臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

由於發明人在新產品開發上的努力，台灣在國際發明展中表現優異，而發明人亦積極將其產品商品化推展至市場，創造出可觀的價值。然而不同發明人在專利商品化的選擇上其考量因素為何？而專利商品化後的績效為何？
過去對於發明人研究，主要以探討發明歷程、商品化經驗與基本統計分析為主，本研究探討針對不同的發明人，瞭解其選擇商品化之因素，並探討其商品化後之績效。
本研究以經濟部智慧財產局主辦之2007年「台北國際發明暨技術交易展覽會中」之刊載名錄作為樣本，使用郵寄方式寄出217份問卷，有效回收問卷為89份。問卷回收後，利用統計方法進行研究分析，包含有信度分析、獨立樣本t檢定、箱關性分析及迴歸分析等，進行驗證。
經分析資料，研究結論如下：
1、不同背景之發明人，其自行商品化決定的因素有顯著的差異。
2、經濟面向的自行商品化的決定因素指標愈高，其財務指標之績效愈好。
3、非經濟面向的自行商品化的決定因素指標愈高，其非財務指標之績效愈好。
4、自行商品化的決定因素，對於不同背景的發明人之商品化績效之關係具有中介效果。

Due to the efforts from the inventors in mew product development, Taiwan contingent behaves outstandingly in the exhibitions of innovation. The inventors create the considerable value by actively displaying their creativity and releasing their commercialized products into the market. However, what are the key factors in the patent commercialization by different inventors? How is the performance of the patent commercialization?

In the past, the researches on the inventors focused on inventors’ careers, commercialized progress and statistical analyses. The following research mainly aims to discuss the factor of the choice commercialization of different inventors and to explore the performance of the patent commercialization?

We collected data from official directory of Taipei International Invention Show and Technomart 2007 . We sent out 217 surveys and received 89 effective samples. And then we used variously analytic methods, which included reliability analysis, Independent-Sample Test, relativity analysis, and regression analysis to certify the research effectiveness and hypotheses.

The results are as the following:

1.The commercialized decision factor depends on the inventors’ background.
2.The higher Indication of voluntarily commercialized determining factor of economical features targets, the better performance of financial Indicator is.
3.The higher Indication of voluntarily commercialized determining factor of non-economical features targets, the better performance of non-financial Indicator is.
4.Voluntarily commercialized determining factor has mediating effect on the commercial performance to the inventors of the different background.

一、緒論...........................................................1
1.1研究背景與動機................................................1
1.2研究流程......................................................6
二、文獻探討.......................................................7
2.1發明人概況...................................................10
2.2自行化商品決定因素...........................................11
2.3商品化發展績效之衡量.........................................17
三、研究方法......................................................20
3.1研究架構.....................................................20
3.2研究變項的定義與衡量.........................................21
3.3研究問題與假設...............................................24
3.4抽樣設計及問卷設計...........................................25
3.5資料分析方法.................................................26
3.6量表信效度分析...............................................27
四、資料分析結果..................................................29
4.1敍述性統計分析...............................................29
4.2發明人類別與自行商品化決定因素之分析.........................38
4.3自行商品決定因素與商品化績效之關係...........................44
4.4發明人類型與自行商品化因素對商品化績效影響...................46
五、結論與建議....................................................49
5.1結論.........................................................49
5.2後續研究.....................................................52
參考文獻..........................................................54

1.俞慧芸，2002，“為何獨行？發明人自行專利商品化的原因探討”，「重訪東亞：全球、區域、國家、公民」研討會，台中、中華民國。
2.蕭新煌，1992，“解讀台灣中小企業家與大企業家的創業過程”，中國社會學刊，16，139-167。
3.許士軍，1993，“創業行為、創業研究與創業教育”，管理教育學會，頁281-300，台北。
4.陳昭儀，1990，台灣獨立發明人的現況與商品化困難之研究，國立師範大學，碩士論文。
5.陳昭儀，1990，我國傑出發明家的生涯路，台北：心理。
6.陳麗昭，2000，台灣獨立發明人專利商品化面臨困難之研究，國立雲林科技大學企業管理系，碩士論文。
7.黃寶棟，2005，人格特質、創業動機、創業策略與創業績效之關係研究—以台灣區中小企業創業家為例，國立成功大學，碩士論文。
8.黃建榮 ，2001，台灣獨立發明人之社會資本與商品化模式、創新滿意度之研究，雲林科技大學企業管理系，碩士論文。
9.劉常勇，2002，創業管理的12堂課，天下文化。
10.劉友菁，2006，發明人為主企業化及專業研發廠商之可行性分析，中央大學產經所，碩士論文。
11.何麗英，2001，中部地區都市原住民創業及成功關鍵因素之研究，大葉大學事業經營研究所，碩士論文。
12.陳景堂，2004，統計分析SPSS for Windows入門與應用，儒林出版社。
13.Astebro, T., (2004), ‘Key success factors for technological entrepreneurs’ R&D projects,’ IEEE Transaction on Engineering Management, 51(3): 314-321.
14.Cooke, D. C. (1968), Inventions: That Made History, Toronto: Longmans.
15.Woods, D. R. (1989), “Creativity,” JCST, Feb. , pp.259-261.
16.Robertson, A. (1984), “Characteristics of the Successful Inventor: Some Notes on the Nature of Creativity and the Creative Mind,” Technovation, No.2, pp.141-145.
17.Parker, R. S., Udell, G. G., & Blades, L. (1996), “The New Independent Inventor: Implications for Corporate Policy,” Review of Business, Spring, Vol.17, No.3, pp.7-11.
18.Jardin, L., (1999), Ingenious Pursuits: Building the Scientific Revolution, New York: Talese.
19.Mackinnon, D. (1978), In Search of Human Effectiveness: Identifying and Developing Creativity, New York: Bearly Limited.
20.Gerld G.,Udell, Kenneth G., Baker, Gerld S. Albaum,”Creativity: Necessary, but Not Sufficient.” The Journal of Creative Behavior,1976.10(2), pp.92-103.
21.Livesay, H. C., Lux, D. S. and Brown, M. A.(1996), Human Factors and the Innovation Process. Technovation, Vol.16(4), pp 173-186.
22.Denyse L. Dagenais, Louis Seguin-Dulude and Claude Desranleau,”Analysis of Individual Canadian Inventor Behavior.” Technovation, 1991, Vol.11(6), pp.357-372.
23.Gerld G.,Udell, Kenneth G., Baker, Gerld S. Albaum,”Creativity: Necessary, but Not Sufficient.” The Journal of Creative Behavior,1976.10(2), pp.92-103.
24.Benz, Mathhias, Frey and Bruno S.,”The Value of Autonomy: Evidence of the Self-Employed in 23 Countries.” Working Paper 173, 2003, Zurich: University of Zurich.
25.Waldinger, R., Aldrich, H., & Ward, R.(1990), Opportunities,group characteristics ,and Strategies, In Waldinger et al.(Eds.), Ethnic Entreprenerus:Immigrant Business in Industrial Societies, CA: Sage.
26.Scott, W. G., & Mitchell, T. R. (1976), Organization theory: A structural and behavioral analysis, New York: Irwin.
27.Herbert, T. T. (1976), Dimensions of organizational behavior, New York: Collier Macmillan.
28.Campbell, J. P., & Pritchard, B. R. (1976), Motivation Theory in Industrial and Organizational Psychology, In M.D. Dunnette (ed.), Handbook of Organizational and Industrial Psychology, Chicago: Rand McNally, 63-130.
29.McClelland, D.C. & Winter, D.C., 1969, Motivating economic achievement., New York: The Free Press.
30.Benjamin Gilad and Philip Levine, “A Behavioral Model of Entrepreneurial Supply.” Journal of Small Business Management, October 1986, 45-53.
31.Hisrich, Robert,D. “The Inventor: A Potential Source for New Products” ,The Mid-Atlantic Journal of Business, Vol. 24, No.1, Winter 1985/86, pp.67-80.
32.Wilkin, P.H.,” Entrepreneurship: A Comparative and Historical Study,” Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Publishing C., 1979, PP.280.
33.Hisrich., “Entrepreneurship--Strarting, Developing, and Managing a New Enterprise”,62.
34.Dubini, p., ”The Influence of Motivations and Environment on Business Start-Ups: Some Hints for Public Policies“, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol.4, No.1, January 1989, 11-26.
35.Feldman, H., Koberg, C. S., & Dean, T.(1991), Minority small business owners and their paths to ownership, Journal of small Business Management, 29(4),13-27.
36.Blackburn, R.(1993), Ethnic minority business in Britain, Helsinki School of Economics , April, 1993.
37.Paul D. Reynolds, Michael Hay, and S. Michael Camp., “Global Entrepreneurship Monitor”, Executive Report, 1999.
38.Griffin, Abbie and Albert L. Page (1993) , “An interim report on measuring product development success and failure,” Journal of Product Innovation Management 10: pp. 291-308
39.Souder, William E., and Michael X. Song (1997),“Contingent Product Design and Marketing Strategies Influencing New Product Success and Failure in U.S. and Japanese Electronics Firms”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 14, 21-34.
40.Song, X. Michael and Mark E. Parry (1997),”A Cross-National Comparative Study of New Product Development Processes：Japan and the United States”,”Journal of Marketing”, 61﹙2﹚, (January), pp.1-18.