跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.213.60.33) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/07/22 16:19
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:黃詩婷
研究生(外文):Shih-Ting Huang
論文名稱:心像認知能力與繪畫手法之間的相關性
論文名稱(外文):The Relationship Between Mental Visualization Types And Drawing Habits
指導教授:陳一平陳一平引用關係
指導教授(外文):I-Ping Chen
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立交通大學
系所名稱:應用藝術研究所
學門:藝術學門
學類:應用藝術學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2008
畢業學年度:96
語文別:中文
論文頁數:51
中文關鍵詞:心像繪畫認知風格空間型心像能力物件型心像能力
外文關鍵詞:mental imagerydrawingcognitive stylespatial imageryobject imagery
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:5
  • 點閱點閱:726
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:149
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:2
本研究探討擅長繪畫者慣用繪畫手法所涉及的認知能力,採取繪畫作業與認知作業的測驗。將繪畫手法分為「A型畫者」-忠實再現物件型態,作客觀、逼真的描繪,以寫實再現程度為主;「B型畫者」-將現實型態提煉和簡化為個人繪畫符號作畫,以符號轉化程度為主。

研究結果發現,貢獻於繪畫寫實度的認知能力與認知風格所屬類型有相當大的關係,屬於物件導向的Visualizer以物件能力與寫實度有關,屬於空間導向的Visualizer則是空間能力,因此寫實再現手法與偏好使用特定的心像能力有關。而在符號轉化的繪畫手法與空間能力呈現負相關,推論是因為空間能力越差者簡化主體的空間脈絡,使用偏符號轉化的手法表現。
In this research, we explore the correlations between types of drawing habits and cognitive styles pertaining to mental visualization. We classified painters according to their performance in drawing and Cognitive ability tests. One group of painters are good at drawing realistically and are called Type A painters. By contrast, Type B painters tend to make schematic drawings.

We found that painters’ representational drawing ability is correlated with mental visualization types. Object visualizers tend to use their object imagery ability to make realistic drawings. Spatial visualizers, however, tend to rely more on their spatial imagery ability to do so. In general, painters’ schematic drawing ability is inversely correlated with their spatial imagery ability, suggesting that painters of inferior spatial imagery ability tend to simplify the spatial relationship of pictorial elements, and ,thus, turning their drawings towards schematic styles.
摘要...................................................i
Abstract...............................................ii
誌謝....................................................iv
目錄....................................................v
圖目錄..................................................vii
表目錄..................................................viii
第一章 緒論................................................1
1.1. 研究動機..............................................1
1.2. 研究目的與貢獻........................................6
1.3. 研究範圍與限制........................................8
第二章 文獻探討............................................9
2.1. 雙碼論(dual-code theory)..............................9
2.2. 記憶…...............................................10
2.3. 表徵(representation)...............................11
2.4. 心像(mental imagery)...............................11
2.4.1 心理旋轉 (mental rotation) .........................11
2.4.2 字符旋轉實驗........................................12
2.4.3視覺掃描(visual scanning)..........................13
2.5. 認知風格(cognitive style)..........................14
2.6. 視覺認知風格的再細分:物件與空間導向.................15
2.7. 空間能力(spatial ability)..........................19
2.8. 空間能力在個別的差異.................................20
2.9. 認知能力作業工具.....................................20
2.9.1 「Verbalizers-Visualizers 認知偏好」作業工具........21
2.9.2 Object-Spatial Imagery Questionnaire(OSIQ) .........21
第三章 實驗...............................................23
3.1. 實驗內容.............................................23
3.1.1 受試者..............................................23
3.1.2 實驗環境............................................23
3.1.3 作業內容............................................24
3.1.3.1 繪畫作業..........................................24
3.1.3.2 認知作業..........................................27
3.2. 實驗資料與收集.......................................28
3.2.1.「繪畫作業」資料....................................28
3.2.2「認知作業」資料.....................................30
第四章 實驗結果與討論.....................................33
4.1 綜合討論..............................................33
4.1.1. 針對受試者所進行的分類之間的能力是否具有相關性.....33
4.1.2. 初步討論...........................................36
4.1.3. 後續研究與建議.....................................37
4.2. 總結.................................................38
第五章 參考文獻...........................................40
5.1. 中文文獻.............................................40
5.2. 英文文獻.............................................40
附錄I:VVCSQ 作業內容.....................................45
附錄II:OSIQ 作業內容.....................................47
附錄III:繪畫作業表現.....................................49
附錄VI:評分員間的 Pearson Correlations Coefficient.......51
李素卿 譯(2003)。認知心理學。台北:五南。
周元琪(2007)。繪畫相關能力與心像認知能力之間的相關性。國立交通大學應用藝術研究所碩士論文,未出版, 新竹市。
柯錫杰(2003)。家鄉人=Home tower native people。臺北市:柯錫杰個人工作室。
陳烜之(主編)(2007)。 認知心理學。 台北:五南。
彭聃齡、張必隱(2000)。認知心理學。台北:東華。
Ausburn, L. J., & Ausburn, F. B. (1978). Cognitive styles: Some information and implications for instructional design. Educational Communications & Technology Journal, 26, 337-354.
Blajenkova, O., Kozhevnikov, M., & Motes, M. A. (2006). Object-spatial imagery: A new selfreport imagery questionnaire. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 239-263.
Campos, A., & Suerio, E. (1993). Sex and age differences in visual imagery vividness. Journal of Mental Imagery, 17, 91-94.
Carroll, J. (1993). Human Cognitive Abilities: A Survey of Factor-analytic Studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Cohen, D. J., & Bennett, S.(1997). Why Can't Most People Draw What They See. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 23, 609-621.
Collins, D. W., & Kimura, D. (1997). A large sex difference on a twodimensional mental rotation task. Behavioral Neuroscience, 111, 845-849.
Cooper, L. A., & Shepard, R. N. (1973). The time required to prepare for a rotated stimulus. Memory & Cognition, 1, 246-250.
Dror, I. E., Kosslyn, S. M., & Waag, W. L. (1993). Visual-spatial abilities of pilots. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 763-773
Ekstrom, R. B., French, J. W., & Harman, H. H. (1976). Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Eysenck, M. W. & Keane, M. T.(2000). Cognitive Psychology:A Student's Handbook (4th ed.). PA: Psychology Press.
Farah, M. J., Hammond, K. M., Levine, D. N., & Calvanio, R. (1988). Visual and spatial mental imagery: Dissociable systems of representations. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 439-462.
French, J. W. (1951). The description of aptitude and achievement tests in terms of rotated factors. Sychometric Monograph No. 5, Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Geary, D. C., Gilger, J. W., & Elliot-Miller, B. (1992). Gender differences in three-dimensional mental rotation: A replication. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 153, 115-117.
Ganis,G., Thompson, W. L., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2004). Brain areas underlying visual mental imagery and visual perception: an fMRI study. Cognitive Brain Research, 20, 226-241.
Haxby, J. V., Grady, C. L., Horwitz, B., Ungerleider, L. G., Mishkin, M., Carson, R. E., Herscovitch, P., Schapiro, M. B., & Rapoport, S. I. (1991). Dissociation of object and spatial visual processing pathways in human extrastriate cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 88, 1621-1625.
Hedges, L. V., & Nowell, A. (1995). Sex Differences in Mental Test Scores, Variability, and Numbers of High-scoring individuals. Science, 269, 41-45.
Hegarty, M., & Kozhevnikov, M. (1999). Types of Visual-Spatial Representations and Mathematical Problem Solving. Journal of Educational Psychology , 91, 684-689.
Jonassen, D.H., & Grabowski, B.L. (Ed.). (1993). Handbook of Individual Differences, Learning, and Instruction . NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates
Kail, R., Carter, P., & Pellegrino, J. (1979). The locus of sex differences in spatial ability. Perception & Psychophysics, 26, 182-186.
Kosslyn, S. M. (1973). Scanning visual images: some structural implications, Percept. Psychophys, 14, 90-94.
Kosslyn, S. M. (1973). Constructing Visual Images. Canada: Dept. of Psychology.
Kosslyn, S. M. (1994). Image and brain: The resolution of the imagery debate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kosslyn, S. M., & Koenig, O. (1992). Wet mind: The new cognitive neuroscience. New York: Free Press.
Kozbelt, A. (2001). Artists as experts in visual cognition. Visual Cognition, 8(6), 705-723.
Kozhevnikov, M., Hegarty, M., & Mayer, R. E. (2002). Revising the visualizer/verbalizer dimension: evidence for two types of visualizers. Cognition & instruction, 20, 47-77.
Kozhevnikov, M., Kosslyn, S. M., & Shepard, J. (2005). Spatial versus object visualizers: a new characterization of visual cognitive style. Memory and Cognition, 33, 710-726.
Lean, G., & Clements, M. A. (1981). Spatial ability, visual imagery, and mathematical performance. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12, 267-299.
Lane, R, M. (2006). How graphing calculators and visual imagery contribute to college algebra students’ understanding the concept of function. The Florida state university college of education.
Levine, D. N., Warach, J., & Farah, M. J. (1985). Two visual systems in mental imagery: Dissociation of “what” and “where” in imagery disorders due to bilateral posterior cerebral lesions. Neurology, 35, 1010-1018.
Lohman, D. F. (1979). Spatial Ability: A Review and Reanalysis of the Correlational Literature(Tech. Rep. No8) . Stanford University.
McGee, M. G. (1979). Human Spatial Abilities: Psychometric Studies and Environmental, Genetic, Hormonal, and Neurological Influences. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 889-918.
Messick, S. (1984). The nature of cognitive styles: Problems and promise in educational practice. Educational Psychologist, 19, 59-74.
Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. A. (1995). The visual brain in action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Shepard, R. N., & Metzler J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701-703.
Shah, P., & Miyake, A. (2005). The Cambridge Handbook of Visuospatial Thinking. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and Verbal Processes. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Paivio, A., & Clark, J. M. (1991). Static versus dynamic imagery. In C. Cornoldi & M. A. McDaniels (Eds.), Imagery and cognition (pp. 221-245). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Paivio, A., & Harshman, R. (1983). Factor analysis of a questionnaire on imagery and verbal habits and skills. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 37, 461-483.
Richardson, A. (1977). Verbalizer-visualizer: A cognitive style dimension. Journal of Mental Imagery, 1, 109-125.
Uhl, F., Goldenberg, G., Lang, W., Lindinger, G., Steiner, M., & Deecke, L. (1990). Cerebral correlates of imagining colours, faces and a map--II. Negative cortical DC potentials. Neuropsychologia. 1990, 28, 81-93.
Ungerleider, L. G., & Haxb, J.V. (1994). What’and ‘where’in the human brain. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 4, 157-l 65.
Ungerleider, L. G., & Mishkin, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems. In D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale, & R. J. W. Mansfield (Eds.), Analysis of visual behavior (pp. 549-586). Cambridge, MA: MIT Pre.
Vannucci, M., Cioli, L., Chiorri, C., Grazi, A., & Kozhevnikov, M. (2006). Individual differences in visuo-spatial imagery: further evidence for the distinction between object and spatial imagers. Cognitive Processing, 7, 144-145.
Vandenberg, S. G., & Kuse, A. R. (1978). Mental Rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 47, 599-604.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top