臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

　　對於位於偏遠地區的海邊國小學校而言，因校長選聘任用的制度，校長調動頻繁，基於每位新到任校長有不同的教學領導風格，也帶來不同的組織運作模式，學校教職員及學生勢必重新適應其教學領導模式。為求學校整體卓越之效能，校長應該深切體認教學領導的重要，積極致力於增進教學與行政效能，提升學生有效學習。
　
　　本研究以系統動態學的觀點，採用Vensim軟體進行系統模式的構建，並舉數值範例對教學與行政的互動情形進行模擬分析與說明，經由數值模擬發現以下系統動態結果：當獎懲的幅度、工作職分提高及改善資訊處理時間時，對教學系統及行政系統的效能均產生正面影響，另提升獎懲幅度以組織運作中期實施最有顯著效果，惟當獎懲的幅度不足或過高時，將產生負面影響。此外，當組織執行力能維持最低閾值（Threshold）時，不論執行力高低均不影響教學效能及行政效能，但當其低於最低閾值時，則對教學效能及行政效能造成負面影響。
　
　　相關學校可根據其所面臨的不同情境以參數設定的方式輸入，即可迅速取得未來執行結果，因此本研究對於校長領導風格之行為模擬而言，著實提供一具有價值的決策工具。

　　Owing to the principals’ select system, those rural area schools which located near the coastland of seas have new principals every two to three years. Every principal has different kind of leadership style, and therefore forms different kinds of organizational operation model. The staff and students have to readjust every time because of the newer leadership style. In order to maximize teaching and learning effectiveness,principals should realize the importance of instructional leadership and devote positively to promote the teaching efficacy and the student to study effectively.
　
　　This research uses the Vensim packaged software to construct the dynamic model by applying the system dynamics approach；a exemplified case is followed to describe as well as to analyze the interactive situation between teaching and administration.
　
　　The main conclusions of this research are presented as below: It has the positive influence on the efficacy of teaching and administration when the rewards and job responsibility are enhanced and they also improved the processing time of information. On the other hand, it will have the remarkable effect when the rewards are enhanced in the intermediate phase of the organization operation. However, if the rewards could not be applicable, it will have a negative influence on teaching efficacy. In addition, if the organization execution can keep up its threshold, the teaching and administration efficacy could not be affected. But if it is lower the threshold, the negative influence on teaching and administration efficacy is happened.
　
　　The related school could apply the proposed model to describe its associated situation by changing the input parameters only.The associated results can be simulated quickly as its referenced basis.Therefore,this research provides a valuable policy-making tool for elementary school principals because the efficacy of teaching and administration could be simulated according to different leadership styles.

中文摘要i
英文摘要ii
目錄iv
圖目錄vi
　
第一章　緒論1
1.1　研究背景及動機1
1.2　研究目的2
1.3　研究架構及流程3
　
第二章　文獻探討4
2.1　系統動態學4
2.2　反饋系統5
2.2.1　因果關係與正、負因果鍊5
2.2.2　反饋與反饋迴路6
2.2.3　存量、流量、輔助變數與反饋迴路8
2.2.4　Vensim套裝軟體9
2.3　授權程度9
2.4　工作倦怠與工作動機10
2.5　教育績效責任與獎勵制度11
2.6　教學領導13
2.7　組織溝通16
　
第三章　系統模式建構18
3.1　建構系統因果圖19
3.2　建構Vensim系統動態模型20
　
第四章　範例模擬與分析24
4.1　校長教學領導對教學與行政效能的影響24
4.2　組織執行力25
4.3　工作職分29
4.4　獎懲幅度33
4.5　時間延滯39
　
第五章　結論與建議44
5.1　結論與建議44
5.2　未來研究方向45
　
參考文獻
一、中文部分46
二、英文部分48
附錄一50
附錄二51
附錄三53
個人簡歷57

一、中文部分
　
1.王敏男（民96），探討有效能的教師和有效能的教學，幼兒保育論壇，2期，148-155頁。
　
2.何金針（民90），新世紀時代學校校長領導之省思，學校行政雙月刊，16期，31頁。
　
3.邱惜玄（民90），學校革新之要務—落實校長教學領導，研習資訊，18卷，6期，15-21頁。
　
4.洪碧珠（民94），國民小學兼任行政教師知覺校長激勵策略與學校組織效能關係之研究，學校行政雙月刊，35期，72-94頁。
　
5.洪啟昌（民92），學校權力結構改變與校長領導因應轉變，學校行政雙月刊，23期，79頁。
　
6.徐自強（民97），教育績效指標之評量，品質月刊，44卷，6期，30-35頁。
　
7.陳昱元（民93），國中小校長的領導探討，學校行政雙月刊，31期，7-15頁。
　
8.韓釧（民91），系統動力學-探索動態複雜之鑰（初版），台北：華泰文化事業有限公司。
　
9.黃哲斌（民93），談增權授能在學校行政之應用，學校行政雙月刊，30期，31-46頁。
　
10.黃俊傑（民97），教育績效責任對學校經營的啟示，學校行政雙月刊，55期，154-168頁。
　
11.黃怡雯（民96），組織溝通在校長領導之應用，學校行政雙月刊，51期，19-34頁。
　
12.張弘勳、蔡淑苓（民95），教師工作倦怠的成因與預防，學校行政雙月刊，36期，62-79頁。
　
13.張憲庭（民94），少子化現象對學校經營管理之衝擊與因應之道，學校行政雙月刊，36期，87-93頁。
　
14.葉子超（民95），國民中小學校長行政領導、工作壓力與積極調適之道，學校行政雙月刊，36期，1-16頁。
　
15.葉佳文（民94），有效能的學校經營-成功的校長領導，學校行政雙月刊，40期，30-46頁。
　
16.蔡慶文、范熾文、林清達（民95），國小校長教學領導與教師教學效能之研究，花蓮教育大學學報，23期，29-48頁。
　
17.蔡淑玲、張本文（民97），組織學習與行政效能關係之研究，學校行政雙月刊，56期，54-79頁。
　
18.劉明德（民94），中小學校長教學領導核心技術關鍵之探討，學校行政雙月刊，38期，65-75頁。
　
19.韓繼成（民97），論試辦教師專業發展條件及改進策略，學校行政雙月刊，55期，169-189頁。
　
二、英文部分
　
1.Andersen, D.A. & Richardson, G.P. (1980), Toward a Pedagogy of System Dtnamcics, In System Dynamics: TIMS Studies in the Management Sciences, No.14, pp.209-228.
　
2.Forrester, Jay W. (1975), A New Corporation Design, Industrial Management Review , Vol.7, No.1, pp.5-17.
　
3.George, J.M. & Jones, G.R. (1999), Understanding and Managing Organizational Behavior,2nd Edition, Addison-Wesley, New York.
　
4.Hackman, R.C. (1969), The Motivated Working Adult, New York, American Management Association.
　
5. Hoy, W.K. & Miskel, G.G. (1991), Education administration: theory, research, and practice ,3rd Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York.
　
6. Legasto, A.A. & Maciariello J.（1980, System Dynamics: A Critical Review, Studies in the Management Science, Vol.14, pp.23-43.
　
7.Lubbers, J.M. (1990), An Investigation to Determine if Principal Behaviors Can Impact Teacher Efficacy, unpublished doctoral thesis, Michigan State University.
　
8. Luthans, F. (2002), Organizational Behavior,9nd Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York.
　
9.Lynch, G.L. (2000), Effective Leadership Behavior:In Selected Municipal Departments, unpublished doctoral thesis, University of New York at Albany.
　
10.Lyneis, J.M.（2000）, System Dynamics for Market Forecasting Structural Analysis, System Dynamics Review, Vol.16, No.11, pp.3-25.
　
11.Northouse, P.G. (2001), Leadership: Theory and Practice, Sage, California.
　
12.Sari, H. (2004), An analysis of Burnout and Job Satisfaction Among Turkish Special School Headteachers and Teachers, and Factors Effecting Their Burnout and Job Satisfaction, Education Studies, Vol.30, No.3, pp.290-306.
　
13.Senge, P.M.（1990）, The Fifth Discipline-The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization, Doubleday, New York.
　
14.Sterman, J.D.（2000）, Business Dynamics: System Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World, McGraw, Hill.
　
15.Talmor, R., Reiter, S. & Feigin, N. (2005), Factors Relating to Regular Education Teacher Burnout in Inclusive Education, European Journal of Special Needs Education, No.18, pp.215-229.
　
16.Terry, G.R. (1962), Englewood Cliff: Principles of Management,4th Edition, Prentice-Hall, N.J.
　
17.Weick, K.E. (1976), Educational Organizations as Loosely Coupled System, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.21, No.1, pp.1-19.
　
18.Yuki, G.A. (1991), Englewood Cliffs: Leadership in Organizations, Prentice-Hall, N.J.