臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

新產品開發是許多公司增加其利潤和競爭力的重要性過程。此研究比較台灣與印尼在新產品開發過程中的評定標準。a stage-gate process引導這研究開發一種結構化的新產品開發性能評價基礎。在這項研究中， 我們使用了20種評定標準，分別基於市場、金融、產品、製程和直覺測量，這5面向。我們有148家工業公司的樣品， 研究的結論顯示新產品開發的後期，特別強調評定標準在基於市場的面向。在測試階段商業分析和產品面向比其他評估面向更為重要。結果顯示兩個國家的評定面向有著明顯的不同，有著不同的水準、不同的新產品開發驅動程序和革新策略和不同總類的新產品發展。實驗的結果提出有用的指導方針於產品開發經理和評估產品開發，使決策更有效力和效率。

New product development (NPD) is one of the most importance processes for companies to increase their profit and competitiveness. This study presents the results of a comparison study between Taiwan and Indonesia in evaluation criteria deployment for new product development process. This study is guided by a stage-gate process to derive a structured NPD performance evaluation framework. In this study we use 20 evaluation criteria that are group under five dimensions, market-, financial-, product-, process-, and intuition-based measures. Based on a sample of 148 industrial companies, the findings of the study reveal that evaluation criteria under market-based dimensions are more stressed during the later phases of NPD gates. Financial-based is appearing importantly during the business analysis gate and product-based dimensions were strongly higher than other evaluation dimensions in the product testing gate. The results also shows significant differences overall the evaluation dimensions from both countries across the firms with different level-factors, with different NPD driver and innovation strategy and developing different types of new product. The results of the experiments present useful guidelines for new product manager and measures of product development to employ for effectiveness and efficiency in decision making.

Table of Contents
摘要………………………………………………………………………….... i
Abstract……………………………………………………………………….. ii
Table of Contents……………………………………………………………... ii
List of Figures………………………………………………………………… v
List of Tables…………………………………………………………………. vi
Acknowledgment…………………………………………………………….. vii
CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION…………………………………………….. 1
I.1. Research Background…………………………………………………... 1
I.2. Research Purposes……………………………………………………… 3
I.3. Research Framework…………………………………………………… 4
I.4. Scope of Study………………………………………………………….. 6
I.5. Thesis Organization…………………………………………………….. 6
CHAPTER II. LITERATURE REVIEW…………………………………….. 7
II.1. Taiwan and Indonesia Industrial………………………………………… 7
II.1.1. Industries in Taiwan…………………………………………….. 7
II.1.2. Industries in Indonesia…………………………………………. 8
II.2. Stages-Gates Systems for NPD process………………………………... 9
II.2.1. Development Stages……………………………………………. 12
II.2.2. Evaluation Gates………………………………………………... 13
II.3. Dimensions and Evaluation Criteria to Measure NPD Performance…… 15
II.4. Summary………………………………………………………………... 16
CHAPTER III. METHODOLOGY FOR MEASURING THE NPD
UTILIZATION……………………………………………………………….. 18
III.1. Concept Definition……………………………………………………... 18
III.2. Research Instrument……………………………………………………. 19
III.3. Study Measures…………………………………………………………. 20
III.4. Data Collection Methods and Sampling………………………………… 21
III.4.1. Taiwan Demographic Information Sample……………………... 22
III.4.2. Indonesia Demographic Information Sample…………………... 26
III.5. Hypothesis……………………………………………………………… 26
III.6. Data Analysis Methods………………………………………………… 28
III.6.1. Mean Test………………………………………………………. 28
III.6.2. One Way ANOVA and Scheffe Test…………………………… 28
III.6.3. Independent T-Test…………………………………………….. 29
CHAPTER IV. DATA ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION............................... 30
IV.1. Evaluation Criteria at NPD Gates………………………………………. 30
IV.1.1. Evaluation Criteria at Taiwan NPD Gates……………………… 30
IV.1.2. Evaluation Criteria at Indonesia NPD Gates…………………… 32
IV.2. Evaluation Dimensions at NPD Gates…………………………………... 36
IV.3. The difference of Taiwan and Indonesia in Evaluation Dimensions
at NPD gates……………………………………………………………. 45
IV.4. The Impact of Demographic Profile on the Evaluation Dimensions Used 48
IV.5. Summary………………………………………………………………… 50
CHAPTER V. CONCLUSIONS……………………………………………… 51
V.1. Discussion of Results…………………………………………………… 51
V.2. Managerial Implications……………………………………………….... 53
REFERENCES……………………………………………………………….. 55
APPENDIX A (Indonesia Questionnaire)……………………………………. 61
APPENDIX B (Scheffe Test of Evaluation Criteria on each Dimension
at Indonesia NPD gates)……………………………………………………….. 68
APPENDIX C (Independent t-test of Differences in Evaluation
Dimensions at Taiwan and Indonesia NPD Gates)…………………………... 70
APPENDIX D1 (ANOVA of Difference in Criteria per Dimensions
across Demographic Profile (Taiwan))………………………………………. 77
APPENDIX D2 (ANOVA of Difference in Criteria per Dimensions
across Demographic Profile (Indonesia))…………………………….……… 89


List of Figures
Figure 1.1 Research Framework………………………………………….. 5
Figure 2.1 A Stage-gate for New Product Development…………………. 10
Figure 2.2 Development Stages and Evaluation Gates in the NPD process 11
Figure 4.1 Country Variations in Market-based Dimension……………… 42
Figure 4.2 Country Variations in Financial-based Dimension…………… 43
Figure 4.3 Country Variations in Product-based Dimension…………….. 43
Figure 4.4 Country Variations in Process-based Dimension…………….. 44
Figure 4.5 Country Variations in Intuition-based Dimension……………. 44
Figure 4.6 Significant 2-tailed Value of Evaluation Dimensions
Taiwan and Indonesia at NPD gates………………………….. 45


List of Tables
Table 3.1 Dimensions and Evaluation Criteria………………………….. 19
Table 3.2 Profile of Taiwan Sample…………………………………….. 24
Table 3.3 Profile of Indonesia Sample…………………………………... 25
Table 4.1 Taiwan Evaluation Gates……………………………………... 34
Table 4.2 Indonesia Evaluation Gates………………………………….... 35
Table 4.3 ANOVA of Means of Evaluation Criteria on Each Dimension
at NPD gates (Taiwan)………………………………………….. 38
Table 4.4 ANOVA of Means of Evaluation Criteria on Each Dimension
at NPD gates (Indonesia)……………………………………….. 39
Table 4.5 Means of Criteria per Evaluative Dimensions at NPD Gates
(Taiwan)………………………………………………………. 41
Table 4.6 Means of Criteria per Evaluative Dimensions at NPD Gates
(Indonesia)……………………………………………………. 41
Table 4.7 Independent T-Test Result (sig. 2-tailed) for Evaluations
Dimensions at NPD Gates of Taiwan and Indonesia (α = 0.05) 47
Table 4.8 Difference in number of criteria used per dimension
across the demographic profile……………………………….. 49

Armstrong, J.S. and Overton, T.S. (1977). Estimating non-response bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research 14 (august): 396 – 402.
Balachandra, R. (1984). Critical signals for making go/no-go decision in new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management 1(2): 92 – 100.
Bozz, Allen and Hamilton. (1982). New Product Management for the 1980’s. New York, NY: Booz, Allen & Hamilton.
Buisson, D., Garrett, T. and Souder, W.E. (1997). Success through customer-driven new product development: a comparison of US and New Zealand small entrepreneurial high technology firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management 14: 459 – 472.
Clark, K.B. and Wheelwright, S.C. (1993). Managing New Product and Process Development. New York: The Free Press.
Cooper, R.G and Kleinschmidt, E.J. (1986). An investigation into the new product process: steps, deficiencies, and impact. Journal of Product Innovation Management 3: 71 – 85.
Cooper, R.G. and de Brentani, U. (1984). Criteria for screening new industrial products. Industrial Marketing Management 13: 149 – 156.
Cooper, R.G. and Kleinschmidt, E.J. (1990). New Products, the key factors in success. American Marketing Association, Chicago, IL.
Cooper, R.G. and Kleinschmidt, E.J. (1987). Success factors in product innovation. Industrial Marketing Management, 16(3): 215 – 223.
Cooper, R.G. (1999). From experience, the invisible success factors in product innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management 16: 115 – 133.
Cooper, R.G. (1979). Identifying industrial new product successes: project New Prod. Industrial Marketing Management 8: 124–135.
Cooper, R.G. (1985). Industrial firm’s new product strategies. Journal of Business Research 13: 107 – 1221.
Cooper, R.G. (1990). Stage-gate systems: a new tool for managing new products. Business Horizons (May-June): 44 – 54.
Cooper, R.G. (1979). The dimensions of industrial new product success and failure. Journal of Marketing, 43(3): 93 – 103.
Cooper, R.G. (1993). Winning at New Products: Accelerating the Process from Idea to Launch. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Craig, A. and Hart, S. (1992). Where to now in new product development research. European Journal of Marketing 26: 1 – 49.
Crawford, C.M. (1994). New Product Management. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.
Dae Hoon, L., Dongwook, K. and Mishra, S. (1996). Factors affecting new product success: cross-country comparisons. Journal of Product Innovation Management 13: 530 – 550.
Edgett, S., Forbes, G. and Shipley, D. (1992). Japanese and British companies compared: contributing factors to success and failure in NPD. Journal of Product Innovation Management 9: 3 – 10.
Griffin, A and Page, A.L. (1996). PDMA’s success measurement project: recommended measures by project and strategy type. Journal of Product Innovation Management 13: 478 – 496.
Griffin, A. and Page, A.L. (1993). An interim report on measuring product development success and failure. Journal of Product Innovation Management 10: 291 – 308.
Griffin, A. (1995). Metrics for measuring product development cycle time. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 10(2): 112 – 125.
Griffin, A. (1997). PDMA research on new product development practices: Updating trends and benchmarking best practices. Journal of Product Innovation Management 14: 429 – 458.
Hart, S. (1993). Dimensions of success in new product development: an exploratory investigation. Journal of Marketing Management 9: 23 – 41.
Hart, S., Hutlink, E.J., Tzokas, N. and Commandeur, H.R. (2003). Industrial companies’ evaluation criteria in new product development gates. Journal of Product Innovation Management 20(1): 22 – 36.
Hauser, J.R. and Zettelmeyer, F. (1997). Metrics to evaluate RD&E. Research-Technology Management 40: 32 – 38.
Hutlink, E.J. and Robben, H.S.J. (1995). Measuring new product success: the difference that time perspective makes. Journal of Product Innovation Management 40: 32– 38.
Joseph, S.L. (2004). Political and Workplace Democracy in Taiwan. Industrial Relations and Democracy in Asia 3-5 (January): 72 – 80.
Knight-Rider/Tribune Business News (20001, May 8). Chicago market research firm’s study says most new product fails (p. 4).
Kuczmarski, T.D. (1994). Winning new product and service practices for the 1990’s. Chicago, IL.
Kuczmarski, T.D (1992). Managing new products: the power of innovation. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Lee, Y. H. (2007). Dynamics Modeling of Workload Impact on the Performance of New Product Development Process Under Different Resource Strategy Allocation, Supplier Involvement and Team-Based Organizational Structure, Dissertation Proposal, Department of Business Administration, National Dong-Hwa University, Taiwan ROC.
Lin, H.Y., Ching, M.O. and Chen, C.T. (2007). Taiwan Industrial Environment Analysis: High Technology Industry.
Link, P.L. (1987). Keys to new product success and failure. Industrial Marketing Management 16: 109 – 118.
Narver, J.C. and Slater, S.F. (1990). The effect of marketing orientation on business performance. Journal of Marketing 54 (October): 20 – 35.
Pinto, J.K. and Slevin, D.P. (1988). Project success: definition and measurement techniques. Project Management Journal 19(3): 67 – 73.
Rochford, L. (1991). Generating and screening new product ideas. Industrial Marketing Management 20: 287 – 296.
Ronkainen, I.A. (1985). Criteria changes across product development stages. Industrial Marketing Management 14: 171 – 178.
Rothwell, R. (1985). Project SAPPHO: a comparative study of success and failure on industrial innovation. Information Age 7(4): 215 – 219.
Schmidt, J.B. and Calantone, R.J. (1998). Are really new product development project harder to shut down? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15 (March): 111 – 123.
Takeuchi, H. and Nonaka, I. (1986). The new product development game. Harvard Business Review (Jan:-Feb:) 137 – 146.
Thee, K.W. (2006). Technology and Indonesia’s industrial competitiveness. ADB Institute Research, 72.
Tzokas, N., Hutlink, E.J. and Hart, S. (2004). Navigating the new product development process. Industrial Marketing Management, 33: 619 – 626.
Wall Street Journal (1992, January). New product troubles have firms cutting back, B1.
Woodruff, R.B. (1997). Customer value: the next source for competitive advantage. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 25(2): 139 – 153.
www.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_product_development (2008).
Yoon, E. and Lilien, G.L. (1985). New industrial product performance: The effect of market characteristics and strategy. Journal of Product Innovation Management 2(3): 134 – 144.