臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本文研究的主要目的在於探討台灣技術創新廠商R&D合作研發行為。我們試圖探討影響創新廠商決定合作與否的因素，以及影響合作研發廠商採取合作策略(垂直合作、水平合作、機構合作以及混合合作)的因素。

我們利用民國90年至91年間，國科會與經濟部共同合作的台灣第一次技術創新調查資料。在實證研究中，我們使用Multinomial Logit Model以及Nested Logit Model來進行實證研究。

本文實證結果中得到最重要的發現是，流入的外溢效果來源不同，對於合作研發廠商進行合作研發策略有顯著的影響，亦即某種合作研發方式流入的外溢效果較大，則廠商越有可能進行該類型的合作研發方式。另外實證結果亦顯示，廠商規模在製造業和服務業中對於合作研發均有顯著的正效果；內部知識流動在製造業和服務業中對於合作研發均有顯著的負效果；外界資助在製造業中和服務業中對於合作研發均有正效果，但僅在製造業中有顯著的效果。

The main purpose of this study is to report new empirical evidences on the innovating firms'' R&D behaviors in Taiwan. We try to explore heterogeneities in the determinants of innovating firms’ decisions to engage in R&D cooperation. And to explore heterogeneities in the determinants of cooperating firms'' decisions to engage between four types of cooperation partners : vertical cooperation, horizontal cooperation, institutional cooperation and mixed cooperation.

We use data on innovating firms drawn from the Taiwan Technological Innovation Survey 1(TTIS-1) which is jointly collected by the National Science Council and the Ministry of Economic Affairs. In the empirical studies, we use Multinomial Logit Model and Nested Logit Model. The most important finding of our empirical study is the sources of incoming spillovers will significantly affect cooperating firms'' decision between different cooperation partners, which means the R&D cooperation of a type is more likely if the information coming from the potential partners is more important. Besides, from our emipircal study we also find the effect of Size is positive and significant on the R&D cooperation both in the Manufacture Industries and Service Industries. The effect of Internal Knowledge Flow is negative and significant on the R&D cooperation both in the Manufacture Industries and Service Industries. The effect of R&D subsidy on the R&D cooperation is positive both in the Manufacture Industries and Service Industries but only significant in the Manufacture Industries.

謝辭………………………………………………………………………i
中文摘要………………………………………………………………ii
英文摘要………………………………………………………………iii
第一章 緒論…………………………………………………………1
1.1 研究動機………………………………………………………… 1
1.2 研究目的………………………………………………………… 2
1.3 研究方法…………………………………………………………2
1.4 本文架構…………………………………………………………3
第二章 文獻回顧…………………………………………………4
2.1 創新的緣起和定義…………………………………………………4
2.2 技術創新以及決定合作研發的影響因素…………………………6
2.3 合作研發的實證文獻……………………………………………10
第三章 資料來源與樣本說明………………………………………19
3.1 台灣技術創新調查簡介與樣本說明……………………………19
3.2 台灣技術創新活動的合作研發情形……………………………22
3.3 合作研發的資訊來源、受阻因素和外界資助…………………23
第四章 模型設定與變數說明……………………………………35
4.1 模型設定…………………………………………………………35
4.2 變數說明…………………………………………………………37
第五章 實證結果分析………………………………………………52
5.1 廠商合作技術創新活動的實證結果……………………………52
5.2 勝算比…………………………………………………………70
第六章 結論與建議…………………………………………………74
參考文獻………………………………………………………………77
附錄……………………………………………………………………83

張嘉升 「一般化巢式羅機模式校估方法之研究 ― 啟發式求解法與基因演算法之比較」，民國92年。
廖健智 「國際化與技術創新 ― 台灣製造業與服務業廠商的驗證」，台灣大學碩士論文，民國96年。
林祖嘉和陳建良 ( 2003 ) 「租買選擇、貸款選擇、與世代組成：巢式Logit模型之應用」，住宅學報，14，1 - 20。
顏秀如和張明輝 ( 2005 ) 「學校創新經營的意涵與實施計畫」，中等教育，56，28 - 52。
許明德 ( 2006 ) 「經濟學大師熊彼得—創新及創造性破壞」，科技發展，403，70 - 75。
劉常勇和劉文龍 ( 2001 ) 「創業管理的基本概念」，劉常勇管理學習知識庫。

Admas, J. ( 1990 ) “Fundamental Stocks of Knowledge and Productivity Growth”, Journal of Political Economy, 98, 673 – 702.
Aghion P. and Howitt P. ( 1992 ) “A Model of Growth through Creative Destruction”, Econometrica, 60, 323 – 351.
Aija Leiponen ( 2005 ) “Innovation Objectives, Knowledge Sources, and the Benefits of Breadth”, Working Paper.
Aija Leiponen ( 2005 )“ Organization of Knowledge and Innovation：The Case of Finnish Business Services”, Industry and Innovation, 12, 185 – 203.
Barnett, H. G. ( 1953 )“Innovation：The Basis of Cultural Change”, Social Forces, 32,
99 – 93.
Beath, J., Katsoulacos, Y. and Ulph, D. ( 1988 ) “R&D Rivalry versus R&D Co-operation under Uncertainty”, Researches Economiques de Louvain, 54, 373 – 384.
Betz, F. ( 1993 ) “Strategic Technology Management” , McGraw Hill.
Bruno Cassiman and Reinhilde Veugelers ( 2002 ) “R&D Cooperation and Spillovers：Some Empirical Evidence from Belgium”, American Economic Review, 92, 1169 - 1184.
Cheung, K-Y. and P. Lin ( 2004 ) “Spillover Effects of FDI on Innovation in China：Evidence from the Provincial Data”, China Economic Review, 15, 25 – 44.
Cibbor, C. ( 1991 ) “Alliances as Learning Experiments：Co-operation, Competition and Change in High Tech Industries. In L. K. Mytelka(Ed.)”, Strategic Partnerships and the World Economy, 51 – 77.
Claudio A. Piga and Marco Vivarelli ( 2004 ) “Internal and External R&D：A Sample Selection Approach”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 66, 457 – 482.
Colombo, Massimo and Paola Garrone ( 1996 ) “Technological Cooperative Agreements and Firm''s R&D Intensity：A Note on Causality Relations”, Research Policy, 25, 923 – 932.
Crespi, Francesco ( 2004 ) “Notes on the Determinants of Innovation：A Multi-Perspective Analysis”, FEEM Working Paper.
Cristina Bayona, Teresa García-Marco and Emilio Hierta ( 2001 ) “Firm''s Motivation for Cooperative R&D：an Empirical Analysis of Spanish Firms”, Research Policy, 30, 1289 – 1307.
D''Aspremont, C. and A. Jacquemin ( 1988 ) “Cooperative and Non-Cooperative R&D in Duopoly with Spillovers”, The American Economic Review, 78, 1133 – 1137.
De Bondt, Raymond and Reinhilde Veugelers ( 1991 )“Strategic Investment with Spillovers”, European Journal of Political Economy, 7, 345 – 366.
De Bondt, Raymond ( 1996 ) “Spillovers and Innovative Activities”, International Journal of Industrial Organisation, 15, 1 – 28.
Désiré Vencatachellum and Bruno Versaevel ( 2006 ) “Horizontal R&D Cooperation and Spillovers：Evidence from France”, Working Paper.
Eaton, B. and M. Eswaran ( 1997 ) “Technology Trading Coalitions in Supergames”, Rand Journal of Economics, 28, 135 – 149.
Fritsch, M. and Lukas, R. ( 2001 ) “Who Cooperates on R&D ? ”, Research Policy, 30, 297 – 312.
Gallouj, F. and Weinstein, O. ( 1997 ) “Innovation in Services”, Research Policy, 26, 537 – 566.
Hennart, J. F. ( 1988 ) “A Transaction Cost Analysis of Equity Joint Venture”, Strategic Management Journal, 9. 361 – 374.
Inkman, J. and W. Pohlmeier ( 1995 ) “R&D Spillovers, Technological Distance and Innovation Success”, University of Konstanz, mimeograph.
Jaffe, A. (1986 ) “Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D：Evidence from Firm''s Patents, Profits, and Market Value”, The American Economic Review, 76, 584 – 1001.
Kamien, M.I., Muller, E. and Zang, I. ( 1992 ) “Research Joint Ventures and R&D Cartels”, American Economic Review, 82, 1293 – 1306.
Kesteloot, Katrien and Reinhilde Veguelers ( 1995 ) “Stable R&D Cooperation with Spillovers”, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 4, 651 – 672.
Kleinknecht, A. and Van Reijnen, J. ( 1992 ) “Why do Firms Co-operate on R&D：An Empirical Study”, Research Policy, 21, 347 – 360.
König, H., Licht, G. and Staat, M. ( 1994 ) “R&D Co-operation and Inovation Activity. In：Gahlen, B., Hesse, H., Ramser, H.J.(Eds) ”, Europäische Integrationsprobleme aus wirtschaftswissenschaftlicher Sicht, Siebecg, Tübingen, 219 – 242.
Link , A. and Bauer, L. ( 1987 ) “An Economic Analysis of Co-operative Research”, Technovation, 6, 247 – 260.
Luecke, Richard and Ralph Katz ( 2003 ) “Managing Creativity and Innovation”, Boston, MA：Harvard Business School Press.
Mariko Sakakibara ( 2001 ) “Cooperative Research and Development：Who Participates and In Which Industries Do Projects Take Place?”, Research Policy, 30, 993 – 1018.
Metcalfe S., Foster J. and Ramlogan R. ( 2003 ) “Adaptive Economic Growth”, CRIC Discussion Paper N. 59.
Mitchell, W. and Singh, K. ( 1992 ) “Incumbents'' Use of Pre-entry Alliances Before Expansion into New Technical Sub-fields of an Industry”, Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organisation, 18, 347 – 372.
Mody, A. ( 1993 ) “Learning Through Alliances”, Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organisation, 20, 151 – 170.
Mohr, L. ( 1969 )“Determinants of Innovation in Organizations”, American Political
Science Review, 63, 111 – 126.
Peeters, C. and B. van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie ( 2006 ) “Innovation Strategy and the Patenting Behavior of Firms”, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 16, 109 – 135.
Peter Druker ( 1985 ) “Innovation and Entrepreneurship：Practice and Principles”, New York, Harper Row.
Pilar Nenetio ( 2006 )“The Innovative Performance of In-house and Contracted R&D in terms of Patents and Utility Models”, Research Policy, 35, 502 – 517.
Pisano, G. ( 1990 ) “The R&D Boundaries of the Firm：An Empirical Analysis”, Administrative Science Quaterly, 35, 153 – 176.
Poh-Kam Wong and Yuen-Ping Ho ( 2007 ) “Knowledge Sources of Innovation in a Small Open Economy: The Case of Singapore”, Scientometrics, 70, 223 – 249.
René Belderbosa, Martin Carreeb, Bert Diederenc, Boris Lokshind and Reinhilde ( 2004 ) “Heterogeneity in R&D Cooperation Strategies”, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 22, 1237 - 1263.
Rogers, E. M. ( 1995 ) “Diffusion of Innovations”, Free Press.
Röller, Lars-Hendrik, Siebert, Ralph, and Tombak, Mihkel ( 1997 )“Why Firms Form Research Joint Ventures：Theory and Evidence”, CEPR Discussion Papers.
Romer P. ( 1990 ) “Endogenous Technological Change”, Journal of Political Economy, 98, 71 – 102.
Schumpeter, Joseph ( 1934 ) “The Theory of Economic Development”, Cambridge, MA：Harvard University Press.
Solow R. ( 1956 ) “A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70, 65 – 94.
Syoum Negassi ( 2004 ) “R&D Co-operation and Innovation a Microeconometric Study on French Firms”, Reserch Policy, 33, 365 - 384.
Tobias Schmidt ( 2007 ) “Motives for Innovation Co-operation ― Evidence from the Canadian Survey of Innovation”, ZEW Discussion Papers, 7 – 18.
Tom Peters ( 1999 ) “The Circle of Innovation：You Can''t Shrink Your Way to Greatness”, New York, Alfred A. Knopf.
Ulrich Kaiser ( 2002 ) “An Empirical Test of Models Explaining Research Expenditures and Research Cooperation：Evidence for the German Service Sector”, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 20, 747 – 774.
Vickers, J. ( 1985 ) “Pre-emptive Patenting, Joint Ventures and the Persistence of Oligopoly”, International Journal of Industrial Organisation, 3, 261 – 273.
Vonortas, N.S. ( 1997 ) “Co-operation in Research and Development”, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.