臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

H-index是最近幾年學術研究衡量重要指標，本研究根據MIS Quarterly期刊中高發表篇數的學者進行分析討論，並且探討其h-index的狀況，在資料分析過程中，提出幾點發現，並且經由ISI Web of Science網站的資料探勘結果，加以驗證。

研究結果顯示，資管領域學者研究合作發表乃為常態。在MIS Quarterly當中，明尼蘇達學派是最大的幫派行為，藉由社會網絡分析圖可以看出此一現象。另外，h-index的分析可以表示一個學者的出版質與量。對後續研究者而言，需要留意ISI Web of Science網站的一些問題，以免造成蒐集資料錯誤。

H-index is one of the most important indicators to evaluate the quality and quantity of a scholar. This study uses h-index to estimate the “high-publication scholar” in MIS Quarterly, one of the best journals of MIS field. Based on data collection and analysis, this study proposes some research findings. We also verify the data from ISI Web of Science.

The findings show that the corporation of scholars is a normal situation in research. In MIS Quarterly, a clan of “University of Minnesota” has been forming for the past 40 years. We use social network analysis to prove this situation. On the other hand, h-index can justify the quality and quantity of a scholar. For the researchers, it must be very carefully to take care of the data accurate of ISI website to avoid wrong data collection.

摘要 i
Abstract ii
誌謝 iii
目錄 iv
表目錄 vi
圖目錄 x

第一章、緒論 1
1.1 研究背景與動機 1
1.2 研究目的與研究問題 7
1.2.1 研究目的 7
1.2.2 研究問題 7
1.3 研究流程 8
1.4 研究範圍與限制 9
1.4.1 研究範圍 9
1.4.2 研究限制 9

第二章 文獻探討 10
2.1 h-index的定義與傳統書目計量學指標的比較 10
2.2 h-index的優點 12
2.3 h指數與同儕審查及其他計量指標的關係 13
2.4 h-index的缺點 13
2.5 h-index的應用 14

第三章 研究方法 16
3.1 研究對象 16
3.2 研究工具 17
3.3 研究方法 18
3.4 資料取樣、彙整及分析 18

第四章 資料分析 20
4.1 敘述性統計分析 20
4.2 MIS Quarterly高發表量之作者分析 25
4.3 MIS Quarterly高發表量作者之h-index分析 93
4.4 MIS Quarterly高發表量作者的h-index與學經歷分析 97
4.5 合作網絡分析 101

第五章 結論與建議 104
5.1 研究結論 104
5.2研究建議 105

參考文獻 106

附錄
附錄1 ISI Web of Science線上資料庫查詢步驟 109
附錄2 以e-mail蒐集資料 113
附錄3 45名作者及366篇文章之書目文獻資料 117

英文部份
Ball, P. (2005). Index aims for fair ranking of scientists. Nature, 436(7053), 900-900.
Banks, M.G. (2006). An extension of the Hirsch index: Indexing scientific topics and compounds. Scientometrics 69 (1), 161–168.
Batista, P. D., Campiteli, M. G., Kinouchi, O., & Martinez, A. S. (2006). Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests? Scientometrics, 68(1), 179-189.
Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H. D. (2006). Selecting scientific excellence through committee peer review - A citation analysis of publications previously published to approval or rejection of post-doctoral research fellowship applicants. Scientometrics, 68(3), 427-440.
Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H. D. (2007). What do we know about the b index? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(9), 1381-1385.
Braun, T., Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2005). A Hirsch-type index for journals. Scientist, 19(22), 8-8.
Braun, T., Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2006). A Hirsch-type index for journals. Scientometrics, 69(1), 169-173.
Cronin, B., & Meho, L. (2006). Using the h-index to rank influential information scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(9), 1275-1278.
Egghe, L. (2006). An improvement of the h-index: the g-index. ISSI Newsletter, 2(1), 8-9.
Gillenson, M.L., & Stutz, J.D. (1991). Academic Issues in MIS: Journals and Books. MIS Quarterly, 15(4), 447-452.
Glänzel, W. (2006a). On the h-index - A mathematical approach to a new measure of publication activity and citation impact. Scientometrics, 67(2), 315-321.
Glänzel, W. (2006b). On the opportunities and limitations of the h-index. Science Focus, 1(1), 10-11.
Hardgrave, B.C., & Walstrom, K.A. (1997). Forums for MIS Scholars. Communications of ACM, 40(11), 119-124.
Hayes, R. M. (1983). Citation statistics as a measure of faculty research productivity. Journal of Education for Librarianship, 23, 151-172.
Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United Sidles of America, 102(46). 16569-16572.
Iglesias, J. E., & Pecharroman, C. (2007). Scaling the h-index for different scientific ISI fields. Scientometrics, 73(3), 303-320.
Koong, K.S., & Weistroffer, H.R. (1989). Faculty Usage of Management Information Systems Journals: A Survey. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 30(1), 14.
McCain, K., & Turner, K. (1989). Citation context analysis and aging patterns of journal articles in molecular genetics. Scientometrics, 17(1/2), 127-163.
Moed, H.F. (2005). Hirsch Index is a creative and appealing construct but be cautious when using it to evaluate individual scholars. Retrieved May 22, 2009, from the World Wide Web: http://www.cwts.nl/hm/Comments_on_Hirsch_Index_2005_12_16.pdf
Mylonopoulos, N.A., & Theoharakis, V. (2001). Global Perceptions of IS Journals. Communications of ACM, 44(9), 29-33.
Oppenheim, C. (2007). Using the h-index to rank influential British researchers in information science and librarianship. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(2), 297-301.
Pouris, A. (2003). Sought Africa’s research publication record: the last ten years. South African Journal of Science, 99, 425-428.
Roediger, H. L., III. (2006). The h-index in science: A new measure of scholarly contribution. Observer: The Academic Observer, 19(4).
Rousseau, R. (2006a). A case study : evolution of JASIS' Hirsch index. [Electronic Version]. Retrieved May 22, 2009, from the World Wide Web: http://www.citebase.org/fulltext?format=application%2Fpdf&identifier=oai%3Aeprints.rclis.org%3A5430
Rousseau, R. (2006b). New Developments related to the Hirsch index. Science Focus, 1(4), 23-25. Retrieved May 25, 2009, from the World Wide Web: http://sci2s.ugr.es/impact/Hirsch_new_developments.pdf
Rousseau, R. (2007). The influence of missing publications on the Hirsch index. Journal of Informetrics, 1(1), 2-7.
Sidiropoulos, A., Katsaros, D., & Manolopoulos, Y. (2007). Generalized Hirsch h-index for disclosing latent facts in citation networks. Scientometrics, 72(2), 253-280.
The Association for Information Systems (AIS), “AIS: MIS Journal Rankings,” http://ais.affiniscape.com/displaycommon.cfm?an=1&subarticlenbr=432 (accessed May 15, 2009)
van Leeuwen, T. N., Visser, M. S., Moed, H. F., Nederhof, T. J., & van Raan, A. F. J. (2003). The Holy Grail of science policy: Exploring and combining bibliometric tools in serch of scientific excellence. Scientometrics, 57(2), 257-280.
van Raan, A. F. J. (2006). Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliornctric indicators and will peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups. Scientometrics, 67(3). 491-502.
Vanclay, J. K. (2007). On the robustness of the h-index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(10), 1547-1550.
Vinkler, P. (2007). Eminence of scientists in the light of the h-index. and other scientometric indicators. Journal of Information Science, 33(4), 481 -491.
Walstrom, K. A., & Hardgrave, B. C. (2001). Forums for Information Systems Scholars: III. Information and Management, 39, 117-124.

中文部份
梁定澎主持（2002）。資訊管理學術研究國際化之策略（行政院國家科學委員會補助專題研究計畫結案報告，NSC 90-2419-H-001-001-B9105）。高雄市：國立中山大學資訊管理研究所。
黃慕萱（2007）。<跨國比較篇>華人四地學術研究競爭誰出線？評鑑雙月刊，5，10-15。
蔡明月（2003）。資訊計量學與文獻特性。臺北市：國立編譯館。
蔡明月（2005）。引用索引與引用分析之探討。圖書館學與資訊科學，31(1)，45-53。