(3.238.96.184) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/05/08 02:41
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果

詳目顯示:::

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:劉力維
研究生(外文):Li-Wei Liu
論文名稱:在不同生命週期下董事會組成特性對公司經營績效之影響
論文名稱(外文):The Relationship between Characteristics of Board Directors and Firm’s Performance : A Test of the Life Cycle Hypothesis
指導教授:許永聲許永聲引用關係
指導教授(外文):Yung-Sheng Shu
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立中興大學
系所名稱:會計學研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:會計學類
論文種類:學術論文
畢業學年度:97
語文別:中文
論文頁數:65
中文關鍵詞:生命週期董事會組成特性代理理論管家理論資源依賴理論
外文關鍵詞:Life cycleCharacteristics of board directorsAgency theoryStewardship theoryResource dependence theory
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:4
  • 點閱點閱:267
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
本研究探討在不同的生命週期下,董事會組成特性對公司經營績效是否有不同程度上的影響,以1996年到2007年間台灣上市櫃公司資料進行實證觀察。本文參考Anthony and Ramesh ( 1992 ) 的方法,將銷貨成長率、資本支出率、公司成立年度以及綜合指標做為生命週期判斷因子。
實證結果顯示,企業處於成長階段,董事長兼總經理對公司績效有正向影響,但在成熟與衰退階段,則會不利於公司績效。外部董事比率對於處在成長期之公司績效影響為負向,但並不明顯,而對處於成熟期與衰退期的公司績效則有明顯提升效果。董事規模在各生命週期階段對公司績效均產生不利的效果,尤其在成長期時,負向影響公司績效的情況更為明顯。董事持股比率與公司績效具正向關聯性,在成熟期與衰退期階段,提升公司績效之效果較為明顯。
This study is to investigate the relationship between characteristics of board directors and firm’s performance for a differential stage in a firm’s life cycle, and the data was collected from various industries listed in the Taiwan stock exchange during 1996-2007. According to the firm’s life cycle of Anthony and Ramesh (1992), we use sales growth rate (SG), capital expenditures rate (CEV), establishment years (AGE), and composite score as life cycle descriptors.
The empirical results show that the firm’s performance is better when the chairman of the board is the CEO in the stage of growth, but in the stage of mature and decline, the chairman of the board is the CEO will harm firm’s performance. The external director rate is negatively related to the firm’s performance in the stage of growth, but in the stage of mature and decline, which can promote firm’s performance significantly. In any stage, the board size is negatively related to the firm’s performance, and it has much influence in the stage of growth than in the stage of mature and decline. Finally, the share ownership of directors is positively associated with firm’s performance, and in the stage of mature and decline, the effect of promoting firm’s performance is more conspicuous.
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第三節 研究流程 4
第二章 文獻探討與假說發展建立 5
第一節 企業資源需求 5
第二節 董事會組成結構與假說 9
第三章 研究方法 16
第一節 樣本來源 16
第二節 變數定義與衡量 19
第四章 實證結果分析 26
第一節 敘述統計 26
第二節 變異數分析 31
第三節 多變量迴歸模型實證結果分析 36
第四節 敏感性分析 50
第五章 結論 54
第一節 結論 54
第二節 研究限制 56
參考文獻 58
一、中文部分
李馨蘋、詹凱玲,2007,「股權結構、董事會組成與公司績效之關係-以家族與非
家族企業之角度」,當前會計理論與實務研討會。
侍台誠,1994,「董事會特性中家族因素與經營績效之實證研究-兼論法人董事的
影響」,國立台灣大學,會計系研究所未出版碩士論文。
金成隆、林修葳、邱煒�琚A2005,「研究發展支出與資本支出的價值攸關性:以
企業生命週期論析」,中山管理評論,第13卷,第2期,頁617-643。
金成隆、林修葳、紀信義,2004,「專利權的價值攸關性:從企業生命週期論析」,
管理學報,第21卷,第2期,頁175-197。
洪永昌,2004,「企業生命週期與融資策略」,國立台灣科技大學,財務金融所碩
士論文。
陳冠仲,2005,「董事會特性及組成與現金增資公司長期績效關連性研究」,國立
成功大學,財務金融研究所碩士論文。
陳貴端,2005,「公司治理經濟法律制度之探討:以公司內部治理結構與組織運
作為中心」,律師雜誌,第310期,頁 18-37。
高蘭芬,2001,「董監事股權質押之代理問題對會計資訊與公司績效之影響」,國
立成功大學,會計學研究所博士論文。
黃旭輝、王育偉,2006,「績效不佳的經理人會被撤換嗎?」,證券市場發展季刊,
第18卷,第4期。
張瑞當、方俊儒、曾玉琦,2007,「核心代理問題與盈餘管理:董事會結構與外
部監督機制之探討」,第24卷,第1期,頁17-39。
曹壽民、紀信義、陳光政,2006,「企業生命週期對商標權價值攸關性之影響」,
企業管理學報,第69卷,第6期,頁39-72。
楊朝旭、黃潔,「企業生命週期、資產組合與企業未來績效關連性之研究」,商管
科技季刊,第5卷,第1期,頁49-71。
楊嘉斌,2005,「軟體產業策略性人力資源雇用構築之初探:以企業生命週期觀
點」,崑山科技大學,資訊管理系碩士論文。
廖秀梅,2004,「董事會結構特性與公司績效關係之研究-探討台灣家族控制企業
因素的影響」,國立台北大學,會計學系研究所博士論文。
二、西文部分
Anthony, J. H. and K. Ramesh, 1992, “Association Between Accounting Performance
Measures and Stock Prices”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol.15, pp. 203-277.
Bacon, J., 1973, “Corporate Directorship Practices: Membership and Committees of
The Board”, New York: The Conference Board.
Baliga, B. R., N. C. Moyer and R. S. Rao, 1996,“CEO Duality and Firm Performance:
What’s the Fuss”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.17, No.1, pp.41-53.
Baysinger, B. and H. Butler, 1985, “Corporate Governance and the Board of Directors:Performance Effects of Changes in Board Composition”, Journal of Law,
Economics and Organization, Vol.1, pp.101-134.
Beasley, M. S. 1996, “An Empirical Analysis of the Relation Between the Board of
Director Composition and Financial Statement Froud”, The Accounting Review, Vol.71, No.4, pp.443-465.
Beatty, R. E. and E. J. Zajac, 1994, “Managerial Incentives, Monitoring, and Risk
Bearing: A Study of Executive Compensation, Ownership, and Board Structure in Initial Public Offerings”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.39, pp.313-335.
Black, E. L., 1998, “Which Is More Value Relevant: Earnings or Cash Flows ? A Life
Cycle Examination”, Journal of Financial Statement Analysts, Vol.4, pp.40-56.
Boyd, B., 1990, “Corporate Linkages and Organizational Environment: A Test of the
Resource Dependence Model”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.11, pp.419-430.
Boyd, B. K, 1995, “CEO Duality and Firm Performance: A Contingency Model”,
Strategic Management Journal, Vol.16, No.4, pp.301-312.
Chandler, A. D., 1962, “Strategy and Structure”, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chava, S., M. Dierker and D. Livdan, 2004, “Do Shareholder Rights Affect the Cost
of Bank Loans”, The University of Houston Working Paper.
Dahya, J., A. A. Lonie and D.M. Power, 1996, “The Case for Separating the Roles of
Chairman and CEO:An Anaylsis of Stockmarket and Accounting Data”, Corporate Governance :An International Review, No.4, pp.71-77.
Daft, R. L., 2004, “Organization Theory and Design”, South-Western ,8th Ed.
Daily, C. and D. Dalton, 1993, “Board of Directors Leadership and Structure: Control
and Performance Implications”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, No.17, pp.65-81.
Daily, C. and D. Dalton, 1994, “Bankruptcy and Corporate Governance: The Impact
of Board Composition and Structure”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol.37,No.6, pp.1603-1617.
Dalton, D. R., C. M. Daily, A. E. Ellstrand, and J. L. Johnson, 1998, “Mate-Analytic
Reviews of Board Composition, Leadership Structure and Financial Performance”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.19, pp.269-290.
Davis, J. H., F. D. Schoorman and L. Donaldson, 1997,“Toward a Stewardship
Theory of Management”, The Academy of Management Review, Vol.22, No.1,
pp.20-47.
Dechow, P. M., R. G. Sloan and A. P. Hutton, 1996, “Causes and Consequences of
Earnings Manipulation: An Analysis of Firm Subject to Enforcement Actions by the SEC”, Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol.13, No.2, pp.1-36.
Demsetz, H. and K. Lehn. 1985, “The Structure of Corporate Ownership: Causes and
Consequences”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 93, pp.1155-1177.
Dodge, H. J. and J. E. Robbins, 1992, “An empirical Investigation of the
Organizational Life Cycle Model for Small Business Development and Survival”, Journal of Small Business Management, Vol.30(1), pp.27-37.
Donaldson, L. and J. H. Davis, 1991, “Stewardship Theory or Agency Theory: CEO
Governance and Shareholder Returns”, Australian Journal of Management, Vol.16, pp.49-64.
Fama, E., 1980, “Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm”, Journal of Political
Economy , Vol.88, pp.288-307.
Fama, E. and M. Jensen, 1983, “Separation of Ownership and Control”, Journal of
Law and Economics, Vol.26, pp.301-325.
Francis, J. R., I. K. Khurana and R. Pereira, 2005, “Disclosure Incentives and Effects
on Cost of Capital Around the World”, The Accounting Review, Vol.80, pp.1125-1162.
Greiner, L. E., 1972, “Evolution and Revolution as Organizations Grow”, Harvard
Business Review, Vol.50(4), pp.37-56.
Gupta, A. 1987, “SBU Strategies, Corporate-SBU Relations, and SBU Effectiveness
in Strategy Implementation”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol.30, pp.477-500.
Haire, M., 1959, “Biological Models and Empirical History of the Growth of
Organizations.” , In M. Haire (Ed.) Modern Organizational Theory, pp.272-306.
Heracleous, L., 2001, “What is the Impact of Corporate Governance on
Organizational Performance?”, Conference Papers, Vol.9, No.3, pp.165-173.
Hillman, A. J., A. A. Cannella and R. L. Paetzold, 2000, “The Resource Dependence
Role of Corporate Directors: Strategic Adaptation of Board Composition in Response to Environmental Change”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol.37, pp.235-254.
Jawahar, I. M. and L. McLaughlin, 2001, “Toward a Descriptive Stakeholder Theory:
An Organizational Life Cycle Approach”, Academy of Management Preview, Vol.26, No.3, pp.397-414.
Jensen, M. C., 1993, “The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of
Internal Control System”, Journal of Finance, Vol.48, pp.831-880.
Jensen, M. C. and W. H. Meckling, 1976, “Theory of the Firm:Managerial Behavior,
Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure.”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.3, pp.305-360.
John, K. and L. W. Senbet, 1998, “Corporate Governance and Board Effectiveness”,
Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol.22, pp.371-403.
Johnson, J., C. Daily and A. Ellstrand, 1996, “Boards of Directors: A Review and
Research Agenda”, Journal of Management, Vol.22, pp.409-438.
Katz, D. and R. L. Kahn, 1978, “The Social Psychology of Organizations”, New York: Wiley.
Kesner, I. F., 1987, “Directors Stock Ownership and Organization Performance: An
Investigation of Fortune 500 Companies”, Journal of Business Research, Vol.16, pp.235-249.
Lynall, M.D., B. R. Golden and A. J. Hillman, 2003, “Board Composition From
Adolescence To Maturity: A Multitheoretic View”, The Academy of Management Review, Vol.28, No.3, pp.416-431.
McConnell, J. J. and H. Servaes, 1990, “Additional Evidence on Equity Ownership
and Corporate Value”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.27, No.2, pp.595-612.
Miller, D. and P. H. Friesen, 1984, “A Longitudinal Study of the Corporate Life
Cycle”, Management Science, Vol.30(10), pp.1161-1183.
Morck, R., A. Shleifer and R.W. Vishny, 1988, “Management Ownership and Market
Valuation: An Empirical Analysis”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.20, pp. 293-315.
Ocasio, W., 1994, “Political Dynamics and the Circulation of Power: CEO Succession
in U.S. Industrial Corporations, 1960–1990”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.39, pp.285-312.
Patton, A. and J. C. Baker, “Why Won’t Directors Rock the Boat”, Harvard Business
Review, Vol.65, NO.6, pp.10-18.
Pfeffer, J.,1972, “Size and Composition of Corporate Boards of Directors”,
Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.21, pp.218-228.
Pfeffer, J. and G. R. Salancik, 1978,“The External Control of Organizations: A
Resource Dependence Perspective”, New York: Harper and Row.
Pi, L. and S. G. Timme, 1993, “Corporate control and bank efficiency”, Journal of
Banking and Finance, Vol.17, pp. 515-530.
Quinn, R. E. and K. Cameron, 1983, “Organizational Life Cycles and Shifting Criteria
of Effectiveness: Some Preliminary Evidence”, Management Science, Vol.29, No.1, pp. 33-51.
Rechner, P. L. and D. R. Dalton, 1991,“CEO Duality and Organizational Performance: A Longitudinal Analysis”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.12, No.2,
pp.155-160.
Shalit, S. S. and U. Sankar, 1977, “The Measurement of Firm Size”, The Review of
Economics and Statistics, Vol.59, No.3, pp.290-298.
Smith, K. G., T.R. Mitchell, and C. E. Summer, 1985, “Top Level Management
Priorities Lndifferent Stages of the Organizational Life Cycle”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol.28, pp.799-820.
Weisbach, M., 1988, “Outside Directors and CEO Turnover”, Journal of Financial
Economics, Vol.20, pp.431-460.
Williamson, O., 1984, “Corporate governance”, Yale Law Journal Q2, pp.1197-1229.
Yermack, D., 1996, “Higher Market Valuation of Companies with a Small Board of
Directors”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.40, pp.185-211.
Zahra, S. A. and J. A. Pearce, 1989, “Boards of Directors and Corporate Financial
Performance: A Review and Integrative Model”, Journal of Management, Vol.15, pp. 291-344.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
系統版面圖檔 系統版面圖檔