跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.87) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/12/09 05:51
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:蕭榮智
研究生(外文):Rong-jr Xiao
論文名稱:公司創新行為與市場反應
論文名稱(外文):Exploratory Behaviors and Market Valuation
指導教授:張紹基張紹基引用關係
指導教授(外文):Shao-chi Chang
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立成功大學
系所名稱:企業管理學系碩博士班
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2009
畢業學年度:97
語文別:英文
論文頁數:39
中文關鍵詞:市場評價負債比例
外文關鍵詞:exploration orientationfinancial constraints
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:211
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
自從1991年March將廠商的創新行為分為Exploration與Exploitation兩種之後,創新行為背後的策略意涵也成為近年來廣為討論的管理議題。儘管創新行為背後代表了公司重要的策略意涵,卻甚少文獻研究市場投資人對於這兩種創新行為的反應,以及其他財務指標對於公司創新行為的影響。基於此原因,本文針對廠商的Exploration行為進行研究,Exploration著眼於未來的機會,創造需求與未來的競爭優勢,本文預期市場將給予Exploration的創新正向的評價。另外,本文亦研究了公司的資本結構以及Financial Constraints如何影響市場對於廠商Exploration創新的評價。
本研究針對2007年Scoreboard中167間美國的廠商,從2001到2005年連續五年,橫跨七個不同的產業部門共835個觀察值,並利用廠商的R&D Intensity分為High/Medium/Low三個部門,當廠商有越高的R&D Intensity,代表在這個部門中,科技變動較大,也隱含著廠商有較佳的成長機會。
結果顯示市場對於廠商進行Exploration的創新給予正面的評價,此效果在High R&D Intensity的組別中更加顯著。這代表當廠商所面臨較高的科技變動時,市場上的投資人越支持廠商進行Exploration的創新。另外,結果顯示當廠商的負債比例越低時,市場的投資人將給與廠商Exploration的創新越正面的評價,市場將隨著廠商負債比率的下降而更支持廠商進行Exploration的創新;另一方面,在廠商面臨較高的科技變動時,當廠商的Financial Constraints程度越低,市場則越支持廠商進行Exploration的創新行為。
本研究以財務的角度探討創新行為,希望本文的發現可以為未來更深入的研究提供方向與建議。
Since March sparked the issue of exploration and exploitation in 1991, the strategic implications behind innovative behaviors have been an issue in managerial fields. However, there are few researchers take financial perspectives into consideration when studying innovative behaviors. Thus, financial perspectives were taken to study the exploration orientation of the firms. Exploration innovations were defined as innovations for future opportunities and create demand and future competitive advantages. This article proposed that investors in the stock market would give positive reactions to exploration orientation of the firms. Besides, capital structure and financial constraints were also studied as major moderators in this article.
In this article, 835 observations are from 167 U.S. firms out of 2007 Scoreboard, across 2001-2005 and 7 different industries segments. Also, samples were separated into 3 groups by R&D intensity. It implies a higher technological growing opportunities in high R&D intensity group, and lower technological growing opportunities in low R&D intensity group.
The result showed that market would give positive reactions to exploration orientation of firms, and it’s more significant in high R&D intensity group. That is, investors in the market were more likely to support exploration when firms faced high technological growing opportunities. Besides, investors would give more supports to firms’ exploration orientation when they have lower debt ratios. On the other hand, in high R&D intensity group, investors would give more supports to exploration of the firms when they have lower financial constraints.
Financial perspectives were taken in this article, and the finding could provide directions and suggestions for future studies.
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
1-1 Research Background and Motivations 1
1-2 Research Objectives 3
1-3 The Organization of This Study 4
Chapter 2 Literature Review and Hypothesis 6
2-1 Market Reaction 6
2-2 Exploration Orientations 7
2-3 Financial Moderators 9
2-3-1 Capital Structure 10
2-3-2 Financial Constraints 13
Chapter 3 Research Design and Methodology 15
3-1 Samples and Data Collection 15
3-2 The Conceptual Framework 16
3-3 Measures and Dependent Variables 17
3-4 Independent Variables and Financial Moderators 19
3-4-1 Relative exploration orientation 19
3-4-2 Financial Data and Moderators 19
Chapter 4 Statistic Result 22
4-1 Descriptive Statistics of variables 22
4-2 Hausman Test 23
4-3 The Fixed Effect Model 24
4-4 Hypothesis Test 26
4-5 Sensitivity Analysis 27
4-6 Result summary 31
Chapter 5 Discussion 32
5-1 Implication 32
5-1-1 Market reaction to exploration orientation of firms 32
5-1-2 Financial Moderator: Capital structure 33
5-1-3 Financial Moderator: Financial constraints 34
5-2 Future research 35
Reference 36
Anandhi S. Bharadwaj, Sundar G. Bharadwaj, Benn R. Konsynski Source. Information Technology Effects on Firm Performance as Measured by Tobin's q Management Science, Vol. 45, No. 7 (Jul., 1999), pp. 1008-1024

Barton SL, Gordon PJ. 1987. Corporate strategy: useful perspective for the study of capital structure? Academy of Management Review 12: 67–75.

Basu, S., 1983, The relationship between earnings yield, market value, and return for NYSE common stocks: Further evidence, Journal of Financial Economics 12, 126-156.

Baum, J.A.C., Li, S.X., and Usher, J.M. 2000. Making the next move: How experiential and vicarious learning shape the locations of chains’ acquisitions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45: 766–801.

Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. 2002. Process management and technological innovation: A longitudinal study of the photography and paint industries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47: 676–706.

Bromiley P. 1991. Testing a causal model of corporate risk taking and performance. Academy of Management Journal 34: 37–59

Bourgeois LJ. 1981. On the measurement of organizational slack. Academy of Management Review 6: 29–39.

Baird, Douglas G. and Robert K. Rassmussen, 2006, Private Debt and the Missing Lever of Corporate Governance, University of Pennsylvania Law Review 154, 1209-1252.

Chan, Louis K.C., Yasushi Hamao, and Josef Lakonishok, 1991, Fundamental and stock returns in japan, Journal of Finance 46, 1739-1764.

Chen, K. C., J. Lee. 1995. Accounting measures of business perfor- mance and Tobin's q theory. J. Accounting, Auiditing and Finance 10(Summer) 587-607.

Cockburn, I., Z. Griliches. 1988. Industry effects and appropriability measures in the stock market's valuation of R&D and patents. AEA Papers and Proceedings 78(May) 419-423.

DeBondt, Werner F. M., and Richard H. Thaler , 1987, Further evidence on investor overreaction and stock market seasonality, Journal of Finance 42, 557-581.
Fama, Eugene F., and Kenneth R. French, 1992, “ The cross-section of expected stock returns”, Journal of Finance 47, 427-465.

Froot KA, Scharfstein DS, Stein JC. 1993. Risk management: coordinating corporate investment and financing policies. Journal of Finance 48: 1629–1658.

Hall, B. H. 1993. The stock market's valuation of R&D investment during the 1980's. AEA Papers and Proceedings 70(2) 259-264.

He, Z.-L., & Wong, P.-K. 2004. Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15: 481–494.

Hirschey, M. 1982. Intangible capital aspects of advertising and R&D expenditures. J.Indutst. Econom. 30(June) 375-390.

Jaffe, Jeffrey, Donald B. Keim, and Randolph Westerfield, 1989, Earnings yields, market values, and stock returns, Journal of Finance 44, 135-148.

John Graham and Campbell Harvey, The Theory and Practice of Corporate Finance, Journal of Financial Economics.2001
Jonathan P. O’brien. 2003. The capital structure implications of pursing a strategy of innovation. Strategic Management Journal 24: 415–431

Kent Daniel and Sheridan Titman, 2003, Market Reactions to Tangible and Intangible Information, NBER Working Paper No. W9743.

Koza, M.P., & Lewin, A.Y. 1998. The co-evolution of strategic alliances. Organization Science, 9: 255–264.

Lakonishok, Josef, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert W. Vishny, 1994, Contrarian investment, extrapolation and risk, Journal of Finance 49, 1541-1578.

Lang, L.H.P., R.H. Litzenberger. 1989. Dividend announcements: cash flow signalling vs. free cash flow hypothesis Journal of Financial Economic. 24 181-191.

Lowe, and Taylor (1998) Jordan J, Lowe J, Taylor P. 1998. Strategy and financial policy in UK small firms. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 25: 1–27.

March J. 1991, Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science 2(1): 71–87.

Rafael La Porta, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, Andrei Shleifer, Robert Vishny, 2000. Investor protection and corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics 58 (2000) 3 27

Rosenberg, Barr, Kenneth Reid, and Ronald Lanstein, 1985, “Persuasive evidence of market inefficiency”, Journal of Portfolio Management 11, 9-17.

Simerly RL, Li M. 2000. Environmental dynamism, capital structure and performance: a theoretical integration and an empirical test. Strategic Management Journal 21(1): 31–49.

Stattman, Dennis, 1980, Book values and stock returns, The Chicago MBA: A Journal of Selected Papers 4, 25-45.

Tobin, J. 1969. A general equilibrium approach to monetary theory. J. Money, Credit and Banking l (February) 15-29.

Tobin, J. 1978. Monitary policies and the economy: the transmission mechanism. Southern Economic Journal. 37(April) 421-431.

Winter, S. G., G. Szulanski. 2001. Replication as strategy. Organization Science .12 730–743.
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top