臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本論文主要是探討不同的教學法對於特定學習風格的學生在程式語言學習上的影響。本研究以某大學資訊工程系一年級同學為樣本，在前置性研究調查中先利用Felder-Silverman學習風格問卷將學生的學習傾向做分類，分析在學習程式語言課程時何種學習風格的學生其學習成效較差，再應用貝式網路分析後發現學習風格為Input和Perception的學生成績不及格的機率較高[46]，依此結果再做本次的研究分析。本次的研究將依學習風格的定義並配合相對應的教學法及課程的特性進行研究，分析應用特定的教學法是否會改善學生在程式語言課程上的學習成效。本次的研究設計將學生分為實驗組和對照組，並以相對應的教學法作為研究探討，其研究步驟先進行教學後再收集結果資料，以SPSS進行二因子變數統計分析。本研究結果發現：
1. 學習風格(Input屬性)的學生使用圖片輔助教學法優於學習風格(Input屬性)的學生使用傳統性教學法，在程式語言學習成效中存在顯著作用效果，檢定結果達到顯著性。
2. 學習風格(Perception屬性)的學生使用類比教學法優於學習風格(Perception屬性)的學生使用傳統性教學法，在程式語言學習成效中存在顯著作用效果，檢定結果達到顯著性。
關鍵詞：E-learning、learning styles、Felder-Silverman、Bayesian networks

摘要...........................................................................................................i
Abstract....................................................................................................ii
目錄.........................................................................................................iv
圖目錄.....................................................................................................vi
表目錄....................................................................................................vii
第一章緒論..............................................................................................1
1.1研究動機及背景.......................................................................1
1.2研究目的...................................................................................2
1.3研究假設...................................................................................3
1.4論文架構...................................................................................4
第二章相關研究......................................................................................5
2.1學習風格.....................................................................................5
2.2 Felder-Silverman Learning Style................................................5
2.2.1各種學習風格的教學建議..........................................9
2.3圖片輔助教學法(Diagrammatic materials).............................10
2.4類比教學法(Analog materials).................................................12
2.5貝式網路...................................................................................13
2.6程式設計教學相關理論...........................................................15
第三章研究方法....................................................................................17
3.1研究架構與方法........................................................................17
3.2研究工具...................................................................................20
3.2.1研究對象........................................................................23
3.3教材分析...................................................................................25
3.4資料分析..................................................................................28
第四章實驗討論.........................................................................................30
4.1前置性調查分析......................................................................30
4.2實驗設計……...........................................................................31
4.3學習風格與相對應教學法對程式設計學習成就之影響.......33第五章結論與未來研究........................................................................38
5.1結論.........................................................................................38.
5.2建議與未來工作.......................................................................39
參考文獻................................................................................................40
附件........................................................................................................45

[1]. Brown D.E. and John C., “Overcoming misconceptions in mechanics ：a comparison of two example-based teaching strategies.,” Education Resources Information Center, Apr,pp150-185, 1987
[2]. Bajraktarevic N., Hall W. and Fullick P.,“Incorporating learning style in hypermedia environment： empirical evaluation,” Proceedings of AH2003： Workshop on Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-Based Systems, May, pp.20-24,2003
[3]. Carver C.A.,.Howard R.A and Lane W.D., “Enhancing student learning through hypermedia courseware and incorporation of student learning styles, ” IEEE T ransactions on education , Vol.4,pp.33-38, 1999
[4]. Chalmers J.D., Rebert M.F. and Hofstadter D.R., “High-level perception, representation , and analogy： a critique of artificial- intelligence methodology”, The Journal of experimental and theoretical artificial intelligence , Vol.4 , pp.185-21, 19921
[5]. Cook N.J, Schvaneveldt R.W.,“Effects of computer programming experience on network representations of abstract programming concepts.” International Journal of Man-Machine Studies , Vol.2,pp.407-427,1988.
[6]. Cristina C., Gladys C. and Eva M., “Designing a dynamic Bayesian network for modeling students’ learning style,” IEEE International conference on advanced learning technologies, pp.346-350,July,2008
[7]. Clement J., “Analogy generation in scientific problem solving,” Education Resources Information Center, pp.44-56, March 1981
[8]. Dunbar K., Sternber R.J.and Davidson J., How scientists really reason： Scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories,：Mechanisms of insight.Cambridge MA： MIT press.,1st ed,pp.365-395,1995
[9]. Felder R.M. and Spurlin J.E., “Applications, Reliability, and Validity of the Index of Learning Styles,” Intel Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.21,pp.103-112,2005
[10]. Felder R.M., Silverman L.K., “Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education,” Engineer. Education, Vol.78,pp.674-681 , 1988
[11]. Felder R.M., Barbara A.S., “Learning styles and strategies”, Engr.Education,Vol.78,pp.674-681,1988
[12]. Glynn S.M., Yeany R.H. and Britton B.K. , The psychology of learning science, 1en, Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc Inc,1st ed,pp.219-240,1991
[13]. Honey P. and Mumford A, “ The Manual of Learning Styles,”,1st ed, Peter Honey Publications.,pp220-250, 1986
[14]. Holyoak K.J.,Thagard R.P, A computational model of analogical problem solving , 1st ed, Cambridge University Press,pp.242-266,1989
[15]. Hernan C. , Gabriela G., “Expertise and the use of visual analogy ： implications for design education,” Elsevier science , Vol.20.pp153-17,March,19995
[16]. Index of Learning Styles Questionnaire 學習風格問卷[Online]. Available： http：//www.engr.ncsu.edu/learningstyles/ilsweb.html
[17]. Kolb D.A.,Experiential learning：experience as the source of learning and development, Prentice Hall,1st ed,pp.120-200, 1984
[18]. Kenneth D.F., Ronald.W.F and Jeffery.M.U, “Towards a computational model of sketching,”. IUI’01, January ,pp.14-17, 2001
[19]. Kevin M., “A Brief Introduction to Graphical Models and Bayesian Networks,” 1998. [Online]. Available：http：//www.cs.ubc.ca/~murphyk/Bayes/bnintro.html
[20]. Terveen.L.G.; Hill.W., “Human-Computer Collaboration in Recommended Systems,”,2001, [Online]. Available： http：//www.grouplens.org/papers/pdf/rec-sys-overview.pdf
[21]. Larkin J.H., Simon H.A, “Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words,” Cognitive Science,Vol.11, pp.65-97,1989
[22]. Lawrence J.N., Dual Coding as a Possible Explanation for the Effects of Multimedia on Learning, 1st ed, Georgia Institute of Technology,pp.3-4, 1995

[23]. Michalis X., “Prediction and assessment of student behavior in open and distance education in computers using Bayesian networks,” computers & education,Vol.43,pp.345-359,2004
[24]. Oliver R., “Measuring hierarchical levels of programming knowledge ”, Journal of educational computing research , Vol.92,pp.299-311,1993
[25]. Patricio G., Analia A. and Silvia S. and Marcelo C., “Evaluating Bayesian networks' precision for detecting students' learning styles”, Computers & Education, Vol.49,pp.794-808,2007
[26]. Paivio A., “Dual coding theory： Retrospect and current status. Canadian,” J CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE, Vol.45, pp.255-287,1991
[27]. Paul T., “Analogy, explanation, and education,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol.29, pp.537-544,1992
[28]. Petrov A., “A dynamic emergent computational model of analogy-making based on decentralized representations.”. New Bulgarian University Central and Eastern European Center for Cognitive Science,pp35-41, 1998
[29]. Shneiderman B., Mayer R.E.,“Syntactic/semantic interactions in programmer behavior：A model and experimental results.,” International Journal of Parallel Programming,Vol.8, pp.219-238. 1979
[30]. Stephan J.B. , Daniel H., “Exploring the boundary conditions of the delay hypothesis with adjunct displays,” Journal of educational psychology ,Vol.96,pp381-388,2004
[31]. Shneiderman B., Software psychology ：Human factors in computer and information system,1st ed, Winthrop Publishers,110-150,1980
[32]. Winslow L.E., “Programming pedagogy： A psychological overview.”, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, Vol.28, pp.17-22. 1996
[33]. Wei Y.Z., Moreau L. and Jennings N.R., “Learning Users’ Interests by Quality Classification in Market-Based Recommended Systems”, IEEE Trans on Knowledge and Data Engineering, Vol.17, pp.1678-1688,2005
[34]. Wei Y.Z., Moreau.L. and Jennings. N.R., “Market-Based Recommendations： Design, Simulation, and Evaluation,” in Proceedings of International Workshop on Agent-Oriented Information Systems, pp.63-78, 2004.
[35]. Zywno M.S., “A contribution to validation of score meaning for Felder-Solman’s index of learning styles,” Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition ,pp.200-217,2003
[36]. 尹玫司,“電腦程式設計能力與認知能力相關之研究,”台南師院學報, vol.24,pp39-54,1991
[37]. 王麗茹, “瑞亭國小英語教學分享,” 2004 [Online]. Available： http：//www.lles.tpc.edu.tw/~englishgov/englishgov-25/raiting.htm
[38]. 林清山, 有效的學習方式, 教育部發行,1st ed,1997,
[39]. 區國良,吳銘哲,黃孟文,張家榮, “輔助教師分析國小學生小數學習迷思概念教學系統,” Journal of Information Technology and Applications (JITA), vol.2, pp.93-106, 2007
[40]. 洪燕竹,“學生人格特質與物件導向程式學習成就的關係”,國民教育研學報,Vol.14,pp.127-141,2005
[41]. 周慶祥, “網路多媒體新聞學習成效之研究,” 中華傳播學會2007年會論文, pp.2-4-A3,2007
[42]. 高健智,張景翔,“以貝式網路為基礎之學生分數概念診斷系統,”台北教育大學數學資訊教育研究所,2006
[43]. 吳忠魁,余凱,永利, 精通功課有方法, 正展出版社,1st ed,2000
[44]. 張文華, “同步網路合作學習中學習風格對國小學童學習之影響,” 國立台南大學資訊教育研究所,2003
[45]. 黃河銓,謝錦泉,“以貝式網路建構適性化學習環境,” 國立高雄應用科技大學資訊管理研究所,2006
[46]. 黃斐曼,洪燕竹,“以貝式網路分析不同學習風格在程式語言之學習成研究” Taiwan academic network conference , pp.117,2008
[47]. 賴阿福, 林立斌, “國小電腦課程數位學習與學習風格之相關研究,” 臺北市立教育大學數學資訊教育研究所,2005
[48]. 賴阿福, 周凡淇, “學習歷程檔案系統的發展及其在不同學習風格、認知風格學童之網路行為的探討,” 臺北市立教育大學數學資訊教育研究所,2005