跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.9.173) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/01/18 02:17
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:陳怡君
研究生(外文):Yi-Chun Chen
論文名稱:海運資訊平台關鍵功能認知與重要度分析
論文名稱(外文):Cognition map and importance analysis of shipping information platform key functions
指導教授:林成蔚林成蔚引用關係
指導教授(外文):Cheng-Wei Lin
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:開南大學
系所名稱:物流與航運管理學系
學門:運輸服務學門
學類:運輸管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2009
畢業學年度:97
語文別:中文
論文頁數:72
中文關鍵詞:資訊平台多準則決策(MCDM)決策實驗室分析法(DEMATEL)網路分析法(ANP)
外文關鍵詞:MT-NetTrade-VanMultiple Criteria Decision Making(MCDM)Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory(DEMATEL)Analytic Netw
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:286
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:2
台灣位居亞洲樞紐,航運扮演著相當重要的角色。為維持航運的競爭力,有效率的貨物通關成為需要被探討的關鍵項目。目前在台灣有兩種資訊平台- Maritime Transport Network,簡稱為MT-Net與Trade- Van。MT-Net的主要功能是提供港口及航運的相關資訊;Trade-Van的功能是提供貨物通關服務。為了提供一個整合的資訊系統與加強台灣競爭力,此二系統有必要加以整合。整合資訊平台牽涉到發展方向及相關功能,因此,需要確定與評估資訊平台之關鍵功能。本研究嘗試使用多準則決策(MCDM)方法達到本研究目的,因此應用決策實驗室分析法(Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory,DEMATEL)建構認知圖,確定網路架構之關聯性及影響程度。並依此結果,利用Saaty於1996年發展出網路分析法(Analytic Network Process,ANP),建立網路架構圖,求取功能之權重,確定與評估資訊平台之關鍵功能。本研究發現於DEMATEL結果中,各因子彼此之間總影響程度最大為「關貿網路資料庫」,經適當門檻值篩選後,得知「航政監理」、「港埠作業」相對於「通關」和「資料交換」的關聯度是獨立的狀況,而此因果圖所呈現之結果與國內目前資訊平台的狀況是完全相同的,研究結果同時顯示,此結果實為部分忽略資訊平台使用者需求之結果。ANP結果分析,其相關權重排名第一為「海關資料庫」,而部份「資料交換」和「航政監理」比「港埠作業」和「海關通關」重要。
Shipping business plays a vital role at Taiwan as the hub in Asia. To maintain the competitiveness of shipping, efficient cargo clearances has become the key issue to be discussed. Currently, there are two shipping information platforms in Taiwan, the MT-Net and the Trade-Van. The MT-Net provides the port and shipping information service and the Trade-Van provides the service of cargo clearances. To provide an integrated information system, and strengthen the competitiveness of Taiwan, these two systems need to be consolidated. Before consolidation, the first step is to identify the key functions needed by the industry. In this research, we try to apply Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) to construct the cognition map of the functions of platforms which are connected and influenced respectively. Besides, Analytic Network Process (ANP) will be applied, developed by Saaty in 1986, to identify the relative weight of each function. The cognition map is constructed by the analysis of DEMATEL. The cognition map of total relationship, after cutting the influences of functions moderately, reveals the situations that the shipping business in Taiwan faced currently; however, the cognition map constructed by the cut influence can not describe the true demand of the shipping business. After the analysis of ANP, relative weight ranked first is customs data base, and some of functions in the data exchange and maritime administration is more important than port operation and customs clearance.
第一章 緒論1
第一節 研究背景與動機1
第二節 研究目的 2
第三節 研究架構 3
第四節 研究內容 3
第五節 研究流程 4
第二章 文獻回顧 6
第一節 國外海運資訊平台現況分析 6
第二節 國內海運資訊平台現況分析 8
第三節 研究方法相關文獻 24
第三章 研究方法 26
第一節 決策實驗室分析法(DECISION MAKING TRIAL AND EVALUATION LABORATORY, DEMATEL) 26
第二節 網路分析法(ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCESS, ANP) 30
第三節 一致性模糊偏好關係法(CONSISTENT FUZZY PREFERENCE RELATIONS) 34
第四章 海運資訊平台關鍵功能分析 37
第一節 平台功能認知分析 37
第二節 平台功能重要度分析 42
第三節 討論 49
第五章 結論與建議 54
參考文獻 56
附錄 59
附錄一 相互影響關係矩陣 59
附錄二 海運資訊平台整合分析之關聯性問卷調查 60
附錄三 海運資訊平台功能整合分析之重要性問卷調查 64
王天津、陳盈秀(2005)。模糊偏好關係與AHP在實施先進製造技術(AMT)預測上之比較研究。中華管理學報,6(3),61-72頁。
交通部運輸研究所 (2006)。全球運籌與貨櫃資訊系統應用整合規劃之研究。台北:交通部運輸研究所。
紀岱玲(2005)。供應商績效評估研究-結合ANP及DEMATEL之應用。未出版碩士論文,國立政治大學資訊管理研究所,台北市。
鄭亦真(2006)。台灣地區發展單一航運貨櫃資訊平台之探討。未出版碩士論文,開南大學航運與物流管理研究所,桃園縣。
鄭書季(2005)。多目標模糊偏好規劃法求解AHP及ANP優先權重。未出版碩士論文,國立暨南大學資訊管理研究所,南投縣。
Chiu, Y. J., Chen, H. C., Tzeng, G. H., & Shyu, J. Z. (2006). Marketing strategy based on customer behavior for the LCD-TV. International Journal of Management and Decision Making, 7(2/3), 143–165.
Chung, S. H., Lee, H. I. & Pearn, W. L. (2005). Analytic network process (ANP) approach for product mix planning in semiconductor fabricator. International Journal of Production Economics, 96(1), 15-36.
Herrera, V. E., Herrera, F., Chiclana, F. & Luque M. (2004). Some Issues on Consistency of Fuzzy Preference Relations. European Journal of Operational Research, 154(1), 98-109.
Hori, S. & Shimizu, Y. (1999). Designing methods of human interface for supervisory control systems. Control Engineering Practice, 7(11), 1413–1419.
Huang, J. J., Tzeng, G. H. & Ong, C. S. (2005). Multidimensional data in multidimensional scaling using the analytic network process. Pattern Recognition Letters, 26(6), 755-767.
Lee, J. W. & Kim, S. H. (2000). Using analytic network process and goal programming for interdependent information system project selection. Computers & Operations Research, 27(4), 367-382.
Li, C.W. & Tzeng, G. H. (2009). Identification of a Threshold Value for the DEMATEL Method Using the Maximum Mean De-Entropy Algorithm to Find Critical Services Provided by a Semiconductor Intellectual Property Mall. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(6), 9891-9898.
Lin, C. J. & Wu, W. W. (2008). A causal analytical method for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(1), 205-213.
Neaupane, K. M. & Piantanakulchai, M. (2006). Analytic network process model for landslide hazard zonation. Engineering Geology, 85(3), 281-294.
Promentilla, M. A. B., Furuichi, T., Ishii, K. & Tanikawa, N. (2008). A fuzzy analytic network process for multi-criteria evaluation of contaminated site remedial countermeasures. Journal of Environmental Management, 88(3), 479-495.
Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process (1st ed.), Pittsburgh: RWS Publications.
Saaty, T. L. (1999). Fundaments of the Analytic Network Process. Paper presented at the international symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Kobe, Japan., Kobe, Japan.
Saaty, T. L. (2006). Rank from comparisons and from ratings in the analytic hierarchy/network processes. European Journal of Operational Research, 168(2), 557-570.
Seyed-Hosseini, S. M., Safaei, N. & Asgharpour, M. J. (2006). Reprioritization of failures in a system failure mode and effects analysis by decision making trial and evaluation laboratory technique. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 91(8), 872-881.
Tamura, M., Nagata, H., & Akazawa, K. (2002). Extraction and systems analysis of factors that prevent safety and security by structural models. Paper presented at 41st SICE annual conference, Osaka, Japan.
Tsai, W. H., & Chou, W. C. (2009). Selecting management systems for sustainable development in SMEs: a novel hybrid model based on DEMATEL, ANP, and ZOGP. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(2), 1444-1458.
Tseng, M. L. (2009). A causal and effect decision making model of service quality expectation using grey-fuzzy DEMATEL approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(4), 7738-7748.
Tseng, M. L.(2009). Using the extension of DEMATEL to integrate hotel service quality perceptions into a cause- effect model in uncertainty. Expert System with Applications, 36(5), 9015-9023.
Tzeng, G. H., Chiang, C. H. & Li, C. W. (2007). Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: A novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL. Expert Systems with Applications, 32(4), 1028-1044.
Wu, W. W. & Lee, Y. T. (2007). Developing global managers’ competencies using the fuzzy DEMATEL method. Expert Systems with Applications, 32(2), 499–507.
Wu, W. W. (2008). A hybrid approach to IT project selection-DEMATEL and ANP. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, 5(6), 361-371.
Wu, W. W. (2008). Choosing Knowledge management strategies by using a combined ANP and DEMATEL approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 35(3), 828–835.
Yu, R. & Tzeng, G. H. (2006). A soft computing method for multi-criteria decision making with dependence and feedback. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 180(1), 63-75.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top