跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.200.82.149) 您好!臺灣時間:2023/06/09 23:21
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:許文耀
研究生(外文):Wen-Yao Xu
論文名稱:國內外創業投資評估準則重要性比較分析
論文名稱(外文):The Comparison of Investment Criteria for New Ventures among Different Areas
指導教授:陳振遠陳振遠引用關係白凢芸
指導教授(外文):Roger C. Y. ChenFan-Yun Pai
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立高雄第一科技大學
系所名稱:企業管理研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:其他商業及管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2009
畢業學年度:97
語文別:中文
論文頁數:107
中文關鍵詞:分析層級程序法創業投資投資決策評估準則
外文關鍵詞:Venture CapitalAHPEvaluation CriteriaInvestment Decision
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:4
  • 點閱點閱:647
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
網路經濟泡沫化及歷經本世紀最大、影響全球經濟的金融海嘯後的全球經濟不景氣,令全世界創投家無不損失慘重,造成往後創投家投入資金時將漸趨保守。「選擇正確的投資案遠比經營管理投資案還來的重要」,此為創投界眾所皆知的原則,因而擁有一套良好且精準的評估準則評核案源公司是重要的。
本研究歸納整理過去創業投資家所參考的評估準則,歸納出五大評估準則分別為「創業家特質」、「市場特性」、「產品特性」、「財務風險特性」及「預期報酬特性」,並取得國內創投專家對於此五大準則重要性之排序。研究工具為問卷調查,並利用層級分析法(AHP)分析國內創投專家對於評估準則的重要性差異,計算出各準則權重排名。
在取得國內創投專家的重要性排序後,與美國、歐洲、加拿大與新加坡的創投公司之評估準則做比較,目的在於瞭解不同國家是否會不同創業家特質及不同市場環境影響而有差異並分析其意涵。
研究結果顯示台灣創投家與各國創投家在評估準則重要性看法上具差異性。本研究藉由產業結構環境、國家政策、民族特性等角度分析其中差異。在分析的國家中最注重的為創業家特質,凸顯出以人為本的特性;但歐洲與美國在預期報酬特性順位考量上皆高於其他國家;而台灣與新加坡所有準則的重要性完全一致。
After the network economy bubble and the financial tsunami of the global economic downturn, venture capital (VC) around the world suffered heavy losses, resulting venture capitalists’ conservative investment behaviors. It’s well-known that choosing the right investment objects is more important than managing it. Therefore, it is critical for venture capitalists to globally identify higher-return but lower-risk investment objects before putting resources.
This study, thus, proposes investment-object evaluation criteria for VC to assess a new venture in different area, such as Europe, USA, Singapore and so on, and then determine whether to invest it or not. This research first reviews and analyzes the related criteria collected form previous literature. Five criteria that influence investment decisions most are the characteristics of entrepreneur, market, product, financial risk and expected return. To investigate the differences of these evaluation criteria in different areas, we collect the importances of criteria of USA, Europe, Canada and Singapore. In Taiwan, an AHP method is employed to get experts’ opinions. The criteria importances of different areas are compared and studied.
The results shows that the importance of criteria that are different. We analyze the difference from the perspectives of industrial structure, national policy, and national identity. Some managerial implications are provided for entrepreneurs and venture capitalists to construct start-up and make investment decisions in different areas or countries.
表目錄 iv
圖目錄 vi
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第三節 研究對象 4
第四節 研究程序 4
第二章 文獻探討 6
第一節 創業投資意涵 6
第二節 創業投資公司評估之決策程序 10
第三節 投資新創事業評估準則 14
第四節 國內外創業家特質比較 26
第五節 國內外創業環境比較 29
第六節 投資準則研究方法 37
第三章 研究設計與方法 39
第一節 分析層級程序法 39
第二節 研究設計 48
第三節 準則權重計算 51
第四章 實證結果與分析 55
第一節 問卷回收及基本資料 55
第二節 台灣創投公司評估準則權重分析 62
第三節 台灣創投公司評估準則分析 69
第四節 國內外創投評估準則比較分析 72
第五章 結論與建議 77
第一節 研究結論探討 77
第二節 研究建議 81
第三節 後續研究建議 82
參考文獻 83
一、 中文部分 83
二、 英文部分 85
附錄一 研究問卷 89
一、中文部分
1.96年度創業投資事業發展計畫國內外創業投資事業現況調查與趨勢分析報告,2007,「經濟部工業局96年度專案計畫執行成果報告」。
2.中華民國創業投資商業同業公會,2005,創新、創業、創投,中華民國創業投資商業同業公會,台北。
3.中華民國創業投資商業同業公會,2007,中華民國創業投資年鑑,中華民國創業投資商業同業公會,台北。
4.方至民、蔡憲唐、石孟勳、張慧君,2006, “創業投資的評選準則與經理人特質之研究”,創業管理研究,1卷,3期,頁175-196。
5.白俊男,1991,投資學,三民書局。
6.何照義、陳振遠、許杉能,2000,“台灣地區創業投資經理人工作感受及對投資案評估準則之實證研究”,第一屆海峽兩岸財經研討會論文集,中國:南京。
7.唐富藏,1989,投資計畫評估,華泰書局,台北。
8.陳家聲、吳奕慧,2007,“華人創業家心理與行為特質之初探”,創業管理研究,2卷,1期,頁1-30。
9.陳振遠,1986,創業投資方案之策略性分析,政治大學企業管理研究所,碩士論文。
10.陳振遠,2002,「台灣地區創業投資事業發展現況與經營分析」,中國風險投資,1卷,4期,頁13-39。
11.許方銘,2007,“新興產業營運計畫之評估模式-以網際網路產業為例”,東吳經濟商學學報,56期,頁1-26。
12.張忠本,1998,台灣投資戰略:決策、風險評估與實務,財訊出版社,台北。
13.張忠本,2001,投資決策分析,和通創投,台北。
14.鄧振源、曾國雄,1989,“層級分析法的內涵特性與應用上”,中國統計學報,27卷,6期,頁5-22。
15.鄧振源、曾國雄,1989,“層級分析法的內涵特性與應用下”,中國統計學報,27卷,7期,頁1-15。
16.劉常勇,1996,“創業投資評估決策程序”,中外科技政策與管理,12期,頁69-74。
17.蘇拾忠,2008,創投事業發展策略與措施建議案,經濟部工業局。
二、英文部分
1.Aldrich H., 1999, “London: Sage”, Organizations Evolving.
2.Alex, P., Wayne, M., 2006, “Entrepreneuring into Vanture Capital”, The Journal of Private Equity, Vol.9, No.3, pp.23-34.
3.Sátre, A.S., 2003, “Entrepreneurial perspectives on informal venture capital”, Venture Capital, Vol.5, No.1, pp.71-94.
4.Alhorr, H.S., Moore, C.B. and Payne, G.T., 2008, “The Impact of Economic Integration on Cross- Border Venture Capital Investments: Evidence From theEuropean Union”, Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, Vol.32, No.5, pp.897-917.
5.Barry, C.B., 1994, “New Directions in Research on Venture Capital Finance”, Financial Management, Vol.23, No.3, pp.3-15.
6.Baum, J.A.C, Silverman, B.S., 2004, “Picking winners or building them? Alliance, intellectual, and human capital as selection criteria in venture financing and performance of biotechnology startups”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol.19, No.3, pp.411-436.
7.Campanella, F.B., Kelly, A. J., Mckierman, J., 1971, “Venture Capital: A Guidebook for New Enterprise”, The Management Institute, School of Management., pp.33-34.
8.Chorev, S., Anderson, A.R., 2006, Success in Israeli High-Tech Start-Ups : Critical Factors and Process, Technovation, Vol.26, No.2, pp.162-174.
9.Colombo, M.G., Delmastro, M., Grilli, L, 2003, “Entrepreneurs’ Human Capital and the Start-up Size of New Technology-Base Firms”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol.18, No.3, pp.301-331.
10.De Clercq, D., Fried, V., Lehtonen, O., Sapienza, H., 2006, “An Entrepreneur’sGuide to the Venture Capital Galaxy”, Academy of Management Perspective, Vol.20, No.3, pp.90-112.
11.Dixon, R.,1991, “Venture Capitalists and the Appraisal of Investments”, Journal of Management Science, Vol.19, No.5, pp.333-344.
12.Fried, V.H., Robert, D. Hisrich, 1994, “Toward a Model of Venture Capital Investment Decision Making”, Financial Management, Vol.23, No.3, pp.28-37.
13.Franke, N., Marc, G., Harhoff, D., Henkel, J., 2008, “Venture Capitalists’ evaluations of start-up teams - Trade-offs, Knock-out Criteria, and the impact of VC” Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, Vol.32, No.3, pp. 459-483.
14.Gompers, P.A., Lerner, J., 2001, “The venture capital revolution”, The Journal of Economic Perspective, Vol.15, No.2, pp.145-168.
15.Haar, N.E., Staar, J., MacMillan, I.C., 1998, Information Risk Capital Investors: Investment Partners on the East Coast of the U.S.A., Journal of Business Venturing, Vol.3, No.1, pp.11-29.
16.Henderson, J., 2002, “Building the Rural Economy with High-Growth Entrepreneurs”, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Economic Review, Vol.87, No.3, pp.45-70.
17.Jeng, A.L., Wells, P.C., 2000, “The determinants of venture capital funding: evidence across countries”, Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol.6, pp.241-289.
18.Keely, A.J., Campanella, F.B., Mckiernan, J., 1991, “Venture Capital: A Guide book for New Enterprises”, Mass: The Management Institute, School of Management, Boston College.
19.Lynskey, A.J., 2004, “Finance and Human Capital: The Role of Social Institutional Variables on Entrepreneurship in Japan”, Industry and Innovation, Vol.11, No.4, pp.373-405.
20.Meyer, A., 2000, “The Potential of Actuarial Decision Models: Can They Improve the Venture Capital Investment Decision?”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol.15, No.4, pp.323-346.
21.MacMillan, I.C., Seigel, R., Subba Narasimha, P.N., 1985, “Criteria used by venture capitalist to evaluate new venture proposals”, Journal of Business Venture, Vol.1, pp.119-128.
22.MacMillan, I.C., Zeman, L., Subba Narasimha, P.N., 1987, “Criteria distinguishing unsuccessful ventures in the venture screening process”, Journal of Business Venture, Vol.2, pp.123-137.
23.Minniti, M., 1999, “Entrepreneurial Activity and Economic Growth”, Global Business and Economics Review, Vol.1, No.1, pp.31-42.
24.Mitchell, R.K., Smith, B., Seawright, K.W., Morse, E.A., 2000, “Cross-Culture Cognitions and the Venture Creation Decision”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol.43, No.5, pp.974-993.
25.Park, W.R., Maillie, J.B.,1970, Strategic analysis for venture evaluation, New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co.
26.Poindexter, J.B., 1976, “The Efficiency of Financial Markets:The Venture Capital Case”, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, New York University, New York.
27.Reynolds, P.D., Hay, M.,Camp, M., 1999, Global entrepreneurship monitor: 1999 execute report. Kansas City.
28.Riquelme, H., 1994, “Venture Capitalists’ Collective Beliefs on New Business Venture Investments”, Journal of Enterprising Culture, Vol.12, No.2, pp.629-667.
29.Roberts, M.J, Stevenson, H.H, Sahlman, W.A., Marshall, P.W., Hamermesh, R.G, New Business Ventures and the Entrepreneur, McGraw-Hill, New York.
30.Rubel, S.M., 1972, Guide to Venture Capital Sources, Chicago: Capital Publishing Corporation.
31.Ruhnka, J.C., Young, J.E., 1984, “A Venture Capital Model of the Development Process for New Ventures”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol.2, No.2, pp.167-184.
32.Shepherd, D. A., 1999, “Venture Capitalists'' Assessment of New Venture Survival”, Management Science, Vol.45, No.5, pp.621-632.
33.Sven, J. B., 2007, “The Due Diligence Process- Guiding Principles for Early Stage Innovative Products and Venture Capital Investments”, The Journal of Private Equity, Vol.10, No.3, pp.22-34.
34.Sheu, D.F., Lin, H.S., 2006, “A Study on the Information Transparency of theInvolvements by Venture Capital—Case from Taiwan IT Industry”, The Journal of American Academy of Business, Vol.10, No.1, pp.227-233.
35.Saaty, T.L., 1980, The Analysis Hierarchical Process, McGraw Hill, New York.
36.Saaty, T.L., 1994, “How to make a decision: The Analysis Hierarchical Process”, Interface, Vol.24, pp.19-43.
37.Saaty T.L., 2008, “Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process”, Services Sciences, Vol.1, No.1, pp.83-98.
38.Silva, J., 2004, “Venture capitalists’ decision-making in small equity markets: a case study using participant observation”, Venture Capital, Vol.6, No.2/3, pp.125-145.
39.Timmons, J.A., Stephen S., 2007, New Venture Creation, McGraw-Hill, New York.
40.Tomás, R.P., Domingo, G.P. and Howard, V.A., 2007, “Venture Capital in Spain by Stage of Development”, Journal of Small Business Management, Vol.45, No.1, pp.66-88.
41.Tyebjee, T.T., Bruno, A.V., 1984, “A Model of Venture Capitalist Investment Activity, Management Science, Vol.30, No.9, pp.1051-1066.
42.Vance, H.F., Robert, D.H., 1994, “Toward a Model of Venture Capital Investment Decision Making”, Financial Management, Vol.23, No.3, pp.28-37.
43.Wang, C.K., Ang, B.l., 2004, “Determinants of venture performance in Singapore”, Journal of Small Business Management, Vol.42, No.4, pp.347-363.
44.Wright, M.,Robbie, K., Ennew, C., 1997, “Venture Capitalists and Serial Entrepreneurs”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol.12, No.3, pp.227-249.
45.Wayne, A., 2006, “Entrepreneuring into Venture Capital”, The Journal of Private Equity, Vol.9, No.3, pp.23-34.
46.Zacharakis, A.L., Meyer, G.D., 1998, “A Lake of Insight: Do Venture Capitalists Really Understand Their Own Decision Process?”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol.13, pp.57-76.
47.Zacharakis, A.L., Meyer, G.D., 2000, “The Potential of Actuarial Decision Models: Can They Improve the Venture Capital Investment Decision?”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol.15, pp.323-346.
48.Zutshi, R.K., Tan, W.L., 1999, “Singapore Venture Capitalists (VCs) investmentevaluation criteria”, Small Business Economic, Vol.13, pp.9-26.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top