(3.239.33.139) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/03/08 17:47
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果

詳目顯示:::

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:鄭利利
研究生(外文):Wathanaporn Sriprapaipong
論文名稱(外文):A Study on Mobile Learning in a Thai University
指導教授:林 蘋
指導教授(外文):Ju, Teresa L.
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:樹德科技大學
系所名稱:資訊管理研究所
學門:電算機學門
學類:電算機一般學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2008
畢業學年度:96
語文別:英文
外文關鍵詞:Mobile learningm-learning technologydistance learningself-efficacytechnology acceptance modelhandheld devices
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:222
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:10
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
Just as e-Learning enjoyed great popularity during the 1990’s, Mobile Learning (m-learning) has since attracted great attention in today’s business and academic community. Recently, there has been a growing amount of interest in examining the strengths and weaknesses associated with m-learning, however, still very few studies had examined the factors that influence the user behavior of m-learning.

The purpose of this study is to explore the relationships between self-efficacy and effective m-learning. This study integrates the concept of knowledge sharing self-efficacy and Technology Acceptance Model for investigating the users’ intention to use mobile learning. Data was collected from several participating students from one University in Thailand. The hypothesized research model is then validated empirically with structural equation modeling to analyze and test if the empirical data support the proposed hypotheses with the sample size of 245 students who are interested in m-learning course. Significant hypotheses were found between the constructs.

Finally, in the end, that the user’s behavior of mobile learning systems are concluded to be influenced by the following factors: First, is if the participant realizes the system user-friendly, they will appreciate more the mobile technology based on the usefulness for their intended design and use . Second: the participants who are aware of the system’s functionality will appreciate it more, since they knew that it would be useful for them. Third: Finally, the system’s usefulness, in the end, contributes to its effectiveness to the participants.
Abstract i
Acknowledgement ii
Table of Contents iii
List of Tables v
List of Figures vi
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Research Background 3
1.2 Research Motivations 6
1.3 Research Goals 8
1.4 The Research Structure 10
CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 12
2.1 E-Learning 12
2.2 Mobile Learning 15
2.3 Technology Acceptance Model 26
2.4 Model of Self-Efficacy 33
CHAPTER 3 RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY 39
3.1 Research Framework 39
3.2 Research Hypotheses 40
3.3 Methodology 44
3.3.1 Instrument and Questionnaire Design 44
3.3.2 Respondents and Sample Size 45
3.3.3 Pilot Test and Modification 46
3.3.4 Data Collection 46
CHAPTER 4 DATA ANALYSIS AND RESULTS 47
4.1 Analytical Procedures 47
4.2 Descriptive Analysis 50
4.2.1 Demographic of Respondents 50
4.2.2 Measurement Result of Each Variable 51
4.3 Measurement Model 53
4.4 Scale Validity and Reliability 54
4.5 The Assessment of Model 56
4.6 Structure Model Analysis and Hypotheses Testing 58
CHAPTER 5 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS 61
5.1 Research Findings 62
5.2 Limitations and Recommendations 64
5.3 Contributions 65
References 67
Appendix 82
Autobiography 83
1.Abbitt J.T. & Klett M. D., 2007, “Identifying Influences On Attitudes And Self-Efficacy Beliefs Towards Technology Integration Among Pre-Service”, Electronic Journal for the Integration of Technology in Education, vol 6, pp. 28-42, April.
2.Abernathy, D. J., 2001, Get Ready For M-Learning, Training & Development, vol. 55(2), pp. 20-22.
3.Adams, D.A., Nelson, R.R., & Todd, P.A., 1992, “Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: A replication”, MIS Quarterly, vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 227-247.
4.Adkins S. S., 2007, The US Market for Mobile Learning Products and Services: 2006-2011 Forecast and Analysis, Monroe:Ambient Insight.
5.Agarwal R., Sambamurthy V. & Stair R.M., 2000, “Research report: the evolving relationship between general and specific computer self-efficacy—an empirical assessment”, Information Systems Research, vol. 11(4), pp. 418–430.
6.Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M., 1980, Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
7.Ajzen, I., 1991, “The theory of planned behavior”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 50, No. 2, pp.179-211.
8.Ames, C., 1990, Motivation: What Teachers Need to Know. Teachers College Record, vol. 91, pp. 409-421.
9.Anderson, K. C., 2005, “The Relationship of course Relevance, Online Features, and Perceived Learner Readiness with Corporate Employee Satisfaction with e-Learning”, Dissertation Abstracts International, Vol. 66(3), 966B. (UMI No.3167658).
10.Anonymous, 1998, “Merging the Intellectual and Technical Infrastructure of Higher Education: The Internet Example”, The Internet and Higher Education, vol. 1(1), pp. 10.
11.Bandura, A., 1977, “Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change,” Psychological Review, vol. 84, pp.191-215.
12.Bandura, A., 1986, Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory., Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
13.Bandura, A., 1994, Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior, vol. 4, pp. 71-81, New York: Academic Press. (Reprinted in H. Friedman [Ed.], Encyclopedia of mental health. San Diego: Academic Press, 1998).
14.Bandura, A., 1996, “Failures in self-regulation: energy depletion or selective disengagement?”, Psychological Inquiry, vol. 7(1), pp. 20–25.
15.Bandura, A., 1997, Self-efficacy : the exercise of control W.H. Freeman and company, New York.
16.Bandura, A., 1998, Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
17.Bandura, A., 2000, “Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy”, Current Directions in Psychological Science, vol. 9, pp. 75–78.
18. Bandura A, Pastorelli C, Barbaranelli C, & Caprara GV. “Self-efficacy pathways to childhood depression”, Journal of Personal Social Psychology (1999), vol. 76 (2), pp. 258-269.
19.Bhattacherjee A., “Acceptance of Internet applications services: the case of electronic Brokerages”, IEEE Transactions on systems, Man, and Cybernetics—Part A: Systems and Humans, vol. 30 (2000), pp. 411–420.
20.Bhattacherjee, A., 2001, “Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation confirmation model”, MIS Quarterly, vol. 25:3, pp. 351-370.
21.Bollen, K. A., 1989, Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
22.Brandon Hall, 2002, http://www.brandon-hall.com/
23.Brown J. S., 1999, “Learning, working and playing in the digital age,” in Proc. of Conference on Higher Education of the American Association of Higher Education, Washington, USA.
24.Bunnell D., 2002, “Just around the corner: The next technology revolution.” Upside, vol. 14(3), pp. 62-67.
25.Burkhardt, M.E., & Brass, D.J., 1990, “Changing patterns of change: the effect of a change in technology on social network structure and power”, Administrative Science Quarterly, nr.35, 104-127.
26.Carlson S., 2000, “Universities find wireless systems bring them convenience and savings,” The Chronicle of Higher Education, vol. 47, no.8.
27.Chau, P.Y.K., 2001, “Influence of computer attitude and self-efficacy on IT usage behavior”, Journal of End User Computing, vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 26-33.
28.Chin, W. W., 1998, “The Partial Least Squares Approach for Structural Equation Modeling,” in Modern Methods for Business Research, G. A. Marcoulides (ed.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 1998, pp. 295-336.
29.Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., & Newsted, P. R., 2003, “A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simula-tion study and an electronic-mail emotion / adoption study”, Information Systems Re-search, vol. 14(2), pp. 189-217, June.
30.Compeau, D.R. & Higgins, C.A., 1995, “Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test”, MIS Quarterly, vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 189-211.
31.Cooper, D. R. & Schindler, P. S., 2002, Business Research Methods, 7 th ed, Singapore: McGraw Hill.
32.Daniel, G. & Cox K., 2002, Background and Resoucres. Mobile Computing for Teaching and Learning at Wake Forest - What are the Critical Infrastructre Services?
33.Davis, F.D., 1989, “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology”, MIS Quarterly, vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 318-339.
34.Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., & Warshaw, P.R., 1989, “User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models”, Management Science, vol. 35, No. 8, pp. 982-1003.
35.Decker, C.A., (n.d), “Training transfer: Perceptions of computer use self-efficacy among university employees”, Journal of Vocational and Technical Education, vol.14(2), pp. 1-14. [Online] http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournal/JVTE/v14n2/JVTE-3.html [2007, November 25].
36.Devaraj, S., Fan, M., & Kohli, R., 2002, “Antecedents of B2C channel satisfaction and preference: Validating e-commerce metrics”, Information Systems Research, vol. 13(3), pp. 316-333.
37.Dewey J., 1927, The Public and Its Problems, The Later Works, vol.2, Southern Illinois University Press, 1984, pp.367 and 371.
38.Diamantopoulos, A. & Siguaw J., 2000, Introducing Lisrel: A Guide for the Uninitiated, London: SAGE.
39.Donald, M., 1991, Origins of the Modern Mind: Three Stages in the Evolution of Culture and Cognition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40.Duan, B.; et al., 2006, “An Architechture for Online Laboratory E-learning System”, Journal of Distance Education Technologies, vol. 4(2), pp. 839-869.
41. Durndell A. & Haag Z., 2002, “Computer self-efficacy, computer anxiety, attitudes towards the Internet and reported experience with the Internet, by gender, in an East European sample”, Computers in Human Behavior 18 (2002), pp. 521–535.
42. Eastin MS, LaRose R., 2000, Internet self efficacy and psychology of the digital divide. [Online] available: http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol6/issue1/eastin.html. Last accessed 22nd January 2003.
43.Eastin, M. & LaRose, R., 2005, “Internet self-efficacy and the psychology of the digital divide”, In: Journal of Computer Mediated Communication. vol. 6(1). Retrieved January 19, 2005 from the WWW: http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol6/issue1/eastin.html.
44.Ed, 2001, Colleges Give Palm Hendhelds to Students, Palm InfoCenter.
45.Computerworld-Bulgaria, 2003, The Mobiles' Applications Market Has Huge Potential, Computerworld-Bulgaria, Issue 42.
46.Computerworld-Bulgaria, 2004, European GSM Market has 25% Growth During 1Q’04, According IDC, Issue 16.
47.Fagerberg, T., Rekkedal T., & Russell J., 2002, “Designing and Trying Out a Learning Environment for Mobile Learners and Teachers”, Sub-project of the EU Leonardo Project “From e-Learning to m-Learning”, (http://www.nettskolen.com/forskning/55/NKI2001m-learning2.html)
48.Fishbein, M & Ajzen, I., 1975, “Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behaviour: An Introduction to Theory and Research”, Addison-Wesley, Reading , MA.
49.Francine-Bica1, Regina-Verdin & Maria-Vicari R., 2006, “Towards Cognitive Modeling of Students’ Self-Efficacy”, IEEE the Sixth International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT'06).
50.Garrison, D.R. & Anderson, T., 2003, ELearning in the 21st Century, London: Routledge.
51.Gefen, D. & Straub, D., 2000, “The relative importance of perceived ease of use in IS adoption: A study of e-commerce adoption”, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, vol. 1(8), pp. 1-28.
52.Georgiev, T., E. Georgieva, and A. Smrikarov, 2004, “M-Learning - a New Stage of Е-Learning”, in International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies - CompSysTech’2004.
53.Georgiev, T., Georgieva, E., & Trajovski, G., 2006, Transitioning from e-Learning to m-Learning: Present issues and future challenges. Proceedings of the Seventh ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artifical Intelligence, Networking, and Parallel/ Distributed Computing (SNPD '06). Retrieved April 24, 2007 from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel5/10923/34372/01640716.pdf?tp=&isnumber=34372&arnumber=1640716
54.Gibson, C. B., Randel, A. E., & Earley, P. C., 2000, Understanding group efficacy., Group and Organization Management, vol. 25(1), pp. 67–97.
55.Gist M., 1989, “The influence of training method on self-efficacy and idea generation among managers”, Personnel Psychology, vol. 42, pp. 787-805.
56.Gist, M., Shwoerer, C.E., & Rosen, L.D., 1989, “Effects of alternative training methods on self-efficacy and performance in computer software training”, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 74, pp. 884-891.
57.Grimm, M., M. Tazari, & D. Balfanz, 2005, “A Reference Model for Mobile Knowledge Management”, in 5th International Conference on Knowledge Management (I-Know ’05), Graz, Austria.
58.Guardo, E., et al., 2001, “New Pedagogical Tools for Mobile Learning Groups”, Mobile Summit.
59.Hair, J F, Jr., Anderson R E, Tatham R L, & Black W. C., 1998, Multivariate data analysis 5th ed.,Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
60.Hall, B. & Snider, A., 2000, Glossary: The hottest Buzz Words in the Industry, E-Schreiber, D.A., & Berge, Z. L. Retrieved Auguest 24, 2007 from: http://www.brandonhall.com
61.Harrison, A.W. & Rainer, R.R., 1997, “Testing the self-efficacy-performance linkage of social-cognitive theory”, Journal of Social Psychology, 137 (1), 79-87.
62.Hendrickson, A.R., Massey, P.D. & Cronan, T.P., 1993, “On the test-retest reliability of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use scales”, MIS Quarterly, vol. 17(2), pp. 227-230.
63.Henry J.W. & Stone R.W., 1994, “A structural equation model of end-user satisfaction with a computer-based medical information system”, Information Resources Management Journal, vol.7(3), pp. 21–33.
64.Hill, T., Smith, N. D., & Mann, M. F., 1987, “Role of efficacy expectations in predicting the decision to use advanced technologies: The case of computers.”, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 72(2), pp. 307-313.
65.Hill, T. R., &. Roldan, M., 2005, “Toward third generation threaded discussions for mobile learning: Opportunities and challenges for ubiquitous collaborative learning environments”, Information Systems Frontiers, vol. 7(1), pp. 55-70.
66.Jamalipour, A., 2003, The Wireless Mobile Internet: Architectures, Protocols, and Services, John Wiley & Sons.
67.Joo, Y. J., Bong, M., & Choi, H. J., 2000, “Self-efficacy for self-regulated learning, academic self-efficacy, and internet self-efficacy in web-based instruction”, Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 48(2), pp. 5–17.
68.Kaasinen, E., M. Aaltonen, et al., 2000, “Two approaches to bringing Internet services to WAP devices.” Computer Networks, vol. 33(1-6), pp. 231-246.
69.Kambourakis, G., Kontoni, D. P. N., & Sapounas, I., 2004, “Introducing Attribute Certificates to Secure Distributed E-Learning or M-Learning Services”, Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference. Innsbruck, Australia. Pp. 436-440. Retrieved April 24, 2007 from: http://www.ice.upc.edu/butlleti/innsbruck/416-174.pdf
70.Karsten, R. & Roth, R., 1998a, “The relationship of computer experience and computer self-efficacy to performance in introductory computer literacy courses”, Journal of Research on Computing in Education, vol. 31 (1), pp. 14-22.
71.Karsten, R. & Roth, R., 1998b, “Computer self-efficacy: A practical indicator of student computer competency in introductory IS courses”, Informing Science, vol. 1 (3), pp. 61-68.
72.Keegan, D., 2002, The future of learning: From eLearning to mLearning. Ericsson.
73.Keegan, D., 2005, “Mobile Learning: The Next Generation of Learning”, Distance Education International, http://learning.ericsson.net/mlearning2/files/workpackage5/book.doc, 2005.
74.Kinzie M.B. & Delcourt M.A.B., 1991, “Computer technologies in teacher education: The measurement of attitudes and self-efficacy”, American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL (1991) ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 331 891.
75.Kinzie, M., Delcourt, M.A. & Powers, S.M., 1994, “Computer technologies: Attitudes and self-efficacy across undergraduate disciplines”, Research in Higher Education, vol. 35(6), pp. 745–768.
76.Koufaris, M., 2002, “Applying the Technology Acceptance Model and flow theory to online consumer behavior”, Information Systems Research, vol. 13(2), pp. 205-223.
77.Kukulska-Hulme, A. & Traxler, J., 2005, Mobile learning: A handbook for educators and trainers. London: Routledge.
78.Landers, P., 2002, From E-Learning to M-Learning, Ericsson.
79.Langford, M. and Reeves, T.E., 1998, “The relationship between computer self-efficacy and personal characteristics of the beginning information systems student”, Journal of Computer Information Systems, vol. 38 (4), pp. 41-45.
80.Laouris, Y. and Eteokleous N., 2005, “We need an Educationally Relevant Definition of Mobile Learning”, in mLearn 2005 - 4th World conference on mLearning Cape Town, South Africa, 2005.
81.Lederer, A.L., Maupin, D.J., Sena, M.P. & Zhuang, Y., 2000, “The technology acceptance model and the World Wide Web”, Decision Support Systems, vol. 29, pp. 269-282.
82.Legris P., Ingham J. & Collerette P., “Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model”, Information and Management 40 (2003), pp. 191–204.
83.Lim, C.K., 2001, “Computer self-efficacy, academic self-concept, and other predictors of satisfaction and future participation of adult distance learners”, The American Journal of Distance Education, vol. 15(2) pp. 41-51.
84.Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R., 2002, Motivation as an enabler for academic success. School Psychology Review, vol. 31(2), pp. 313–327.
85.Little, B. L., & Madigan, R. L., 1997, “The relationship between collective efficacy and performance in manufacturing work teams”, Small Group Research, vol. 28(4), pp. 517–534.
86.Lockitt, B., 2005, Mobile Learning, Cheadle, Cheshire: 3T Productions Ltd.
87.Mahajan, V., Muller, E. & Bass F., 1990, “New Product Diffusion Models in Marketing, a Review and Directions for Research”, Journal of Marketing , vol 54, pp. 1-26.
88.Marakas, G., Yi, M., & Johnson, R., 1998, “The multilevel and multifaceted character of computer self-efficacy: Toward clarification of the construct and an integrative framework for research”, Information Systems Research, vol. 9(2), pp. 126-163.
89.Martocchio J.J., 1993, “Employee decisions to enroll in microcomputer training”, Human Resource Development Quarterly, vol. 4, pp. 51-69.
90.Martocchio J.J., 1994, “Effects of conceptions of ability on anxiety, self-efficacy, and learning in training”, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 79, pp. 819-825.
91.Mathieson, K., 1991, “Predicting user intentions: Comparing the technology acceptance model with theory of planned behavior”, Information Systems Research, vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 173-191
92.Mathieson, K., Peacock, E., & Chin, W.W., 2001, “Extending the technology acceptance model: The influence of perceived user resources,” DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, vol. 32, No. 3, pp.86-112.
93.Maurer H., 1998, “Web-Based Knowledge Management”, IEEE Computer, vol. 31, 1998, pp. 122-123.
94.McLean N., 2003, “The M-Learning Paradigm: an Overview”, A Report for the Royal Academy of Engineering and the Vodafone Group Foundation, November.
95.Meru Networks. Wireless LANs in Higher Education, Whitepaper. Available:http://www.merunetworks.com/pdf/WLANS_in_HiEd_WP5- 0705.pdf
96.Mobilearn, 2003, The Mobilearn Project Vision. Available at http://www.mobilearn.org/vision/vision.htm.
97.Moon, J.W. & Kim, Y.G., 2001, “Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context,” Information & Management, vol. 38, No. 4, pp. 217-230.
98.Mueller R.O., 1996, Basic principles of structural equation modeling, Springer, New York.
99.Munro, U., Munro, J. A., Phillips, J. B. & Wiltschko, W., 1997, “Effect of wavelength of light and pulse magnetisation on different magnetoreception systems in a migratory bird”, Austral. J. Zool, vol. 45, pp. 189 -198.
100.Naidu S., 2006, E-Learning A Guidebook of Principles, Procedures and Practices, 2nd Revised Edition, CEMCA, New Delhi 110016 India.
101.Nancy D. & Christopher V. K., 2004, Human Resource Executive.
102.NIIT Corp., 2003, Understanding eLearning. Avaiable online at (http://sg.sun.com/events/presentation /files/sun_ecquaria_govt/NIIT.ppt)
103.Nyíri K., 2002, ‘Towards a Philosophy of M-Learning”, IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education (WMTE 2002), August 29-30, Teleborg Campus, Växjö University, Växjö, Sweden.
104.Oliver, T. A., & Shapiro, F., 1993, “Self-efficacy and computers”, Journal of Computer-Based Interactions, vol. 20, pp. 81-85.
105.Ong. C.S.,Lai J.Y. & Wang Y.S., 2004, “Factors affecting engineers' acceptance of asynchronous e-learning systems in high-tech companies”, Information & Management, vol. 41 (6), pp. 795–804.
106.Pajares, F., & Kranzler, J., 1995, Role of self-efficacy and general mental ability in mathematical problem solving: a path analysis., (ERIC Documents Reproduction Service NO. ED 387 342).
107.Pajares, F., & Miller, M. D., 1995, “Mathematics self-efficacy and mathematical problem-solving”, Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 21, pp. 325–344.
108.Pantazis, C., 2001, Executive Summary: A Vision of E-learning for America’s Workforce. Retrieved February 28, 2007 from: http://www.learningcircuits.org/2001/aug2001/pantazis.html
109.Parsons, D., & Ryu, H., 2006, “A framework for assessing the quality of mobile learning”, Massey University website. Retrieved February 20, 2007 from: http://www.massey.ac.nz/~hryu/M-learning.pdf
110.Petrova, K., 2005, “Mobile Learning Using SMS: A mobile business application”, Proceedings for the 18th Annual Conference of the National Advisory Committee on Computing Qualifications. July 10-13. Tauranga, Australia, pp. 412-417.
111.Pinkwart, N., Hoppe H. U., Milrad M., & Perez J., 2003, “Educational scenarios for cooperative use of Personal Digital Assistants”, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, vol. 19, pp. 383-391, 2003.
112.Quinn, C., 2000, “mLearning: Mobile Wireless, In-Your-Pocket Learning. LiNE Zine.”,http://www.linezine.com/2.1/features/cqmmwiyp.htm, Fall 2000.
113.Rekkedal, T., 1998, Courses on the WWW - Student Experiences and Attitudes Towards WWW Courses. An Evaluation Report Written for the Leonardo Online Training Project, http://www.nki.no/eeileo/
114.Rekkedal, T., 1999, Courses on the WWW ? Student Experiences and Attitudes Towards WWW Courses ? II.Evaluation Report Written for the Leonardo On-line Training Project, MMWWWK. http://www.nki.no/eeileo/
115.Rogers, E.M., 1995, Diffusion of Innovation, The Free Press, NY
116.Roschelle, J., et al, 2002, “To Unlock the Learning Value of Wireless Mobile Devices, Understand Coupling”, In Proceedings of WMTE 2002, pp. 51-60, Växjö, Sweden.
117.Rossiter J.R., 2002), The C-OAR-SE procedure for scale development in marketing, International Journal of Research in Marketing 19 (2002), pp. 305–335.
118.Tazari S., Grimm, M., Finke M., & Balfanz, D., 2004, “White Paper: Mobile Knowledge Management”, ZGDV and HSW in Project mummy (IST-2001-37365) 2004.
119.Segars, A.H., 1997, “Assessing the Unidimensionality of Measurement: A Paradigm and Illustration with in the Context of Information Systems Research”, Omega: The International Journal of Management Science, vol. 25(1), pp.107-121, February.
120.Sharples, M., 2000, “The Design of Personal Mobile Technologies for Lifelong Learning”, Computers and Education, vol. 34, pp. 177-193.
121.Shea, R. H., & Boser, U., 2001, “So where's the beef?”, U.S. News and World Report, pp. 44, 46, 48, 50, 52-54.
122.Silverstone, R. & Hirsch, E., Consuming Technologies, London: Routledge, 1992.
123.Singh, H., 2003, Leveraging Mobile and Wireless Internet, Learning Circuits, September, 2003.
124.Sribhadung, R. A. P., 2006, “Mobile Devices in eLearning”, Third International Conference on eLearning for Knowledge-Based Society, pp. 1-5.
125.Steenkamp, Jan-Benedict E.M. & Hans C.M. van Trijp, 1991, “The Use of LISREL in Validating Marketing Constructs,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, vol. 8 (4), pp. 283-99.
126.Steiger, J. H., 1990, “Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach”, Multivariate Behavioral Research, vol. 25, pp. 173-180.
127.Subramanian, G.H., 1994, “A replication of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use measurement”, Decision Sciences, vol. 25(5,6), pp. 863-874.
128.Sushil K. Sharma & Fred L. Kitchens, 2004, “Web Services Architecture for M-Learning”, Electronic Journal on e-Learning, vol. 2, Issue 1 (February 2004), pp. 203-216.
129.Szajna, B., 1994, “Software evaluation and choice: Predictive validation of the technology acceptance instrument”, MIS Quarterly, vol. 18(3), pp. 319-324.
130.Szajna, B., 1996, “Empirical evaluation of the revised Technology Acceptance Model”, Management Science, vol. 42(1), pp. 85-92.
131.Tallent-Runnels, M.K., et.al., 2006 “Teaching Courses Online: a Review of the Career Decision-making Self-efficacy, Career Salience, Locus of Control and Vocational Indecion”, Jounal of Vocational Behavior, vol. 37(1), pp.17-31.
132.Taylor, S. & Todd, P., 1995a, “Assessing IT usage: The role of prior experience”, MISQuarterly, vol. 19(4), pp. 561-570.
133.Taylor, S., and Todd, P. A., 1995b, “Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models”, Information Systems Research, vol. 6, pp.144-176.
134.Thatcher, J. B. & Perrewe P. L. , 2002, “An empirical examination of individual traits as antecedents to computer anxiety and computer self-efficacy”, MIS Quarterly, vol. 26 (4), pp. 381-96.
135.Thompson, R. L., Higgins, C. A., & Howell, J. M., 1991, “Personal computing: Toward a conceptual model of utilization”, MIS Quarterly, vol.14, pp. 125-143.
136.Training, W., 2002, “Wireless Training Or 'M-Learning' Is Here; First Movers In The Pool.”, Lifelong Learning Market Report, vol. 5(22), pp. 3-5.
137.Trifonova, A., & Ronchetti M., 2003, “A general architecture for M-Learning”, Journal of Digital Contents, vol. 2(1), pp. 31-36.
138.Trunko R., Riboli M. C., Apostolou D., Onsoyen L. E., Schwesig M., Papavassiliou G., Pudlatz M. & G. Mentzas, 2003, Deliverable D 4.2 Final Report on Vision Identification, FP5 project ROCKET (IST-2001-38245) 2003.
139.Upadhyay, N., 2006, “M-Learning – A New Paradigm in Education”, International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 27-34.
140.Urdan, T. A. & Weggen, C. C., 2000, “Corporate E-learning: Exploring a New Frontier”, WR Hambrecht Co., March.
141.Varvel V. E. & Thurston C., 2002, “Perceptions of a Wireless Network,” Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 2002, pp.487-502.
142.Venkatesh, V. & Davis, F. D., 1996, “A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test”, Decision Sciences, vol. 27, pp. 451-481.
143.Venkatesh, V., 2000, “Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model”, Information Systems Research, vol. 11(4), pp. 342-365.
144.Venkatesh, V. & Davis, F. D., 2000, “A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies”, Management Science, vol. 46, pp. 186-204.
145.Vavoula, G. & Sharples, M. , 2002, Editors of the Proceedings of the European Workshop on Mobile and Contextual Learning -MLearn 2002, University of Birmingham, 20th and 21st of June, 2002 ETRP 14* ISSN 1463-9408.
146.Wagner, E. D., 2005, “Enabling mobile learning”, Educause Review, vol. 40(3), pp. 40-53.
147.Wallace, A.R., 1999, An exploratory study of the factors influencing the construction of computer selfefficacy. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Charles Sturt University.
148.Webster, J., & Martocchio, J. J., 1993, “Turning Work into Play: Implications for Microcomputer Software Training”, Journal of Management, vol. 19(1), pp. 127-147.
149.Wenger E., 1998, Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
150.WKO, 2004, “The Telecommunication Market in Austria and International (in German)”.
151.Wu,C.H. et al., 2006, “The Universal Protein Resource (UniProt): an expanding universe of protein information”, Nucleic Acids Res., 34 (Database issue), D187–D191.
152.Young-Ju Joo, Mimi Bong, & Ha-Jeen Choi, 2000, “Self-efficacy for self-regulated learning, academic self-efficacy, and Internet self-efficacy in Web-based instruction”, Educational Technology, Research and Development, vol. 48(2), pp. 5-13.
153.Yu-Liang R.T., 2005, “Mobile learning: current trend and future challenges,” in Proc. of Fifth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, pp.603-607.
154.Zikmund, W. G., 2000, Business Research Methods, 6th edition, NY: Dryden Press.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊
 
系統版面圖檔 系統版面圖檔