跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.9.171) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/12/02 04:43
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:解逸萍
研究生(外文):Yi-Ping Shie
論文名稱:信用風險對可轉換公司債價格之影響
論文名稱(外文):The Effect of Credit Risk on Valuation of Convertible Bond
指導教授:李存修李存修引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺灣大學
系所名稱:財務金融學研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:財務金融學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2008
畢業學年度:96
語文別:英文
論文頁數:37
中文關鍵詞:可轉換公司債最小平方蒙地卡羅法信用風險TCRI違約距離Z分數
外文關鍵詞:Convertible BondLeast-Square Monte CarloCredit riskTCRIDistance to Default (DD)Z-score
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:358
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
可轉換公司債近年來成為公司籌措資金的重要工具,但是大部分的可轉換公司債並沒有信用評等,對投資人來說信用風險對於可轉換公司債的影響是難以捉摸的,本研究以台灣經濟新報所評比的TCRI、穆迪KMV公司之預期違約頻率衡量模型所發展的違約距離,以及Altman在1968所建構的Z分數來衡量可轉換公司債的信用風險。
本研究選取2004至2007年所發行的193筆可轉換公司債資料,以最小平方蒙地卡羅法計算可轉換公司債的模型價格,並驗證未考量信用風險下的模型價格與可轉換公司債發行價格之間的價差是否能被信用風險指標所解釋。一般而言,信用風險愈高,可轉換公司債的價差愈大。TCRI等級愈大表示信用風險愈高;違約距離與Z分數愈大表示信用風險愈低;換句話說,TCRI與價差為正向關係,違約距離和Z分數與價差皆為負向關係。結果發現,價差約有9.7%可以被信用風險指標所解釋,其中,以TCRI的解釋能力最佳。整體解釋能力不高,表示尚有其他解釋變數,例如是流動性、公司治理、轉換後為被稀釋的股票,留待後續研究。
The convertible bond becomes the most important way for the company to raise money, but most of convertible bonds don’t have credit rating. For the investors, the credit risk of convertible bond is elusive. We use the TCRI which is provided by Taiwan Economic Journal (TEJ), Distance to Default (DD) which is calculated by Moody’s KMV model and Z-score which is established by Altman in 1968 as the credit risk measure of convertible bond.
We select the 193 convertible bonds issued in 2004 to 2007 as our empirical data and use Least-Square Monte Carlo method to valuate the model price of convertible bond. We verify whether the price differential between model price and issuing price of convertible bond can be explained by credit risk indexes or not. Generally, the greater the credit risk, the higher the price differential of convertible bond. The greater TCRI rank indicates the higher credit risk; the greater DD and Z-score indicates the lower credit risk. In other words, the relation between TCRI and price differential is positive; the relations between DD and price differential, Z-score and price differential are both negative. The results show that 9.7% of the price differential can be explained by credit risk indexes, and the explanatory power of TCRI is the strongest. The entire explanatory power is not high. It implies that there are still some parts of price differential can not be explained. These parts may be explained by liquidity, corporate governance and conversion stock is diluted which are left for future research.
Abstract i
Contents iii
List of Figures and Tables iv

1. Introduction 1
2. Literature Review and Hypothesis Development 4
2.1 Valuation of convertible bond 4
2.2 Credit Risk 7
2.2.1 Taiwan Corporate Credit Risk Index (TCRI) 7
2.2.2 Distance to Default (DD) 8
2.2.3 Z-score 9
3. Methodology 11
3.1 Valuation of convertible bond 11
3.2 Numerical Example 13
3.3 The provision of convertible bond 19
3.4 Credit Risk 20
3.4.1 Taiwan Corporate Credit Risk Index (TCRI) 20
3.4.2 Distance to Default (DD) 22
3.4.3 Z-score 23
4. Data and Empirical Result 25
4.1 Data 25
4.1.1 Descriptive Statistics 26
4.2 Empirical Result 28
5.Conclusion and Future Research 33
Reference 35
Altman, E. I., 1968, “Financial Ratios, Discriminant Analysis and the Prediction of Corporate Bankruptcy,” Journal of Finance , 22, 589-610.

Black, F., and M. Scholes, 1973, “The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities,” Journal of Political Economy, 81, 637-654.

Boyle, P. P., 1977, “Options: A Monte Carlo Approach”, Journal Financial EconomiPD, 4, 323-338.

Brennan, M. J, and E. S. Schwartz, 1977, “Convertible Bonds:Valuation and Optimal Strategies for Call and Conversion,” The Journal of Finance, 32, 5, 1699-1715.

Brennan, M. J. and E. S. Schwartz, 1980, “Analyzing Convertible Securities,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, XV, 4, 907-929.

Chang, H. J., 2005, “Distance-to-Default and Credit Spread of Corporate Bonds,” Unpublished Master Thesis, National Taiwan University.

Chang, L. W., 2003, “From Pricing to Risk Evaluate of Convertible Bond,” Unpublished Master Thesis, Tam Kang University.

Chang, S. T., 2003, “海外可轉換公司債的評價-考慮平均重設條款、信用風險及利率期間結構,” Unpublished Master Thesis, National Cheng Chi University.

Chen, W. Y., 2005, “ The Financial Risk of CPA Firms Audit Clients in Taiwan
- Altman (1968) Z-Score,” Unpublished Master Thesis, National Cheng Kung University.

Cox, J. C., J. E. Jr. Ingersoll, and S. A. Ross, 1985, “A Theory of the Term Structure of Interest Rates,” Econometrica, 53, 385-407.


Cox, J. C., S. A. Ross and M. Rubinstein, 1979, “Option Pricing: A simplified Approach,” Journal of Financial EconomiPD, 7 (3), 229-263.

Huang, S. S., 2005, “Valuing Convertible Bond with Credit Risk - LSM Approach,” Unpublished Master Thesis, National Cheng Kung University.

Hung, M. W. and J. Y. Wang, 2002, “Pricing Convertible Bond Subject to Default Risk,” Journal of derivative, 10, 75-87.

Ingersoll, J., 1977, “A Contingent-Claims Valuation of Convertible Securities,” Journal of Financial EconomiPD, 4, 289-321.

Kealhofer, S., 2003, “Quantifying Credit Risk I: Default Prediction,” Financial Analysis Journal, January/February, 30-44.

Kealhofer, S., 2003, “Quantifying Credit Risk II: Default Prediction,” Financial Analysis Journal, March/April, 78-92.

Lee, K. H., H. L. Chen, 2008, “TCRI 效力檢驗:失誤率、違約率及調等率,” Money Watching and Credit Rating, 70, 24-50.

Lin, C. C., C. C. Chang, M. T. Yu and Y. J. Huang, 2006, “Valuation of Euro-Convertible Bonds with Embedded Options,” Journal of Financial Studies, 14.3, 35-68.

Lin, C. C., C. C. Chang and M. T. Yu, 2003, “Valuation of a Euro-Convertible Bond,” IEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence for Financial Engineering, Proceedings, 115-112.

Liu, Y., F., 2005, “An Empirical Study: the Most Suitable Definition of Default Point of the KMV Model in Taiwan''s Security Market,” Unpublished Master Thesis, Soochow University.

Longstaff F. A. and E. S. Schwartz, 2001, “Valuing American Options by Simulation: A Simple Least-Squares Approach,” Review of Financial Studies, 4, 113-147.


Longstaff, F. A. and E. S. Schwartz, 1995, “A Simple Approach to Valuing Risky Fixed and Floating Rate Debt,” The Journal of Finance, 50, 789-819.

McConnell, J. J. and E. S. Schwartz, 1986, “LYON taming,” Journal of Finance 41, 561-576.

Merton, R., 1974, “On the pricing of Corporate Debt: The Risk Structure of Interest Rates,” The Journal of Finance, 29, 449-470.
Rao, A. X., 2004, “Estimate probability of default in public offer company,” Unpublished Master Thesis, Soochow University.

Shih, S. H., 2003, “The Price differential Analysis For Convertible Bonds,” Unpublished Master Thesis, National Sun Yat-sen University.

Takahashi A., T. Kobayashi, and N. Nakagawa, 2001, “Pricing convertible bonds with default risk,” Journal of Fixed Income, 11, 20-29.

Tsiveriotis, K. and C. Fernandes, 1998, “Valuing convertible bonds with credit risk.” Journal of Fixed Income, 8(3), 95-102.

Vasicek, Oldrich A., 1984, “Credit Valuation,” White paper, Moody’s KMV

Yeh, L. S., 2004, “轉換債重設條款之評價,” Unpublished Master Thesis, National Taiwan University.

Yu, K. T., 2007, “On the Valuation of Convertible Bonds with Respect to Skewness, Kurtosis, and Credit Risk,” Unpublished Master Thesis, National Taiwan University.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊