臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本文主要研究台灣期貨交易所引入造市者制度後，是否有顯著改善原先流動性不足的契約的市場績效，並加以分析對市場風險的影響。實證結果發現，報價價差、有效價差、定價誤差與波動性均有效降低，日交易量與深度均有效增加，證明了造市者進入後市場績效有顯著改善。因契約特性不同，在三十天利率期貨、十年公債期貨中，造市者多在價差較小的時候提供流動性。在黃金期貨中，造市者多在價差較大的時候提供流動性，藉以降低價差，提高市場流動性。此外，造市者多在開盤的時候進行交易，造市者多在十年期公債期貨開盤時提供流動性，在黃金期貨開盤時需求流動性。另外，在造市者風險承擔的影響中，造市者制度施行後逆選擇成本顯著降低，顯示造市者有效控制了與持有資訊的交易人交易中產生的逆選擇成本。而訂單處理成本也有顯著負成長，顯示造市者較能夠辨認出握有資訊的交易者，降低了因為逆選擇成本過大而導致的虧損。

This study investigates whether Taiwan Futures Exchange (TAIFEX) implemented Market Makers System would affect the market performance and the market risk of the less liquidity traded contracts or not. The results indicate that performed Market Makers System bring about significant decreases in quoted spreads, effective spreads, mispricing and volatility and increases in daily trading volume and market depth. That provides direct evidence that Market Makers System improved the market performance. Because the contract characteristic is different, market makers are more likely to supply liquidity when quoted spreads are thin for both 30-Day Commercial Paper Interest Rate Futures (CPF) and 10-year Government Bond Futures (GBF). In contrast, Market Makers are more likely to supply liquidity when quoted spreads are wide for TAIFEX Gold Futures (GDF), so as to decrease spreads and increase liquidity of market. Whether liquidity supplied or demanded, Market Makers are more likely to trade at the market opening. Market Makers are more likely supply liquidity for GBF at the market opening. However, they are more likely demand liquidity for GDF at the market opening. This study also documents the effect of Market Makers Systems on risk of Market Makers. The results indicate that performed Market Makers System bring about significant decreases in adverse select costs implied that Market Makers control the adverse select costs successful which produced trade with informed traders. Order-processing costs are negative and significant increases. That implied Market makers can identify who is informed trader more than common traders and reduce the loss caused by higher adverse select costs.

摘要 ...................................................................................................................................... i
Abstract ............................................................................................................................... ii
誌謝 .................................................................................................................................... iii
目錄 .................................................................................................................................... iv
表目錄 ................................................................................................................................ vi
圖目錄 ............................................................................................................................... viii
一、 緒論 ............................................................................................................................ 1
1.1 研究背景與動機 ........................................................................................................ 1
1.2研究目的.................................................................................................................... 3
1.3研究架構.................................................................................................................... 4
二、 文獻探討 .................................................................................................................... 5
2.1 流動性的提供 ............................................................................................................ 6
2.2 造市者對市場績效的影響 ....................................................................................... 8
2.3 造市者自身的風險評估 ......................................................................................... 11
三、 造市者制度 .............................................................................................................. 13
3.1 造市者制度簡介 ...................................................................................................... 13
3.2 國內造市者制度 ...................................................................................................... 15
3.3 國外造市者制度 ...................................................................................................... 23
3.4 國內造市者制度與國外造市者制度的比較 ........................................................ 32
四、 研究方法 .................................................................................................................. 35
4.1 資料與樣本 .............................................................................................................. 35
4.2 引入造市者制度對市場績效的影響 .................................................................... 39
4.3 造市者為流動性供給者或需求者 ........................................................................ 47
4.4 造市者參與市場的決定因素 ................................................................................. 48
4.5 造市者自身的風險評估 ......................................................................................... 50
五、 實證結果 .................................................................................................................. 51
六、 結論與建議 .............................................................................................................. 64
參考文獻 ............................................................................................................................ 67

1. 李賢源, 2000, ‖開發我國票券利率期貨之研究(上)‖, 台灣期貨市場, 2卷, 6期, pp.3-27
2. 李賢源, 2001, ‖開發我國票券利率期貨之研究(下)‖, 台灣期貨市場, 3卷, 1期, pp.3-54
3. 黃玉娟、徐守德, 1999, ‖股價指數期貨定價之研究─新加坡摩根台指期貨之實證‖, 亞太管理評論, 4卷, 3期, pp.255-269
4. 黃玉娟、陳培林、鄭堯任, 2007, ‖交易機制改變對市場績效之影響：透明度與撮合頻率之探討‖, Review of Securities & Futures Markets, 19卷, 1期, pp.133-158
5. 黃若予, 1999, 造市者制度之研析, 台灣期貨市場, 1卷, 5期, pp.86-107
6. 黃若予, 2000, ‖我國選擇權市場造市者制度之規劃‖, 台研金融與投資, 26期, 4月, pp.2-7
7. 劉玉珍、李怡宗、李翎竹、林劭杰, 2004, ‖國內選擇權市場造市者制度效益之初探‖, 台灣期貨市場, 6卷, 5期, pp.17-28。
8. 劉玉珍、李怡宗、李翎竹、林劭杰, 2004, 造市者制度效益評估與檢討, 台灣期貨交易所委託研究計畫
9. 劉玉珍、李怡宗、李福隆、陳曉芳, 2006, 商品期貨市場造市者制度與特別交易會員制度之規劃, 台灣期貨交易所委託研究計畫
10. 劉玉珍、周行一、李志宏、李怡宗、洪崇文、徐政義, 2000, ‖國外交易所造市者制度之比較‖, 台灣期貨市場, 2卷, 3期, pp.3-27
11. 劉玉珍、周行一、李志宏、李怡宗、洪崇文、徐政義, 2000, ‖選擇權市場造市者之功能及對市場績效之影響‖, 台灣期貨市場, 2卷, 4期, pp.3-22
12. 謝劍帄, 2003, 期貨與選擇權, 三版, 智勝出版社
13. 台灣期貨交易所網站, http://www.taifex.com.tw/chinese/home.htm
14. Anand A. and Weaver, D.G., 2006, ― The value of the specialist: Empirical evidence from the CBOE‖, Journal of Financial Markets, Vol.9, pp.100-118
15. Anand A., 2005, ―Specialist: The firm or the individual? Empirical evidence from the options markets‖, Journal of economics and Business, Vol.57, pp.555-575
16. Bacidore, J.M. and George S., 2002, ‖Liquidity provision and specialist trading in NYSE-listed no-U.S. Stocks‖, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.63, pp.133-158
17. Barclay, M.J. and Warner, J.B., 1993, ‖Stealth and Volatility: Which trades move prices?‖, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.34, pp.281-306
18. Benveniste, L., Marcus, A. and Wilhelm, W., 1992, ‖What’s special about the specialist?‖, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.32, pp.61-86
19. Biais, B., Hillion, P. and Spatt, C., 2000, ‖An empirical analysis of the limit order and the order flow in the paris bourse.‖, Journal of Finance, Vol.50, pp.1655-1689
20. Brooks, R.M. and Su, T., 1997, ‖A simple cost reduction for small liquidity traders: Trade at the opening.‖, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol.32, No.4, pp.525-540
21. Cakici, N. and Chatterjee, S., 1991, ‖Pricing Stock Index Futures with Stochastic Interest Rates‖, The Journal of Futures Markets, Vol.11, No.4, pp.441-452
22. Chan, K.C., Christie, W.G. and Schultz, P.H., 1995, ‖Market structure and the intraday pattern of the bid-ask spreads for NASDAQ Securities.‖, Journal of Business, Vol.68, pp.35-57
23. Eldor, R., Hauser, S. , Pilo, B. and Shurki I., 2006, ‖The contribution of market makers to liquidity and efficiency of options trading in electronic markets‖, The Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol.30, pp.2025-2040
24. Foucault, T., Kadan, O., and Kandel, E., 2001, ‖Limit Order Book as a Market for Liquidity‖, Working Paper, The Hebrew University
25. Frino, A. and Jarnecic, E., 2000, ―An empirical analysis of the supply of liquidity by locals in futures markets: Evidence from the Sydney Futures Exchange‖, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Vol.8, pp.443-456
26. Garfinkel, J.A. and Nimalendran M., 2003, ―Market Structure and Trader Anonymity: An Analysis of Insider Trading‖, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol.38, No.3, pp.591-610, September
27. Glosten, L.R., 1989, ―Insider Trading, Liquidity, and the Role of the Monopolist Specialist.‖, Journal of Business, Vol.62, pp.211–235
28. Harris, L.E., 1990, ‖Liquidity, trading rules, and electronic trading systems.‖, Working Paper, University of Southern California.
29. Hasbrouck, J., 1988, ‖Trades, quotes, inventories, and information.‖, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.22, pp.229-252
30. Ho, T. and Stoll, H.R., 1983, ‖The dynamics of dealer markets under competition.‖, Journal of Finance, Vol.38, pp.1053-1074
31. Huang, R.D. and Stoll, H.R., 1996, ‖Dealer versus auction markets: A paired comparison of execution costs on NASDAQ and the NYSE‖, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.41, pp.313-357
32. Huang, Y.C., 2004, ―The market microstructure and relative performance of Taiwan stock index futures: a comparison of the Singapore exchange and the Taiwan futures exchange‖, Journal of Financial Markets, Vol.7, pp.335-350
33. Kim, M., Szakmary, A.C. and Schwarz, T.V., 1999, ‖ Trading Costs and Price Discovery across Stock Index Futures and Cash Markets‖, The Journal of Futures Markets, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp.475–498
34. Kuserk, G.J. and Locke, P.R., 1993, ‖Scalper behavior in futures markets: An empirical examination.‖, Journal of Futures Markets, Vol.13, pp.409-431
35. Li, M., McCormick T. and Zhao X., 2005, ‖Order imbalance and liquidity supply: Evidence from the bubble burst of Nasdaq stocks‖, Journal of Empirical Finance, Vol.12, pp.533– 555
36. Lee, C.M.C. and Ready M.J., 1991, ‖Inferring trade dirction from intraday data‖, The Journal of Finance, Vol.46, pp.733-746
37. Locke, P.R. and Sarkar, A., 2001, ‖Liquidity supply and volatility: futures market evidence‖, Journal of Futures Markets, Vol.21, Iss.1, pp.1-17
38. Madhavan, A. and George S., 1998, ‖An empirical analysis of NYSE specialist trading‖, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.48, pp.189-210
39. Madhavan, A. and Smidt, S., 1993, ‖An analysis of change in specialist inventories and quotations.‖, Journal of Finance, Vol.48, pp.1595-1628
40. Manaster, S. and Mann, S.C., 1996, ‖Life in the pits: Competitive market making and inventory control.‖, Review of Financial Studies, Vol.36, pp.409-431
41. Manaster, S. and Mann, S.C., 1998, ‖Sources of market making profitsL Man does not live by spread alone‖, Working Paper, Texas Christian University
42. Mann, S., VenKataran, K. and Waisburd, A., 2002, ‖Stock Liquidity and the value of designated liquidity provider: Evidence from the Euronext Paris, Working Paper, Southern Methodist University
43. Nimalendran, M. and Petrella, G., 2003, ―Do ―thinly-traded‖ stocks benefit from specialist intervention?‖, Journal of Banking & Finance, Vol.27, pp.1823-1854
44. Saar, G., 2001, ‖Investor uncertainty and order flow information‖, Working Paper, New York University
45. Schultz, P., 2003, ―Who makes markets‖, Journal of financial Markets, Vol.6, pp.49-72
46. Schwartz, R.A., 1991, Reshaping the Equity Market, Harper Business
47. Silber, W.L., 1981, ‖Innovation, competition, and new contract design in futures markets‖, Journal of Futures Markets, Vol.1, pp.123-155.
48. Stoll, H., 1978, ‖The supply of dealer services in securities markets.‖, Journal of Finance, Vol.33, pp.1133-1151
49. Stoll, H.R., 1978, ‖The supply of dealer services in securities markets.‖, Journal of Finance, Vol.33, pp.1133-1151
50. Tse, Y. and Zabotina, T.V., 2004, ‖Do designated market makers improve liquidity in open-outcry futures markets?‖, Journal of Futures Markets, Vol.24, Iss.5, pp.479-502
51. Yadav, P.K. and Pope, P.F., 1994, ―Stock index futures mispricingL profit opportunities or risk premia?‖, Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol.18, pp.921-953