跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(35.173.42.124) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/07/26 13:05
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:林柏志
研究生(外文):Po-jhin Lin
論文名稱:遊憩專們化、場所依戀、心流體驗之關係研究—以台灣池釣者為例
論文名稱(外文):A Study on the Relationship among Recreation Specialization, Place Attachment, Flow Experience for Pondfishing in Taiwan
指導教授:丁誌魰丁誌魰引用關係
指導教授(外文):Chih-wen Ting
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:南華大學
系所名稱:旅遊事業管理學系碩士班
學門:民生學門
學類:餐旅服務學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2009
畢業學年度:97
語文別:中文
論文頁數:87
中文關鍵詞:遊憩專們化場所依戀心流體驗
外文關鍵詞:specializationflow exeperienceplace attachment
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:10
  • 點閱點閱:330
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:2
  遊憩專門化理論指出個人在生理活動、情意狀態以及場所偏好會有所不同,雖有些研究證實專門化會造成場所依戀或是心流現象的發生,但是過去文獻少有學者同時探討此三構面,本研究是首先將此三構面同時做研究探討,並且找出此三構之間的相互影響性;抽樣對象則是台灣地區的池釣專門化者,有效問卷412份,分析過程先以驗證性因素分析驗證各構面的構成成分,並使用結構方程式找出各構面之間的關係;分析結果有三項發現,首先發現遊憩專門化對心流體驗會有顯著的正向影響關係,其二為心流體驗對場所依戀會有顯著的正向影響關係,第三是遊憩專門化對場所依戀沒有顯著的影響。
  Recreation specialization theory predicts that individuals differ from their physical, management, and social setting preferences.Although some Perious studies support the hypothesis that specialization may result in place attachment or flow exeperience,there were few literatures on searching into those relation. This paper aims to discuss the effections among recreation specialization, place attachment and flow exeperience. A total of 412 useable samples via the questionnaire survey members of the Taipei fisihging Association . The Results of SEM research shows that:(1) Flow exeperience was influenced positively by recreation specialization;(2) Place attachment was influenced positively by flow exeperience ;(3)Place attachment was not influenced positively by Recreation specialization.
中文摘要………………………………………………………………i
英文摘要……………………………………………………………ii
目錄………………………………………………………………iii
表目錄………………………………………………………………v
圖目錄………………………………………………………………vi
符號說明……………………………………………………………vii
 
第一章 緒論……………………………………………………1
1.1 研究背景………………………………………………1
1.2 研究動機………………………………………………4
1.3 研究對象………………………………………………7
1.4 研究目的………………………………………………7
1.5 研究流程………………………………………………8
 
第二章 文獻探討………………………………………………9
2.1 遊憩專門化……………………………………………9
2.2 場所依戀……………………………………………13
2.3 心流體驗………………………………………………17
2.4 各變項間的影響關係…………………………………23
 
第三章 研究方法………………………………………………30
3.1 研究架構與假設………………………………………30
3.2 研究變項之操作性定義………………………………31
3.3 問卷設計與抽樣方法…………………………………31
3.4 資料分析方法………………………………………36
 
第四章 研究結果與討論………………………………………37
4.1 描述性統計分析………………………………………37
4.2 構面衡量的信度………………………………………44
4.3 結構方程式模型分析…………………………………45
 
第五章 結論與建議……………………………………………62
5.1 研究結論………………………………………………62
5.2 主要貢獻………………………………………………66
5.3 實務建議………………………………………………67
5.4 研究限制………………………………………………69
5.5 後續研究建議…………………………………………70
 
參考文獻…………………………………………………………71
一中文部份………………………………………………………71
二英文部份………………………………………………………72
 
附錄一 研究問卷……………………………………………84
附錄二 各觀察變項之偏態、峰度係數值…………………87
中文部份
1.中國評論網絡有限公司(2006),漁具專賣店前景可觀,僑報。
 
2.台北市進出口商業同業公會(2008),進出口貿易報告,貿易雜誌電子報,201期。
 
3.台北市釣魚協會網站(2008),大陸池釣深圳站總冠軍- -www.taipeifishing.com。
 
4.台灣釣權會(2005),建議台中港務局開放北堤釣魚公文。
 
5.李嘉聲(1991),池釣釣技秘訣,戶外生活圖書股份有限公司,台北市。
 
6.吳嵩浩(2004), 時報周刊,全球華文行銷知識庫。
 
7.林晏州(1984),遊憩者選擇遊憩區之研究,都市與計畫,第10卷,35頁。
 
 
8.倪執中(1987),觀光遊憩活動淺說,觀光資料,132期,30-35頁。
 
9.周文賢(1991),觀光、旅遊與遊憩等相關名詞之界定,民國80年觀光事業發展學術研討會論文集,交通部觀光局,1-1~1-10頁。
 
10.梁英文與曹勝雄(2007),認真性休閒與場所依戀之關係:遊憩專門化扮演的角色,戶外遊憩研究, 20(3),1-24頁。
 
11.曹正(1979),東北角海岸風景區規畫報告,台北:交通部觀光局。
 
12.葉源鎰(2007),具心流體驗之高爾夫運動參與者之心流體驗、休閒阻礙與遊憩精熟度之相關性研究,戶外遊憩研究, 20(1),69-94頁。
 
13.詹滿色、林妍伶、莊慶達(2007),台灣外岸磯釣遊憩效益之評估,農業與經濟,39,45-72頁。
 
14.譚佛航(2005),現代垂釣,國家出版社,台北市。

15.NOWnews(2004),父親節陪爸爸釣魚去,環保擬餌研習營。
 
16.Taiwan News財經•文化周刊,0244期。
 
英文部份
1.Bagozzi, R. P. &Yi, Y. (1988), On the evaluation of structural equation models, Academic of Marketing Science, Vol.16, pp.74-94.
 
2.Beatty, S. E., Kahle, L. R., & Homer, P. (1988), The involvement-commitment model: Theory and implications, Journal of Business Research, Vol.16, pp.149–167.
 
3.Becker, H. S. (1960), Notes on the concept of commitment, American Journal of Sociology,Vol.66, pp.32–40.
 
4.Bloch, P. H., Black, W. C., & Lichtenstein, D. (1989), Involvement with the equipment component of sport: Links to recreational commitment, Leisure Sciences, Vol.11, pp.187–200.
 
5.Bentler, P. M. (1995), EQS: Structural equations program manual, Encino: Multivariate Software.
 
6.Bricker, K. S. (1998), Place and preference: A study of whitewater recreationists on the South Fork of the American River, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania.
 
7.Bricker, K. S. & Kerstetter, D. L. (2000), Level of specialization and place attachment: An exploratory study of whitewater recreationists, Leisure Sciences, Vol.22, pp.233–257.
 
8.Bryan, H. (1977), Leisure value systems and recreation specialization: The case of trout fishermen, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.9, pp.174-187.
 
9.Buchanan, T. (1985), Commitment and leisure behavior: A theoretical perspective, Leisure Sciences, Vol.7, pp.401–420.
 
10.Cantrell, R. N., G. Marissa, P. S. Leung, & D. Ziemann (2004), “Recreational Anglers’ Willingness to Pay for Increased Catch Rates of Pacific Threadfin (Polydactylus Sexfilis) in Hawaii,” Fisheries Research, Vol.68, pp.149-158.
 
11.Carli, M., DelleFave, A., & Massimini, F. (1988), The quality of experience in flow channels: omparison of Italian and U.S. students. In M. Csikszentmihalyi & I. Csikszentmihalyi (eds.), Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness, pp. 288–306. NY: Cambridge University Press.
 
12.Chipman, B. & Helfrich, L. (1988), Recreational specialization and motivations of Virginia river anglers, North Americans Journal of Fisheries Management, Vol.8, pp.390–398.
 
13.Choi, S., Loomis, D., & Ditton, R. (1994), Effect of social group, activity, and specialization on recreation substitution decisions. Leisure Sciences, Vol.16, pp.143–159.
 
14.Crosby, L. A. & Taylor, J. R. (1983), Psychological commitment and its effects on postdecision evaluation and preference stability among voters, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.9, pp.413–431.
 
15.Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975), Beyond boredom and anxiety, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
 
16.Csikszentmihalyi M. (1978), Intrinsic rewards and emergent motivation, In: Lepper MR, Greene D. editors, The hidden costs of reward. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc, pp.205–16.
 
17.Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Csikszentmihalyi, I. (1988), Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness, NY: Cambridge Press.
 
18.Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990), Flow: The psychology of optimal experience, NY: Harper & Row.
 
19.Davenport, M. A., & Anderson, D. H. (2005), Getting from sense of place to place-based management: An interpretive investigation of place meanings and preceptions of landscape change, Society & Natural Rresources, Vol.18, pp.625-64.
 
20.deCharms, R. (1968), Personal causation: The internal affective determinants of behavior, New York: Plenum Press.
 
21.Deci, E. (1975), Intrinsic motivation, New York: Plenum.
 
22.Ditton, R. B., Loomis, D. K., & Choi, S. (1992), Recreational specialization: Re-conceptualization from a social world perspective, Journal of Leisure Research, Vol.24, pp.33–51.
 
23.Doell, C. E. & Twardzik, L. F. (1979), Elements of Park and Recreation Administration, New York: Burgess Public Company.
 
24.Donnelly, M., Vaske, J., & Graefe, A. (1986), Degree and range of recreation specialization: Toward a typology of boating related activities, Journal of Leisure Research, Vol.18, No.2, pp.81–95.
 
25.Driver, B. L. (1976), Toward a better understanding of the social benefits of outdoor recreation participation, In Proceedings of the Southern States Recreation Research Applications Workshop, pp. 63–189.
 
26.Ellis, G.,Voelkl, J., & Morris, C. (1994), Measurement and analysis issues with explanation of variance in daily experience using the flow model, Journal of Leisure Research, Vol.26, No.4, pp.337–356.
 
27.Ellis, C. & Bochner,A. (2000), Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: Researcher as subject. In N. Denzin, & Y. Lincoln, (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 733–768). London: Sage Publications.
 
28.Fisher, A. C., W. M. Hanemann, & A. G. Keeler (1990), “Integrating Fishery and Water Resource Management: A Biological Model of a California Salmon Fishery,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol.20, No.3, pp.234-61.
 
29.Godbey, G. (1976) , Recreation and Park Planning: The Exercise of Values, Ontario: University of Waterloo.
 
30.Guiliani, M. V. & Feldman, R. (1993), Place attachment in a developmental and cultural context, Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol.13, pp.267–274.
 
31.Hairs, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998), Multivariate data analysis, Englewood Cliffs: Printice Hall.
 
32.Hammitt,W. E., & McDonald, C. D. (1983), Past on-site experience and its relationship to managing river recreation resources, Forest Science, Vol.29, No.2, pp.262–266.
 
33.Hammitt,W. E., Backlund, E. A., & Bixler, R. D. (2004), Experience use history, place bonding, and resource substitution among trout anglers during recreational engagements, Journal of Leisure Research, Vol.36, pp.356–378.
 
34.Havitz, M. E. & Dimanche, F. (1997), Leisure involvement revisited: Conceptual conundrums and measurement advances, Journal of Leisure Research, Vol.29, pp.245–278.
 
35.Havitz, M. E. & Dimanche, F. (1999), Leisure involvement revisited: Drive properties and paradoxes, Journal of Leisure Research, Vol.31, pp.122–149.
 
36.Huctchinson, J. (1951), Principles of Recreation, New York: Ronald.
 
37.Hu, L. & Bentler, P. M. (1999), Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance , Structural Equation Modeling,Vol.6,No.1,pp.1-55.
 
38.Hunt, L. M. (2004), Examining State Dependence and Place Attachment Within a Recreational Fishing Site Choice Model, Journal of Leisure Research, Vol.40, pp.110–127.
 
39.Jackson, S. A. & Csikszentmihalyi M. (1999), Flow in Sports: The Keys to Optimal Experiences and Performances.
 
40.Jacob, G. R. & Schreyer, R. (1980), Conflict in outdoor recreation: A theoretical perspective, Journal of Leisure Research, Vol.12, pp.368–380.
 
41.Jöreskog, K. G. & Sörbom, D. (1989), LISREL 7:A guide to the program and applications,Chicago:SPSS.
 
42.Jones C. D., Hollenhorst S. J., & Perna F. (2003), An Empirical Comparison of the Four Channel Flow Model and Adventure Experience Paradigm. Leisure Sciences, Vol.25, pp.17–31.
 
43.Johnson, M. (1973), Commitment:Aconceptual structure and empirical application, The Sociological Quarterly, Vol.14, pp.395–406.
 
44.Jorgensen, B.&Stedman, R. (2001). Sense of place as an attitude: Lakeshore owners’ attitudes toward their properties, Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol.21, pp.233–248.
 
45.Kauffman, R. B. & Graefe, A. R. (1984), Canoeing specialization, expected rewards, and resource related attitudes. In J. S. Popodic, D. I. Butterfield, D. H. Anderson, & M. R. Popodic (eds.), National River Recreation Symposium proceedings, pp. 629–641. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University.
 
46.Keaveney, S. M. (2008), Equines and their human companions, Journal of Business Research, Vol.61, pp.444–454.
 
47.Kelly, J. R. (1977), Leisure socialization: Replication and extension, Journal of Leisure Research, Vol.9, pp.121–132.
 
48.Kubey, R., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990), Television and the quality of life: How viewing shapes everyday experience, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
 
49.Kuentzel, W. F. & Heberlein, T. (1992), Does specialization affect behavioral choices and quality judgments among hunters? Leisure Sciences, Vol.14, pp.211–226.
 
50.Kuentzel,W. F. & McDonald, C. D. (1992), Differential effects of past experience, commitment, and lifestyle dimensions of river use specialization, Journal of Leisure Research, Vol.24, pp.269–287.
 
51.Kyle, G. T., Graefe, A. R., Manning, R. E., & Bacon, J. (2003), An examination of the relationship between leisure activity involvement and place attachment among hikers along the Appalachian Trail, Journal of Leisure Research, Vol.35, pp.249–273.
 
52.Kyle, G., Bricker, K., Graefe, A., & Wickham, T (2004), An examination of recreationists'' relationships with activities and settings, Leisure Sciences, Vol.26, pp.123-142.
 
53.Kyle, G. T., Graefe, A. R., & Manning, R. E. (2004), Place attached recreationists . . . Who are they? Journal of Recreation and Parks Administration, Vol.22, No.2, pp.65–84.
 
54.Kyle, G., Ciraefe, A., & Manning, R. (2005), Testing the demensionality of place attachment in recreational settings, Environment and Behavior, Vol.37, No.1, pp.53-177.
 
55.Kyle, G.& Chick, G. (2007), The Social Construction of a Sense of Place, Leisure Sciences, Vol.29, pp.209–225.
 
56.Laitila, T. and A. Paulrud (2006), “A Multi-Attribute Extension of Discrete - Choice Contingent Valuation for Valuation of Angling Site Characteristics,” Journal of Leisure Research, Vol.38, pp.133-142.
 
57.Lastovicka, J. L. & Gardner, D. M. (1979), Components in involvement. In J. C. Maloney & B. Silverman (eds.), Attitude research plays for high stakes , pp. 53–73, Chicago: American Marketing Association.
 
58.Lee, J. H., & Scott, D. (2004), Measuring birding specialization: A confirmatory factors analysis, Leisure Sciences, Vol.26, pp.245–260.
 
59.Lee S. H. (2007), The Effects of Specialization and Genderon Motivations and Preferences for Site Attributes in Paddling, Leisure Sciences, Vol.29, pp.355–373.
 
60.Lee, S. (1993), Recreation choice behavior: The interrelationships of specialization levels, motivations,perceptions of site attributes and spatial choice patterns.Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania.
 
61.Lepper, M., & Greene, D. (1978), The hidden costs of reward, Ventura, CA: Halsted Press.
 
62.Low, S. M. & Altman, I. (1992), Place attachment: A conceptual inquiry, In Altman, I., and Low, S. M. (Eds.), Place attachment, New York: Plenum Press, pp.1–12.
 
63.Mannell, R., Zuzanek, J., & Larson, R. (1988), Leisure states and “flow”experiences:Testing perceived freedom and intrinsic motivation hypotheses, Journal of Leisure Research, Vol.20. No.4, pp.289–304.
 
64.Martin, S. R. (1997), Specialization and differences in setting preferences among wildlife viewer, Human Dimensions of Wildlife, Vol.2, No.1, pp.1–18.
 
65.Maslow, A. (1968), Toward a psychology of being, New York: Van Nostrand.
 
66.Massimini, F., & Carli, M. (1986), La selezione psicologica umana tra biologia e cultura. In F. Massimini & P. Inghilleri (eds.), L’esperienza quotidiana , pp.65–84, Milan: Franco Angeli.
 
67.Matthews, H. G. (1982), Tourism: Economic, Physical and Social Impacts, New York: Longman.
 
68.McCaville R. (2007), From a Fall in the Mall to a Run in the Sun:One Journey to Ironman Triathlon, Leisure Sciences, Vol.29, pp.159–173.
 
69.McDonald, R. P. & Ho, M. R. (2002), Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analysis, Psychological Methods, Vol.7, pp.64-82.
 
70.McFarlane, B. L., Boxall, P. C.,&Watson, D. O. (1998), Past experience and behavioral choice among wilderness users, Journal of Leisure Research, Vol.30, pp.195–213.
 
71.McFarlane, B. L. (2004), Recreation Specialization and Site Choice Among Vehicle-Based Campers, Leisure Sciences, Vol.26, pp.309–322.
 
72.McIntyre, N. (1989), The personal meaning of participation: Enduring involvement, Journal of Leisure Research, Vol.21, No.2, pp.167–179.
 
73.McIntyre, N. & Pigram, J. J. (1992), Recreation specialization reexamined: The case of vehicle-based campers, Leisure Sciences, Vol.14, pp.3–15.
 
74.Mitchell, R. (1983), Mountain experience: The psychology and sociology of adventure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
 
75.Moore, R. L. & Graefe, A. R. (1994), Attachments to recreation settings: The case of rail-trail users, Leisure Sciences, Vol.16, pp.17–31.
 
76.Mowen, A. J., Graefe, A. R., & Virden, R. J. (1997), A typology of place attachment and activity involvement. In H. G. Vogelsong (ed.), Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium , pp.89–92.
 
77.Pomfret,G. (2006), Mountaineering adventure tourists: a conceptual framework for research, Tourism Management, Vol.27, pp.113-123.
 
78.Proshansky, H. M. (1978), The city and self-identity, Environment and Behavior, Vol.10, pp.147–169.
 
79.Proshansky, H. M., Fabian, A. K., & Kaminoff, R. (1983), Place-identity: Physical social world socialization of the self, Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol.3, pp.57–83.
 
80.Roberts, K. (1978), Contemporary society and the growth of leisure, London : Longman.
 
81.Saltz, R. J., Loomis, D. K., & Finn, K. L. (2001), Development and validation of a specialization index and testing of specialization theory, Human Dimensions of Wildlife, Vol.6, pp.239–258.
 
82.Schreyer, R. M., Jacob, G., & White, R. (1981), Environmental meaning as a determinant of spatial behavior in recreation. Papers and proceedings of the Applied Geography Conferences, Kent State University, Vol.4, pp. 294–300.
 
83.Schreyer, R. & Roggenbuck, J.W. (1981), Visitor images of National Parks: The influences of social definitions of places on perceptions of behavior. In D. Lime & D. Field (eds.), Some recent products of river recreation research , pp.39–44.
 
84.Schreyer, R. & Lime, D. (1984), A novice isn’t necessarily a novice: The influence of experience use history on subjective perceptions of recreation participation, Leisure Sciences, Vol.6, pp.131–149.
 
85.Schreyer, R., & Beaulieu, J. T. (1986), Attribute preference for wild-land recreation settings, Journal of Leisure Research, Vol.18, pp.231–247.
 
86.Schreyer, R., Lime, D., & Williams, D. (1989), Characterizing the influence of past experiences on recreation behavior, Journal of Leisure Research, Vol.16, pp.34–50.
 
87.Scott, D., & Shafer, S. (2001a), A rejoinder to reviewers’ comments, Journal of Leisure Research, Vol.33, pp. 319–343.
 
88.Scott, D., & Shafer, S. (2001b), Recreational specialization: A critical look at the construct, Journal of Leisure Research, Vol.33, pp.357–361.
 
89.Scott, D., & Thigpen, J. (2003), Understanding the birder as tourist: Segmenting visitors to the texas hummer /bird celebration, Human Dimensions of Wildlife, Vol.8, No.3, pp.199–218.
 
90.Shafer, C. S. & Hammit, W. (1995), Purism revisited: Specifying recreational conditions of concern according to resource intent, Leisure Sciences, Vol 17, pp.15–30.
 
91.Shelby, B. & Vaske, J. (1991), Resource and activity substitutes for recreational salmon fishing in New Zealand, Leisure Sciences, Vol 13, pp.21–32.
 
92.Stebbins, R. (1992), Amateurs, professional, and serious leisure. Montreal, Canada: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
 
93.Stedman, R. C. (2002), Toward a social pychology of place: Predicting behavior from placebased cognitions, attitude, and identity, Flnvitvnmenl and Behavior, Vol.34, pp.561 58.
 
94.Stokols, D. & Shumaker, S. A. (1981), People and places: A transactional view of settings. In J. Harvey (ed.), Cognition, social behavior, and the environment, pp.441–488, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
 
95.Tuan, Y. F. (1977), Space and place: The perspectives of experience, St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
 
96.Thapa, B. (1996), The role of tolerance in recreation conflict: The case of adult skiers and snowboarders, Unpublished masters’ thesis, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania.
 
97.Virden, R. J. & Schreyer, R. M. (1988), Recreation specialization as an indicator of environmental preference, Environment and Behavior, Vol.20, pp.721–739.
 
98.Voelkl, J. (1990), The challenge-skill ratio of daily experiences among older adults residing in nursinghomes, Therapeutic Recreation Journal, Vol.24, No.2, pp.7–17.
 
99.Voelkl, j.e., & Ellis, D.G. (1998), Measuring flow experience in daily life:An examination of the items used to measure challenge and skill, Journal of Leisure Research, Vol.30, No.3, pp.380–389.
 
100.Wellman, D., Roggenbuck, J., & Smith, A. (1982), Recreational specialization and norms of depreciative behavior among canoeists, Journal of Leisure Research, Vol.14, pp.323–340.
 
101.Wickham, T. D. (2000), Attachments to places and activities: The relationship of psychological constructs to customer satisfaction, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania.
 
102.Williams, D. R. & Huffman, M. (1986), Recreation specialization as a factor in backcountry trail choice, In Proceedings of the National Wilderness Research Conference: Current Research, pp.31–45.
 
103.Williams, D. R. & Roggenbuck, J.W. (1989), Measuring place attachment: Some preliminary results, In L. H. McAvoy & D. Howard (eds.), Leisure Research Symposium, p. 32, Arlington, VA: National Recreation and Park Association.
 
104.Williams, D. R., Patterson, M. E., Roggenbuck, J.W., & Watson, A. E. (1992), Beyond the commodity metaphor: Examining emotional and symbolic attachment to place, Leisure Sciences, Vol.14, pp.29–46.
 
105.Williams, D. R., Anderson, B. S., McDonald, C. D., & Patterson, M, E, (1995), Measuring place attachment: More preliminary results. In V PYeysinger, & P. Stokowski (Eds,), Symposium on Leisure Research, p.78, Arlington. VA: National Recreation and Park ssociation.
 
106.Williams, D. R. & Patterson, M. E. (1999), Environmental psychology: Mapping landscape meanings for ecosystem management. In H. K. Cordell & J. C. Bergstrom (eds.), Integrating social sciences and ecosystem management: Human dimensions in assessment, policy, and management, pp.141–160. Champaign, IL: Sagamore.
 
107.Williams, D. R., Patterson, M. E., Roggenbuck, J.W., & Watson, A. E. (1992), Beyond the commodity metaphor: Examining emotional and symbolic attachment to place, Leisure Sciences, Vol.14, pp.29–46.
 
108.Williams, D. R. (1980), Relationship to place as a determinant of outdoor recreation preferences, Unpublished M.S. Thesis, Utah State University, Logan.
 
109.Williams, D. R., Schreyer, R., & Knopf, R. (1990), The effect of the experience use history on multidimensional structure of motivations to participate in leisure activities, Journal of Leisure Research, Vol.22, pp.36–54.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top