跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(98.80.143.34) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/10/04 15:48
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:葉耀仁
研究生(外文):YEH YAO JEN
論文名稱:應用推敲可能性理論模式(ELM)於部落格口碑行銷效果─以旅遊部落格為例
論文名稱(外文):Word-of-Mouth Effect of Travel Blogs: A Perspective from Elaboration Likelihood Model
指導教授:唐日新唐日新引用關係
指導教授(外文):Jih-Hsin Tang
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺北商業技術學院
系所名稱:商學研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:一般商業學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2008
畢業學年度:96
語文別:中文
論文頁數:81
中文關鍵詞:部落格推敲可能性模式口碑行銷中央路徑周邊路徑
外文關鍵詞:blogsELMword-of-mouth marketingcentral routeperipheral route
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:38
  • 點閱點閱:6048
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:1376
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:10
最近幾年部落格的影響力越來越大,商業界和學術界也開始注意部落格的現象。許多人在自己的部落格持續的寫日記,放照片和分享影音檔案,也有不少人會回應別人部落格的文章。不過令人訝異的是,儘管部落格在商業上的應用日益廣泛,對於部落格的口碑效果的瞭解卻十分有限。
本研究試圖從推敲可能性模式的觀點(ELM) 探討部落格上的訊息,如何影響網路使用者,進而如何說服使用者成為客戶,或推薦給其他使用者。我們設計了一個特殊類型的部落格—旅遊部落格—採用線上實驗法,驗證ELM的觀點。實驗操弄兩個獨立變數:旅遊部落格論點品質(中央路徑)與名人對非名人角色代言(周邊路徑)來測試1528個受測者的旅遊意圖以及口碑推薦意願,其中使用者涉入程度作為中介變數。如ELM模式所預測,實驗證實旅遊意圖三個假設;然而對低涉入受測者,旅遊部落格的強論點品質仍是影響潛在顧客之旅遊意圖的主要因素。在口碑推薦意願變數中ELM模式無法驗證其假設,本研究認為口碑推薦意願應該屬於「購後行為」的觀念,所以周邊線索和旅遊部落格論點品質會影響旅遊意圖進而影響口碑推薦意願,故本研究提出修正後觀念性架構,可提供後續研究參考,文章也討論管理意涵提供經營者實質建議。
In recent years, Weblog (or blog) has attracted a lot of attention from both practitioners and academics. Many individuals keep diaries, photos and video clips on their blogs and sometimes get comments from friends, classmates or net-surfers. Surprisingly, few studies has been devoted to the impact of blogging on these net-surfers or potential customers.
The study attempts to get a better understanding of how persuasive the messages on the blog may affect the net-surfers. We consider that Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM) is an appropriate model since it has been applied and tested in many domains. We examined ELM model with a specific type of blog – travel blog – by designing an online experiment; argument quality (central routes) and famous vs. non-famous endorsers (peripheral routes) were manipulated to test 1528 subjects’ (grouped by personal Involvement Inventory) travel intention. Experiment results confirmed three hypotheses as ELM model predicted; yet for those low involvers, the strength of arguments on a travel blog is still a dominant factor affecting a potential customer’s travel intention. As for the word-of-mouth recommendation, ELM model can not predicte hypotheses , this study consider that word-of-mouth is a "post-shopping behavior"; therefore, it is the peripheral routes and argument quality of travel blog have a impact on online customers’ travel intentions, thus affecting word-of-mouth recommendation., The study makes some adjustments of ELM model Discussions and managerial implications were also provided.
摘要i
英文摘要ii
致謝iii
目錄iv
表目錄vi
圖目錄vii
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究動機 1
1.2 研究目的 2
第二章 文獻探討 3
2.1 口碑推薦意願 3
2.2 網路口碑 4
2.3 網路行銷之口碑行銷 5
2.4 旅遊部落格 5
2.5 推敲可能性模式 6
2.5.1 中央路徑 7
2.5.2 周邊路徑 7
2.5.3 涉入程度 9
2.5.4 論點品質 10
第三章 研究方法 12
3.1 研究架構 12
3.2 研究假設與推論 13
3.2.1 採取中央路徑時旅遊部落格論點品質與周邊線索之關 13
係 13
3.2.2 採取周邊路徑時旅遊部落格格論點品質與周邊線索之關係 15
3.3 實驗設計 17
3.3.1 旅遊部落格論點品質強度前測與衡量 17
3.3.2 旅遊部落格論點品質之操作性定義與衡量 21
3.3.3 周邊線索之操作性定義與衡量 22
3.3.4 涉入程度之操作性定義與衡量 23
3.3.5 旅遊意圖之操作性定義與衡量 24
3.3.6 口碑推薦意願之操作性定義與衡量 25
3.3.7 實驗流程 25
第四章 實證結果與資料分析 27
4.1 樣本基本特徵描述與涉入衡量分析 27
4.2 旅遊意圖之信、效度檢驗 29
4.3 研究假設檢定 31
4.3.1 旅遊意圖之假設檢定 31
4.3.2 口碑推薦意願之假設檢定 40
4.4 旅遊意圖與口碑推薦意願之相關分析 49
4.5 旅遊部落格論點品質和周邊線索對性別之影響關係 49
4.6 旅遊部落格留言部份質化資料分析 51
第五章 結論與建議 53
5.1 管理意涵與實質建議 54
5.2 研究限制與未來研究方向 55
參考文獻 57
附錄一 正式問卷61
附錄二 樣本測試72
參考文獻
書籍
[1]方華恩,口碑式行銷,Ivan R.Misner原著,台北:高寶國際(集團)有
限公司,1999。
[2]白滌清,消費者行為,Blackwell, Miniard, and Engel原著,
台北:華泰文化,2007
[3]吳明隆,SPSS問卷統計分析實務,台北:五男圖書出版,2007。
[4]林建煌,消費者行為概論,台北:華泰文化,2007。
[5]林蓬榮,網路行銷,台北:新文京,2004。
[6]吳奕軍,從傳統行銷出發看網路行銷,突破雜誌,第153期,頁98-
101,1998。
[7]Arndt, Johan, Word of Mouth Advertising:A Review of The
Literature, New York:AdvertisingResearch Federation,
1967.
[8]DeVellis, R. F., Scale Development: theory and
applications (Applied Social Research Methods Series,
Vol. 26). Newbury Park: Sage, 1991.
[9]Kalakota,R. & A.B.Whinston, Frontiers of Electronic
commerce, Addision-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc., 1996.
[10]Nunally,J.C., Psychometric Theroy, New York:McGraw-
Hill, 1978.
[11]Petty,Richard E.and John T.Cacioppo, Communication and
Persuasion:Central and
Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change, New
York: Springer-Verlag,
1986.
[12]Petty R. E., and Cacioppo, J. T., Attitudes and
Persuasion: Classic and
Contemporary Approaches, IA: Wm. C. Brown., 1981.
[13]Rogers, E.M., Diffusion of Innovations, 3rd ed., The
Free Press, New York,1983.
[14]Szczepanski, C. M., General and Special Interest
Magazine Advertising and
the Elaboration Likelihood Model:A Comparative Content
Analysis and
Investigation of the Effects of Differential Route
Processing Execution
Strategies, Unpublished doctoral dissertation,
Department of Communication of
Buffalo University, 2006, NY.

期刊論文
[1]Andrews, J. C., & Shimp, T. A., “Effects of involvement
argument strength, and source characteristics on central
and peripheral processing of advertising”,Psychology
and Marketing, Vol. 7, no. 3, 1990, pp.195-214.
[2]Anderson, E.W., “Customer satisfaction and word of
mouth”, Journal of Service Research, Vol.1, no.1, 1998,
pp. 5-17.
[3]Bearden, WO. and Etzel, M.J., “Reference group
influence on product and brand purchase decisions”,
Journal of Co nsumer Research, Vol.9, no. 2, 1982, pp.
183-94.
[4]Blood,R., ”How blogging software reshapes the online
community”, Communications of the ACM, Vol.47, no. 2,
2004, pp. 53–55.
[5]Bone, Paula Fitzgerald, “Word-of-mouth effects on short-
term and long-term product judgments”, Journal of
Business Research, Vol.32, no.3, March 1995, pp.
213-223.
[6]Brown, J.J. and Reingen, RH., “Social ties and word-of-
mouth referral behaviour”, Journal of Consumer
Research, Vol.14, no. 3, 1987, pp. 350-362.
[7]Chau, M., & Xu, J., “Mining communities and their
relationships in blogs: A study of online hate groups,”
International Journal of Human – Computer
Studies, vol. 65, no. 1, 2007, pp. 57-70.
[8]Cross,R.&S.Janet, “Internet marketing that works for
consumers(PartI)”, Directing Marketing,Vol. 58, 1995,
pp. 22-23.
[8] Dainton, M., & Zelley, E. D., Applying communication
theory for professional life: A practical
introduction , Sage Publications, 2004.
[9]Escalas, J. E., Moore, M. C., & Edell, J. A., “Fishing
for feelings: a hook helps !”, Journal of Consumer
Psychology, Vol.14, no.1-2, 2004, pp. 105-113.
[10]Freiden, J. B., “Advertising spokesperson effects:
examination of endorser type and gender ontwo
audiences”, Journal of Advertising Research, Vol.24,
no.5,
1984, pp. 33-41.
[11]Gelb, B., Johnson, M., “Word-of-mouth communication:
causes and
consequences”, Marketing Review , Vol.15, no. 3, 1995,
pp. 54-58.
[12]Gleb, B. D. and Sundaram, S., “Adapting to word of
mouse”, Business Horizon, Vol.45, no.4, 2002, pp. 21-
25.
[13]Greenwald, A. G., & Leavitt, C., “Audience involvement
in advertising: Four Levels”, Journal of Consumer
Research, Vol.11, no. 1, Jun 1984, pp. 581-593.
[14]Helm, Sabrina, “Viral marketing – establishing
customer relationships by‘word-of-mouse’,”
Electronic Markets, Vol.10, July 2000, pp. 158-161.
[15]Herr, P.M., Kardes, FR. and Kim, J., “Effects of word-
of -mouth and product-attribute information on
persuasion: an accessibility-diagnosticity
perspective”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.17,
no. 4, 1991, pp. 454-62.
[16]John Fong, Suzan Burton, “Online word-of-mouth: a
comparison of american and chinese discussion boards”,
Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics ,Vol.
18, no. 2, 2006, pp. 146 -156.
[17]Kozinets, RN., “The field behind the screen: using
netnography for marketing research in online
communities”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.39,
no. 1, 2002, pp. 61-73.
[18]Krugman, Herbert E., “The impact of television
advertising: learning without involvement”, Public
Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 29, Fall 1965, pp. 349-356.
[19]Lord, K. R., Lee, M. S., & Sauer, P. L., “The combined
influence hypothesis:central and peripheral antecedents
of attitude toward the ad”, Journal of Advertising,
Vol. 24, no. 1, 1995, pp. 73-85.
[20]Pan, Bing. Tanya MacLaurin, John C Crotts, “Travel
blogs and the implications for destination marketing”,
Journal of Travel Research, Vol. 46, no. 1, August
2007, pp. 35–45.
[21]Petty, R. E. and Cacioppo, J. T., “The effects of
involvement on responses to argument quantity and
quality: central and peripheral routes of persuasion”,
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 46,
no. 1, January 1984, pp. 69-81.
[22]Petty, Richard E., John T. Cacioppo and David
Schumann, “Central and peripheral routes to
advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of
involvement”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 10,
no. 2, September 1983, pp. 135-146.
[23]Porter Lance and Golan Guy J., “Form subservient
chickens to brawny men: a comparison of viral
advertising to television advertising”, Journal of
interactive Advertising ,Vol. 6, no. 2, Spring 2006,
pp.30-38.
[24]Scott, D., “Marketing’s new fascination: figuring out
word-of-mouth”, Advertising Age, Vol. 74, no. 45,
2003, pp. 18.
[25]Söderlund, M. and Rosengren, S., Receiving word-of-
mouth from the service customer: An emotion-based
effectiveness assessment, Journal of Retailing and
Consumer Services, Vol. 14, no. 2, March 2007, pp. 123-
136.
[26]Subramani, Mani R. and Rajagopalan, B., Virtual
extension: Knowledge-sharing and influence in online
social networks via marketing. Communications of the
ACM, Vol. 46, no. 12, December 2003, pp. 300-307
[27]Thorsten Henning-Thurau, Kevin P. Gwinner, Gianfranco
Walsh & Dwayne d.Gremler, “Electronic word-of-mouth
via consumer-opinion platforms:what
motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the
internet?”, Journal of Interactive Marketing, Vol.
18, no. 1, 2004, pp. 38-52.
[28]Westbrook, R. A., “Product/consumption-based affective
responses and postpurchase processes”, Journal of
Marketing Research, Vol.24, no. 3, 1987, pp. 258-270.
[29]Wood-Black, F., & Pasquarelli, T., “Blogs”, Journal
of Chemical Health & Safety,Vol. 14, no. 2, 2007,
pp.37.
[30]Yalch, R., & Elmore-Yalch, R., “The effect of numbers
on the route to Persuasion”, Journal of Consumer
Research. Vol. 11, no. 1, Jun1984, pp. 522-527.
[31]Zaichkowsky, J. L., “Measuring the involvement
construct”, Journal of Consumer Research,Vol. 12, no.
3, 1985, pp.341-353.
[32]Zaichkowsky, J. L., “Conceptualizing involvement”,
Journal of Advertising, Vol.15, no. 2, 1986, pp. 4-14.

學位論文
[1]田治平,角色代言人在推敲可能性模式的影響途徑,碩士論文,國立中央
大學企業管理研究所,桃園縣,2006。
[2]林重光,以同理心的觀點探索部落格的廣告效果,碩士論文,東吳大學商
學院企業管理學系碩士在職專班,台北市,2007。
[3]張志豐,訴求客觀性對消費者態度之影響-以大學生為例,碩士論文,國
立中興大學企業管理研究所,台中,1995。
[4]劉江釗,部落格之社會網絡與自我呈現初探,碩士論文,國立中山大學資
訊管理研究所,2005。
[5]盧筱筠(2007),旅遊動機、滿意度與重遊意願之研究-以瑞士團體套裝旅
遊為例,碩士論文,世新大學觀光學系,2007。

網路資源
[1]創市際市場研究顧問,近七成網友坐擁部落格願為空間影音上傳付費,
2008年5月15日,取自
http://www.insightxplorer.com/news/news_09_21_07.html
[2]維基百科全書,2007年9月1日, 取自
http://zh.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?
title=BLOG&variant=zh-tw
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top