臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本文旨在探究國中男學生的男子氣概，聚焦在男學生對男子氣概的想法與表現，研究目的如下：

一、瞭解國中男學生對男子氣概之定義與內涵
二、探討校園內國中男學生展現男子氣概的活動及其意義
三、比較不同階級男學生對男子氣概界定與展現的差異
四、分析班級脈絡與男子氣概的關係

本研究以大臺北地區兩所男女合校的國民中學為研究場域，各選擇一個八年級的班級，進行為期八個月的參與觀察及訪談。觀察的內容以課堂（如國文課、數學課、理化課、體育課）與下課時間男學生的活動情形為主，並根據訪談男學生所得資料，進行分析詮釋與討論。經過以上探討，本研究獲致下述結論：

一、男學生普遍崇尚男子氣概，界定男學生的行動內容
二、中上班級男生追求制度與主導的力量
三、勞工班級男生傾向展現生理力量
四、性別弱勢者處境因班級脈絡有異
五、教師具有引導班級氣氛、調整學生性別觀念的正向力量

最後，根據研究結論，研究者提出有關男子氣概後續研究之可行方向與建議，備供參酌。

This article focuses on how junior high school boys define their masculinities, especially on their activities and experiences on campus. Two co-educational public junior high schools with variant region conditions in Taipei were selected, and one class in each school for 8 months participated. Observation and interview were conducted for data analyzed and discussed. The results discussed here mainly concern boys, from diverse backgrounds and locations in Taipei city, negotiate and perform their masculinities, including activities, peer interaction, emotional expressiveness, and different masculine images with treatment and adjustments. The major findings are as follows.

1.Junior high school boys generally uphold masculinities which conduct their acts.

2.Upper-middle class boys pursue institutional power with noble and graceful mien.

3.Working class boys grasp physiological power with abilities, are usually neglectful of their appearance.

4.As for predicament of masculine disadvantaged boys, working class boys are open to, while upper-middle class boys are much stricter with them.

5.Teachers could lead harmonious atmosphere of classes and regulate students’ gender concepts.

目 次

第一章 緒論............................................1
第一節 研究動機與研究目的................................1
第二節 名詞釋義.........................................6
第三節 研究方法與對象....................................7

第二章 文獻探討.........................................9
第一節 男子氣概及其理論背景...............................9
第二節 校園內男子氣概之具現..............................23
第三節 男子氣概的形塑來源................................35

第三章 研究設計與實施....................................41
第一節 研究設計與工具....................................41
第二節 研究場域與對象....................................45
第三節 研究實施.........................................65

第四章 研究發現與討論....................................73
第一節 男子氣概的共通點..................................73
第二節 男子氣概的相異處.................................102
第三節 男子氣概的弱勢者.................................126

第五章 結論與建議......................................141
第一節 結論...........................................141
第二節 後續研究發展與建議...............................143

參考文獻................................................146
附錄....................................................153

壹、中文部分
丁雪茵、鄭伯壎（1994，1月）。研究者的角色與主觀性：以兩個研究為例。載於中央研究院民族學研究所舉辦之「社會科學研究方法檢討與前瞻」第二次科際研討會：質化研究、次級分析與綜合方法論文集（頁1-21），臺北市。
內政部警察署（2007）。各案類年齡層被害者人數─按性別分。2007年11月10日，取自http://www.npa.gov.tw/NPAGip/wSite/lp?ctNode=11397&mp=1
內政部警察署（2007）。各案類年齡層嫌疑犯人數─按性別分。2007年11月10日，取自http://www.npa.gov.tw/NPAGip/wSite/lp?ctNode=11397&mp=1
行政院主計處（2007）。家庭收支調查統計表—2006年平均每戶家庭收支依可支配所得按戶數五等分位分。2007年10月25日，取自http://fies2.tpg.gov.tw/a11.asp
吳明燁（1999）。近朱者赤？近墨者黑？青少年同儕團體的形成與影響。東吳社會學報，8，1-33。
吳書榆（譯）（2000）。該隱的封印：揭開男孩世界的殘忍文化。Dan K. 與Michael T. 著。臺北市：商周。
宋踐（譯）（1994）。三個原始部落的性別與氣質。Mead M.著。臺北市：遠流。
李政賢（譯）（2007）。質性研究—設計與計畫撰寫。Marshall C.與Rossman G. B.著。臺北市：五南。
李昶儀（2000）。電視綜藝節目與青少年次文化形成之研究。中國文化大學新聞研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
卓珍伃（2003）。青年學生收看韓劇的文化認同與消費行為。中國文化大學新聞研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
林鶴玲（2000）。新聞報導中的男性形象。載於謝臥龍（主編），性別：解讀與跨越（頁159-171）。臺北市：五南。
邱建章（2005，11月）。運動明星與文化英雄。論文發表於吳鳳技術學院主辦之「2005臺灣體育運動與健康休閒發展趨勢」研討會論文集（頁13-24），嘉義縣。
柯雅華（2005）。高中階段青少年流行音樂的階級與性別差異－文化消費與生產之分析。國立臺灣師範大學教育學系碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
洪文龍（2003）。我是如何成為支持女性主義的男人？2007年10月9日，取自http://hermes.hrc.ntu.edu.tw/csa/journal/31/journal_park252.htm
教育部（2002）。教育部九十三年度施政方針。2007年11月29日，取自http://www.edu.tw/EDU_WEB/EDU_MGT/SECRETARY/EDU8559001/guide/93guide.htm
畢恆達（1998）。社會研究的研究者與倫理。載於嚴祥鸞（主編），危險與秘密—研究倫理（頁31-91）。臺北市：三民。
畢恆達（2003）。男性性別意識之形成。應用心理研究，18，51-84。
畢恆達、吳瑾嫣、唐筱雯、鄭湘敏、吳怡玲、柳廷岳（2000）。校園空間與性別。2007年11月19日，取自http://www.bp.ntu.edu.tw/WebUsers/hdbih
莊明貞（2003）。性別與課程：理念、實踐。臺北市：高等教育。
郭怡伶（2005）。磨蹭的快感？－阿魯巴的男子氣概建構。臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
張建成、陳珊華（2006）。生涯管教與行為管教的階級差異：兼論家庭與學校文化的連續性。教育研究集刊，52（1），129-161。
陳向明（2002）。社會科學質的研究。臺北市：五南。
陳雅如（2006）。解讀電視新聞建構下的女性形象。中國文化大學新聞研究所在職專班碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
湯志民、張淑瑜（2005）。教育環境：性別與校園空間。2007年11月20日，取自http://www3.nccu.edu.tw/~tangcm/edu%20envirinment.doc
童琬芬（2001）。青少年漫畫閱讀文化之研究－以臺北都會區兩所國中為例。國立臺灣師範大學教育學系碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
黃河（2007，11月）。男性研究對性別平等教育的意義。論文發表於北京師範大學主辦之「首屆教育社會學論壇」研討會論文集（頁570-577），北京市。
黃淑君（1999）。社會階級與青少年性別世界之建構—以臺北都會區兩所國中為例。臺灣師範大學教育學系碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
黃淑玲（2003）。男子性與喝花酒文化：以Bourdieu的性別支配理論為分析架構，台灣社會學，5，72-132。
黃瑞琴（1994）。質的教育研究方法。臺北市：心理
黃毅志（1999）。社會階層、社會網絡與主觀意識 : 台灣地區不公平的社會階層體系之延續。臺北市：巨流。
黃囇莉（2007）。性別歧視的多面性。載於黃淑玲、游美惠（編），性別向度與臺灣社會（頁3-24）。臺北市：巨流。
黃囇莉（主編）（1999）。跳脫性別框框。臺北市：女書。
楊巧玲（2007）。學校中的性別政權：學生校園文化與教師工作文化之性別分析。臺北市：高教。
楊芳枝（2007）。流行文化裡的性別。載於黃淑玲、游美惠（主編），性別向度與臺灣社會（頁91-110）。臺北市：巨流。
楊淑智（譯）（1995）。新男性：掙脫男子氣概的枷鎖。Pittman F.著。臺北市：牛頓。
劉泗漢（譯）（2004）。性／別：多元時代的性別角力。Connell R. W. 著。臺北市：書林。
潘慧玲（主編）（2000）。教育議題的性別視野。臺北市：國立臺灣師範大學。
蔡敏玲（1994，1月）。教育民族誌中研究者的角色。載於中央研究院民族學研究所舉辦之「社會科學研究方法檢討與前瞻」第二次科際研討會：質化研究、次級分析與綜合方法論文集（頁1-21），臺北市。
鄭英傑（2007）。揭露下課十分鐘之秘密—小六學生遊戲及其階級因素之探討。國立臺灣師範大學教育學系碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
鄭嘉揚（2003）。愛情流行歌曲對歌迷愛情態度之影響關聯。中國文化大學新聞研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
謝臥龍（1996）。兩性文化&社會。臺北市：心理。
蘇芊玲（1999）。兩性平等教育的本土發展與實踐。臺北市：女書。
蘇芊玲、蕭昭君（2003）。校園現場性別觀察。臺北市：女書。
臺灣性別平等教育協會（2006）。擁抱玫瑰少年。臺北市：女書。
貳、西文部分
American Association of University Woman. (2001). Beyond the ” Gender Wars” : A conversation about girls, boys, and education. Washington, DC: American As-sociation of University Women Educational Foundation.
Arnot, M. (2002a).Gender relations and schooling in the new century: Conflicts and challenges. In Reproducing gender? : Essays on educational theory and feminist politics(pp. 256-266). London: Routledge.
Arnot, M. (2002b).School in capitalist America revisited. In Reproducing gender? : Essays on educational theory and feminist politics (pp. 200- 225). London: Routledge.
Arnot, M. (2003). Male working-class identities and social justice: A reconsideration of Paul Willis’s Learning to Labour in light of contemporary research. In C. Vincent (Ed.), Social justice, education, and identity (pp. 97-119). London: Routledge.
Arnot, M.(1984).How shall we educate our sons?, in R. Deem (Ed.), Co-education reconsidered. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Arnot, M., David, M., & Weiner, G. (1999). School boys and social change. In Clos-ing the gender gap: Postwar education and social change. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Beynon, J. (2002). What is Masculinity? In Masculinities and culture (pp.1-25). Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Cambridge dictionaries online. (1999). Retrieved August 7, 2007, from http://dictionary.cambridge.org/define.asp?key=49024&dict=CALD
Clarricoates, K. (1980). All in a day’s work. In D. Spender & E. Sarah (Eds.), Learning to lose: Sexism and education (pp.69-80). London : Women's Press.
Clarricoates, K.(1981). The experience of patriarchal schooling. Interchange,12(2-3), 185-205.
Clatterbaugh, K. (1998). What is problematic about masculinities? Men and mascu-linities, 1(1), 24-45.
Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. London: Polity Press.
Connell, R. W. (1996). Teaching the boys：new research on masculinity, and gender strategies for school. Teacher College Record, 98(2), 206-237.
Connell, R. W. (1998). Gender politics for men. In S. Schacht & D. Ewing (Eds.), Feminism and men: Reconstructing gender relations (pp. 225-236). New York: New York University Press.
Connell, R. W. (2005). Globalization, imperialism, and masculinities, in M. S. Kimmel, J. Hearn, & R. W. Connell (Eds.), Handbook of studies on men & mascu-linities(pp.71-89).Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.
Cornwall, A., & Lindisfarne, N. (1994). Dislocating masculinity: gender, power and anthropology. In A. Cornwall & N. Lindisfarne (Eds.), Dislocating masculinity: comparative ethnographies (pp. 11-47). London: Routledge.
Dalley-Trim, L. (2007). The boys' present... Hegemonic masculinity: a performance of multiple acts. Gender & Education, 19(2), 199-217.
Dhavernas, M. J. (1996). Hunting Masculinity not Man. In S. Jackson & S. Scott (Eds.), Feminism and Sexuality－a reader (pp. 150-154). British: Great Britain.
Dictionary of the Social Sciences. (2002). Calhoun, C. (Ed.). Oxford University Press . Oxford Reference Online. Oxford University Press. Retrieved November 11, 2007, from http://www.oxfordreference.com/views/ENTRY.htmlsubview=Main&entry=t104.e1039
Edwards, T. (1997). Conclusion: Men's Fashion, Masculinity and Consumer Society, in Men in the mirror: Men's fashion, masculinity and consumer society(pp.132-135). London: Cassell.
Epstein, C. F. (1988). Deceptive distinctions: Sex, gender, and the social order. New York: Russell Sage.
Epstein, D., Elwood, J., Hey, V., & Maw, J. (1998). Schoolboy frictions: feminism and ‘failing’ boys. In D. Epstein, J. Elwood, V. Hey, & J. Maw (Eds.), Failing boys? Issues in gender and achievement (pp. 3-18). Philadelphia: Open Univer-sity Press.
Foley, D. E. (1990).The great American football ritual, in Learning capitalist culture: deep in the heart of Tejas. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Foster, V., Kimmel, M. S., & Skelton, C. (2001). What about the boys? An overview of the debates. In W. Martino & B. Meyenn (Eds.), What about the boys? Issues of masculinity in schools (pp. 1-23). Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Gilbert, R., & Gilbert, P. (1998). Masculinity Goes to School. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
Gurian, M. (1998).Schoolboys: Adolescent boys and the educational system. In A fine young man: What parents, mentors, and educators can do to shape adoles-cent boys into exceptional men (pp. 177-208). New York: Jeremy P. Tarch-er/Putnam.
Gutmann, M. C. (1997). Trafficking in men: The anthropology of masculinity. Annual Review of Anthropology, 26(1), 385-409.
Halsey, A. (1997). Trends in access and equity in higher education: Britain in an in-ternational perspective, in A. Halsey, H. Lauder, P. Brown and A. Stuart-Wells (Eds.). Education: Culture, economy and society (pp. 638-645). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Haywood, C., & Mac an Ghaill, M. (1996).Schooling masculinities. In M. Mac An Ghaill (Ed.), Understanding masculinities (pp. 50-60). Philadelphia: Open Uni-versity Press.
Hearn, J., & Collinson, D. L. (1994). Theorizing Unities and Differences Between Men and Between Masculinities. In H. Brod & M. Kaufman (Eds.), Theorizing masculinities (pp. 97-118). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Holland, D. C., & Eisenhart, M. A. (1990).Reproduction theory and the gender status quo. In Education in romance: Women, achievement, and college culture (pp. 25- 42). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Jackson, D. (1998).Breaking out of the binary trap: Boy's underachievement, schooling and gender relations. In D. Epstein, J. Elwood, V. Hey, J. Maw (Eds.), Failing boys? Issues in gender and achievement (pp. 77-95). Buckingham: Open University Press.
Jones, S., & Myhill, D. A. (2004). ‘Troublesome boys' and `compliant girls': gender identity and perceptions of achievement and underachievement. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 25(5), 557-571.
Kenway, J., & Kraack, A. (2004). Reordering work and destabilizing masculinity. In N. Dolby & G. Dimitriadis (Eds.), Learning to labor in new times (pp. 95-109). New York: Routledge Falmer.
Kessler, S., Ashenden, D. J., Connell, R. W., & Dowsett, G. W. (1985). Gender rela-tions in secondary schooling. Sociology of education, 58, 34-48.
Mac an Ghaill, M. (1994a). Local student cultures of masculinity and sexuality. In The making of men: Masculinities, sexualities and schooling (pp. 51-88). Phila-delphia: Open University Press.
Mac an Ghaill, M. (1994b). Sexuality: Learning to become a heterosexual man at school. In The making of men: masculinities, sexualities and schooling (pp. 89-109). Philadelphia: Open University Press.
MacInnes, J. (1998). The end of masculinity: the confusion of sexual genesis and sexual difference in modern society. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Marshall, C. (1985). Appropriate criteria of trustworthiness and goodness for qualita-tive research on education organizations. Quality and Quantity, 19, 353-373.
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (1999). Designing qualitative research (3rd). Thou-sand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Martino, M., & Pallotta-Chiarolli, M. (2003). ’You have to be strong, big and mus-cular’ boys, bodies and masculinities, in So what's a boy? Addressing issues of masculinity and schooling (pp. 14-31). Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Meyenn, B., & Parker, J. (2001). Naughty boys at school: perspectives on boys and discipline. In W. Martino & B. Meyenn (Eds.), What about the boys? Issues of masculinity in schools (pp. 169-185). Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Mickelson, R. A. (1989). Why does Jane read and write so well? The anomaly of women's achievement. Sociology of Education, 62(1), 47-63.
Morgan, D. H. G. (1992). Discovering men. London: Routledge.
Murphy, P., & Elwood, J. (1998). Gendered learning outside and inside school: in-fluences on achievement. In D. Epstein, J. Elwood, V. Hey, J. Maw (Eds.), Failing boys? Issues in gender and achievement (pp. 162-181). Buckingham: Open University Press.
Nayak, A., & Kehily, M. J. (2001). 'Learning to laugh': A study of schoolboy humour in the English secondary school. In W. Martino & B. Meyenn (Eds.), What about the boys? Issues of masculinity in schools (pp. 110-123). Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Niche marketing. (n.d.). Retrieved November 15, 2007, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niche_%28industry%29
Not for wimps. (1995). Retrieved August 29, 2007, from http://www.tes.co.uk/search/story/?story_id=15678
O'Donnell, M., & Sharp, S. (2000). The social construction of youthful masculinities: peer group sub-cultures. In Uncertain masculinities: youth, ethnicity, and class in contemporary Britain (pp. 38-88). London: Routledge.
Oplatka, I., & Atias, M. (2007).Gendered views of managing discipline in school and classroom. Gender and Education, 19(1), 41-59.
Plummer, D. (2006). Sportophobia: Why do some men avoid sport? Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 30, 122-137.
Schein, E. H. (1985). A conceptual model for managed culture change, in Organiza-tional culture and leadership (pp. 319-336). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Pub-lishers.
Schmitt, R. (1998). Profeminist men and their friends. In T. Digby (Ed.), Men doing feminism (pp. 81-98). New York: Routledge.
Sedgwick, E. K. (1985). Between men: English literature and male homosocial desire. New York: Columbia university press.
Simpson, M. (1994). Male Impersonators: Men performing masculinity. London: Cassell.
Smith, J. (2007). `Ye've got to `ave balls to play this game sir!' Boys, peers and fears: the negative influence of school-based `cultural accomplices' in constructing hegemonic masculinities. Gender and Education, 19(2), 179-198.
Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Wins-ton.
Taga, F. (2005). East Asian masculinities. In M. S. Kimmel, J. Hearn, & Connell, R. W.(Eds.), Handbook of studies on men and masculinities (pp. 129-140). Thou-sand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Weaver-Hightower, M. B. (2003). The “Boy Turn” in research on gender and educa-tion. Review of educational research, 73(4), 471-498.
Willis, P. E. (1977). Learning to labor: How working class kids get working class jobs. New York : Columbia University Press.
Witz, A. (1995). Gender and service class formation. In T. Butler & M. Savage (Eds.), Social change and the middle classes (pp. 41-57). London: UCL Press.
Women’s Commission for Refugee Women and Children. (2005). Masculinities: Male roles and male involvement in the promotion of gender equality. NY: New York.