跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.90) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/12/05 18:07
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:周家卉
研究生(外文):Chia-Hui Chou
論文名稱:台灣上市公司現金股利政策之決定因素探討
論文名稱(外文):What drives the dividend policy of Taiwan firms?
指導教授:楊朝成楊朝成引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺灣大學
系所名稱:財務金融學研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:財務金融學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2008
畢業學年度:96
語文別:英文
論文頁數:43
中文關鍵詞:現金股利
外文關鍵詞:dividend
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:745
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
在完美的資本市場中,投資人可以自製股利,所以公司的股利政策並不會影響公司價值。但許多學者提出在實際的世界中公司為何要發現金股利的原因,這使得找出發放現金股利背後的原因是個有趣的議題,本研究的目的即是以實證研究探討現金股利的決定因素。
本研究利用五個假說探討2001年至2006年台灣上市公司現金股利政策背後的影響因素,五個假說包含測試現金股利和交易成本、公司獲利能力的關係、現金流量假說(cash flow hypothesis)、成熟假說(maturity hypothesis),以及現金管道假說(cash channeling hypothesis)。實證結果支持現金流量假說(cash flow hypothesis)及現金管道假說(cash channeling hypothesis);此外,台灣上市公司發放現金股利的行為亦和交易成本有關,且和公司獲利能力成高度正相關。但實證上未顯示當公司投資機會變少時,會增加發放給股東的現金股利,亦即不支持成熟假說(maturity hypothesis)。
Dividend policy does not matter to the investor in a perfect financial market as they can create homemade dividends from the market. But a lot of researches provide reasonable and convincing logic to explain why firms pay out cash dividends in the real world. So, it is interesting to find out the determinants of the cash dividend behind. The subject of this study is an empirical investigation of the determining factors of dividend policy.
This study uses financial data of Taiwan listed firms from 2001 through 2006 to examine the motives behind firms for paying out cash dividends. Five hypotheses, including cash flow hypothesis, maturity hypothesis, cash channeling hypothesis and relationship between cash dividend and transaction costs and profitability, are tested in this study. The empirical results support the free cash flow hypothesis and cash channeling hypothesis. The results also indicate that cash dividend payment behaviors of the Taiwan firms are related to transaction costs and largely consistent with earning ability. But there is no evidence showing firms pay out cash dividends to stockholders when the investment opportunities of the firms decline, thus rejecting the maturity hypothesis.
誌謝 i
中文摘要 ii
Abstract iii
Content iv
Table Content vi
1. Introduction 1
2. Theoretical Background 3
2.1 Research Related to Dividend 3
2.2 Theory and Hypotheses for Determinants of Dividend Policy 6
3. Definitions of Proxies 15
3.1 Dependent Variable 15
3.2 Independent Variables 15
3.3 Control Variables 17
4. Data and Methodology 19
5. Empirical Results 21
5.1 Data Description 21
5.2 Correlation Matrix 22
5.3 Two-sample Comparison 23
5.4 Determinants of Cash Dividends 26
6. Robust Tests 29
6.1 Firm Size 29
6.2 Leverage Level 35
7. Conclusion 40
References 41
1.Aharony, J., and A. Dotan, 1994, “Regular dividend announcements and future unexpected earnings: an empirical analysis”, The Financial Review, Vol. 29, pp.125-151.
2.Akerlof, G., 1970, “The market for “lemons”: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 84, pp.488-500.
3.Alli, K. L., A. Q. Khan, and G. G. Ramirez, 1993, “Determinants of corporate dividend policy: a factorial analysis”, Financial Review, Vol. 28, pp.523-547.
4.Backer, H. K. and Gail E. F., and R. B. Edelman, 1985, “A survey of management views on dividend policy”, Financial Management, Vol. 14, pp.78-84.
5.Baker, H. K. and G. E. Powell, 2000, “Determinants of corporate dividend policy: a survey of NYSE firms”, Financial Practice and Education, Vol. 9, pp.29-40.
6.Benartzi, S., R. Michaely, and R. Thaler, 1997, “Do changes in dividends signal the future or the past?”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 52, pp.1007-1034.
7.Berk, J.B., R.C. Green, and V. Naik, 1999, “Optimal investment, growth options, and security returns”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 54, pp.1553-1607.
8.Bhattacharya, S., 1979, “Imperfect information, dividend policy and the bird in the hand fallacy”, Bell Journal of Economics, Vol. 10, pp.259-270.
9.Bhattacharya, S., 1980, “Nondissipative signaling structures and dividend policy”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 95, pp.1-24.
10.Brennan, M., and A. Thakor, 1990, “Shareholder preferences and dividend policy”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 45, pp.993-1018.
11.Chang, R. P., and S. G. Rhee, 1990, “The impact of personal taxes on corporate dividend policy and capital structure decisions”, Financial Management, Vol. 19, pp.21-31.
12.Chaplinsky, S., and H. N. Seyhun, 1990, “Dividend and taxes: evidence on tax-reduction strategies”, Journal of Business, Vol. 63, pp.239-260.
13.Crutchley, C. and R. Hansen, 1989, “A test of the agency theory of managerial ownership, corporate leverage, and corporate dividends”, Financial Management, Vol. 18, pp.36-46.
14.DeAngelo, H., 1991, “Payout policy and tax deferral”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 46, pp.357-368.
15.DeAngelo, H., L. DeAngelo, 1990, “Dividend policy and financial distress: an empirical investigation of troubled NYSE firms”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 45, pp.1415-1431.
16.DeAngelo, H., L. DeAngelo, and D. J. Skinner, 1992, “Dividends and losses”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 47, pp.1837-1863.
17.DeAngelo, H., L. DeAngelo, and D. J. Skinner, 2004, “Are dividends disappearing? Dividend concentration and the consolidation of earnings”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 72, pp.425-456.
18.Dempsey, S. J., and G. Laber, 1992, “Effects of agency and transaction costs on dividend payout ratios: further evidence of the agency-transaction cost hypothesis”, Journal of Financial Research, Vol. 15, pp.317-321.
19.Easterbrook, F. H., 1984, “Two agency-cost explanations of dividends”, American Economic Review, Vol. 74, pp.650-659.
20.Faccio, M., L. Lang, and L. Young, 2001, “Dividends and expropriation”, American Economic Review, Vol. 91, pp.54-78.
21.Fama, E., 1974, “The empirical relationships between dividend and investment decisions of firms”, American Economic Review, Vol. 64, pp.304-318.
22.Fama, E. F., and H. Babiak, 1968, “Dividend policy: an empirical analysis”, Journal of American Statistical Association, Vol. 63, pp.1132-1161.
23.Farrar, D. E., and L. L. Selwyn, 1967, “Taxes, corporate financial policy and return to investors”, National Tax Journal, Vol. 20, pp.444-454.
24.Frankfurter, G. M., B.G. Wood, and J. Wansley, 2003, “Dividend policy theory and practice”, Academic Press, pp.108-139.
25.Gordon, M. J., 1963, “Management of corporate capital”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 18, pp.264-272.
26.Grullon, G., R. Michaely, and B. Swaminathan, 2002, “Are dividend changes a sign of firm maturity?”, Journal of Business, Vol. 75, pp.387-424.
27.Higgins, R. C., 1972, “The corporate dividend-saving decision”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Methods, Vol. 7, pp.1527-1541.
28.Huberman, G., 1990, “Dividend neutrality with transaction costs”, Journal of Business, Vol. 63, pp.93-106.
29.Jensen, G. R., D. P. Solberg, and T. S. Zorn, 1992, “Simultaneous determination of insider ownership, debt and dividend policies”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 27, pp.247-263.
30.Jensen, M. C., 1986, “Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeover”, American Economic Review, Vol. 76, pp.323-329.
31.Jensen, M. C. and W. H. Meckling, 1976, “Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3, pp.305-360.
32.Kalay, A. and U. Loewenstein, 1985, “Predictable events and excess returns: The case of dividend announcements”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 14, pp.149-175.
33.Lintner, J., 1956, “Distribution of incomes of corporations among dividends, retained earnings, and taxes”, American Economic Review, Vol. 46, pp.97-113.
34.Meyer, M., P. Milgrom, and J. Roberts, 1992, “Organizational prospects, influence costs, and ownership changes”, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Vol. 1, pp.9-35.
35.Miller, M. H. and F. Modigliani, 1961, “Dividend policy, growth and the valuation of shares”, Journal of Business, Vol. 34, pp.411-433.
36.Miller, M. H. and M. S. Scholes, 1978, “Dividend and taxes”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 6, pp.333-364.
37.Miller, M. H. and M. S. Scholes, 1982, “Dividend and taxes: some empirical evidence”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 90, pp.1118-1141.
38.Moh’d, Mahmoud A., L. G. Perry, and J. N. Rimbey, 1995, “An investigation of the dynamic relationship between agency theory and dividend policy”, The Financial Review, Vol. 30, pp.367-385.
39.Myers, S. and S. Majluf, 1984, “Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 13, pp.187-221.
40.Nissim, D. and A. Ziv, 2001, “Dividend changes and future profitability”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 56, pp.2111-2133.
41.Pruitt, S. W. and L. J. Gitman, 1991, “The interactions between the investment, financing, and dividend decisions of major U.S. firms”, Financial Review, Vol. 26, pp.409-430.
42.Riley, J. G., 1979, “Informational equilibrium”, Econometrica, Vol. 47, pp.331-360.
43.Rozeff, M. S., 1982, “Growth, beta and agency costs as determinants of dividend payout ratios”, Journal of Financial Research, Vol. 5, pp.249-259.
44.Smith, C. W., Jr., and R. L. Watts, 1992, “The investment opportunity set and corporate financing, dividend, and compensation policies”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 32, pp.263-292.
45.Spence, A. M., 1973, “Job market signaling”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 87, pp.355-374.
46.Sterk, W., and P. Vandenberg, 1990, “The market valuation of cash dividends and the tax differential theory of dividend policy: a case revisited”, Financial Review, Vol. 25, pp.441-455.
47.Yoon, P. S., and L. Starks, 1995, “Signaling, investment opportunities, and dividend announcements”, Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 8, pp.995-1018.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top