跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.222.131.239) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/09/08 20:25
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:林廣易
研究生(外文):Kuang-Yi Lin
論文名稱:空服員人格特質、組織社會化與個人-團隊契合度關係研究-中華航空公司為例
論文名稱(外文):The research of relationship among Flight Attendants’s Personality Traits, Socialization and Person-Team Fit-Examples of China Airlines
指導教授:張德儀張德儀引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:高雄餐旅學院
系所名稱:旅遊管理研究所
學門:民生學門
學類:觀光休閒學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2009
畢業學年度:97
語文別:中文
論文頁數:87
中文關鍵詞:人格特質社會化個人與團隊契合度空服員
外文關鍵詞:Personality TraitsSocializationPerson-Team FitFlight Attendants
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:8
  • 點閱點閱:806
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:5
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
本研究旨在探討中華航空公司的空服人員的人格特質、社會化及個人-團隊契合度之間的關係。首先經由業者深度訪談及相關文獻探討與實證研究為基礎,了解研究變數的意涵與概念。其次進行問卷調查,總計發放500份問卷,回收問卷為240份,刪除填答不完整問卷20份,最後以44% 的有效問卷220份之資料進行統計分析。
利用SPSS及Amos統計軟體,首先進行樣本結構之敘述性統計,其次進行信度分析,接著進行適合度檢定及整體結構方程式模式分析,證明本模式應具有良好的內在結構適配度。最後分析組織社會化之調節作用,進行人格特質與個人-團隊契合度之調節檢驗及結構系數調節效果檢驗,檢證整體結構係數存有一定的干擾效果,
經研究結論,人格特質對個人-團隊契合度呈現正向的關係,而其中和善性、勤勉謹慎性、外向性、以及經驗開放性都對個人-團隊契合度有正向的影響。此外,討論出在人格特質與個人-團隊契合度正向關係上,組織社會化扮演著準調節者的角色,組織社會化程度較高的空服員,與團隊的契合度較佳。
The study was designed to explore the relationships among personality traits, socialization, and person-team fit of the flight personnel in China Airlines. First of all, the research was based on the in-depth interviews with the airline industry, related literature review, and empirical research so as to understand the meaning and the concept of variables. A questionnaire was then designed and administered: a total of 500 questionnaires were issued, resulting in 240 respondent questionnaires. Deleting 20 incomplete questionnaires, the researcher used the remaining 220 valid questionnaires, 44 % of the total number, for statistical data analysis.
Using statistical software SPSS and Amos, descriptive statistics of the sample structure was first conducted, followed by reliability analysis, and then followed by fitness testing and the analysis of overall structural equation model, all of which prove that the model should have a high degree of internal structural fit. Finally, socialization was used as moderator variable to test two variables: first to test the moderator between personality traits and person-team fit, and then to test the structure coefficient. The results of this testing indicates that structure coefficient has certain moderating effects.
The results indicate that the relationship between personality traits and person-team fit is positive. More specifically, Agreeableness、Conscientiousness、Extraversion and Openness to experience seem to have positive impact on person-team fit. In addition, in terms of the positive relationships between personality traits and person-team fit, the socialization of the community plays the role of moderator; for those flight attendants who have higher level of organizational socialization, they also have better organization fit.
書名頁.....................................................i
論文授權書................................................ii
口試委員審定書...........................................iii
中文摘要..................................................iv
英文摘要...................................................v
致謝辭....................................................vi
目錄.....................................................vii
表目錄..................................................viii
圖目錄.....................................................x
第一章 緒論.............................................1
第一節 研究背景.........................................1
第二節 研究問題.........................................4
第三節 研究目的.........................................6
第四節 研究流程.........................................7
第二章 文獻探討.........................................9
第一節 人格特質.........................................9
第二節 組織社會化......................................22
第三節 個人─團隊契合度................................30
第四節 人格特質、組織社會化與個人─團隊契合度之關係探討 ................................................38
第三章 研究方法........................................43
第一節 研究架構........................................43
第二節 研究變數之操作性定義與衡量方式..................45
第三節 樣本與資料收集..................................52
第四節 資料分析方法....................................53
第五節 研究限制........................................55
第四章 資料分析........................................56
第一節 樣本結構之敘述性統計............................56
第二節 問卷信度與效度分析..............................59
第三節 整體結構方程式模式分析..........................68
第四節 組織社會化之調節作用............................74
第五章 結論與建議......................................77
第一節 研究結論........................................77
第二節 研究建議........................................78
參考文獻.................................................80
附錄:問卷...............................................85
ㄧ、中文文獻
江愛華(2004),團隊學習及團隊運作,人事月刊,第224 期, 45-52。

何青蓉(2000),台灣讀書會的功能:一項全國性焦點團體的座談結果,教育研究雜誌,71, 89-98。

陳景堂(2005),統計分析SPSS for Windows 入門與應用第六版,臺北:儒林。

吳秉恩(1987),組織行為學,台北:華泰。

宋鎮照(2005),團體動力學,台北市:五南書局。

李青芬、李雅婷、趙慕芬編譯(2002),Stephen P. Robbins 著,組織行為學,華泰文化事業股份有限公司。

李美枝(1979),社會心理學,基隆:大洋出版社。

李郁文(2002),團體動力學-群體動力的理論、實務與研究,台北:桂冠圖書。

林孟彥/編譯 (2003),管理學 (Stephen P. Robbins,Mary Coulter,Management, 7th ed.) 台北:華泰文化事業公司

林惠彥(2005),個人與環境適配對工作態度與行為之影響,台灣管理學刊,第5卷第1期,123-148。

林萬億(1998),團體工作:理論與技巧,台北:五南。

張玉蓮(2003),旅行業銷售人員角色壓力、服務能力與工作績效關係之研究,中國文化大學觀光事業研究所碩士論文。

陶育華(2005),空服員組織支持認知與組織公民行為關係之研究-以組織自尊為中介變項,中國文化大學觀光事業研究所碩士論文。

郭建志(1999),文化契合與效能:台灣集團企業之個案研究,國立台灣大學心理學研究所未發表之博士論文。

黃微媗(2004),航空公司內部服務品質與空服員服務行為關係之研究,中國文化大學商學院觀光休閒事業管理研究所碩士論文。

楊紹強(2003),團隊10 項修練,台北:原動力國際開發。

楊極東(1992),團體輔導-理論與實務,台北:五南。

溫金豐(2000),人力資源資訊系統構型與組織績效關係之研究:以高科技廠商為例,高雄:國立中山大學企業管理研究所博士論文。

潘正德(2004),團體動力學,台北市:心理出版社。

蔡欣嵐(2001),工作特性、人格特質與工作滿意度之關係-以半導體業為例,國立中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,桃園。

鄭伯壎(1993),「有效組織文化的探討:組織價值觀一致性與成員效能的關係」,行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告,台北。

鄭伯壎,郭建志(1993),組織文化與員工效能:契合度與強度模式,載於鄭伯壎、郭建志、任金剛編著,組織文化:員工層次的分析, 211-262,臺北:遠流圖書公司。

鄭伯壎、郭建志(1993),組織價值觀與個人工作效能符合度研究途徑,中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,75: 63-103。

鄭伯壎、郭建志、任金剛(2001),組織文化:員工層次的分析,台北:遠流。

謝麗紅(1995),成長團體過程與團體效果之分析研究,國立彰化師範大學輔導研究所博士學位論文,未出版。
 
二、西文文獻
 
Adkins, C. L., Russell, C. J., & Werbel, J. D. (1994). Judgements of fit in the selection process: The role of work value congruence. Per-sonnel Psychology, 47 (3), 605-623.

Agrell, A. & Gustafson, R. (1996). “Innovation and creativity in work groups”, in West, M. (Ed.), Handbook of Work Group Psychology, Wiley, Chichester.

Allport, G.W. (1937). Personality : A psychological interpretation. New York : Holt.

Anderson, C., John, O. P., Keltner, D., & Kring, A. M. (2001). Who attains social status? Effects of personality traits and physical attractiveness in social groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(2), 116–132.

Anderson, N., West, Dreu, C.K.W., & Nijstan, B. (2004). “The routinization of innovation research: a constructively critical review of the satate-the-science”, Journal of Organizational Behaviwr, 25(2), 73-147.

Anderson, S. E., & Williams L. J. (1996). Interpersonal, job, and individual factors related to helping processes at work. Journal of Applied Psychology,81(2), 282–296.

Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction process analysis: A method for the study of small group. MA: Addison-Wesley.

Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of personality.Handbook of personality: Theory and research,61(2), 154-196.

Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G. L., Neubert, M. J., & Mount, M. K. (1998). Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(3), 377–391.

Barrick, M.R., & Mount, M.K. (1991). The five personality dimensions and job performance:A meta-analysis, Personnel Psychology, 44(2), 1-26.

Bizot, E. B., & S. H. Goldman. (1993). Prediction of satisfactoriness and satisfaction: An 8-year follow up. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 43(2), 19-29.

Breeden, S. A. (1993). Job and occupational change as a function of occupational corresponden
and job satisfaction. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 43(2), 30-45.

Bretz, R. D. Jr., Rynes, S. L., & Gerhart, B. (1993). Recruiter perceptions of applicant fit: implications for individual career preparation and job search behavior. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 43(3), 310-327.

Brim, O. C. (1965). Adult socialization. Socialization and society. Boston: Little, Brown.

Buchanan, B.. (1974). Building organizational commitment:The socialization of managers in work organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19(2), 533-546.

Cable, D. M., & Judge, T. A. (2003). Managers’ upward influence tactic strategies: The role of manager personality and supervisor leadership style. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(2), 197–214.

Caldwell, D. F., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1990). Measuring person-job fit with a profile-comparison process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(6), 648-657.

Crae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., (1999). A five-factor theory of personality. Handbook of personality theory and research, 23(2), 139-153.

Chatman J. (1989). Improving interactional organizational reseach: A model of person-organization fit. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 333-349.

Cooper-Thomas, H. D., Van Vianen, A., & Anderson, N. (2004). Changes in person-organization fit: the impact of socialization tactics on perceived and actual p-o fit. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 13(2), 52-78.

Cooper-Thomas, H., & Anderson, N. (2002). Newcomer adjustment: the relationship between organizational socialization tactics, information acquisition and attitudes. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75(3), 423-437.

Costa P.T., McCrae R.R., & Busch, C.M., (1986). Evaluating comprehensive in personality system:The california q-set and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality, 54(2) 430-446.

Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The neo personality inventory. Psychological Assessment, 16(4), 5-13.

David, G. ( 2006). Do organizational socialization tactics influence newcomer embeddedness and turnover? Journal of Management, 25(3), 16-23.

Dawis, R.V., & Lofquist, L.H. (1984). A psychological theory of work adjustment: An individual differences model and its application. Journal of Applied Psychology, 16(2), 123-144.

Drexler, J. A., & Lindell, M. K. (1981). Training job fit and worker satisfaction. Human Relations, 34(10), 907-915.

Edwards, J. R. (1991). Person-job fit: A conceptual integration, literature review, and methodological critique. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 6(3), 283-357.

Feldman, D. C. (1981). The multiple socialization of organization members. Academy of Management Review, 6(2), 309-318.

Feldman, D. C. (1989). Careers in organizations: Recent trends and future directions. Journal of Management, 17(3), 135-156.

Feldman, R. S. (1998). Learning our way out: A conceptual framework for social environmental learning. Journal of Social Psychology, 23(3), 503-513.

Giles J. Burch., & Neil Anderson. (2004). Measuring person-team fit: development and validation of the team selection. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 18(3), 213-223.

Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the big-five factor structure. Psychological Assessment,16(4), 26-42.

Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. AmericanPsychologist, 48(5), 26–34.

Guion, R. M., & Gottier, R. F. (1965). Validity of personality measures in personnel selection. Personnel Psychology, 18(2), 135–164.

Hackman, J. R., & Wageman, R. (2005). A theory of team coaching. Academy of Management Review, 30(2), 269-287.

Hambrick, D. C. (1994). Top management group:A conceptual integration and consideration of the team. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 18(3), 213-223.

Hambrick, D. C. (1995). Fragmentation and the other problems CEOs have with their top management teams. California Management Review, 37 (3), 110-127.

Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., Gavin, G. H., & Florey, A. (2002). Time, teams, and task performance: A longitudinal study of the changing effects of diversity on group performance. Academy of Management, 45(2), 1029-1045.

Heskett, James. L. (1987). Lessons in the service sector. Harvard Business Review, 65(7), 1-23.

Higgins, C. A., Judge, T. A., & Ferris, G. R. (2003). Influence tactics and work outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(3), 89-106.

Hitt, M. A., & Barr, S. H. (1989). Managerial selection decision models: Examination of configural cue processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(2), 53-61.

John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The big five traits taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. Handbook of personality theory and research, 2(3), 102-138.

Jones, G. R. (1986). Socialization tactics, self-easy, and newcomers adjustments to organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 29(11), 262-279.

Judge, T. A., & Gerhardt, M. W. (2002). Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(5), 765-780.

Judge, T. A.,& Cable, D. M. (1997). Applicant personality, organizational culture, and organization attraction. Personnel Psychology, 50(4), 359–394.

Kolenko, T. A., & Aldag, R. J. (1989). Congruence perceptions and managerial career/work outcomes: An exploratory analysis. National Academy of Management, 17(5), 34-50.

Kristof-Brown, A. L. (2000). Perceived applicant fit : Distinguishing between recruiters’ perceptions of person-job and person-organization fit. Personnel Psychology, 53(4), 643-671.

Louis, M. R., Posner, B. Z. & Powell, C. N.. (1993) The availability and helpfulness of socialization practices. Personnel Psychology, 36(11), 857-866.

Morrison, E. W. (1993). Longitudinal study on the effects of information seeking on newcomer socialization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(3), 173-183.

Moynihan, L. M., & Peterson, R. S. (2004). The role of personality in groups processes. Personality and organizations Mahwah, 51(3), 317-345.

Norman, W. T. (1963). Tower and adequate taxonomy of personality attribute: replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality rating. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66(11), 574-583.

O’Reilly CAⅢ, Chatman J, Caldwell D.F. (1991). People and organizational culture:A profile comparison approach to assessing person-organizational fit. Academy of Management Journal, 34(2), 487-516.

Quinn, J. B., Anderson, P., & Finkelstein, S. (1996). Managing professional intellect: making the most of the best. Harvard Business Review, 74(13), 71-80.

Saucier, Gerard (1994). Mini-markers: A brief version of Goldbergs unipolar big-five Markers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63(3), 505-516.

Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2001). Meta-analysis. Handbook of industrial, work and organizational psychology, 1(1), 51-70.

Schneider B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40(22), 437-453.

Simsek, Z., Veiga, J. F., Lubatkin, M. H., & Dino, R. N. (2005). Modeling the multilevel determinants of top management team behavioral integration. Academy of Management Journal, 48(1), 69-84.

Swieringa, J. & Wierdsma, A. (1992), Becoming a learning organization, Amsterdam, Addison-Wesley Publishers Ltd.

Taormina, R. J. (1997). Organizational socialization: A multidomain, continuous process model. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11(5), 29-47.

Taris, R., & Feij, J. A. (2000). Longitudinal examination of the relationship between supplies-values fit and work outcomes.Journal of Organizational Psychology, 67(2), 31-43.

Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Development sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63(2), 384-399.

Van Maanen, J. ( 1976). Breaking in: Socialization to work. Handbook or Work, Organization and Society, 24(3), 67-130.

Vancouver, J. B. (1991). An exploratory examination of person-organization fit: Organizational goal congruence. Personnel Psychology, 44(23), 333-352.

Wanous, J. P. (1980). Organizaiton entry: recruitment, selection, and socialization of newcomers. Reading. MA: Addison-Wesley.

West, M.A., & Aderson, N. (1996). Innovation in top management teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(3), 93-680.

Wiggins, J. S. (1979). A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(8), 395-412.

Zaccaro, S. J. (1991). Nonequivalent associations between forms of cohesiveness and group-related outcomes: Evidence for multidimensionality. The Journal of Social Psychology, 131(3), 387-399.
電子全文 電子全文(本篇電子全文限研究生所屬學校校內系統及IP範圍內開放)
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top