( 您好!臺灣時間:2024/06/13 23:15
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::


研究生(外文):Tzu-Yu Huang
論文名稱(外文):Modeling Collaboration Effectiveness: A Perspective of Social Capital Theory
指導教授(外文):Wen-Kung Lin
外文關鍵詞:Social CapitalOrganizational CommitmentCollaboration Effectiveness
  • 被引用被引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:288
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:44
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
With the prompt development of information technology, the traditional form of communication has been replaced by Internet. The Internet could solve the drawbacks of the traditional form of communication limited to one spatiotemporality. Given that teamwork plays an important role in organizations, team collaboration through online communication has gained people’s attention. This thesis explored the relationship among dimensions of social capital, organizational commitment and online collaboration effectiveness. A total of 540 questionnaires were distributed during March 8 to April 5 2008, and 417 usable ones were collected, and the response rate is 77.22%. This structural equation modeling (SEM) is used to analyze data in this study.
The results of the study revealed that reliability analysis, convergent validity and goodness-of-fit indices were acceptable. The path from organizational commitment to collaboration effectiveness was positive and significant. The path from structural social capital to organizational commitment was positive and significant. The path from cognitive social capital to organizational commitment was positive and significant. However, relational social capital showed no significant influence on organizational commitment. Suggestions for theory and practice as well as for future research directions were discussed at the end of the thesis.
摘要 i
Abstract ii
誌謝 iii
目錄 iv
表目錄 vi
圖目錄 vii
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景 1
1.2 研究動機 3
1.3 研究目的 4
1.4 研究範圍 5
1.5 論文架構 5
1.6 研究流程 6
第二章 文獻探討 8
2.1 社會資本 8
2.1.1 關係社會資本 10
2.1.2 結構社會資本 12
2.1.3 認知社會資本 13
2.2 組織承諾 14
2.2.1 組織承諾之定義 14
2.2.2 組織承諾之分類 15
2.3 合作效能 18
第三章 研究方法 20
3.1 研究架構 20
3.2 研究假說 21
3.3 研究變數定義 23
3.4 研究設計 25
3.4.1 資料蒐集 26
3.4.2 問卷設計 26
3.4.3 問卷內容 28
3.5 資料分析方法 28
第四章 資料分析 33
4.1 樣本資料分析 33
4.2 信度分析 35
4.3 驗證性因素分析 37
4.3.1 配適度檢定 37
4.3.2 收斂效度 39
4.3.3 區別效度 41
4.4 研究假設檢定 42
第五章 結論與建議 45
5.1 研究結論 45
5.2 管理意涵 46
5.3 研究限制 48
5.4 未來研究建議 49
參考文獻 50
附錄 正式問卷 57

1.Adler, P. S. and Kwon, S. W., Social capital: Prospects for a new concept, Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17-40, 2002.
2.Ancona, D. G. and Caldwell, D. F., Bridging the boundary: external activity and performance in organizational teams, Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(4), 634-665, 1997.
3.Andaleeb, S. S., Dependence relations and the moderating role of trust: Implications for behavioral intentions in marketing channels, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 12(2), 157-172, 1995.
4.Anderson, J. C. and Gerbing, D. W., Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach, Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423, 1988.
5.Bagozzi, R. P. and Philips, L. W., Representing and testing organization theories: A holistic construal, Administrative Science Quarterly, 27(3) , 459-489, 1982.
6.Bagozzi, R. P. and Yi, Y., On the evaluation of structural equation models, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94, 1988.
7.Beer, M., Eisenstat, R. and Spector, B. A., The critical path to corporate renewal, Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1990.
8.Bentler, P. M. and Bonett, D. G., Significance tests and goodness-of-fit in the analysis of covariance structures, Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606, 1980.
9.Bonoma, T. V., Conflict, cooperation, and trust in three power systems, Behavioral Science, 21, 499-514, 1976.
10.Bourdieu, P., The forms of capital, In Richardson, J. G. (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education, New York: Greenwood Press, 241-258,1986.
11.Browne, M. W. and Cudeck, R., Alternative ways of assessing model fit, In Bollen, K. A. and Long, J. S.(Eds.), Testing structural equation models, Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 136-162, 1993.
12.Burt, R., Structural holes: The social structure of competition, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1992.
13.Cameron, A. and Webster, J., Unintended consequences of emerging communication technologies: Instant messaging in the workplace, Computers in Human Behavior , 21(1), 85-103, 2005.
14.Carmines, E. G. and Mciver, J. P., Analyzing models with unobserved variables: Analysis of covariance structures, In Bohrnstedt, G. w. and Bogatta, E. F. (Eds.), Social Measurement: Current Issues, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1981.
15.Chiu, C. M., Hsu, M. H. and Wang, E. T. G., Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories, Decision Support Systems, 42, 1872-1888, 2006.
16.Clark, B. R., The occupational saga in higher education, Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 178-184, 1972.
17.Coleman, J. S., Social capital in the creation of human capita, American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-120, 1988.
18.Coleman, J. S., Foundations of social theory, Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1990.
19.Currivan, D. B., The causal order of job satisfaction and organizational commitment in models of employee turnover, Human Resource Management Review, 9(4), 495-524, 1999.
20.Deshpande, L. and Satish, P., The impact of ethical climate types on facets of job satisfaction: An empirical investigation, Journal of Business Ethics, 15(6), 655–660, 1996.
21.Dixon, N.D., Common knowledge: How companies thrive by sharing what they know, Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2000.
22.Espinoza, M. M., Assessing the cross-cultural applicability of a service quality measure a comparative study between Quebec and Peru, International Journal of Service Industry Management, 10(5),449-468, 1999.
23.Fornell, C. and Larcker, D. F., Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error, Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50, 1981.
24.Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A. and Segars, A. H., Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective, Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1) , 185-214, 2001.
25.Guzzo, R. A., Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1995.
26.Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L. and Black, W. C., Multivariate data analysis, 5th(Ed), NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1998.
27.Hardy, C., Phillips, N. and Lawrence, T. B., Resources, knowledge and influence: The organizational effects of interorganizational collaboration, Journal of Management Studies, 40(2), 321-347, 2003.
28.Hodge, B. J, Anthony, W. P. and Gales, L. M., Organization theory: A strategic approach, 5th(Ed), NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1996.
29.Ibarra, H., Structural alignments, individual strategies, and managerial action: Elements toward a network theory of getting things done, In Nohria, N. and Eccles, R. G. (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action, Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1992.
30.Jones, M. C. and Harrison, A. W., Is Project team performance:An empirical assessment, Information and Management, 31(2), 57-65, 1996.
31.Joreskog, K. G. and Sorbom, D., LISREAL 8: structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1993.
32.Kawakubo, M. K., Perception of authority, control, and commitment in Japanese organizations, Dissertation Abstrcacts International, 49, 1-17 , 1987.
33.Kotlarsky, J. and Oshri, I., Social ties, knowledge sharing and successful collaboration in globally distributed system development projects, European Journal of Information Systems, 14(1), 37-48, 2005.
34.Krackhardt, D., Graph theoretical dimensions of informal organization, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, 1989.
35.Lewicki, R. and Bunker, B., Developing and maintaining trust in work relationships, In R. Kramer and T. Tyler(Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1996.
36.MacGillivray, A. and Walker, P., Local social capital: Making it work on the ground, In Barron, S., Field, J. and Schuller, T. (Eds.), Social Capital: Critical Perspectives, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
37.McKenna, K. Y. A. and Bargh, J. A., Coming out in the page of the internet: Identity demarginalization through virtual group participation, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(3), 681-694, 1998.
38.Meyer, J. P. and Allen, N. J. , A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment, Human Resource Management, 1, 61-89, 1991.
39.Misztal, B., Trust in modern societies, Cambridge England: Polity Press, 1996.
40.Mohrman, S. A., Cohen, S.G. and Mohrman, A. M., Designing team-based organization: New forms for knowledge work, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Pub, 1995.
41.Moon, M. J., Organizational commitment revisited in new public management: Motivation, organizational culture, sector, and managerial level, Public Performance and Management Review, 24(2), 177-194, 2000.
42.Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M. and Porter, L. W., The measurement of organization commitment, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14, 224-247,1979.
43.Nahapiet, J. and Ghoshal, S., Social capital, intellectual capital and the organizational advantage, Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266, 1998.
44.Nelson, K. M. and Cooprider, J. G., The contribution of shared knowledge to IS group performance, MIS Quarterly, 20(4), 409-432, 1996.
45.Nisbet, R. A., Social change and history: Aspects of the western theory of development, London: Oxford University Press, 1969.
46.Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H., The knowledge creating company, New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.
47.Nunnally, J. C., Psychometric theory, 2nd(Ed), NY: McGraw-Hill, 1978.
48.Obst, P. L. and White, K. M., Three-dimensional strength of identification across group memberships: A confirmatory factor analysis, Self and Identity, 4(1), 69-80, 2005.
49.Peterson, R. A., A meta-analysis of Cronbach's coefficient alpha, Journal of Consumer Research, 21(2), 381-391, 1994.
50.Putnam, R. D., Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993.
51.Sheldon, M. E., Investments and involvements as mechanisms producing commitment to the organization, Administrative Science Quarterly, 67, 626-650, 1971.
52.Smith, K. G., Carroll, S. J. and Ashford, S. J., Intra- and interorganizational cooperation: Toward a research agenda, Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 7-23, 1995.
53.Starbuck, W. H., Learning by knowledge intensive firms, Journal of Management Studies, 29, 713-740, 1992.
54.Thomas, K. W., Conflict and negotiation process in organizations, In Dunnette, M. D. and Hough, L. M. (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1992.
55.Tsai, W. and Ghoshal, S., Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks, Academy of Management Journal, 41, 464-476, 1998.
56.Waller, M. J., The timing of adaptive group responses to nonroutine events. Academy of Management Journal, 42(2), 127-137, 1999.
57.Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M. and Linden, R. C., Perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange: A social exchange perspective, Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), 82-111, 1997.
58.Wellman, B. and Gulia, M., Net surfers don't ride alone: Virtual communities as communities. In Smith, M. and Kollock, P.(Eds.), Community in Cyberspace, London: Routledge, 1999.

2.資策會FIND/經濟部技術處「創新資訊應用研究計畫」,即時傳訊增加工作效率 然安全性仍有待解決,2004。http://www.find.org.tw/find/home.aspx?page=news&id=3455
3.資策會FIND/經濟部技術處「創新資訊應用研究計畫」,我國產業e化能力穩定中求進步 創新資訊應用蔚為風尚,2006。http://www.find.org.tw/find/home.aspx?page=many&id=153
4.資策會FIND/經濟部技術處「創新資訊應用研究計畫」,「行動影音」、「安全監控」服務 未來一年民眾需求最強烈,2007。http://www.find.org.tw/find/home.aspx?page=many&id=188
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top