臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

脊骨神經醫學在北美洲、歐洲及澳洲已有上百年的歷史，在治療神經、肌肉、骨骼的相關問題是被民眾普遍的使用，且具有高度的療效和滿意度。反觀亞洲國家，除了文化上的差異之外，民眾和醫界對於脊骨神經醫學的瞭解還依舊存有高度的質疑。本論文以質性研究的架構，以深度訪談的方式訪問十二位在台灣的執業醫師，瞭解他們對於脊骨神經的認知以及看法。分析方法主要採用口語資料分析法，先將訪談內容整理成逐字稿，在根據主題與內容的關聯性進行概念化定義及編碼 (coding)，當資料被分解成一個個單位後，在進而分析資料裡所反映的現象。在分析後發現，醫師們對於脊骨神經醫學瞭解上的不足，造成了許多對於此專業的誤解。在制定相關法案的看法上，多半醫師雖然普遍不樂觀，但是都贊成政府以立法的方式，讓一般民眾在尋求相關解決辦法時，能夠更有保障。

Background: Chiropractic is a health care profession in the Western society for over a century. It is the largest profession in the Complementary and Alternative Medicine system, and is considered as the closest to the mainstream. After massive amount of research, it is evident that chiropractic not only gains high patient satisfactory rate, it is also a very cost-effective approach on treating neuromusculoskeletal conditions. However, it is not widely introduced in the Asian countries, especially in Taiwan. Public, as well as health care workers may not have a clear understanding of what chiropractic profession is all about.

Objective: The objective of this study is to understand medical doctors’ perception on chiropractic and to determine the necessity of establishment of such a profession in Taiwan.

Method: In-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted in Mandarin language to twelve licensed medical doctors in Taiwan. Results in the form of narratives were analyzed using common coding technique.

Result: Among the twelve medical doctors, most associate chiropractic with rehabilitation or folk therapy. All of them have heard of the term chiropractic, but most have limited knowledge about the scope of practice, length and content of education of the profession. Most participants do not know that chiropractors earn a doctoral credential, and thus relate chiropractors to therapists or technicians. Almost all participants support the legislation to regulate those who perform spinal manipulations, but qualification is a debate. About half of the respondents emphasize on the importance of evidence-based practice.

Conclusion: After these in-depth interviews and the narrative analysis, it is evident that numerous misunderstanding about the profession due to lack of knowledge have impeded the development of chiropractic profession in Taiwan. Further research including long-term randomized controlled trials on the efficacy and public demand of chiropractic in Taiwan are recommended.

Acknowledgement ………………………………………………………………………i
Abstract ...…………………………………………………………..…………………..ii
Chapter One: Introduction
1.1 The Chiropractic Profession 1
1.2 Conventional Medicine versus Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) 1
1.3 Low Back Pain in Taiwan 3
1.4 Current Chiropractic Standing in Taiwan 4
1.5 Research Objective 6
Chapter Two: Literature Review
2.1 Definition of Chiropractic 7
2.2 History 7
2.3 Chiropractic Principles and Philosophy 8
2.4 Education 9
2.5 Licensing Board and Regulation 11
2.6 Scope of Practice 12
2.7 Research and Literature (evidence-based) 13
2.8 Inter-Professional Network in the West 14
Chapter Three: Research Method
3.1 Design 17
3.2 Methodology 18
3.3 Sample Selection 19
3.4 List of Interview Questions 21
3.4.1 Physicians’ Profile: 21
3.4.2 Knowledge about Chiropractic: 21
3.4.3 Attitude towards Chiropractic: 22
3.4.4 Practice: 22
3.5 Outcome Measures 23
3.6 Analysis Procedure 24
Chapter Four: Result
4.1 Result Interpretation Procedure 25
4.2 Common Coding Technique 25
4.3 Physician Profile 27
4.4 Categories 28
4.5 Description of Categories 28
4.5.1 Category One 28
4.5.2 Category Two 30
4.5.3 Category Three 33
4.5.4 Category Four 34
4.5.5 Category Five 36
4.6 Limitation 37
4.6.1 Sample Size Limitation 37
4.6.2 Limited diversity of response, but yet enhanced validity 37
4.6.3 Bias 38
4.7 Reliability and validity 39
4.7.1 Reliability 39
4.7.2 Validity 39
Chapter Five: Conclusion and Recommendation 41
Reference 43
Appendix: Interview Trascript ....................................................................................48

Brennan P.C., Cramer G.D., Kirstukas S.J., Cullum M.E. Basic science research in chiropractic : state-of-the-art and recommendations for research agenda. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics. 1997;20(3):150-68.

Bureau of National Health Insurance, National Department of Health of Taiwan: http://www.doh.gov.tw/cht/index.aspx

Chapman-Smith D.A. The Chiropractic Profession. West Des Moines, IA: NCMIC Group Inc, 2000.

Chen et al. Vertebral artery dissection and cerebellar infarction following chiropractic manipulation. Emergency Medicine Journal. 2006;23(1):e1.

Cherkin D.C. Nonsurgical hospitalization for low-back pain. Is it necessary? Spine. 1993 Oct;18(13):1728-35.

Cherkin D.C., MacCormack F.A. Patient evaluation of low-back pain care from family physicians and chiropractors. The Western Journal of Medicine 1989; 150(3):351-5.

Cherkin D.C., Mootz R.D. Chiropractic in the United States: Training, Practice and Research. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, 1997.

Cole T.M., Kewman D, Boninger M.L. Development of medical rehabilitation research in 20th-century America. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. 2005;84:940-954.

Complementary medicine, new approaches to good practice. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, British Medical Association, 1993.

Coulter I.D. et al. Interprofessional referral patterns in an integrated medical system, Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics. 2005; 28(3): 170-174.

Council on Chiropractic Education. Educational Standards for Chiropractic Colleges. Scottsdale, AZ: Council on Chiropractic Education, 1995.

Creswell J.W. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 2nd Ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc, 2003.

DeLisa J.A. Shaping the future of medical rehabilitation research: Using the interdisciplinary research model. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2004;85:531-537.

Eisenberg D.M., Cohen M.H., Hrbek A., Grayzel J., Van Rompay M.I., Cooper R.A. Credentialing complementary and alternative medical providers. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2002;137(12):965-973.

Eisenberg D.M. et al. Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990-1997. JAMA 1998; 280(18): 1569-1575.

Ehrlich G.E. Back pain. The journal of rheumatology. Supplement. 2003 Aug;67:26-31.

Federation of Chiropractic Licensing Boards. Official Directory of the Federation of Chiropractic Licensing Boards: 1997-1998. Colorado: Federation of Chiropractic Licensing Boards, 1997.

Homola S. Chiropractic. Clinical Orthopaedics and related research. 2006; 444:236-242.

Keating J.C., Green B.N., Johnson C.D. “Research” and “science” in the first half of the chiropractic century. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics. 1995;18(6):357-78.

Kelner M.J. et al. Complementary and alternative groups contemplate the need for effectiveness, safety and cost-effectiveness research. Complementary therapies in medicine. 2002 Dec;10(4):235-9.

Lew-Ting C.Y. Who uses non-biomedical, complementary and alternative health care? Sociodemographic undifferentiation and the effects of health needs. Taiwan Journal of Public Health. 2003;22(3):155-166.

Liu D. Cervical manipulation leading to dissection was not performed by a chiropractor. Emergency Medicine Journal. 2007 Feb;24(2):146.

Manga P. Economic case for the integration of chiropractic services into the health care system. Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics. 2000; Feb;23(2):118-22.

Marketos S.G. and Skiadas P. Hippocrates. The father of spine surgery. Spine. 1999 Jul 1;24(13):1381-7.

Marshall C., Rossman G.B. Designing Qualitative Research, 2nd Ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc, 1995.

Mason J. Qualitative Researching. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc, 1996.

Meeker W.C., Haldeman S. Chiropractic: A profession at the crossroads of mainstream and alternative medicine. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2002;136(3):216-227.

Miles M., Huberman A. Qualitative Data Analysis: An expanded Sourcebook. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications Inc, 1994.

National Centre for Complementary and Alternative Medicine: http://nccam.nih.gov/

Patton M. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc, 1990.

Peterson D, Wiese G. Chiropractic: An illustrated history. St. Louis, MO: Mosby Year Book, 1995: 196-98, 203-5.

Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on Complementary Medicine, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, Toronto, adopted September 22, 1997.

Rossman G.B., Rallis S.F. Learning in the Field: An introduction to qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc, 1998.

Sato A, Swenson R.S. Sympathetic nervous system response to mechanical stress of the spinal column in rats. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics. 1984;7:141-7

Schmidt K. et al. Cross-cultural differences in GPs’ attitudes towards complementary and alternative medicine: a survey comparing regions of the UK and Germany. Complementary Therapies in Medicine. 2002; 10:141-147.

Sharma R. et al. Patient attitudes, insurance, and other determinants of self-referral to medical and chiropractic physicians. American Journal of Public Health. 2003 Dec;93(12):2111-7.

Sofaer S. Qualitative Methods: What are they and why use them? Health Services Research 34:5 part II, 1999.

Strauss A., Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications Inc, 1990.

Suter E. et al. Assessment of the information needs and use of information resources on complementary and alternative medicine by Alberta family physicians. Clinical investigation medicine. 2004;27(6):312-315.

The Association of Chiropractic Colleges: www.chirocolleges.org

Wardwell W.I. Chiropractic: History and Evolution of a New Profession. St. Louis, MO: Mosby Year Book, 1992:105-30

WHO guideline on basic training and safety in chiropractic, Geneva 2005

WHO, Regional Office for Europe: www.who.org

World Federation of Chiropractic: www.wfc.org

王金明. 贏在起跑點上: 談醫界反對「脊醫師法草案」立法的努力過程及致勝之道實況報導. 台灣醫界. 2006;49(4):11-12, 72-73