跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.87) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/02/13 05:27
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:蔡鳳德
研究生(外文):Feng-de Tsai
論文名稱:供應鏈組織間複合或組合關係導向選擇模型之研究
論文名稱(外文):A study on Compound or Portfolio Relationship Oriented Selection Model in Supply Chain
指導教授:陳昭宏陳昭宏引用關係
指導教授(外文):Jao-Hong Cheng
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立雲林科技大學
系所名稱:資訊管理系碩士班
學門:電算機學門
學類:電算機一般學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2008
畢業學年度:96
語文別:中文
論文頁數:78
中文關鍵詞:關係導向選擇模型區別分析約略集合論羅吉特迴歸模型組合關係複合關係
外文關鍵詞:Compound RelationshipPortfolio RelationsLogistic RegressionRough setDiscriminate AnalysisRelations Oriented Selection model
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:209
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
為因應環境多元變化,供應鏈組織間的關係已由簡單關係逐步發展至複雜的複合(Compound)或組合(Portfolio)關係。其目的在於整合內外部資源和維持應變的彈性,以提升公司的競爭優勢。因此,究竟採複合關係導向或組合關係導向較符合公司的整體利益和未來發展型態,已成為現階段相當重要的課題之一。
檢視過去供應鏈組織間關係的相關文獻,大多侷限在各別複合關係和組合關係型態與特性之研究,甚少分析複合或組合關係導向之選擇。由於複合關係與組合關係之基本鏈結架構和特質上的差異,公司會照其本身能力和資源特性,選擇其所需的關係導向。因為複合關係或組合關係所形成的不同關係鏈結能力而產生差異化,因此,有必要分析此兩種關係導向本質的配適性。
藉由多種可能的相關理論架構和訪談進行研究分析和發展複合關係導向與組合關係導向的關係本質及理論結構,並藉由探討供應鏈組織間選擇不同關係導向的理論依據,結合關係本質和選擇理論建構採用不同關係導向之模型。並對所建構模型分析其原理意涵與可能之應用。
實證分析係針對台灣前2000大製造業之廠商為研究主體,並以製造商作為研究單位,而將填答對象設定為與合作夥伴有相關業務往來之單位主管、研發主管或對供應鏈有相關經驗之單位主管填寫。本研究採用郵寄方式進行問卷調查,經催收與整理後,共得有效問卷240份,有效問卷回收率達12%。應用羅吉特迴歸、區別分析及約略集合論實證的結果顯示,本研究的衡量模型皆具備良好的配適度,模型中共12假說,在p<0.1,在不同的考量因子下,皆圈選出在各產業中影響組織之關係模型變項。至於在各產業中分類準確度皆達七成,具備良好的預測分類。
綜合而言,本研究提供供應鏈組織間選擇不同關係導向的之模型,應更能正確且完整的說明供應鏈組織間取得優勢關係、關係穩定度等關鍵因素的理論架構,俾以作為後續從事供應鏈組織關係的研究者和實務界之參考。
Along with the environment changed, the inter-organizational in Supply chain has been transferred from simple relations to complex relations. “Compound or Portfolio Relationship” The main of purpose are integrated external/internal resource and maintained flexible volatility of inter-organizational, to help organization increase the organization’s competitive advantage. However, Facing the organization overall benefits and organizational type perspective, organization should adapt the compound relationship oriented or portfolio relationship oriented to fit their company. There is an important issue to manage their organization relationship for industry. The few research to analyze compound relationship oriented or portfolio relationship oriented selection. The difference of feature and the nature of linkage structure of compound and portfolio relationship, the organization willing to select relational oriented based on its ability and resource by their needs.
Our research uses multiple relative theory and interviews to perform the research. To develop theory model and analyze the nature of relations about compound relationship oriented and portfolio relationship oriented. Use building model to analyze the basic concept and application. The empirical study aims at top 2000 manufactory enterprises selected from the directories of the 2008 Chinese Credit top 2000 firms in Taiwan. Raising the total response to 240, this produced a final response rate of 12%. The results show fine goodness of fit in measuring model and structural model. In addition, 4 hypotheses are supported in p-value<0.1. From the selection point of view, we found that the effect of selection factors was so different at each industry.
In conclusion, the theoretical framework model concerning the influence of the difference selection oriented in Supply Chain model. We hope this research will contribute to further studies and provide some suggestions for implementing management of the relationship between supply chains.
摘 要 i
ABSTRACT ii
致 謝 iii
目錄 iv
表目錄 vi
圖目錄 viii
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景與動機 1
1.2 研究內容與目的 2
1.3 研究方法 2
1.4 研究範圍與限制 3
1.5 研究流程 4
1.6 章節架構 5
第二章 文獻回顧 6
2.1 複合關係 6
2.2 組合關係 8
2.3 選擇複合或組合關係導向之影響因素 10
2.4 羅吉特迴歸模型 15
2.5 區別分析 18
2.6 約略集合論 19
第三章 研究設計 21
3.1 觀念性架構 21
3.2 研究假說 23
3.3 衡量變數定義 26
3.4 複合或組合關係導向模型研究統計模型介紹 30
3.5 約略集合理論模型 32
3.6 抽樣方法與問卷設計 34
第四章 實證分析 35
4.1 樣本基本資料分析 35
4.2 衡量模型評估 40
4.3 實證結果 42
4.4 複合關係導向或組合關係導向選擇模型研究假說分析 51
第五章 結論及建議 54
5.1 結論 54
5.2 建議 56
參考文獻 57
附錄一: 相關係數矩陣 61
附錄二:Rough Set分類規則 62
附錄三:問卷 64
一、中文文獻
1.陳啟政,2003,運用總品質成本分析之供應商績效評估模式,中原大學博士學位論文。
2.楊勝評,1997,製造業廠商區位調整行為模式之研究─台灣資訊電子區位行為分析,台灣大學博士論文。
3.吳思華,知識型產業之評價研究,知識經濟之產業研發暨創新衡量與評估,台北,2001。
4.黃素莉,2003,台灣TFT-LCD廠商對關鍵零組件之統治結構,中原大學碩士論文。
二、英文文獻
1.Anderson, E. & Weitz, B.(1989) “Determinants of Continuity in Conventional Industrial Channel Dyads,” Marketing Science, vol.8(4), 310-323.
2.Anderson, J. C. & Narus, J. A.(1990)“A Model of Distributor Firm and Manufacturer Firm Working Partnerships,” Journal of Marketing, vol.54(1), 42-58.
3.Arthur, W. B.(1989) “Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical Event,” The Economic Journal, vol.99(394), 116-131.
4.Ben-Akiva, M. & Lerman, S. (1985), “Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand,” The MIT Press
5.Bensaou, M. (1999), “Portfolios of Buyer-Supplier Relationships,” Sloan Management Review, vol.40, 35-44.
6.Blau, P. M.(1964)Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
7.Browne, M.W. & Cudeck, R.(1993)”Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen and J. S. Long(Editors):Testing Structural Equation Models,” Sage Publications, 136-162.
8.Brown, J. R. & Lusch R. F. & Muehlingl D. D.(1983) “Conflict and Power-Dependence Relations in Retailer-Supplier Channels,” Journal of Retailing, 59 (4), 53-80.
9.Caniëls, M. & Gelderman, C. J.(2004) ” Buyer-supplier relationship development,” Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 21(Jun)
10.Cook, K. S. & Emerson, R. M. (1978) “Power equity commitment in the exchange networks.” American Sociological Review, 43, 721-739.
11.Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998) “Working Knowledge,” Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
12.Dixon, N. M. (2000) “Common Knowledge: How Companies Thrive By Sharing What They Know,” Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
13.Doney, P. M. & Cannon J. P.(1997) “On Examination of the Nature of Trust in Buyer-Seller Relationships,” Journal of Marketing, 61, 35-51
14.Dwyer, R. F. & Schuur, P. H. & Oh S. (1987) "Developing Buyer-Seller Relationships," Journal of Marketing, vol.51(Apr) 11-27.
15.Etgar, M. (1979) “Sources and Types of Intra-channel Conflict,” Journal of retailing, vol.55(Spr), 61-78.
16.Firat, F.A. & Fuat, A. & Tybout, A.M. & Stern, L.W. (1975) “A Perspective on Conflict and Power in Distribution,” in 1974 Combined Proceedings, Ronald C. Curhan, ed., Chicago: American Marketing, 435-439.
17.Ganesan, S.(1994)”Determinants of Long-Term Orientation in Buyer-Seller Relationships”, Journal of Marketing, vol.58 (2).
18.Gattorna, J. (1978) "Channels of Distribution," European Journal of Marketing, vol.12, 471-512.
19.Grönroos, C. (1996) “Relationship Marketing Logic,” Asia-Australia Marketing Journal, vol.4(1), 7-18
20.Hair, Jr. J. F. & Anderson, R. E. & Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998) Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings. 4th Edition, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
21.Hamel. G. L. D, (1989) “Collaborate with You Competitors and Win,” Harvard Business Review,(Feb), 133-139.
22.Heide, J. B. & John G.(1990), “Alliances in Industrial Purchasing:The Determinants of Joint Action in Buyer-Supplier Relationships,” Journal of Marketing Research , vol.27, 24-36
23.Hendriks, P. (1999) “Why Share Knowledge? The Influence of ICT on the Motivation for Knowledge Sharing,” Knowledge and Process Management, vol.6(2), 91-100.
24.Jap, S. D. (1999) “Pie-Expansion Efforts: Collaboration Processes in Buyer-Supplier Relationships,” Journal of Marketing Research, vol.36(4), 461-475.
25.Jöreskog, K. G. & Sorbom, D. (1993) LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language, Scientific Software International.
26.Kalwani, M. U. & Narayandas, N. (1995) “Long- Term Manufacturing – Supplier Relationships: Do They Pay off for Supplier Firms ?” Journal of Marketing, vol.59, 1-16.
27.Kishore, G. P., & Arun, S. (2003) “Mature relationships: Why does relational orientation turn into transaction orientation? ,” Industrial marketing management, vol.32(Jun), 643-651
28.Lee J. K. & Larry, P. R.(2000) Operations Management: Strategy and Analysis, Fifth Edition, 464-496.
29.Lee, J. & Y. Kim. (1999) “Effect of Partnership Quality on IS Outsourcing Success: Conceptual framework and Empirical Validation,” Journal of Management Information Systems, vol.15(4), 29-61.
30.________. (2001) “The Impact of Knowledge Sharing, Organizational Capability and Partnership Quality on IS Outsourcing Success,” Information & Management, vol.38(5), 323-335.
31.Lewin, J. E. (2003) “An Empirical Investigation of the Effects of Downsizing on Buyer–Seller Relationships,” Journal of Business Research, vol.56(4), 283-293.
32.Maccallum, R. C. & Roznowski, M. & Mar, C. M. & Reith, J. V. (1994) “Alternative Strategies For Cross-Validation Of Covariance Structure Models,” Multivariate Behavioral Research, vol.29(1), 1-32.
33.Malone, T. J. & Yate & Benjamin, R. (1987) “Effects of new information technologies on market structures and corporate strategies,” Communications of the ACM, vol30 (6), 484–497.
34.Mohr, J & Spekman, R.(1994) “Characteristics of Partnership Success: Partnership Attributes, Communication Behavior and Conflict Resolution Techniques,” Strategic Management Journal, vol.15, 135-152
35.Morgan, R. M. & Hunt, S. D. (1994) “The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing,” Journal of Marketing, vol.58(Jul), 20-38.
36.Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995) “The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation,” New York: Oxford University Press.
37._________, Toyama, R. & Konno, N. (2000) “SECI, Ba and Leadership: A Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation,” Long Range Planning, vol.33(1), 5-34.
38.Oliver, C. (1990) “Determinants of Interorganizational Relationship: Integration and Future Directions,” Academy of Management Review, vol.15(2), 241-265.
39.Senge, P. (1998) “Sharing Knowledge,” Executive Excellence, vol.15(6), 11-12.
40.Sher, P. J. & Lee, V. C. (2004) “Information Technology As a Facilitator for Enhancing Dynamic Capabilities Through Knowledge Management,” Information & Management, vol.41(8), 933-945.
41.Simonin, B. L. (1999) “Ambiguity and the Process of Knowledge Transfer in Strategic Alliances,” Strategic Management Journal, vol.20(7), 595-623.
42.Teigen, R. (1997) “Information Flow in a Supply Chain Management System”, Available at http://www.eil.utoronto.ca/profiles/rune/dip-thesis.html.
43.Thorelli, H. B.(1986)"Network: Between Markets and Hierarchies,” Strategic Management Journal, 7, 37-51.
44.Tsai, W. & Ghoshal, S. (1998) “Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Intra-firm Networks,” Academy of Management Journal, vol.41(4), 464-476.
45.Wamsley, G. L. & Zald, M. N.(1973)“The Political Economy of Public Organizations,” Public Administration Review, vol.33(Feb), 62–73.
46.Weitz, B. A. & Jap, S. D. (1995)“Relationship Marketing and Distribution Channels,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, vol.23(4), 305-320.
47.Ross, W. T. Jr. & Roberson, D. C.(2007) “Compound relationships between firms,” Journal of Marketing, vol.71(July), 108-123.
48.Williamson, E. O.(1975) Market and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications, The Free Press.
49.Wilson, J. A.(1980) “Adaptation a uncertainty and small numbers exchange: The New England fresh fish market,” Bell Journal of Economics, vol.11, 491-504.
50.Vokurka, R. J.(1998) “Supplier Partnership: A Case Study,” Production and Inventory Management Journal, vol.39(1), 30-36.
51.Luo, X., & Rindfleisch A. & David K. T. (2007) “Working with Rivals: The Impact of Competitor Alliances on Financial Performance,” Journal of Marketing Research, vol.44(Feb).
52.Zaheer, A. & Venkatraman N. (1995) “Relational governance as an inter-organizational strategy: An empirical test of the role of trust in economic exchange,” Strategic Management Journal vol.16(5), 373 – 392. 
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊