參考文獻
中文部分
王文科(2001)。教育研究法。台北市:五南。
王雲五(1972)。中外圖書統一分類法(臺三版)。台北市:台灣商務。
王靜如、張靜儀(2001)。教師科學本質觀、教學信念與教學實務之研究。國立屏東師院學報,14,859-898。古智雄、何燿州(2005)。東台灣地區六七九年級學生科學本質觀調查研究。2005年臺灣教育學術研討會論文集,台東市。
巫俊明、黃德和(1997)。五專普通物理課程中加入科學史事例對學生科學本質的了解、科學態度、及物理學科成績之影響。元培學報,4,143-158。林陳涌(1996)。「瞭解科學本質量表」之發展與效化。科學教育月刊,4(1),31-58。
柳信榮(2003)。高學業成就之高中學生科學本質了解之探討。雄中學報,6,177-200。洪木利、陳和玉、溫武男(1999)。科學史融入高中物理之教學研究。物理教育,3(1),35-57。翁秀玉、段曉林(1998)。國小自然科教師傳達科學本質之行動研究。科學教育,8,36-52。高慧蓮(2006)。九年一貫課程提昇學生科學本質能力指標表現可行教學模組之開發研究。科學教育學刊,14(4),401-425。高慧蓮、蘇明洲(2004)。科學本質的理論回顧與課程設計的實例分享。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告(編號:NRC 92-2522-S-153-012-),未出版。
張玲齡(2004)。科學本質與教學。景女學報,4,145-155。張鳳琴(1994)。高雄地區公立高中學生對科學知識本質之看法。國立高雄師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。張簡明旺、黃志賢、高慧蓮(2002)。小組合作學習與學生科學本質。屏師科學教育,15,3-11。教育部(2003)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要自然與生活科技學習領域。台北市:教育部。
莊嘉坤(1999)。從認同觀點分析學童對科學本質的瞭解與科學生涯的知覺。科學教育學刊,7(4),343-366。許良榮、柯玉庭(2000)。師院學生對科學本質之教學態度的研究。台中師院學報,14,411-434。
郭重吉、許玫理(1992)。從科學哲學觀點的演變探討科學教育的過去與未來。彰化師範大學學報,3,531-560。陳文靜(1999)。原子與電子發展史融入教學對高一學生科學本質觀改變之研究。國立高雄師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。陳國成等人(主編)(1984)。圖解科學大辭典。臺北縣:華文。
陳淑媛、洪振方(1997)。融入科學史之教學對學生了解科學本質之影響。國立高雄師範大學科學與教育學報,2,125。黃萬居、李悅美(2003)。國民小學高年級學童科學本質觀之研究。臺北市立師範學院學報:人文藝術類社會科學類科學教育類,34,173-197。
劉振中、熊召弟(2002)。國小教師的科學本質觀及其教學實踐個案研究。國立台北師範學院學報,15,285-314。
鄭淑妃(1999)。國小自然科教師科學本質觀之詮釋性研究。國立花蓮師範學院國小科學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,花蓮市。戰克勝(2006)。互動式科學小故事對高中學生科學本質觀之影響。屏東教大科學教育,24,3-20。蕭瑞麟(2006)。不用數字的研究:鍛鍊深度思考力的質性研究。台北市:台灣培生教育。
英文部分
Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2004). Over and over again: College students’ views of nature of science. In L. B. Flick & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and nature of science (pp. 389-425). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (1998).The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82(4), 417-436.
Aikenhead, G. S. (1987). High school graduates’ beliefs about science-technology-society: Characteristics and limitations of scientific knowledge. Science Education, 71(4), 459-487.
American Association for the Advancement of Science (1989).Science for all Americans. Washington, D.C.: Author.
American Association for the Advancement of Science (1994).Benchmarks for science literacy: A project 2061 report. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bell, R. L. (2004). Perusing pandora’s box: Exploring the what, when, and how of nature of science instruction. In L. B. Flick & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and nature of science (pp. 427-446). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
Conley, A. M., Pintrich, P. R., Vekiri, I., & Harrison, D. (2004). Changes in epistemological beliefs in elementary science students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 186-204.
Huang, C. M., Tsai, C. C., & Chang, C. Y.(2005).An investigation of Taiwanese early adolescents' views about the nature of science. Adolescence, 40(159),645-655.
Khishfe, R., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). Influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(7), 551-578.
Kimball, M. E. (1967). Understanding the nature of science: A comparison of scientists and science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 5, 110-120.
Lederman, N. G. (1995). Translation and transformation of teachers’ understanding of the nature of science into classroom practice. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 382474)
McComas, W. F., Clough, M. P., & Almazroa, H. (1998). The role and character of nature of science in science education. In W. F. McComas (Ed), The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies (pp. 3-39). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
Moore, R. W., & Foy, R. L. H. (1997). The scientific attitude inventory: A revision (SAI II). Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 327-336.
Neuhaus, B., Sandmann, A., & Chang, W.H. (2006). Students' attitude towards science and the nature of science. Paper presented at the 6th Conference of European Researchers in Didactics of Biology, Sep. 11-15, London, UK.
Nussbaum, J. (1989). Classroom conceptual change: Philosophical perspectives.International Journal of Science Education, 11, 530-540.
Rubba, P. A., & Andersen, H. O. (1978). Development of an instrument to assess secondary students’ understanding of the nature of scientific knowledge. Science Education, 62(4), 449-458.
Schwartz, R. S., & Crawford, B. A. (2004). Authentic scientific inquiry as context for teaching nature of science: Identifying critical elements for success. In L. B. Flick & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and nature of science (pp. 331-355). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
Suchin, K. (1993). Effect of research experience on teachers’ perceptions of the nature science (science training). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.
Tamir, P. (1994). Israel students’ conceptions of science and views about the scientific enterprise. Research in Science and Technological Education, 12(2), 99-116.
Tsai, C. C. (2006). Biological knowledge is more tentative than physics knowledge: Taiwan high school adolescents’ views about the nature of biology and physics. Adolescence, 41(164), 691-703.