跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(3.229.137.68) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/07/25 16:33
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:陳郁喬
研究生(外文):Yu-chiao Chen
論文名稱:知識商務之技術型知識商品價值評估方法研究
論文名稱(外文):Development of a Technological Knowledge Product Valuation Method for knowledge Commerce
指導教授:陳宗義陳宗義引用關係陳裕民陳裕民引用關係
指導教授(外文):Tsung-Yi ChenYuh-Min Chen
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立成功大學
系所名稱:製造工程研究所碩博士班
學門:工程學門
學類:機械工程學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2009
畢業學年度:97
語文別:中文
論文頁數:97
中文關鍵詞:決策支援知識資產知識商務知識價值評估
外文關鍵詞:knowledge commercedecision-making supportknowledge valuationknowledge asset
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:184
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
近年來,隨著網際網路及線上交易技術的成熟,技術知識的交易由以往的技術市場,逐漸轉型為新的交易型態—知識商務(Knowledge Commerce)。在買賣雙方眾多且無法獲知雙方實際身份背景的電子化交易環境下,因知識商品無形性與市場資訊不對稱性,使得眾多技術型知識商品的價值不明,為能提高交易之公平性,減少網路詐欺之行為,本研究發展一知識需求者評選所需知識商品或知識供應者決定商品最適價格時之決策支援方法,以技術知識價值本體為基來推估技術型知識商品的價值,提高知識商務交易之公平性與可靠性。
本研究首先從價值評估之現況探討與知識商務環境特性分析,界定出「研發者能量」、「供應者聲譽」、「複雜性」、「創新性」與「知識內容市場價值」五個價值評估指標與價值評估程序,接著設計各指標之評估方法,最後實作一價值評估系統驗證本方法之可行性。
In recent years, with the maturity of the Internet and on-line transaction technology, technological knowledge trading methods have been gradually transformed from traditional technological knowledge markets into electronic-based knowledge commerce (k-commerce). In the k-commerce environment, which includes a number of buyers and sellers, it is difficult to identify the actual identities and backgrounds of these buyers and sellers. Furthermore, due to the intangible nature of knowledge and asymmetric information about knowledge transactions, the value of technological knowledge products is unclear and not easily identified. To improve transaction fairness and to reduce deceptions in the Internet-based knowledge transaction environment, this study develops a decision-making support method that helps knowledge requesters to select knowledge products, and knowledge suppliers to determine knowledge price. This method estimates knowledge value based on a technological knowledge value ontology proposed by this study.
This study first surveys the current status of technological valuation and analyzes the characteristics of the k-commerce environment to identify five knowledge value evaluation indicators, including developer capacity, supplier reputation, knowledge complexity, innovation, and marketable value. This study then develops assessment methods for each of these indicators. Finally, this study implements a knowledge valuation system to verify the feasibility of the proposed methods.
摘要 I
Abstract II
誌謝 III
目錄 IV
圖目錄 VII
表目錄 IX
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景 1
1.2 研究動機 2
1.3 研究目的 3
1.4 問題分析 4
1.5 研究項目與方法 5
1.6 研究步驟 5
1.8 論文架構 7
第二章 文獻探討 9
2.1知識交易市場 9
2.1.1知識市場 9
2.1.2知識商務 10
2.2 知識商品 14
2.3 技術知識與技術商品交易 16
2.3.1技術知識 16
2.3.2技術知識特性 22
2.3.3 技術商品交易 27
2.4 技術價值評估 29
2.4.1 技術評估方法 30
2.4.2 技術評估指標 32
第三章 價值評估模式與價值本體建立 36
3.1 技術型知識商品價值評估模式建立 36
3.1.1 價值評估指標建立 36
3.1.2 價值評估程序建立 40
3.2 技術知識價值本體建立 41
第四章 價值評估方法設計 46
4.1 研發者能量評估方法設計 46
4.2 供應者聲譽評估方法設計 51
4.3 複雜性評估方法設計 59
4.4 創新性評估方法設計 65
4.5知識內容市場價值評估方法設計 69
第五章 實例模擬與系統實作驗證 72
5.1 實例建置 72
5.2 實例模擬過程 76
5.2.1 研發者能量評估模擬 76
5.2.2 供應者聲譽評估模擬 78
5.2.3 複雜性評估模擬 80
5.2.4 創新性評估模擬 82
5.2.5 知識內容市場價值評估模擬 84
5.3 系統實作 86
第六章 結論與未來研究方向 90
6.1 結論 90
6.2 未來研究方向 91
參考文獻 92
英文文獻:
1.Abernathy, W.J. and J.M. Utterback, “Patterns of Innovation in Technology”, Technology Review, vol.80, no.7, pp.40-47, 1978.

2.Akerlof, G.A., “The Market for 'Lemons': Quality Uncertainty and the Market and Mechanism”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol.84, no.3, pp.488-500, 1970.

3.Batagelj, V. and Zaversnik, M., “An O(M) Algorithm for Cores Decomposition of Networks”, University of Ljubljana,
preprint series, 40:799, 2002.

4.Bidault, F. and Fischer, W. A., “Technology transaction: networks over markets”, R&D Management, vol.24, no.4, pp.373-386, 1994.

5.Bohn, R. E., “Measuring and managing technological knowledge”, Sloan Management Review, vol.36, no.1, pp.61-73, 1994.

6.Booz, Allen and Hamilton, “New Product Management for the 1980s”, New York: Booz, Allen & Hamilton, 1982.

7.Branson, J., “Transfer Technology Knowledge by International Corporation to Developing Countries”, American Economics Review, May, pp.259-267, 1966.

8.Chen, S. J. and Hwang, C. L., “Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Marketing:Method and Application”, Springer-Verlag, New York., 1992.

9.Cohen, W. M. and Levinthal, D. A., “Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation”, Administrative Sciences Quarterly, vol.35, no.1, pp.128–152 , 1990.

10.Davenport, T.H. and Prusak, L., “Working knowledge: How Organization Management What They Know”, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA. , 1998

11.Dosi G., “Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories”, Research Policy, vol.11, pp.147-162, 1982.

12.Faulkner, W., “Conceptualizing Knowledge Used in Innovation A Second Look at the Science-Technology Distinction and Industrial Innovation”, Science Technology and Human Values, vol. 19, pp.425-58, 1994.

13.Feibleman, J.K., “Pure science, applied science and technology: An attempt at definitions”, In C. Mitcham and R. Mackey (eds.). Philosophy and technology. New York: Free Press, 1972.

14.Foster,R.N., “Innovation: The attacker's advantage”, New York, Summit Books,1986.

15.Frey, R.E.. “A philosophical framework for understanding technology”. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, vol.27, no.1, pp.23-35, 1989.

16.Garud, R. and Kumaraswamy, A., “Technological and Organizational Designs for Realizing Economies of Substitution”, Strategic Management Journal, vol.16, pp.93-109, 1995.

17.Garud, R. and Nayyar, P. R., “Transformative Capacity Continual Structuring by Intertemporal Technology Transfer,” Strategic Management Journal, vol.15, no.5, pp.365-385, 1994.

18.Hameri, A., ”Technology transfer between basic research and industry,” Technovation, vol.16, no.2, pp.51-57, 1996.

19.Herschbach, D.R., “Technology as Knowledge: Implications for Instruction “, Journal of Technology Education. vol.7 no.1, 1995.

20.Hippel, E.Von, "Cooperation between rivals: Informal know-how trading", Research Policy, vol.16, pp.291-302, 1987.

21.Itami, H. and Namagami, T., “Dynamic interaction between strategy and technology”, Strategic Management Journal, vol.13, pp.119–135, 1992.

22.Kafentzis, K, Apostolou, D., Mentzas G.. and Geogolios P., “A Framework for Analysis and a Review of Knowledge Asset Marketplace”. In: D. Karagiannis U. Reimer (eds): PAKM2002- Fourth Int. Conference on Practical Aspects of Knowledge Management, Springer LNAI 2569, 2002.

23.Leonard-Barton, D., "Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development", Strategic Management Journal, vol.13, special issue, pp.111-125, 1992.

24.Lowell L. B., “Making a market in knowledge”, The McKinsey Quarterly, no.3, 2004.

25.MaGee, S.P., “Information and multinational corporation: An appropriability theory of foreign direct investment”, in Bhagwati(ed), Cambridge, Mass. MIT Press. , 1977.

26.McGinn, R.E., “What is technology?”, Research in Philosophy and Technology, vol.1, pp.179-197, 1978.

27.Mesthen, E. G.., “Technology change: Its impact on man and society”, Cambridge, MA: Harvard university Press, 1970.

28.Miyazaki, K., “Complex System: Toward a New Paradigm in Technology Management”, International Forum on Technology Management, 7th, Tokyo, 1997.

29.JapanParayil, G.., “Technological knowledge and technological change” Technology in Society, vol.13, pp.289-304, 1991.

30.Perrin, J., “The Inseparability of Technology and Work Organizations”, History and Technology, vol.7, no.1, pp.1-13, 1990.

31.Perlmutter, H. V. and Sagafinejad, T., ”Technology Transfer”, New York: Pergamo, 1991.

32.Polanyi, M., “Personal Knowledge: Toward a Post-critical Philosophy”, Routledge & Kegan Paulm, London, 1958.

33.Polanyi, M.. “The Tacit Dimension”, Doubleday Anchor, New York, 1967.

34.Razgaitis, R., “Early-Stage Technologies Valuation and Pricing”, John Wiley&Sons, Inc., 1999.

35.Robinson, R.D., “The International Transfer of Technology Theory, Issues and Practice, Cambridge”, Mass: Ballinger, 1988.

36.Rophl, G., Knowledge Types in Technology, International Journal of Technology and Design Education, vol.7, no.1-2, pp.65-72, 1997.

37.Schmidt, S.; Steele, R., Dillon, T.S. and Chang, E., ”Fuzzy trust evaluation and credibility development in multi-agent system”, Applied Soft Computing, vol.7,no.2, pp.492-505, 2007.

38.Simon, H., “The Architecture of Complexity. The Science of the Artificia.”, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1979.

39.Simonin,B.L., ”Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances.”, Strategic management journal, vol.20, pp.595-623, 1999.

40.Skolimowski, H. “The structure of thinking in technology”, In C. Mitcham and R. Mackey (eds.). Philosophy and technology: Readings in the philosophical problems of technology. New York: Free Press, pp.42-49, 1972.

41.Skyrme, D.J., “Capitalizing on Knowledge: From E-Business to K-Business”, Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2001.

42.Souder, W.E., “ Managing New Product Innovation.”, MA: Lexington Books, 1987.

43.Stantikarn, M., “Technology Transfer-A Case Study”, Singapore University Press, 1981.

44.Technology Atlas Team, “A framework for Technology Based National Planning”, Technology Forecasting and Social Change, vol.32, pp.5-18, 1987.

45.Teece, D.J., "Competition, cooperation, and innovation organizational arrangements for regimes of rapid technological progress", Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, vol.18, pp.1-25, 1992.

46.Teece,D.J.,”Firm Organization, Industrial Structure, and Technological Innovation.”, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol.31, pp.193-224, 1996.

47.Teece J. David, "Capturing Value from Knowledge Assets: The New Economy, Markets for Know-How and Intangible Assets," California Management Research, vol.40, no.3, pp. 55-79, 1998.

48.Tyre, M., “Managing the Introduction of New Process Technology International Differences in a Multi-plant Network”, Research Policy, vol.20, pp.57-76, 1991.

49.Vincenti, W.G., “Technological knowledge without science: The innovation of flush riveting in American airplanes”, ca. 1930-ca. 1950. Technology and Culture, vol.25, no.3, pp.540-576, 1984.

50.Vries, M. J.de, “The Nature of Technological Knowledge: Extending Empirically Informed Studies into What Engineers Knows”, Techne, vol.6, no.3, pp.1-12, 2003.

51.Willoughby, K.W., “Technology Choice:A Critique of the Appropriate Technology Movement”, Colorado: Westview Press, London. pp.185-191, 1990.

中文文獻:
1.王俊呈、邱垂呈、葛煥元,「以交易紀錄的社會網路結構建立線上拍賣哄抬評價的偵測指標」,資訊管理學報,第12卷第4期,143-184頁,2005。

2.甘路明、潘惠、劉景江,「企業技術知識管理研究」,科學研究,頁201-204,2003。

3.李仁芳、賴建男、賴威龍,「台灣IC設計業中技術知識特質與組織動態能耐之研究」,科技管理學刊,第3卷,第1期,頁37-80,1997。

4.李仁芳、花櫻芬,「技術知識類型與知識交流網路模型」, 科技管理學刊, 第二卷,第一期,,頁75-121,1997。

5.李仁芳、涂瑞德,「技術知識特質、產品開發團隊與組織動態能耐關係之研究」,國立政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文,1998。

6.花櫻芬,「高科技事業中技術知識特質與知識資源吸收之研究」,國立政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文,1996。

7.林文鼎、王俊如,「知識特性與技術授權模式:資源依賴觀點」,政大智慧財產評論,第四卷第二期,頁55-77,2006。

8.吳江,「知識經濟三題」,北京行政學院學報,第4期,2001。

9.吳思華、蔡文、賴鈺晶,「知識型商品擴散模式之理論性探討」,科技管理學刊,第9卷, 第3期,頁1-35,2004。

10.房定堅,「關於技術商品交易定價的思考」,經濟師,第7期,2003。

11.許張原,「技術交易平台運作機制之研究」,中原資訊管理研究所碩士論文,2004。

12.曾瑜玉,「技術知識商品的交易市場研究∼以SIP(矽智產)產業為例」,國立政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文,2001。

13.曾信超、王文賢,「研究機構技術移轉之探討-以工研院為例」,促進產業升級學術研討會論文集,中山大學,1993。

14.楊君琦,「技術移轉互動模式失靈及重塑之研究----以研究機構與中小企業技術合作為例」,台灣大學商學研究所博士論文,2000。

15.劉江彬,劉文卿,張孟元,「技術價值關鍵指標之研究」,資訊管理學報,第11期,頁79-120,2004。

16.劉翠玲,「生技藥品研發過程評價模式之研究」,長庚大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,2006。

17.陳威融,「技術鑑價模式之初探與運用」,雲林科技大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,2003。

18.陳宗義、陳裕民、陳垂呈、林家柔,「從角色的觀點探討協同創新為基之知識商務模式」,第十六屆全國自動化科技研討會,國立高雄第一科技大學,2008。

19.羅懷英,「技術知識特性、組織平台與情境對組織知識流通之影響-以工研院電通所為例」,輔仁大學管理學研究所碩士論文,2000。
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top