跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.221.70.232) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/05/29 10:46
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:楊淩欽
研究生(外文):Ling-Chin Yang
論文名稱:高科技產業內投資網絡與董監事網絡之研究─以台灣半導體產業為例
論文名稱(外文):A Study of High-tech Inter-industry Investment Network and Director Interlocks Network –An Example of Taiwan Semiconductor Sector
指導教授:施信佑施信佑引用關係
指導教授(外文):Hsin-Yu Shih
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立暨南國際大學
系所名稱:國際企業學系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2009
畢業學年度:97
語文別:中文
論文頁數:109
中文關鍵詞:產業內投資活動董監事活動網絡分析半導體產業
外文關鍵詞:Inter-industry InvestmentInterlocking DirectoratesNetwork AnalysisSemiconductor Sector
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:485
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:146
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:5
本研究旨在探討高科技產業內廠商彼此的互動關係,由於廠商經常以強化連結的方式達到協調與控制的目的,因此本研究選擇產業內最常見的兩種連結方式,也就是透過「產業內投資活動」以及「董監事活動」來觀察廠商間的互動關係;以台灣高科技產業中的半導體產業作為研究對象,除了具備產業的代表性以及資料的取得性外,高科技半導體產業發展出一套強調策略性考量的特殊投資模式,更重視透過產業內投資活動達成本身的策略目的;同時許多文獻也指出半導體產業內的廠商也積極涉入許多董監事活動,來降低環境的不確定性。
藉由社會網絡分析法,首先將廠商間的產業內投資活動與董監事活動的關係性資料轉為量化數值資料,架構出產業內投資網絡與董監事網絡並以整體網絡觀點進行網絡圖形描述;接著以探索性之研究方法將廠商的網絡屬性對應各種網絡量化分析指標,分別以廠商的能見度、活躍度、策略位置與資訊掌握度對應網絡指標可達性(reachability)、點度中心度(degree centrality)、侷限性(constraint)與居間性(betweenness);並與廠商的各項能力如獲利能力、研發能力與營運能力進行相關性分析,進而探討網絡位置所衍生出的網絡屬性與廠商各項能力之間的相關性;最後根據產業內投資網絡與董監事網絡中廠商的網絡屬性所對應的量化指標與廠商能力的相關性,以及網絡屬性所對應的量化指標之間的分析結果,提出十二項研究命題與研究發現,將可作為實務上高科技半導體廠商發展產業內投資活動與董監事活動時的經營指導方針。
This research is focus on the firms’ relationship in high-tech industry. Since firms usually strengthen their connections in order to coordinate and control, the most common two kinds of connection, “inter-industry investment” and “interlocking directorates”, is mentioned. Choosing Taiwan semiconductor sector is not only for representative and availability, but also for its’ distinctive strategic- incentive investment activities. Meanwhile, lots research point out the firms in semiconductor sector involved in interlocking directorates aggressively in order to reduce the environment uncertainty.
Through social network approach, inter-industry investment activities and the interlocking directorates relationship could be coded and transformed into quantitative data, then inter-industry investment network and interlocking directorates network are
constructed and followed by graph description as a whole.
Exploring methodology is used to match up the firm’s network attributes and quantitative analyzing indicators. Viability attribute is match up to reachabilty indicator, activeness is match up to degree centrality, strategic position is match up to constraint, and information control is match up to betweenness. These indicators would be analyzed with firm’s abilities such as profit earning, research and development and operation ability, to find the relationship between firm’s network attributes and abilities. Finally, the research proposition and research finding were presented based on the relationships results and analyzing outcomes. Twelve propositions presented by this research are anticipated to offer the strategic guidelines of inter-industry investment and interlocking directorates activities
for high-tech industry firms.
第一章 緒論
第一節 研究背景與研究動機…………………………………………... 1
第二節 研究目的……………………………………………………...… 2
第三節 研究流程………………………………………………………... 3

第二章 文獻回顧
第一節 高科技產業投資模式…………………………………………... 6
第二節 高科技產業董監事活動…………………………………........... 14

第三章 研究方法
第一節 研究架構………………………………………………………... 20
第二節 網絡觀點與分析指標…………………………………………... 22
第三節 廠商網絡屬性變數與能力衡量指標…………………………... 24

第四章 研究結果與分析
第一節 資料蒐集………………………………………………………... 30
第二節 資料概況與分析………………………………………………... 33
第三節 網絡指標相關性分析…………………………………………... 59

第五章 結論與建議
第一節 研究發現與討論………………………………………………... 88
第二節 管理意涵與研究貢獻…………………………………………... 97
第三節 研究限制與後續研究之建議…………………………………... 98

參考文獻
中文文獻....................................................................................................... 99
英文文獻....................................................................................................... 100

附錄
【附錄1】:上市半導體廠商與子公司一覽表.......................................... 106
【附錄2】:產業內投資網絡廠商屬性與能力之關係總表...................... 108
【附錄3】:董監事網絡廠商屬性與能力之關係總表.............................. 109
中文文獻
1.楊式玗,2007,「新竹科學園區半導體廠商董監經理人之社會網絡分析」,國立清華大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。
2.陳東升,2003,「積體電路:台灣高科技產業的社會學分析」,台北:群學。
3.李佩縈等,2008,「2008半導體年鑑」,新竹:工業技術研究院。
4.張文勤,2004,「國內高科技企業創投之有效營運模式探討」,國立台灣大學管理學院財務金融學研究所碩士論文。
5.羅偉特,2006,「台灣企業創投可行模式之研究」,國立中山大學企業管理學系碩士班碩士論文。
6.洪淑玲,2006,「集團企業董監事網絡連結關係對營運能力之影響」,國立成功大學企業管理研究所在職專班碩士論文。
7.蘇國賢,2007,「網絡控制:企業集團的交叉持股與重疊股東的網絡分析研究成果報告」,行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫。
英文文獻
1.Allen, M., 1974. “The Structure of Interorganizational Elite Cooptation: Interlocking corporate directorates”, American Sociological Review, 39: 393-406.
2.Au, K., Peng, W., Wang, D., 2000. “Interlocking Directorates, Firm Strategies, and Performance in Hong Kong: Towards A Research Agenda”, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 17(1): 29-47.
3.Block, Z., MacMillan, I., 1993. “Venturing with Corporate Venture Capital”, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA: 330-363.
4.Borgatti, S., Everett, M., Freeman, L., 2002. “Ucinet for Window: Software for Social Network Analysis”, Harvard: Analytic Technologies.
5.Brody, P., Ehrlich D., 1998. “Can Big Companies Become Successful Venture Capitalists? “, The McKinsey Quarterly, 2: 50-63.
6.Brunello, G., Graziani, C., Parigi, B., 2000. “Ownership or performance: What determines board of directors’ turnover in Italy?”, IZA Discussion Papers, 105.
7.Burt, R., 1980. “Co-optive corporate actor networks: Areconsideration of interlocking directorates involving American manufacturing”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 25:557-582.
8.Burt, R., 1983. “Corporate Profits and Cooptation: Networks of market constraints and directorate ties in the American economy”, New York: Academic Press.
9.Burt, R., 1992. “Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition”, Cambridge, Harvard University Press: MA.
10.Campbell, A., Birkinshaw, J., Morrison, A., Bastenburg, R., 2003. “The Future of Corporate Venturing”, MIT Sloan Management Review, 45(1): Fall.
11.Carpenter, M., Westphal, J., 2001. “The Strategic context of external network ties: Examining the impact of director appointments on board involvement in strategic decision making”, Academy of Management Journal, 44: 639-660.
12.Chesbrough, H., Teece, D., 1996. “When is Virtual Virtuous?”, Harvard Business Review, January-February: 65-73.
13.Chesbrough, H., 2002. “Making Sense of Corporate Venture Capital”, Harvard Business Review, Mar.-Apr., 4-11.
14.Davis, G., Greve, H., 1997. “Corporate Elite Networks and Governance Changes in the 1980s”, American Journal of Sociology, 103(1): 1-37.
15.Davis, G., Mizruchi, M., 1999. “The money center cannot hold: Commercial Banks in the U.S. system of corporate governance”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 215-239.
16.Dooley, P., 1969. “The Interlocking Directorate”, The American Economic Review , 59(3):314-23.
17.Everard, A., Henry, H., 2002. “A social network analysis of interlocked directorates in electronic commerce firms”, Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 1: 225-235.
18.Fennema, M., Schijf, H., 1978. “Analyzing interlocking directorates: theory and methods”, Social Networks,1: 297-332.
19.Fligstein, N., Brantley, P., 1992. “Bank Control, Owner Control, or Organizational Dynamics: Who controls the large modern corporation? “, American Journal of Sociology, 98: 280-307.
20.Freeman, L., 1979. “Centrality in social networks: I. Conceptual clarification”, Social Networks, 1.
21.Gedajlovic, E., Shapiro, D., 1998. “Management and Ownership Effects: Evidence from five countries”, Strategic Management Journal, 19:533-553.
22.Gerlach, M., 1992. “Alliance Capitalism: The Social Organization of Japanese Business”, University of California Press.
23.Gompers, P., Lerner, J., 1999. “The Venture Capital Cycle”, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA: 95-123.
24.Gompers, P., 2002. “Corporations and the Financing of Innovation: The Corporate Venturing Experience”, Economic Review Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, Fourth Quarter.
25.Gulati,M., Carbado, D., 2000. “Conversations at Work”, Oregon Law Review, 79: 103-146.
26.Haunschild, P., Miner, A., 1997. “Modes of Interorganizational Imitation: The Effects of Outcome Salience and Uncertainty”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 42:472-500.
27.Haunschild, P., Beckman, C., 1998.”When Do Interlocks matter? Alternative source of information and interlock influence”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 43:815-844.
28.Henderson, R., Clark, K., 1990. “Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 9-30.
29.Iwanami, F., 2006. “The Structure of Interlocking Directorates and Corporate Power in the U.S. and Japan Through Social Network Analysis.”, The Ritsumeikan Business Review, XLV: 4.
30.Kraatz, M., 1998. “Learning by Association? Interorganizational Networks and Adaptation to Environmental Change”, Academy of Management Journal, 41 (6): 621-643.
31.La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., 1999. “Corporate Ownership Around the World”, Journal of Finance 54, 471-517.
32.Lester, H., Cannella, J., 2006. “Interorganizational familiness: how family firms use interlocking directorates to build community-level social capital“, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice.
33.Lorsch, J., MacIver, E., 1989. “Pawns or potentates: The reality of America's corporate boards”, Harvard Business School Press: Boston, Mass.
34.Mace, M., 1971. “Directors: Myth and Reality”, Harvard Business School Press.
35.MacMillan, I., Roberts, E., Livada, V., Wang, A., 2008. “Corporate Venture Capital (CVC) Seeking Innovation and Strategic Growth”, National Institute of Standards and Technology, GCR 08-916.
36.Markham, S., Gentry, S., Hume, D., Ramachandran, R., Kingon, A., 2005. “Strategies and Tactics for External Corporate Venturing”, Research Technology Management Industrial Research Institute, Mar.-Apr.
37.Mintz, B., Schwartz, M., 1985. “The Power Structure of American Business”, University of Chicago Press.
38.Mizruchi, M., Stearns, L., 1988. “A Longitudinal Study of the Formation of Interlocking Directorates”, Administrative Science Quarterly , 33: 194-210.
39.Mizruchi, M., 1996. “What Do Interlocks Do? An Analysis, Critique, and Assessment of Research on Interlocking Directorates”, Annual Review of Sociology, 22: 271-299.
40.O' Hagan, S., Green, M., 2004. ”Corporate Knowledge transfer via interlocking directorates: a network analysis approach”, Geoforum, 35: 127-139.
41.Palmer, Donald, Friedland, R., 1986. “Corporation, Class, and City Growth”, Structural Analysis of Business, Cambridge University Press.
42.Pederson, T., Thomsen, S., 1997. “European Patterns of Corporate Ownership”, Journal of International Business Studies, 28: 759-778.
43.Peng, M., Lu, Y., Shenkar, O., 2001. “Treasures in the China House: AReview of Management and organizaiotnal Research on Greater China”, Journal of Business Research.
44.Pennings, J., 1980. ” Interlocking Directors”, Jossey-Bass.
45.Pfeffer, J., Salancik, G., 1978. “The External Control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective”, Harper and Row.
46.Richardson, R., 1987. “Director Interlocks and Corporate Profitability”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 32: 367-386.
47.Rind, K., 1981. “The Role of Venture Capital in Corporate Development”, Strategic Management Journal, 2:169-180.
48.Sheppard, J., 1994. “The relationship between corporate board linkages, industry environment, firm condition and organizational survival”, American Business Review,12: 15-28.
49.Schoorman, F., Bazerman, M., Atkin, R., 1981. “Interlocking directorates: A strategy for reducing environmental uncertainty“, The Academy of Management Review, 6: 243-251.
50.Scott, J., 2000. “Social Network Analysis”, British: SAGE Publications.
51.Sonquist, J., Koenig, T., 1975. “Interlocking Directorships in Top US Corporations: A graph theory.” Insurgent Sociologist, 5:196-230.
52.Stanworth, P., Giddens, A., 1975. “The modern corporate economy: Interlocking directorships in Britain”, Sociological Review, 23(1): 5-28.
53.Stokamn, F., Ziegler, R., Scott, J., 1985. “Networks of Corporate Power”, Policy Press.
54.Useem, M., 1984. “The Inner Circle: Large Corporations and the Rise of Business Political Activity”, New York: Oxford University Press.
55.Uzzi, B., 1999. “Social relations and networks in the making of financial capital”, American Sociological Review, 64: 481-505.
56.Wasserman, S., Faust, K., 1994. “Social Network Analysis: Methods and Application”, New York: Cambridge University Press.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top