臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究以供應鏈管理的觀點切入，分析互補性投資及互補性資產，與供應鏈管理特質間之關係，並更進一步分析企業之互補性資產透過供應鏈管理特質是否能夠提升企業績效，及供應鏈管理特質透過互補性投資是否能夠提升企業績效。
本研究藉由迴歸模型與共變異結構模型分析各企業對問卷所進行之回答，期能提供產業界在實施供應鏈管理時，如何進行互補性投資及互補性資產的調整之參考依據。研究結果顯示，企業所擁有之生產能力及研發資源有助於供應鏈夥伴間的合作關係及資訊溝通，研究結果也顯示了企業之生產能力並無法只透過供應鏈管理特質來提升企業績效，其必須再透過互補性投資才能有效提升企業績效。

This research analyzed relationships between complementary investments, complementary assets and characteristics of supply chain management in the regard of supply chain management. Moreover, this research analyzed whether complementary assets promote enterprise performance by way of characteristics of supply chain management, and whether characteristics of supply chain management promote enterprise performance by way of complementary investments.
This research analyzed answers of questionnaires of manufacturing industry in Taiwan by regression model and covariance structure model, hoped to provide consultation on how to adjust complementary assets and complementary investments when industry implement supply chain management. The research results suggest that production ability and R&D resource contribute to partnership with supply chain members and information communication between each other. The research results also suggest that production ability promoting enterprise performance by way of characteristics of supply chain management is not enough. Production ability has to promote enterprise performance by way of characteristics of supply chain management and complementary investments.

目錄
圖目錄 iii
表目錄 iv
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景與動機 1
1.2 研究目的 3
1.3 研究貢獻 4
1.4 研究架構與流程 5
第二章 文獻探討與研究假說 7
2.1 供應鏈管理 7
2.2 互補性資產與供應鏈管理 11
2.3 互補性投資與供應鏈管理 14
2.4 企業績效 16
2.4.1 企業績效之衡量 16
2.4.2 互補性資產、供應鏈管理與企業績效 18
2.4.3 互補性投資、供應鏈管理與企業績效 19
第三章 研究設計與方法 22
3.1 研究架構與研究假說 22
3.1.1 研究假說 22
3.1.2 研究架構 23
3.2 變數定義與衡量 24
3.2.1 供應鏈管理特質 24
3.2.2 互補性資產 26
3.2.3 互補性投資 27
3.2.4 企業績效 28
3.3 研究樣本與問卷發放 29
3.4 資料分析方法 30
3.5 實證模型 33
3.5.1 迴歸模型 33
3.5.2 結構方程模型 37
第四章 實證分析 39
4.1 樣本之敘述性統計分析 39
4.1.1 樣本特性分析 39
4.1.2 相關分析 42
4.2 研究構面之信效度檢驗 43
4.3 多元迴歸分析 46
4.4 共變異數結構模式分析 58
4.4.1 衡量模型分析 58
4.4.2 結構模型分析 61
第五章 結論與建議 70
5.1 研究結果與討論 70
5.2 實務管理意涵 76
5.3 研究限制與後續研究建議 77
參考文獻 78
附錄 83

圖目錄
圖1-1 研究流程圖 6
圖2-1 資訊蒐集範圍比較圖 8
圖3-1 研究架構圖 23
圖3-2 結構方程架構圖 38
圖4-1 結構模型分析(供應鏈管理特質、互補性資產與企業績效) 63
圖4-2 結構模型分析(供應鏈管理特質、互補性資產、互補性投資與企業績效) 66
圖5-1 整體關係圖 75

表目錄
表3-1 供應鏈管理特質之變數定義 24
表3-2 供應鏈管理特質之衡量項目 25
表3-3 互補性資產之變數定義 26
表3-4 互補性資產之衡量項目 26
表3-5 互補性投資之變數定義 27
表3-6 互補性投資之衡量項目 27
表3-7 企業績效之變數定義 28
表3-8 企業績效之衡量項目 28
表4-1 樣本公司產業分佈狀況表 40
表4-2 樣本公司成立年數分佈表 41
表4-3 樣本公司員工人數分佈表 41
表4-4 Pearson相關分析 42
表4-5 信度與效度分析 44
表4-6 供應鏈管理特質對企業績效之迴歸分析 47
表4-7 互補性資產對供應鏈管理特質之迴歸分析 48
表4-8 供應鏈管理特質對互補性投資之迴歸分析 50
表4-9 中介效果之迴歸分析(供應鏈管理特質) 52
表4-10 中介效果之迴歸分析(互補性投資) 55
表4-11 迴歸驗證研究假說結果整理表 57
表4-12 驗證性因素分析表 59
表4-13 構面間相關係數彙整表 61
表4-14 第一階段模型之路徑係數表 64
表4-15 第二階段模型之路徑係數表 67
表5-1 研究假說驗證結果整理表 71

中文文獻：
于卓民，1998，國際企業之協調與控制－個案之整理與分析，第三屆企業跨國國際經營管理研討會論文集，台北：輔仁大學管理學院。
司徒達賢，2001，策略管理新論：觀念架構與分析方法，台北：智勝文化。
吳志明、朱素玥、方文昌，2006，供應鏈關係中信任與承諾影響因素之研究－交易成本及社會交換理論觀點，資訊管理學報，第13卷第S期，頁91-118。
呂俊德、黃郁琮，2007，3C事業運籌體系再造及其電子化環境建置之個案研究，電子商務學報，第9卷第3期，頁529-554。
李宗儒、鄭卉方，2001，農企業供應鏈管理之基礎作業－改善內部作業之個案研究，農業經濟半年刊，第69期，頁55-90。
林公孚，2006，供應鏈管理與SCOR模式，品質月刊，第42卷第7期，頁12-18。
林亭汝、謝光偉、游雅雯，2007，以品牌權益觀點探討B2B品牌經營之關鍵成功要素，亞太經濟管理評論，第11卷第1期，頁87-118。
邱皓政，2005，「結構方程模式—LISREL 的論理、技術與應用」，台北：雙葉書廊出版社。
施坤壽，2003，應用資訊系統整合全面品質管理與供應鏈管理建構企業競爭優勢之結構化模式分析－台灣製造產業之驗證與比較，管理評論，第22卷第4期，頁1-33。
徐嘉蓮，2006，供應鏈關係品質對交貨品質以及快速回應的影響，大同大學事業經營研究所碩士論文。
張陽隆，2001，產業群聚成因、廠商行為與組織績效之關連性研究－以台灣高科技產業為例，國立成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
陳東升，1999，高科技產業組織網絡統理架構的內涵及其演變的探討：以台灣積體電路產業封裝部門為例，中山管理評論，第七卷第二期，頁293-324。
陳昱欣、陳穆臻，2001，台灣產業因應供應鏈管理與全球運籌現況之對策，2001年科技與管理學術研討會論文集，頁45-54。
陳家祥、林博文，2001，資訊科技在台灣零售供應鏈應用之研究，資訊管理展望，第3卷第1期，頁1-12。
楊台寧、康傳林、吳鳳儀，2007，台灣資訊電子業全球供應鏈管理之建置與其營運模式關係之研究，多國籍企業管理評論，第1卷第1期，頁55-76。
盧舜年、鄒坤霖，2005，供應鏈管理的第一本書，台北：商周出版。
蕭惟隆、陳禹辰，2001，從互動觀點來探討國內企業如何進行供應鏈整合，資訊管理研究，第三卷第二期，頁88-108
英文文獻：
Anthony, R. N., and V. Govindarajan. 2007. Management Control Systems: McGraw-Hill.
Balakrishnan, S., and B. Wernerfelt. 1986. Technical Chang, Competition, and Vertical Intergration. Strategic Management Journal 7 (4):347-359.
Barclay, D., R. Thompson, and C. Higgins. 1995. The Partial Least Squares Approach to Causal Modeling: Personal Computer Adoption and Use as an Illustration. Technology Studies: Research Methogology Special Issue 2 (2):281-324.
Baron, R. M., and D. A. Kenny. 1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical consideration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (6):1173-1182.
Bollen, K. A., and R. Stine. 1992. Bootstrapping goodness of fit measures in structural equation models. Sociological Methods and Research 21 (2):205-229.
Bontis, N. 1998. Intellectual capital: an exploratory study that develops measures and models. Management Decision 36 (2):63-76.
Boxersox, D. J., and D. J. Cloos. 1996. Logistics Management－The Integrated Supply Chain Process: McGraw-Hill.
Brynjolfsson, E., and L. M. Hitt. 2000. Beyond Computation: Information Technology, Organizational Transformation and Business Performance. Journal of Economic Perspectives 14:23-48.
Byrd, T. A., and N. W. Davidson. 2003. Examining possible antecedents of IT impact on the supply chain and its effect on firm performance. Information＆Management 41:243-255.
Chin, W. W., and P. R. Newsted. 1999. Structural equation modeling analysis with small samples using partial least squares. Edited by H. RH. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Chiu, Y.-C., H.-C. Lai, T.-Y. Lee, and Y.-C. Liaw. 2008. Technological diversification, complementary assets, and performance. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 75:875-892.
Contractor, F. J. 1990. Contractual and Cooperative Forms of International Business : Towards a Unified Theory of Modal Choice. Management International Review 1 (1):31-54.
Daft, L. R. 2001. Organization Theory and Design. 7 ed. Cincinnati: South-Western College.
Dehning, B., V. J. Richardson, and R. W. Zmud. 2007. The financial performance effects of IT-based supply chain management systems in manufacturing firms. Journal of Operations Management 25 (4):806-824.
Demirag, I. S. 1987. Assessing Foreign Subsidiary Performance: The Currency Choice of U.K. MNCs. Journal of International Business Studies 19:257-276.
Doney, P., and J. P. Cannon. 1997. An Examination of the Nature of Trust in Buyer-Seller Relationships. Journal of Marketing 61:35-51.
Dyer, J. H. 1997. Effective Interfirm Collaboration: How Firms Minimize Transaction Costs and Maximize Transaction Value. Strategic Management Journal 18 (7):535-556.
Eng, T. Y. 2005. The Influence of a Firm''s Cross-Functional Orientation on Supply Chain Performance. Journal of Supply Chain Management 41:4-16.
Fisher, M. L. 1997. What is the Right Supply Chain for Your Product? Harvard Business Review 75 (2):105-116.
Fornell, C., and D. Larcker. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variable and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 18:39-50.
Ganesan, S. 1994. Determinants of Long-Term Orientation in Buyer-Seller Relationships. Journal of Marketing 58:1-19.
Guieford, J. P. 1965. Fundamental Statistics in Psychology and Education. NY: McGraw-Hill.
Hair, J. F., R. E. Anderson, R. L. Tatham, and W. C. Black. 1998. Multivariate Data Analysis. 5th ed. NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Handfield, R. B., and C. Bechtel. 2002. The Role of Trust and Relationship Structure in Improving Supply Chain Responsiveness. Industrial Marketing Management 31 (4):367-382.
Hendricks, K. B., V. R. Singhal, and J. K. Stratman. 2007. The Impact of Enterprise Systems on Corporate Performance: A Study of ERP, SCM, and CRM System Implementations. Journal of Operations Management 25:65-82.
Hite, J. M. 2000. Patterns of Multidimensionality in Embedded Network Ties of Emerging Entrepreneurial Firms. In Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management. Toronto.
Iacovou, C. 1995. Electronic Data Interchange and Small Organizations: Adoption and Impact of Technology. MIS Quarterly 19 (4):465-485.
Kaiser, H. F. 1974. An index of Factorial Simplicity. Psychomertrika 39:31-36.
Kale, P., H. Singh, and H. Perlmutter. 2000. Learning and Protection of Proprietary in Strategic Alliances: Building Relation Capital. Strategic Management Journal 21 (2):217-231.
Karlsson, C., and P. Ahlstrom. 1996. The Difficult Path to Lean Product Development. Journal of Product Innovation Management 13:283-295.
Koh, S. C. L., and A. Gunasekaran. 2006. A knowledge management approach for managing uncertainty in manufacturing. Industrial Management & Data Systems 106 (4):439-459.
Kohli, A. K., and B. J. Jaworski. 1990. Market orientation: the construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing 54:1-18.
Laudon, K. C., and J. P. Laudon. 2006. Management information system: managing the digital firm. 9 ed: Prentice Hall.
Laumann, E. O. 1982. Microstructural Analysis in Interorganizational Systems. Social Networks 4 (4):329-348.
Lummus, R. R., R. J. Vokurka, and K. L. Alber. 1998. Strategic Supply Chain Planning. Production and Inventory Management Journal:49-58.
Majchrzak, A., C. M. Beath, R. Lim, and W. W. Chin. 2005. Management Client Dialogues During Information Systems Design to Facilitate Client Learning. MIS Quarterly 29 (4):653-672.
Moberg, C. P., T. W. Speh, and T. L. Freese. 2003. SCM: Making the Vision a Reality. Supply Chain Management Review:34-39.
O’Callaghan, R., P. J. Kaufmann, and B. R. Konsysnski. 1992. Adoption Correlates and Share Effects of Electronic Data Systems in Marketing Channels. Journal of Marketing 56:45-56.
Panizzolo, R. 1998. Applying the Lessons Learned from 27 Lean Manufacturers: The Relevance of Relationships Management. International Journal of Production Economics 55:223-240.
Poter, M. E. 1985. Competitive Advantage, Free Press, New York.
Rockart, J. F., and J. E. Short. 1989. IT in the 1990s: Managing organizational interdependence. Sloan Management Review:7-17.
Ross, D. 1997. Completing through Supply Chain Management: Creating Market Winning Strategies Through Supply Chain Partnerships. London: Chapman & Hall.
Rothaerme, F. T. 2001. Complementary assets, strategic alliances, and the incumbent''s advantage: an empirical study of industry and firm effects in the biopharmaceutical industry. Research Policy 30 (8):1235-1251.
Russell, L. P., V. Sambamurthy, and R. W. Zmud. 2001. The assimilation of knowledge platforms in organizations: an empirical investigation. Organization Science 12 (2):117-135.
Scott, T. W., and P. Tiessen. 1999. Performance measurement and managerial teams. Accounting, Organizations and Society 24:263-285.
Simchi-Levi, D., P. Kaminsky, and E. Simchi-Levi. 1999. Designing and Managing the Supply Chain：Concepts, Strategies, and Cases. IL: McGraw-Hill.
Stump, R. L., and V. Sriram. 1997. Employing Information Technology in Purchasing: Buyer-Supplier Relationships and Size of the Supplier Base. Industrial Marketing Management 26:127-136.
Tan, K. C. 2002. Supply Chain Management: Practices, Concerns, and Performance Issues. Journal of Supply Chain Management 38 (1):42-53.
Tanriverdi, H., and T. W. Ruefli. 2004. The role of information technology in risk/return relations of firms. Journal of The Association for Information Systems 5 (11-12):421-447.
Taylor, P., and J. Lowe. 1997. Are functional assets or knowledge assets the basis of new product development performance? Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 9 (4):473-488.
Teece, D. J. 1986. Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Policy 15:285-305.
Tracey, M., J. S. Lim, and M. A. Vonderembse. 2005. The Impact of Supply Chain Management Capabilities on Business Performance. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 10 (3):179-191.
Venkatraman, N. 1994. IT-enabled business transformation: From Automation to Business Scope Redefinition. Sloan Management Review 35 (2):73-87.
Wold, H. 1985. Systems analysis by partial least squares. Edited by P. Nijkamp, H. Leitner and N. Wrigley. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Zantout, Z. 1994. External Capital Market Control, Corporate Restructuring, and Firm Performance during The 1980s. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 21:37-65.
Zhu, K., K. L. Kraemer, and S. Xu. 2002. A Cross-Country Study of Electronic Business Adoption Using the Technology-Organization-Environment Framework. In ICIS 2002 Best Paper: Conference Theme, 337-348.