, D.C. ﹙1993﹚ “The impact of intangible capital on Tobin’s Q in the semiconductor industry”, America Economic Review, 83:2, 265-269.
35. Miles, D. and Scott, A. ﹙2002﹚, “Microeconomics – Understanding the wealth of nations”, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
36. Nadiri, M.I. ﹙1993﹚, “Innovations and technological spillovers”, Working Paper, No. 4423, National Bureau of Economic Research.
37. Porter, M. E. ﹙1980﹚, “Competitive strategy”, New York: The Free Press.
38. Raut, L.K. ﹙1995﹚, “R&D spillover and productivity growth: evidence from Indian private firm”, Journal of Development Economics, 48, 1-23.
39. Rivette,K.G and D.Kline(2000), ”Discovering new value in intellectual property”, Harvard Business Review(January-February) , pp54-66
40. Romer, P. ﹙1990﹚, “Endogenous technological change”, Journal of Political Economy, 98, 71-102.
41. Spence, M. (1984), “Cost Reduction, Competition, and Industry Performance”, Econometrica, 52(1), pp.101-122.
42. Shane, H. (1993), “Patent Citations as an Indicator of The Value of Intangible Assets in The Semiconductor industry”, Working Paper, University of Pennsylvania.
43. Stolpe, M. (2001), “Mobility of Research Workers and Knowledge Diffusion as Evidence in Patent Data: The Case of Liquid Crystal Display Technology”, Working paper 1038, Kiel Institute for World Economics, Germany.
44. Tsai, K.H. ﹙2005﹚, “R&D output and firm size: a nonlinear examination”, Technovation, 25:7: 795-803.
45. Von Hippel, E. ﹙1988﹚, “The sources of innovation”, Cambridge University Press.
46. Wakelin, K. (2001), Productivity growth and R&D expenditure in UK manufacturing firms”, Research Policy,30(7):1079-1090.
47. Yasuda, T. ﹙2005﹚, “Firm growth, size, age and behavior in Japanese Manufacturing”, Small Business Economics, 24:1, 1-14.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
系統版面圖檔 系統版面圖檔