跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(98.82.140.17) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/09/08 01:58
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:張鎧麟
論文名稱:以結構方程模式探討組織創新與智慧資本之因果關係─以中科院與工研院為例
論文名稱(外文):Using Structural Equation Modeling to Examine Causality between Organizational Innovation and Intellectual Capital: A Case of CSIST and ITRI
指導教授:林麗雪林麗雪引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:明新科技大學
系所名稱:企業管理研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2009
畢業學年度:97
語文別:中文
論文頁數:74
中文關鍵詞:組織創新智慧資本結構方程模式中科院工研院
外文關鍵詞:Organizational InnovationIntellectual CapitalSEMCSISTITRI
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:501
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:128
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
由於全球化與價值觀念多元化,知識、經驗與技術之整合已成為企業的重要能力。企業必須持續創造新知識,並將這些知識深入且廣泛的傳遞給組織的所有成員,有效增加智慧資本,以獲得競爭優勢。本研究旨在探討組織創新對智慧資本之因果關係,透過結構方程模式(SEM)進行兩階段驗證法,探討組織創新對智慧資本之因果關係。本研究以中科院與工研院為研究對象,針對兩機構之員工發放問卷,共回收228份有效樣本。組織創新可分為管理創新與技術創新兩個次構面;智慧資本則可分為人力資本、結構資本與關係資本三個次構面。研究架構有兩個模型,模型一以組織創新對智慧資本之影響;模型二即以組織創新的兩個次構面研究架構對智慧資本的三個次構面之影響。實證結果顯示組織創新對智慧資本存在正向影響。管理創新對人力資本、結構資本與關係資本之影響皆不顯著;技術創新對人力資本、結構資本與關係資本存在正向影響。顯示當組織創新程度愈高,愈能創造更多的智慧資本。對研究機構而言,技術創新對智慧資本的影響遠重要於管理創新。
Because of globalization and diversification of values, the integration of knowledge, experience and technology has become the important capability for companies. Companies must continually create new knowledge that can be quickly turned to new technology or products and transfer these knowledge to the members belonging to the organizations. These will make corporations create more intellectual capital (IC) to gain competitive advantages. This research aims to know the relationship between Organizational Innovation (OI) and IC by adapting the method of the Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), and by examining the causality of OI and IC in a two-step test. The 300 subjects who answer of the survey are the employees of Chung-shan Institute of Science and Technology and Industrial Technology Research Institute in Taiwan. The surveys are 228 effective samples received. The qustionary consists of a set OI sections and IC sections. OI consists of two sub-dimensions, Administer Innovation (AI) and Technique Innovation (TI). IC consists of three sub-dimensions, Human Capital (HC), Structural Capital (SC) and Relation Capital (RC). There are two models in the research framework. Model 1 is the causality of OI and IC. Model 2 is the causality of two sub-dimensions of OI and three dimensions of sub-dimensions of IC. The result of this study shows that OI has a significant positive influence on IC. AI has respectively no significant influence on HC, SC and RC. However, TI has respectively significant influence on HC, SC and RC. To conclude, this study indicates that the higher OI is gained, the more IC can be created. To the two research organizations, the influence on IC from TI is greater than that from AI.
中文摘要 i
英文摘要 ii
謝辭 iii
目錄 iv
表目錄 vi
圖目錄 vii
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景與動機 1
1.2 研究目的 3
1.3 研究流程與論文架構 3
1.3.1研究流程 3
1.3.2論文架構 4
第二章 文獻探討 6
2.1 組織創新 6
2.1.1組織創新定義 6
2.1.2組織創新類型 9
2.2 智慧資本 11
2.2.1智慧資本定義 11
2.2.2智慧資本之分類 12
2.2.3智慧資本衡量指標 15
2.3 組織創新與智慧資本之關聯性 17
第三章 研究方法 19
3.1 研究架構 19
3.2 研究假設 22
3.3 研究變數與操作型定義 24
3.4 問卷設計與研究對象 25
3.4.1問卷設計 25
3.4.2研究對象 26
3.5 資料分析方法 27
第四章 實證結果與分析 31
4.1 敘述性統計分析 31
4.2 資料檢測 33
4.3 驗證性因素分析(CFA) 34
4.4 整體模型評鑑與分析 43
4.4.1整體模型之評鑑(模型一) 43
4.4.2整體模型之評鑑(模型二) 44
4.4.3整體模型之結果分析 46
4.5 結果與討論 47
第五章 結論與建議 49
5.1 研究結論 49
5.2 管理意涵 50
5.3 研究限制 51
5.4 建議與後續研究 51
參考文獻 53
附錄一 組織創新與智慧資本之量表 63

中文部份
1. 方世榮(2005)。智慧資本價值精練術─如何將公司無形資產轉化為市場價值,初版。台北:五南圖書。(Sullivan, P. H. (2000). Value-driven intellectual capital: How to convert intangible corporate assets into market value. New York: Wiley.)
2. 王怡文(2005)。組織創新與人力資源管理之研究。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
3. 台灣經濟研究院(2005)。健全我國智慧資本交易環境之研究。行政院研究發展考核委員會編印。
4. 林義屏、黃俊英與董玉娟(2004)。市場導向、組織學習、組織創新與組織績效間關係之研究:以科學園區資訊電子產業為例。管理評論,第23卷第1期,101-134頁。
5. 林燦螢(2007)。智慧資本發展與組織創新。T&D飛訊,第3卷,1-6頁。
6. 林麗雪與李界賢(2008)。智慧資本與知識分享之實證研究─以高科技產業為例。全球服務科學管理評論與實務學術研討會,1255-1266頁。
7. 林麗雪與莫茜淯(2008)。智慧資本與組織信任關聯性之研究─以高科技產業為例。2008年中華商管科技學會年會暨─兩岸商管科技合作暨創新學術研討會。
8. 李自平(2001)。我國醫療產業智慧資本之衡量。義守大學管理學科研究所碩士論文。
9. 李亭宜(2007)。智慧資本、組織文化對組織創新與組織績效影響之研究。銘傳大學國際企業學系碩士班碩士論文。
10. 李界賢(2008)。智慧資本與知識分享之實證研究─以高科技產業為例。明新科技大學企業管理碩士班碩士論文。
11. 吳安妮(2002)。剖析智慧資本。會計月刊,第204期,57-66頁。
12. 吳永昌(2007)。智慧資本、組織創新、顧客關係管理與組織績效之關聯性研究─以票券金融公司為例。國立成功大學企業管理學系碩士專班論文。
13. 汪美伶與徐治齊(2006)。組織創新與組織績效─人力資源管理系統之干擾效果。人力資源管理學報,第6卷第3期,45-69頁。
14. 吳思華(1998)。知識流通對產業創新的影響。第七屆產業創新管理研討會論文集,2-42頁
15. 吳思華與許牧彥(2005)。智慧資本策略思維。台灣智慧資本研究中心電子報,第1期,2005/01/18。
16. 杜敏綺(2003)。組織知識促進因素、組織知識產生要素、組織文化與智慧資本之關聯性研究。國立成功大學工業管理研究所碩士論文。
17. 邱皓政(2008)。結構方程模式:LISREL的理論技術與應用,初版。台北:雙葉書廊。
18. 卓鴻賓(2005)。從知識經濟發展談知識管理層面上的領導新變革。T&D飛訊,第31期,1-11頁。
19. 徐木蘭(2006)。我們這一班:組織創新要素。管理雜誌,第384期,254-255頁。
20. 財團法人工業技術研究院網站(2008)。2009年4月28日,取自:http://www.itri.org.tw/chi/。
21. 秦夢群與濮世緯(2006)。學校創新經營理念與實施之研究。教育研究與發展期刊,第2卷第3期,123-150頁。
22. 莊立民(2002)。組織創新模式建構與實證之研究─以台灣資訊電子業為例。國立成功大學企業管理研究所博士論文。
23. 陳玉玲(1999)。組織內人力資源的蓄積─智慧資本管理之觀點。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
24. 國防部軍備局中山科學研究院網站(2009)。2009年5月16日,取自:http://cs.mnd.gov.tw/。
25. 陳昆宏(2007)。組織創新、智慧資本、知識移轉與組織績效之關聯性研究。大葉大學人力資源暨公共關係學系碩士在職專班碩士倫文。
26. 陳明惠譯(2007)。智慧資本管理實務,初版。台北:華泰文化(Roos, G., Stephen Pike & Lisa Fernström (2006). Managing Intellectual Capital in Practice. Elsevier Pte. Ltd.)
27. 陳美純(2001)。資訊科技投資與智慧資本對企業績效影響之研究。國立中央大學資訊管理研究所博士論文。
28. 陳美純(2002)。智慧資本─理論與實務。台中:滄海書局。
29. 張淑娟(2008)。中小企業家創新精神對組織創新之影響:智慧資本與敬業貢獻度的中介角色。國立彰化師範大學會計學系企業高階管理碩士論文。
30. 陳鴻基(2006)。專題報導─管理與生活:科技管理。科學發展,第399期,26-33頁。
31. 莫茜淯(2008)。智慧資本與組織信任之關聯性研究─以高科技產業為例。明新科技大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
32. 黃芳銘(2007)。結構方程模式:理論與應用,第五版。台北:五南圖書。
33. 楊子江與王美音譯(1997)。創新求勝:智價企業論。台北:遠流出版(Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H., (1995). The knowledge creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation, Oxford University Press, Inc.)
34. 楊世瑩(2008)。SPSS統計分析實務,第二版。台北市:旗標出版。
35. 蔡青姿(2004)。醫學雷射美容消費意向模式建構之實證研究─結構方程式之應用。國立中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
36. 蔡啟通、黃國隆與高泉豐(2001)。組織因素、組織成員整體創造性與組織創新之關係。管理學報,第18卷第4期,527-566頁。
37. 蕭文龍(2007)。多變量分析最佳入門實用書─SPSS+LISREAL(SEM),台北:□峰資訊。
38. 簡文娟(1999)。組織創新氣候評鑑量表之建立─以高科技產業為實證研究對象。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
39. 國立政治大學商學院台灣智慧資本研究中心與財團法人資訊工業策進會資訊市場情報中心主編(2006)。智慧資本管理,台北:華泰文化。
英文部分
1. Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organization. In B. M. Staw. & L. L. Cummings (Eds), Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 123-167.
2. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education (1985). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
3. Armbruster, H., Bikfalvi, A., Kinkel, S., & Laya, G. (2008). Organizational innovation: The challenge of measuring non-technical innovation in large-scale surveys. Technovation, 28(10), 644-657.
4. Bagozzi, R. P. & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Mareting Research, 16, 74-94.
5. Betz, F. (1987). Managing technology-competing through new ventures-Innovation, and corporate research. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
6. Bhartesh, K. R. & Bandyopadhyay, A. K. (2005). Intellectual capital: Concept and its measurement. Finance India, 19(4), 1365-1374.
7. Blau, J. R. & McKinley, W. (1979). Ideas, complexity, and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 200-219.
8. Bontis, N. (1996). There’s a price on your head: Managing intellectual capital strategically. Ivey Business Quarterly, 10(4), 40-47.
9. Bontis, N. (1999). Managing organizational knowledge by diagnosing intellectual capital: Framing and advancing the state of the field. International Journal of Technology Management, 18(5/6/7/8), 433-462.
10. Burgess, G.. H. (1989). Industrial Organization. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
11. Cabrita, M. & Vaz, J. (2006). Intellectual capital and value creation: Evidence from the Portuguese banking industry. The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(1) 11-20.
12. Castro, G. M. & Sáez, P. L. (2008). Intellectual capital in high-tech firms. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 9(1), 25-36.
13. Chang, S. C. & Lee, M. S. (2007). The effects of organizational culture and knowledge management mechanisms on organizational innovation: An empirical study in Taiwan. The Business Review, Cambridge, 7(1), 295-301.
14. Chang, S. C. & Lee, M. S. (2008). The linkage between knowledge accumulation capability and organizational innovation. Journal of Knowledge Management, 12(1), 3-20.
15. Chen, J., Zue, Z. & Xie, H. Y. (2004). Measuring intellectual capital: A new model and empirical study. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5(1), 195-213.
16. Daft, R. L. (1978). A dual-core model of organizational innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 21(2), 193-210.
17. Damanpour, F. & Evan, W. M. (1984). Organizational innovation and performance: the problem of organizational lag. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 392-409.
18. Damanpour, F. & Evan, W. M. (1990). The adoption of innovation overtime: Structural characteristics and performance of organizations. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Decision Science Institute, San Diego.
19. Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555-590.
20. Dougherty, D. & Bowman, E. H. (1995). The effects of organizational downsizing of product innovation. California Management Review, 37(4), 28-44.
21. Drucker, P. F. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship: Practice and principles. London: Heinemann.
22. Dzinkowski, R. (2000). The measurement and management of intellectual capital: An introduction. Management Accounting, 78(2), 32-36.
23. Edvinsson, L. (1997). Developing intellectual capital at Skandia. Long Range Planning, 30(3), 366-373.
24. Edvinsson, L. & Malone, M. S. (1997). Intellectual capital: Realizing your company’s true value by finding it’s hidden roots. New York: Harper Business.
25. Edvinsson, L., Dvir, R. Roth, N. & Pasher, E. (2004). Innovations: The new unit of analysis in the knowledge era: The quest and context for innovation efficiency and management of IC. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5(1), 40-58.
26. Gobeli, D. H. & Brown, D. J. (1987). Analyzing product innovations. Research Management, 30(4), 25-31.
27. Gumusluoglu, L. & Ilsev, A. (2008). Transformational leadership, creativity, and organizational innovation. Journal of Business Research, 62(4), 461-473.
28. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham R. L., Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). U.K.: Prentice Hall
29. Henderson, R. M., & Clark, K. B. (1990). Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 9-30.
30. Hendriks, P. (1999). Why share knowledge? The influence of ICT on motivation for knowledge sharing. Knowledge and Process Management, 6(2), 91-100.
31. Higgins, J. M. (1995). The core competence: Innovation. Planning Review, 23(2), 32-35.
32. Holt, K. (1988). The role of the user in product innovation. Technovation, 7(3), 249-258.
33. Hu, L. & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55.
34. Johne, A. (1998). Using mark vision to steer innovation. Technovation, 19(4), 203-207.
35. Johnson, W. H. (1999). An integrative taxonomy of intellectual capital: Measuring the stock and flow of intellectual capital components in the firm. International Journal of Technology Management, 18(5/6/7/8), 562-575.
36. Kanter, R. M. (1988). When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 169-211.
37. Kaplan, R. S. & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balance scorecard measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, Jan.-Feb., 71-79.
38. Kaplan, R. S. & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balance scorecard –translating strategy into action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
39. Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.
40. Knight, D. J. (1999). Performance measure for increasing intellectual capital. Strategy & Leadership, 27(2), 22-27.
41. Lin, C. Y. (2006). A study on the organizational innovations in Taiwan’s logistics Industry. The Business Review, 5(1), 270-275.
42. Liao, S. H., Fei, W. C. & Liu, C. T. (2008). Relationships between knowledge inertia, organizational learning and organization innovation. Technovation, 28(4), 183-195.
43. Lumpkin, G. T. & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135-172.
44. Lynn, B. (1998). Intellectual capital, CMA Magazine, 72(1), 10-15.
45. Mansfield, E. (1975). International technology transfer: Forms. Journal of American Economic Association, 68(2), 28-37.
46. Martínez-Torres, M. R. (2006). A procedure to design a structural and measurement model of intellectual capital: An exploratory study. Information & Management, 43, 617-626.
47. Masoulas, V. (1998). Organizational requirements definition for intellectual capital management. International Journal Technology Management, 16(1/2/3), 126-144.
48. Molyneux, A. (1998). IC and the ASCPA: seeking competitive advantage. Australian CAP, 68(5), 27-28.
49. Mouritsen, J., Bukh, P. N., Larsen, H. T. & Johansen, M. R. (2002). Developing and managing knowledge through intellectual capital statements. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 3(1), 10-29.
50. Nahapiet, J. & Ghoshal, S. (1997). Social capital, intellectual capital, and organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–267.
51. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometrics Methods. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
52. OECD (1996). The knowledge-based economy report. Paris.
53. Pablos, P. (2004). Measuring and reporting structural capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 3(2), 522-539
54. Porter M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. New York: Simon and Schuster.
55. Robbins, S. P. (1996). Organizational behavior: Concepts, controversies and applications. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
56. Roos, J., Roos, G., Edvinsson, L. & Dragonetti, N. C. (1997). Intellectual capital: Navigation in the new business landscape. New York: New York University Press.
57. Russell, R. D. (1995). An investigation of some organizational correlates of corporate entrepreneurship: Toward a systems model of organizational innovation. Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Change, 4(4), 295-314.
58. Scott, S. G. & Burce, R. A. (1994). Determinates of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607.
59. Schepers, J., Schnell, R. & Vroom, P. (1999). From ideas to business─how Siemens bridges the innovation gap. Research Technology Management, 42(3), 26-31.
60. Senge, P. (1997). Sharing knowledge. Executive Excellence, 14(11), 17-20.
61. Shell, S. A., Pedigo, P. R. & Krewiec, G. M. (1995). Managing the impact of information technology on human resource management. Handbook of Human Resource Management, 339-359
62. Skaikh, J. M. (2004). Measuring and reporting of intellectual capital performance analysis. The journal of American Academy of Business, March, 439-448.
63. Stewart, T.A. (1997). Intellectual capital: The new wealth of organizations. New York: Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing.
64. Subramanian, A. & Nilakanta, S. (1996). Organization innovativeness: Exploring the relationship between organization determinants of innovation, types of innovations, and measures of organizational performance. Omega, International Journal of Management Science, 24(6), 631-647.
65. Schumann, P. A., Prestwood, D. C., Tong, A. H. & Vanston, J. H. (1994). Innovate: Straight path to quality, customer delight and competitive advantage. New York: Mcgraw-Hill.
66. Tushman, N. L. & Nadler, D. A. (1986). Organizing for innovation. California Management Review, 28, 74-92.
67. Ulrich, D. (1998). Intellectual capital equals competence × commitment. Sloan Management Review, 39(2), 15–26.
68. Watkins, K. E., Ellinger, A. D. & Valentine, T. (1999). Understanding support for innovation in a large-scale change effort: The manager-as-instructor approach. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 10(1), 63-79.
69. Wolfe, R. A. (1994). Organizational innovation: Review, critique and suggested research directions. Journal of Management Studies, 31(3), 405-430.
70. Yamin, S., Mavondo, F., Gunasekaran, A. & Sarros, J. C. (1997). A study of competitive strategy, organizational innovation and organizational performance among, Australian manufacturing companies, International Journal of Production Economics, 52(2), 161-172.

連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top