|
Chuangtze is the important philosopher in pre-Qin time.He and Laotze to most have Taoism of thinker the representative. Although his philosophy is mainly comes by the Laotze, but also develops is different with Laotze''s philosophy. His philosophy and Laotze''s philosophy compares, Chuangtze''s philosophy take the person as a key point. In Chinese main philosophy school, Confucian, Taoism, their philosophies take the person as a point, therefore treating this angle, may saying that the Chuangtze philosophy is most can unfold the Taoism philosophy special characteristic. May also saying, Chuangtze is the Taoism philosophy epitomizes. In research subject, this thesis is take the philosophy as the research point, and literature textual criticism, edition, author are not this thesis main discussion objects, therefore makes the narration broadbrush only, but no deep research.
The present “Chuangtze” has 33 chapters,and it divides into “Ne—Chi”,”Wy”,”Sar”. Whether “Ne—Chi”,”Wy”,”Sar”author all was Chuangtze still didn''t knew now. In majority of scholar''s mutual recognition, “Chuangtze Ne—Chi” should be Chuangtze''s book. And this thesis to original text choice in “Ne—Chi” that is thesis main object of study, Wy”,”Sar” is only the reference. And this thesis to annotation choice in Guo Xiang ''s annotation that is this thesis main literature.
After the research literature scope is determined, in research viewpoint angle, thesis article take person being comprehension Tao as main research subject. With dissert in the preamble, Chuangtze''s philosophy take the person as a key point. Although therefore his thought follow Laotze, but in the elaboration is actually by the person as the point, therefore the person being comprehension Tao to be possible saying that was in the Chuangtze philosophy the point. Therefore this thesis manifests the person being comprehension Tao as the main research subject. In discourse order, this thesis first gradually explains to “Chuangtze Ne—Chi”, next makes an overall elaboration to “Chuangtze Ne—Chi” philosophy, and take this as this thesis point of discourse.
|