跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.220.247.152) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/09/18 22:02
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:高博瑜
研究生(外文):PO-YU KAO
論文名稱:智慧資本與軍民通用科技發展專案績效關聯性之研究
論文名稱(外文):The Relationship between Intellectual Capital and Dual-use Technology Development Program Performance
指導教授:盧文民盧文民引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國防大學國防管理學院
系所名稱:國防財務資源研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:財務金融學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2009
畢業學年度:97
語文別:中文
論文頁數:97
中文關鍵詞:智慧資本軍通專案資料包絡分析法單因子變異數分析
外文關鍵詞:Intellectual Capital(IC)Dual-use Technology Development Programs (DuTDPs)Data Envelopment Analysis(DEA)One-Way ANOVA(Analysis of Variance)
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:9
  • 點閱點閱:600
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:73
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:3
中山科學研究院為國防科技研發單位,為因應全球趨勢及政府發展產業之需要,藉由執行經濟部科專計畫及軍民通用科技發展計畫,與產官學研各界合作分工,扮演國家經濟發展貢獻者角色,以落實經建與國防並重的政策目標。本研究目的在探討智慧資本對於中科院軍通專案執行效率的關聯性與重要性,並建構「研發效率」與「技術擴散效率」二階段生產模型,再藉由資料包絡分析法衡量「研發效率」與「技術擴散效率」。此外,運用序列資料包絡分析法將專案逐級區分為三層效率群體,再以單因子變異數分析探究智慧資本與不同效率群體間是否有顯著相關性,最後建構管理決策矩陣,探討各專案所在象限與延伸管理意涵。
實證結果指出,智慧資本愈高則其「研發效率」與「技術擴散效率」之效率值愈高,亦即智慧資本對軍通專案能帶來競爭優勢及有助其價值提升的正向影響,其中又以人力資本最為關鍵。另外也發現,整體而言軍通專案之「研發效率」較「技術擴散效率」為佳,而「研發效率」又以「應用力學」領域之效率較佳,「技術擴散效率」以「化學與材料」領域之效率較佳。管理決策矩陣中軍通專案大多位於第I象限,顯示其目前之「研發效率」與「技術擴散效率」大致尚屬良善。
Chung- Shan Institute of Science and Technology (CSIST) is a National Defense Research Organization. For responding the needs of global trend and local industries development, CSIST executes the Technology Development Program (TDP) from the Ministry of Economic Affairs (MOEA) and the dual-use technology development plan, and cooperates with industries, officials, academics and institutes in Taiwan to play the role of national economic promoter. It carries out the policy of promoting national economic developments and local defense industries. The purpose of this paper is to develop two-stage production process of Dual-use Technology Development Programs (DuTDPs) to explore the “R&D performance” and “technology diffusion performance” by using a non-parametric frontier method-data envelopment analysis (DEA). In addition, this study also implements the sequential DEA identifying three DuTDP groups. One-Way ANOVA is used to analyze differences in intellectual capital (IC) variables across the three groups.
The results reveal that R&D performance is better than technology diffusion for DuTDPs. The “Applied Mechanics” is more efficient than the other fileds in R&D performance model. In the technology diffusion performance model,”Chemistry and Material” field is the best among all fields. The findings also point to the important of IC in achieving high levels of DuTDP efficiency. The potential applications and strengths of DEA and IC in assessing the performance of DuTDP are highlighted.
中文摘要
ABSTRACT
目 錄
圖 目 錄
表 目 錄
第壹章 緒論
1.1 研究背景與動機
1.2 研究目的
1.3 研究流程
1.4 章節架構
第貳章 文獻探討
2.1 中科院軍通專案簡介
2.2 研發專案計畫績效評估模式之相關研究
2.3 智慧資本與組織績效關聯性之相關研究
2.4 績效評估方法之相關研究
第參章 研究設計與方法
3.1 研究架構
3.2 研究對象與資料選取
3.3 分析方法
第肆章 實證結果分析
4.1 樣本敘述統計
4.2 兩階段生產績效模型分析
4.3 產業應用研發領域效率分析
4.4 智慧資本與軍通專案績效之關聯性分析
4.5 管理決策矩陣分析
第伍章 結論與建議
5.1 研究結論
5.2 研究建議
參考文獻
中文部份
1.工業技術研究院產業經濟與趨勢研究中心(2007)、資訊工業策進會資訊市場情報中心,2015年台灣產業發展願景與策略。
2.王文英、張清福(2004),「智慧資本影響績效模式之探討:我國半導體產業之實證研究」,會計評論,第39期,頁89-117。
3.王癸元、黃德舜(2002),「技術創新、智慧資本與企業附加價值關係研究」,2002中華企業評價學會研討會,頁23~38。
4.王癸元、黃德舜(2002),「員工生產力、人力資本與企業經濟附加價值關係研究」,2002 管理新思維學術研討會。
5.王東寶、盧文民(2008),「科技類及中小型共同基金績效評估:DEA方法之應用」,2008管理與創新國際學術研討會收錄、發表。
6.王東寶(2008)「智慧資本重要嗎?評估科技專案之研發效率與擴散能力」,國防大學管理學院財務管理學系碩士論文,頁10-43。
7.台灣智慧資本研究中心、財團法人資訊工業策進會資訊市場情報中心著(2006),智慧資本管理,華泰文化事業股份有限公司。
8.江世元、蔣德煊(2004),「國家科技發展之研發績效評估研究」,產業論壇,第7卷,第3期,頁1-23。
9.朱博湧、熊杏華、林裕淩、劉子衙(2005),「非營利研發機構之智慧資本與績效評估-工研院之實證研究」,管理學報,第22卷,第3期, 頁277-293。
10.朱斌妤(2005),科技專案績效評估,行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。
11.行政院國家科學委員會(2007),中華民國科學技術統計要覽,行政院國家科學委員會:台北市。
12.行政院(2003),挑戰2008:國家發展重點計畫(2002-2007)。
13.行政院國家科學委員會(2007),中華民國科學技術白皮書(民國96年至99年)。
14.李坤致(2001),「智慧資本與價值動因對企業價值影響之研究」,中正大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
15.李文福、蔡秋田(2004),「新產品研發技術效率及其影響因素之研究」,中山管理評論,第12卷,第3期,頁573-593。
16.吳秀娟(2000),企業市場價值與淨值差異影響之研究-以我國資訊電子業為例,政治大學會計學研究所碩士論文。
17.吳思華(2000),「智慧資本研究專案」,資訊工業策進會。
18.吳壽山(1995),科技專案績效評估作業之研究,經濟部技術處委託研究期末報告。
19.吳學良、林育司(2005),「經濟部科技專案執行效率之評估-資料包絡分析之實證」,科技管理期刊,第10卷,第1期,頁101-134。
20.林文修(2000),演化式類神經網路為基底的企業危機診斷模型:智慧資本之應用,國立中央大學資訊管理研究所博士論文。
21.林治廷(2000),科技研究發展專案的連續多期效率評估,國立交通大學工業工程與管理所碩士論文。
22.林月珠(2002),資料包絡分析法應用於電子、資訊領域科專計畫的效率評估,國立交通大學工業工程與管理學程碩士論文。
23.林江亮(2002),智慧資本與公司價值之攸關性探討,國立中央大學資訊管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。
24.林金祥(2002),台灣地區都市生產者服務業空間效率之研究,國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士論文。
25.林妙雀(2005),「企業之智慧資本與分享組織文化對組織管理績效影響之實証研究」,管理評論,第24卷,第1期,頁55-81。
26.柯承恩(2001),政府科技研究機構績效衡量之研究,行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。
27.徐基生、李宗耀、史欽泰、洪志洋、虞孝成、曾國雄(2003),「運用資料包絡分析法評量工業技術研究院各研發組織之研發績效」,管理評論,第22卷,第2期,頁25-53。
28.高強、黃旭男、 Sueyoshi著(2003),管理績效評估-資料包絡分析法,華泰文化事業股份有限公司。
29.莊明山(1994),目標導向研發專案評估方法研究,國立交通大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。
30.黃旭男(1992),資料包絡分析法使用程序之研究及其在非營利組織效率評估上之應用,國立交通大學管理科學研究所未出版博士學位論文。
31.許志偉(2006),以資料包絡分析法探討智慧資本、知識效能對非營業組織之重要性,私立華樊大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士學位論文。
32.陳怡之(2003),「科技研究機構組織績效評估之探討」,研考雙月刊,第27卷,第5期,頁62-79。
33.陳玉麟、蔡秋田(2005),「我國科技發展投資與生產效率之關聯性研究-隨機邊界法之應用」,交大管理評論,第25卷,第2期,頁211- 233。
34.陳玉玲(1999),組織內人力資本的蓄積-智慧資本管理之觀點,中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
35.陳美純(2001),資訊科技投資與智慧資本對企業績效影響之研究,國立中央大學資訊管理研究所未出版之博士論文。
36.陳美純著(2002),智慧資本-理論與實務。
37.陳鼎誠(2002),主機板產業經營效率分析-資料包絡分析法之運用,東吳大學經濟學研究所碩士論文。
38.曾俊堯(2000),智慧資本之探討與應用,行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。 
39.國防部軍備局中山科學研究院,1998至2007年度「國軍生產及服務作業基金-軍民通用科技發展作業基金」附屬單位決算報告。
40.國防部軍備局中山科學研究院,1998至2007年度統計報告。
41.經濟部中小企業處(2007),2007中小企業白皮書。
42.經濟部(2005),「科技專案績效考評委員會」作業要點,2005年3月1日第二次修正。
43.黃志男(1997),資料包絡分析法在科技專案執行效率評估的應用-以能源科技研發專案為例,國立交通大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。
44.楊千(2000),「科技專案計畫績效評估」,研考雙月刊,24卷,4期,頁30-36。
45.楊朝旭、蔡柳卿(2002),智慧資本與企業績效,行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。
46.董鍾明(2001),研發效率評估之資料包絡分析法實證研究-以主導性新產品開發計畫為例,國立台灣科技大學企業管理系碩士論文。
47.劉春初(2001),應用DEA 權重設限模型評估組織之相對效率,產業論壇,第二卷,第二期,161-178。
48.盧文民、王東寶(2007),「科技專案研發效率與技術擴散能力之研究」,台灣作業研究學會2007年國際學術研討會暨年會收錄、發表。
49.盧文民、王東寶(2008),「經濟部科技專案研發效率與技術擴散能力之研究」,2008第七屆中華決策科學年會暨學術研討會收錄、發表。
50.賴奎魁(1998),研究發展專案小組研發效率之評估與探討,行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。
51.賴志松(2001),政府資助研發機構計畫績效評估之研究-以經濟部科技專案為例,國立交通大學經營管理研究所未出版博士論文。
52.簡志豪(2001),影響智慧資本之研究-以我國上市資訊電子為例,逢甲大學會計學研究所碩士論文。
53.蘇雲一(1998),資料包絡分析法與比例分析法運用於科技專案效率評估之研究,國立交通大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。

英文部份
1.Agor, W. H. (1997). The measurement, use and development of intellectual capital to increase public sector productivity. Public Personnel Management, 27 (2), 175-186.
2.Amir, E and Lev, B. (1996), “Value-relevance of nonfinancial information: The wireless communications industry”, Journal of accounting & economics, 22(1-3), 3-30.
3.Bagozzi, R. P., and L.W. Phillips, (1982), “Representing and Testing Organizational Theories: A Holistic Construal,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 27(3), 459-489.
4.Banker, R. D., Charnes, A. and Cooper, W. W. (1984), “Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis”, Management Science, 30(9), 1078-1092.
5.Bassi, L. J. (1997), “Harnessing the power of intellectual capital,” Training &Development, Vol. 51, No. 12, 25-30.
6.Bassi, L. J. and Van Buren, M. E. (1999), “Valuing investment in intellectual capital,”International Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 18, No. 5/6/7/8, 414-432.
7.Bell, C.R., “Intellectual Capital, (1997),” Executive Excellence,” 14 (1), 15.
8.Bontis, N. (1996), “There’s a price on your head: managing intellectual capitalstrategically,” Ivey Business Quarterly, Vol.60, No. 4, summer, 40-47.
9.Bontis, N. (1998), “Intellectual capital: An exploratory study that develops measures and models”, Management Decision, 36(2), 63-76.
10.Bontis, N., Dragonetti, N., Jacobsen K., and Roos, G.(1999), “The knowledgetoolbox:A review of the tools available to measure and manage intangibleresources,” European Management Journal, 17, 391-402.
11.Bontis, N. (2004), “National Intellectual Capital Index: A United Nations initiative for the Arab region”, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5(1), 13-39.
12.Bontis, N., Keow, W. C. C. and Richardson, S. (2000), “Intellectual capital and business performance in Malaysian industries”, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1(1), 85-100.
13.Booth, R. (1998). The measurement of intellectual capital. Management Accounting, 76 (10), 26-28.
14.Brockett, P. L. and B. Golany, (1996), ”Using rank statistics for determining programmatic efficiency differences in data envelopment analysis,” Management Science, 42(3), 466-472.
15.Brooking, A., Board, P. and Jones, S. (1998), “The predictive potential of intellectualcapital,” International Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 16, No. 1/2/3, 115-125.
16.Chakravarthy, B. S. (1986), ”Measuring strategic performance,” Strategic Management Journal, 7(5), 437-458.
17.Changa, S. C., Chenb, S. S. and Laic, J. H. (2008), “The effect of alliance experience and intellectual capital on the value creation of international strategic alliances”, Omega, International Journal of management Science, 36, 298-316.
18.Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W. and Rhodes, E. (1978), “Measuring the efficiency of decision making units”, European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429-444.
19.Chang, S. C., Chen, S. S. and Lai, J. H. (2008), “The effect of alliance experience and intellectual capital on the value creation of international strategic alliances”, The International Journal of Management Science, 36 , 298-316.
20.Chu, P. Y., Lin, Y. L., Hsiung, H. H. and Liu, T. Y. (2006), “Intellectual capital: An empirical study of ITRI”, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 73, 886-902.
21.Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M. and Tone, K. (2002), Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
22.D'Aveni, R. A. and Kesner, I. F. (1993), “Top managerial prestige, power and tender offer response: a study of elite socal networks and target firm’s cooperation during takeovers”, Organization science, 4(2), 123-151.
23.Deeds, D. L. (2001), “The role of R&D intensity, technical development and absorptive capacity in creating entrepreneurial wealth in high technology start-ups”, Journal of engineering and technology management, 18(1), 29-47.
24.Dzinkowski, R. (2000). The measurement and management of intellectual capital: An introduction. Management Accounting, 78 (2), 32-36.
25.Edvinsson, L. and Sullivan, P. (1996), “Developing a Model for Managing Intellectual Capital”, European Management Journal, 14(4), 356-364.
26.Edvinsson, L. and Malone, M. (1997), Intellectual Capital: Realizing Your Company’sTrue Value by finding its Hidden Brainpower, New York: HarperCollinsPublishers Inc.
27.Edvinsson, L., Dvir, R., Roth, N. and Pasher,E. (2004), “Innovations: the new unit of analysis in the knowledge era: The quest and context for innovation efficiency and management of IC”, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5(1), 40-58.
28.Farrell, M. J. (1957), “The Measurement of Productive Efficiency”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 120(3), 253- 290.
29.Feng, Y. J., Lu, H. and Bi, K. (2004), “An AHP/DEA method for measurement of the efficiency of R&D management activities in universities”, International Transactions in Operational Research, 11, 181 -191.
30.Golany, B. and Roll, Y. (1989), “An application procedure for data envelopment analysis”, Omega, International Journal of management Science, 3, 237-250.
31.Grantham, C. E. and Nichols, L. D.(1997), “A framework for the management ofintellectual capital in the health care industry,” Journal of Health Care Finance,Vol. 23, No. 3, Spring,1-19.
32.Guthrie, J. (2001), “The management,measurement and the reporting of intellectual capital”, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2(1), 27-41.
33.Hong, H. K., Ha, S. H., Shin, C. K., Park, S. C. and Kim, S. H. (1999), “Evaluating the efficiency of system integration projects using data envelopment analysis (DEA) and machine learing”, Expert Systems with Applications, 16, 283-296.
34.Hsu, K. H. (2005), “Using Balanced Scorecard and Fuzzy Data Envelopment Analysis for Multinational R & D Project Performance Assessment”, Journal of American Academy of Business, 7(1), 189-196.
35.Hubert, Saint-Onge.(1996), “Tacit knowledge: the key to the strategic alignment ofintellectual capital,” Strategy & Leadership, Vol. 24, No. 2, Mar/Apr, 10-14.
36.Huselid, M. A. (1995), “The impact of human resource management practices on turnover productivity, and corporate financial performance”, Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 635-672.
37.Joia, L. A. (2000), “Measuring intangible corporate assets Linking business strategy with intellectual capital”, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1(1), 68- 84.
38.Johnson, W. H. A. (1999). An integrative taxonomy of intellectual capital: Measuring the stock and stock and flow of intellectual capital component in the firm. International Journal of Technology Management, 18 (5), 562-575.
39.Juma, N. and Payne, G. T. (2004), “Intellectual capital and performance of new venture high-tech firms”, International Journal of Innovation Management, 8(3), 297-318..
40.Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996a). Link the balanced scorecard to strategy. California Management, 70 (1), 53-79.
41.Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996b). Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. Harvard Business Review, 74 (1), 75-85.
42.Klein, D. A. & Prusak,“ Characterizing intellectual capital,” Multiclientprogram working paper, March 1994, Boston: Ernst & Young Center forBusiness Innovation.
43.Knight, D. J. (1999). Performance measure for increasing intellectual capital. Strategy & Leadership, 27 (2), 22-25.
44.Kong, E. (2007), “The strategic importance of intellectual capital in the non-profit sector”, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 8(4), 721-731.
45.Lepak, D. P. and Snell, S. A. (1999), “The human resource architecture : toward a theory of human capital allocation and development”, Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 31-48.
46.Lev, B. and Sougiannis, T. (1996), “The capitalization, amortization, and value-relevance of R&D”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 21(1), 107-138.
47.Lo, S. F. and Lu, W. M. (2006), “Dose size matter? Finding the Profitability and Marketability Benchmark of Financial Holding Companies”, Asia - Pacific Journal of Operational Research, 23(2), 229-246.
48.Luo, X. (2003),”Evaluating the profitability and Marketability efficiency of large banks: An application of data envelopment analysis,” Journal of Business Research, 56, 627-635.
49.Lynn, B. (1998). Intellectual capital: Key to value-added success in the next millennium. CAM Magazine, 71 (1), 10-15.
50.Lynn, B. E. (1999), “Culture and intellectual capital management: A key factor insuccessful ICM,” International Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 18,No. 5/6/7/8, 590-603.
51.Masoulas, V. (1998), “Organizational requirements definition for intellectual capitalmanagement,” International Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 16, No.1/2/3, 126-143.
52.Molyneux, A.(1998), “IC and the ASCPA: Seeking competitive advantage,”Australian CAP, Vol. 68, No. 5, June, 27-28.
53.Perelman, S. (1995), “R&D,Technoloical progress and efficiency change in industrial activities”, Review of Income and Wealth, 41(3), 349-366.
54.Petrash, G. (1996), “Dow’s journey to a knowledge value management culture,”European Management Journal, 14, 365-373.
55.Reichmann, G. (2004), “Measuring University Library Efficiency Using Data Envelopment Analysis”, Libri, 54, 136–146.
56.Rennie, M. (1999), “Accounting for knowledge assets: Do we need new financialstatement?” Int. J. Technology Management (18),648-659.
57.Roos, J., Roos, G., Dragonetti, N. C., & Edvinsson, L. (1997). Intellectual capital: Navigating in the new business landscape. New York: New York University Press.
58.Roos, G. and Roos, J. (1997), “Measuring your company’sintellectual performance”, Long Range Planning, 30(3), 413-426. 31 (1), 150-153.
59.Roos, J., Roos G., Edvinsson L., and Dragonetti, N. C. (1998), Intellectual Capital:Navigating in the New Business Landscape. New York: New York UniversityPress.
60.Seiford, L. M. and Zhu, J. (1999), “Profitability and marketability of the top 55 US commercial banks”, Management Science, 45(9), 1270-1288.
61.Sherman, H. D. and Zhu, J.(2006), Service Productivity Management Improving Service Performance using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), Springer Science Business Media, LLC, U.S.A.
62.Skandia Assurance & Financial Services (1994), Visualizing Intellectual Capital in Skandia annual report.
63.Stewart, T. A. (1994), “Your Company’s Most Valuable Asset: Intellectual Capital”, Fortune, 130(7), 68-74.
64.Stewart, T. A. (1997). Intellectual capital. London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.
65.Stewart, T. A. (1997). Intellectual capital: The new wealth of organization. New York: Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group, Incorporation.
66.Sueyoshi, T. and Aoki, S. (2001), “A use of a nonparametric statistic for DEA frontier shift: the Kruskal and Wallis rank test”, Omega, International Journal of management Science, 29, 1-18.
67.Sveiby, K. E. (1997). The new organizational wealth-managing and measuring knowledge-based assets. New York: Berrett-Koehler publishing.
68.Sveiby, K. E. (1998), “Intellectual capital: thinking ahead,” Australian CPA, Vol.68,No.5, Jun,18-22.
69.Swink, M., Talluri, S. and Pandejpong, T. (2006), “Faster, better, cheaper: A study of NPD project efficiency and performance tradeoffs”, Journal of Operations Management, 24, 542-562.
70.Tseng, C. Y. and Goo, Y. J. J. (2005), “Intellectual capital and corporate value in an emerging economy: empirical study of Taiwanese manufacturers”, R&D management, 35(2), 187-201.
71.Ulrich, D. (1998), “Intellectual Capital = Compectence × Commitment”, Sloan Management Review, 39(2), 15-26.
72.Wang, E. C. and Huang, W. (2007), “Relative efficiency of R&D activities: A cross-country study accounting for environmental foctors in the DEA approach”, Research Policy, 36, 260-273.
73.Wang, W. Y. and Chang, C. F. (2005), “Intellectual capital and performance in causal models Evidence from the information technology industry in Taiwan”, Journal of Intellectual capital, 6(2), 222-236.
74.Wu, W. Y., Tsai, H. J., Cheng, K. Y. and Lai, M. (2006), “Assessment of intellectual capital management in Taiwanese IC design companies: using DEA and the Malmquist productivity index”, R&D management, 36(5), 531-545.
75.Zhu, J. (2000), ”Multi-factor performance measure model with an application to Fortune 500 companies,” European Journal of Operational Research, 123(1), 105-124.

網路資料
1.中科院龍園科學園區軍民通用技術服務網,網址:http://www.csistdup.org.tw/index2.asp。
2.行政院主計處,網址:http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/。
3.行政院國家科學委員會,網址:http://www.nsc.gov.tw/。
4.經濟部技術處全球資訊網,網址:http://doit.moea.gov.tw/03know/product.asp。
5.經濟部技術處科專計畫統計總覽,網址:http://tierwebs.tier.org.tw/itis/itis12.asp。
6.經濟部技術處業界開發產業技術計畫網站,網址:http://innovation1.tdp.org.tw/content/application/tdp_itdp/fulltext.class/cntgrp-browse.php。
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top