[1] 王秋華,2001,網路教學之學生學習行爲與學習滿意度及學習績效的關係,大業大學,資訊管理研究所碩士論文。[2] 王受榮,1992,我國國民中小學教師效能感及其影響因素之研究,國立台灣師範大學,博士論文。[3] 方秀瑩,2004,中小學教師進修網路學習課程之研究—以嘉義縣為例,彰化師範大學,教育研究所碩士論文。
[4] 田振榮,2002),我國高職學校學生專業能力標準之建構(II),國科會計畫:NSC90-2511-S-003-089,台北:行政院國科會。
[5] 江政達,2002,2001年我國家庭上網調查報告(二)網際網路與知識經濟,http://www.find.org.tw/0105/trend/0105_trend_disp.asp?trend_id=1207.
[6] 江蕙君,2005,課堂上互動式網路教學之研究,國立中興大學,資訊科學研究所碩士論文。[7] 李名揚,1995,國中教師應用標籤型教育網站提升數學教學品質之行動研究,國立東華大學,行政教育研究所碩士論文。[8] 李碧霞,1998,台北市某高中男生從事規律運動意向和行爲之研究,醫學研究,18(6),頁390-399。[9] 沈峰吉,2004,流程導向之教學品質衡量指標—運用ISO9001:2000,明志技術學院,工程管理研究所碩士論文。[10] 李俊佳,2003,網路學習系統評估模式中研究—模糊多屬性決策之應用,中原大學,資訊管理研究所碩士論文。[11] 李長貴,1988,組織行為學,台北:中華出版。
[12] 林群傑,2004,網路教學中學生感受的社會面貌、教學面貌與對教師滿意度和學習成果之關係,台南科技大學,資訊管理研究所碩士論文。[13] 林天佑,1997,學校經營與教育品質,教育資料與研究,第十九卷,第28-32頁。
[14] 林宏長,1994,企研所專業教育之服務滿意度衡量—公私立大學研究生之觀點,國立中央大學,企業管理研究所碩士論文。[15] 林欽榮,1988,管理心理學,台北:五南圖書公司。
[16] 陳志祥,2007,綜合高中學生學業成就、創造力與資訊素養之研究-以新化高工為例,高雄師範大學,資訊教育研究所碩士論文。[17] 陳清煌,2003,高職實施全面管理教學與學習成效之關係研究,國立台北科技大學,技術及職業教育研究所碩士論文。[18] 吳怡靜 ,2001,網上學習—如何幫孩子成長向前,台北:天下文化。
[19] 吳清基,1995,綜合高中的理念與實施,教育資料文摘,36(4),34-45。
[20] 吳旻憓,2004,大學教師參與産學合作之行爲意向模式—以計畫行為理論為應用,國立高雄第一科技大學,企業管理研究所碩士論文。[21] 教育部,1996,綜合高中實驗課程實施要點,台北:教育部。
[22] 教育部,1998,綜合高中試辦學校行政處理暫行要點,台北:教育部。
[23] 教育部,1999,綜合高中課程實驗相關資料彙編,台北:教育部。
[24] 施益群,2004,綜合高中資訊應用學程課程實施之研究,國立台北科技大學,技術與職業教育研究所碩士論文。[25] 教育部,2001c,綜合高中的內涵,取自:http://www.tve.edu.tw/data/90course/02/04.htm.
[26] 徐欣瑩,1993,兒童生命教育網路學習素材之研發與評鑒研究,國立交通大學,傳播所碩士論文。[27] 許丕忠,2005,組織變革下員工認知、組織承諾與工作滿足之研究—以台北縣人事人員集中辦公為例,大業大學,事業經營研究所碩士論文。[28] 曾小玲,2002,企業推動e-Learning模式之探討,國立中山大學,資訊管理學系研究所碩士論文。[29] 陳文森,2003,非同步網路教學學習路徑的研究,國立高雄師範大學,資訊教育研究所碩士論文。[30] 楊家興,1999,虛擬學校:資訊網路下整合性的教學環境,教學科技與媒體,47,12-23。[31] 楊豪森,2000,綜合高中學生學程分化選擇,國立彰化師範大學,工業教育學系碩士論文。
[32] 楊桂鳳,2002,台灣公共衛生護理人員基本電腦能力、遠距學習態度與遠距學習行爲意向之探討,國立陽明大學,社區護理研究所碩士論文。[33] 楊叔夏,2008,計畫行為理論運用於網路使用行為之研究—以台中縣某校高職生爲例。
[34] 麥孟生,2000,個人心�媄�型、自我效能與態度對電腦學習成效之影響,國立中央大學,資訊管理學系碩士論文。[35] 黃傑政,1999,綜合高中試辦方案之規劃,載於教育部編印,綜合高中課程實驗相關資料彙編,48-65,台北:教育部。
[36] 黃孟元、黃勝嘉,1999,遠距離教學的定義、演進及其理論基礎分析,視聽教育雙月刊,40(4),8-18頁。
[37] 黃彥和,2005,國民小學教師集體效能感之研究,中原大學,教育研究所碩士論文。[38] 蔡宜臻,2003,溝通模式、知識分享與知識創造,東海大學,企業管理研究所碩士論文。
[39] 鄭燊隆,2002,網際網路品質指標構建之研究—以一般系統理論爲觀點,國立清華大學,科技管理研究所碩士論文。[40] 張嘉琪,2002,以認知、自我效能、學習型組織理論探討知識創新之研究,大業大學,資訊管理研究所碩士論文。[41] 張春興,1989,張氏心理學辭典,台北:東華書局。
[42] 蕭錫錡,1999,綜合高中實驗課程規劃,課程與教學,2(1),34-38。[43] 謝宏賜,2000,以社會認知理論探討網路搜尋策略,國立中山大學,資訊管理學系碩士論文。[44] 戴明國,2000,綜合高中經營策略之研究,國立台灣師範大學,工業教育學系博士論文。[45] 廖芷妤,2002,我國高職專業科目教師教學品質指標之構建,國立台灣師範大學,工業教育研究所碩士論文。[46] 劉家雄,1993,社區數位學習中心區位規劃與空間需求分析之研究—以桃園市為例,中原大學,建築研究所碩士論文。[47] 劉煒仁,2001, 品質機能展開應用於教學品質之研究-以國防管理學院爲例,國防管理學院,資源管理研究所碩士論文。[48] 劉文葵,2001,比較不同科系的大學學生在網路教學情境下之學習成效---以實踐大學為例,實踐大學,企業管理研究所碩士論文。[49] 鄒景平,2000,e-Learning是知識企業致勝的不二法門,資訊人通訊,59期,頁1-4。
[50] 鐘健剛,2002,非同步遠距離教學對高職汽車修護科汽油噴射引擎實習課程學習成效之影響,彰化師範大學,工業教育學系在職進修專班碩士論文。
[51] 饒達欽、鄭增財 ,1997,談教師教學品質,技術及職業教育雙月刊,42,頁7-11。[1] Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M.1980,. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
[2] Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. ,1975,. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
[3] Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. ,1975,. Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, No.84, pp.888-918.
[4] Ajzen, I. ,1985,. From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckman (Eds.), Action-control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11-39). Heidelberg: Springer.
[5] Bandura,A.,1980,.Gauging the relationship between self-efficacy judgment and action. Cognitive Therapy and Research,4,263-268.
[6] Bandura, A. ,1982,. Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122-147.
[7] Bandura, A. ,1984,. Recycling misconceptions of perceived self-efficacy, Cognitive Therapy and Research, 8(3), pp.231-255.
[8] Bandura,A.,1986,. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.
[9] Bandura, A.,1988, Organizational applications of social cognitive theory. Australian Journal of Management.13.127-164.
[10] Bandura, A. ,1997,, Self-efficacy: The exercise of control, NY: W. H. Freeman.
[11] Crosby, P.B. ,1979,, Quality is Free, McGraw-Hill, New York.
[12] Compeau, D. R., Higgins, C. A. & Huff, S. ,1999,. Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology: a longitudinal study. MIS Quarterly, 23, 2, 145–158.
[13] T. A. Urden and C. C. Weggen,2000, Corporate E-Learning: Exploring a New Frontier, WR Hambrecht and Company Equity Research Report.
[14] De Chernatony, L. and F. Dall’Olmo Riley,1997, The chasm between managers’and consumers’views of brands:the experts’perspectives, Journal of Strategic Marketing, Vol. 5 (2), pp. 89-104.
[15] Davis, F.D. ,1989,, Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 319-340.
[16] Davis, F.D., R.P. Bagozzi, and P.R. Warshaw, ,1989,, User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models, Management Science, 35(8), pp.983-1003.
[17] Dwyer, C.A.,& Stufflebeam, D.C.,1996,. Teacher evacher evaluation. In Berliner, D.C.,&Calfee, R.C.(Ed.): Handbook of educational psychology.New York:Macmillan- Library Reference USA.
[18] Goldhaber, D, and Brewer, D. ,1997,. Why Don''t Schools and Teachers Seem to Matter? Assessing the Impact of Unobservables on Educational Productivity. Journal of Human Resources, 32(3), 505-523.
[19] Heinich, R., Molenda, M., Russell, J. D. & Smaldino, S. E. ,1996,. Instructional media and technologies for learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
[20] Igbaria, M., Guimaraes, T. & Davis, G. B. ,1995,. Testing the determinants of microcomputer usage via a structural equation model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 11, 4, 87–114.
[21] Lau, S.H., and Woods, P.C., ,2008,, Understanding learner acceptance of learning objects: the roles of learning object characteristics and individual differences, British Journal of Educational Technology, pp.2-17.
[22] Lawn, M.,1999, Social Constructions of quality in teaching, Evaluation and research in education, Vol.5, pp.67-77.
[23] Legris et al, ,2003,Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information and management.
[24] Lederer, A. L., Maupin, D. J., Sena, M. P. & Zhuang, Y. ,2000,. The technology acceptance model and the World Wide Web. Decision Support Systems, 29, 3, 269–282.
[25] Morris M.G. and A. Dillon ,1997,, How User Perceptions Influence Software Use, IEEE Software,Vol. 144,July-Aug. pp. 58-65.
[26] Parasuraman, A., Zethaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. ,1985,. A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implication for Future Research, Journal of Marketing. Vol.49, fall, pp.41-50.
[27] Reeves, C. A., and Bednar, D.A., ,1994,, Defining quality: alternatives and implications. Academy of Management Review, Vol.19, No.3, pp.419-445.
[28] Seddon, P. B. ,1997,. A respecification and extension of the Delone and Mclean model of IS success. Information Systems Research, 8, 3, 240–250.
[29] Schwarzer, R., & Born, A. ,1997,. Optimistic self-beliefs: Assessment of general perceived self-efficacy in thirteen cultures. World Psychology, 3, pp.177-190.
[30] Shih, Y. Y., & Fang, K. ,2004,. The use of a decomposed theory of planned behavior to study Internet banking in Taiwan. Internet Research, 14(3), 213–223.
[31] Tan, M. & Teo, T. S. H. ,2000,. Factors influencing the adoption of internet banking. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 1, 1, 1–44.
[32] Taylor, S., & Todd, P.A. ,1995,. Decomposition and Cross Effects in the Theory of Planned Behavior: A Study of Consumer Adoption Intentions. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 12(2), pp.137-155.
[33] Venkatesh, V. & Davis, F. D. ,1994,. Modeling the determinants of perceived ease of use. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Information Systems, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
[34] Venkatesh, Viswanath; Davis, Fred D. ,2000,, A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies, Management Science, 46(2): 186-204.
[35] Bannan-Ritland, B., Dabbagh, N. &Murphy, K. (2000). Learning object systems as constructivist learning environments: related assumptions, theories, and applications. In D. A. Wiley (Ed.),
[36]The instructional use of learning objects. Retrieved November 30, 2003, from http://reusability.org/read/chapters/bannan-ritland.doc
[37]Baruque, L. & Melo, R. (2004). Learning theory and instructional design using learning objects.Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13, 4, 343–370.
[38]Becta (2004). Discussion paper on quality issues. Retrieved May 28, 2005,fromhttp://partners.becta.org.uk/page_documents/corporate/projects/cab/quality_paper.pdf
[39]Boyle, T. (2003). Design principles for authoring dynamic, reusable learning objects. AustralianJournal of Educational Technology, 19, 1, 46–58.
[40]Boyle, T., Bradley, C., Chalk, P., Jones, R., Haynes, R. & Pickard, P. (2003). Can learning objectscontribute to pedagogical improvement in higher education: lessons from a case study? Paper presentedat the CAL, Belfast.