跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(34.204.169.230) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/02/21 23:20
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:林怡珊
研究生(外文):Yi Shan Lin
論文名稱:新創事業投資對廠商知識內涵之影響
論文名稱(外文):The impact of corporate venturing investments on the knowledge profile
指導教授:林舒柔林舒柔引用關係
指導教授(外文):S. J. Lin
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:長庚大學
系所名稱:企業管理研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:其他商業及管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2009
畢業學年度:97
論文頁數:60
中文關鍵詞:新創事業投資知識深度知識廣度
外文關鍵詞:Corporate venturing investmentsKnowledge depthKnowledge scope
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:159
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
企業創新活動是企業持續成長的主要動力之一,企業透過新創事業投資為公司開創新產品或技術窗口,進而達成其策略性目標。當企業進行新創事業投資時,對於隨後知識創新的關係皆為正向關係,但對於新創事業投資的轉投資屬性與產出知識做連結時,過去的文獻完全沒有將新創事業投資的轉投資屬性與產出知識各別深入探討,因此,當企業進行投資時,是否會因為新創事業投資的轉投資屬性不同,而使廠商的知識內涵受到影響,為本研究欲探討之議題。
本研究目的在探討不同的新創事業投資的轉投資屬性與企業知識內涵的關係。蒐集2000年到2007年上市、上櫃與興櫃之IC設計公司,於研究觀察期間有50家IC設計公司進行轉投資且擁有專利。本研究將新創事業投資的轉投資屬性定義為「轉投資領域」、「轉投資多樣性」與「轉投資家數」,知識的內涵定義為「知識廣度」與「知識深度」,實證結果發現「轉投資的領域」、「轉投資的多樣性」與「轉投資家數」皆對「知識廣度」有顯著正向關係的影響;「知識深度」與「轉投資多樣性」呈現顯著負向關係。
本研究主要貢獻:一、以往研究並沒有深入探究新創事業投資的轉投資屬性,因此限制了此類研究所提供的管理意涵,一家公司進行新創事業投資包含多種轉投資屬性,本研究深入探究新創事業投資的轉投資屬性,這些屬性包括「轉投資領域」、「轉投資多樣性」與「轉投資家數」,補足了過去文獻之缺口。二、本研究將母公司知識的內涵進一步分為知識的廣度與深度,以實證數據證實新創事業投資的轉投資屬性將影響其隨後產出的知識內涵。

關鍵詞:新創事業投資、知識深度、知識廣度
Innovation is vital for firm growth. Corporate venturing investments are identified as a strategic way for enhancing innovation, since it stimulates new product development and create a window on novel technologies. Previous studies showed that corporate venturing investments affect subsequent knowledge creation for corporate investors. However, the link between attributes of investment portfolio and knowledge profile has not been examined in depth. This study seeks to bridge the research by exploring how different configurations of corporate venturing investment portfolio influence the corporate investors’ knowledge outcomes (i.e., knowledge diversity and knowledge depth). Our empirical analyses are based on the panel data from listed IC design companies during year 2000 to 2007. We found that, investment diversity was negative and significantly correlated with the knowledge depth. Investment domain, investment diversity and number of investments were positively and significantly correlated with the knowledge scope.
The main contribution of this study: Firstly of all, in the past, the heterogeneity of the investment lead to vague studies. Therefore, this study got beyond the existing literature limit, we separate the meaning of corporate venturing investment portfolio into investment domain, investment diversity and number of investments. Secondly, this study separated knowledge profile into depth and scope. Our empirical data which has confirmed the corporate venturing investment portfolio will have an impact on the knowledge profile.

Keywords: Corporate venturing investments; Knowledge depth; Knowledge scope
目錄

指導教授推薦書
口試委員審定書
長庚大學博碩士論文著作授權書誌謝 iii
誌謝 iv
摘要 v
ABSTRACT vi
圖目錄 ix
表目錄 ix
第一章 緒論 - 1 -
1.1 研究背景 - 1 -
1.2 研究動機 - 1 -
1.3 研究目的 - 2 -
1.4 論文流程 - 4 -
第二章 文獻探討 - 5 -
2.1 新創事業投資與知識 - 5 -
2.2 影響企業透過新創事業投資知識吸收累積之因素 - 7 -
2.3 知識的內涵與衡量 - 9 -
第三章 研究假說 - 12 -
3.1 知識深度假說 - 12 -
3.2 知識廣度假說 - 14 -
第四章 研究方法 - 16 -
4.1 研究概念圖 - 16 -
4.2 樣本資料結構說明 - 17 -
4.3 研究變項之定義 - 20 -
4.4 資料分析方法 - 24 -
第五章 實證結果 - 27 -
5.1 敘述性統計分析 - 27 -
5.2 相關係數分析 - 34 -
5.3 迴歸分析 - 36 -
第六章 結論與建議 - 39 -
6.1 研究結論 - 39 -
6.2 本研究重要貢獻 - 39 -
6.3 管理意涵 - 40 -
6.4 研究限制與建議 - 41 -
參考文獻 - 42 -
壹、網站資料 - 42 -
貳、英文文獻 - 43 -
附錄 - 47 -
附件一 - 47 -
附件二 - 48 -
附件三 - 50 -

圖目錄
圖1-1 論文流程圖 4
圖4-1 研究概念圖 18

表目錄

表4-1 IC設計產業公司名稱一欄表 18
表4-2 應變數與自變數衡量方法 23
表5-1 變數敘述統計表 30
表5-2 IC設計產業樣本結構特徵分析 31
表5-3 IC設計公司轉投資領域分佈 32
表5-4 IC設計公司前十大技術領域 33
表5-5 相關係數矩陣表 35
表5-6 知識深度迴歸分析模型 37
表5-7 知識廣度迴歸分析模型 38
壹、網站資料
公開資訊觀測站http://newmops.tse.com.tw/
台經院產經資料庫http://tie.tier.org.tw/tie/index.jsp
台灣經濟新報資料庫http://www.tej.com.tw/twsite/
全國商工行政服務網http://gcis.nat.gov.tw/index.jsp
財政部稅務入口網http://www.mof.gov.tw/
經濟部智慧財產局http://oldweb.tipo.gov.tw/

貳、英文文獻
Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 425-455.
Ahuja, G., & Katila, R. (2001). Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal, 22(3), 197-220.
Altman, J. W., & Zacharakis, A. (2003). An integrative model for corporate venturing. Journal of Portfolio, Euromoney Publicatons PLC.
Anand, B. N., & Galetovic, A. (2000). Weak property rights and holdup in R&D. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 9(4), 615-642.
Block, Z., & MacMillan, C. (1993). Corporate venturing: creating new businesses within the firm. Harvard Business Press.
Bierly, P. E. I., & Chakrabarti, A. K. (1996). Technological learning, strategic flexibility, and new product development in the pharmaceutical industry. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 43(4), 386-380.
Campbell, A., Birkinshaw, J., Morrison, A., & Van Basten Batenburg, R. (2004). The
future of corporate venturing. MIT Sloan Management Review, 45(1), 30-37.
Cartin, E. (2005) Corporate venturing: A financing Cinderella. Corporate finance. Accountancy Ireland, 37(3), 95-107.
Chesbrough, H. W. (2002). Making sense of corporate venture capital. Harvard Business Review, 80(3), 90.
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152.
Cohen, W., Nelson, R. & Walsh, J. (2002). Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why US manufacturing firms patent (or not). Management Science, 48(1), 1-23.
Dushnitsky, G., & Lenox, M. J. (2005a). When do firms undertake R&D by investing in new ventures? Strategic Management Journal, 26(10), 947-965.
Dushnitsky, G., & Lenox, M. J. (2005b). When do incumbents learn from entrepreneurial ventures? Corporate venture capital and investing firm innovation rates. Research Policy, 34(5), 615-639.
Dushnitsky, G., & Lenox, M. J. (2006). When does corporate venture capital investment create firm value? Journal of Business Venturing, 21(6), 753-772.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Tabrizi, B. N. (1995). Accelerating adaptive processes: Product innovation in the global computer industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(1), 84-110.
Gans, J. S., & Stern, S. (2003). The product market and the market for "ideas": Commercialization strategies for technology entrepreneurs. Research Policy, 32(2), 333-350.
Garcia-Vega, M. (2006). Does technological diversification promote innovation? An empirical analysis for European firms. Research Policy, 35(2), 230-246.
Gavetti, G., & Levinthal, D. (2000). Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(1), 113-137.
Hill, C. W. L., & Rothaermel, F. T. (2003). The performance of incumbent firms in the face of radical technological innovation. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 257-274.
Hoetker, G. & Agarwal, R. (2004). Death hurts, but it isn't fatal: The post-exit diffusion of knowledge created by innovative companies. UIUC working paper.
Inkpen, C. A., & Crossan, M. M. (1995). Believing is seeing: Joint ventures and organization learning. Journal of Management Studies, 32(5), 595-618.
Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and Effort. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Katila, R., & Ahuja, G. (2002). Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. The Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1183-1194.
Keil, T. (2004). Building external corporate venturing capability: Initial conditions, learning processes and knowledge management. Journal of Management Studies, 41(5), 799-825.
Keil, T., Maula, M., Schildt, H., & Zahra, S. A. (2008). The effect of governance modes and relatedness of external business development activities on innovative performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29(8), 895-907.
Lerner, J. (1995). Patenting in the shadow of competitors. Journal of Law and Economics, 38, 563-595.
Levinthal, D., & March, J. G. (1981). A model of adaptive organizational search. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 2(4), 307-333.
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87.
Markham, S. K., Gentry, S. T., Hume, D., Ramachandran, R., & Kingon, A. I. (2005). Strategies and tactics for external corporate venturing. Research Technology Management, 48(2), 49-59.
Mcgrath, R. G. (1999). Falling forward: Real options reasoning and entrepreneurial failure. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 13-30.
Narayanan, V. K., Yang, Y., & Zahra, S. A. (2009). Corporate venturing and value creation: A review and proposed framework. Research Policy, 38(1), 58-76.
Nicholls-Nixon, C. L., & Woo, C. Y. (2003). Technology sourcing and output of established firms in a regime of encompassing technological change. Strategic Management Journal, 24(7), 651-666.
Ocasio, W. (1997). Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 18(SPEC. ISS.), 187-206.
Palepu, K. (1985). Diversification strategy, profit performance and the entropy measure. Strategic Management Journal, 6(3), 239-255.
Pisano, G. P. (1991). The governance of innovation: Vertical integration and collaborative arrangements in the biotechnology industry. Research Policy, 20(3), 237-249.
Roberts, E. B., & Berry, C. A. (1985). Entering new businesses: Selecting strategies for success. Sloan management review, 26(3), 3-17.
Rosenkopf, L., & Nerkar, A. (2001). Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management Journal, 22(4), 287-306.
Schildt, H. A., Maula, M. V. J., & Keil, T. (2005). Explorative and exploitative learning from external corporate ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(4), 493-515.
Veugelers, R. (1997). Internal R&D expenditures and external technology sourcing. Research Policy, 26(3), 303-315.
Volberda, H. W. (1996). Towards the flexible form: How to remain vital in hypercompetitive environments. Organization Science, 7(4), 359-387.
Wadhwa, A., & Kotha, S. (2006). Knowledge creation through external venturing: Evidence from the telecommunications equipment manufacturing industry. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 819-835.
Yost, M., & Devlin, K. (1993). The state of corporate venturing. Venture Capital Journal, 33(3), 37-40.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top